ارزیابی تأثیر کم‌آبیاری تنظیم‌شده و آبیاری ناقص ریشه بر کارایی مصرف آب بر مبنای تولید و کیفیت علوفه ارزن مرواریدی

2. حاجی‌راد، ایمان، میرلطیفی، سید مجید، دهقانی سانیج، حسین، و محمدی، ساناز. 1400. بررسی تأثیر کم‌آبیاری بر عملکرد و بهره‌وری آب ذرت علوفه‌ای در استفاده از دو نوع مدیریت مختلف در سیستم آبیاری قطره‌ای. مجله پژوهش آب ایران، 15، 15-23.
3. خشائی، فرشاد، بهمنش، جواد، رضاوردی‌نژاد، وحید، و آزاد، نسرین. 1398. تأثیر مقدار آبیاری و تقسیط کود نیتروژن بر عملکرد، اجزای عملکرد و بهره‌وری آب ذرت دانه‌ای در آبیاری قطره‌ای زیرسطحی. مجله پژوهش آب در کشاورزی، 33، 601-612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22092/jwra.2020.121241
4. صفائی طرقبه، محمد، آذری، آرمان، دشتی، حسین، و مداح حسینی، شهاب. 1396. اثر تنش آبی بر ویژگی‌های مورفوفیزیولوژیک ارزن نوتریفید و سورگوم اسپیدفید در چین‌های مختلف. نشریه تولید و فرآوری محصولات زراعی و باغی، 7، 69-82. URL: http://jcpp.iut.ac.ir/article-1-2675-fa.html
5. مزیدی، احمد، عنایت‌پور، مهدیه، و حسینی، سید سلام. 1400. تعیین اقلیم استان کرمان با استفاده از روش‌های منحنی آمبروترمیک، ضریب خشکی دومارتن، اقلیم‌نمای آمبرژه. جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، 4، 35-43.

6. موسوی، سید محمدسعید، الباجی، محمد، ناصری، عبدعلی، گلابی، منا، و مرادی تلاوت، محمدرضا. ۱۴۰۱. تأثیر کم‌آبیاری به روش تنظیم‌شده و خشکی موضعی ریشه بر عملکرد، اجزاء عملکرد و بهره‌وری مصرف آب گلرنگ در شرایط اقلیمی خوزستان. مجله تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران، ۵۴، ۱۵۵-۱۷۱.

7. مهرپویان، مهدی، و فرامرزی، علی. 1390. تاثیر سطوح مختلف کم آبیاری بر عملکرد کمی و راندمان مصرف آب در ارزن نوتریفید و سورگوم اسپید فید. گیاه و زیست بوم (ویژه نامه تنش خشکی و شوری)، 7، 60-71.

8. Aguilar, J., Moghbel, F. and Fazel, F., 2023. Evaluation of novel deficit irrigation techniques in western Kansas. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.8492

9. Ahmad, S., Raza, M.A.S., Saleem, M.F., Zaheer, M.S., Iqbal, R., Haider, I., Aslam, M.U., Ali, M. and Khan, I.H., 2020. Significance of partial root zone drying and mulches for water saving and weed suppression in wheat. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 30, pp.154-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36899/japs.2020.1.0018
10. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome, Italy, 300(9), p.D05109.
11. Alghamdi, A., Aly, A., Al-Omran, A., Louki, I. and Alkhasha, A., 2023. Tomato yield responses to deficit irrigation and partial root zone drying methods using biochar: A greenhouse experiment in a loamy sand soil using fresh and saline irrigation water. Water, 15(15), p.2797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w15152797
12. Alhammad, B.A., Zaheer, M.S., Ali, H.H., Hameed, A., Ghanem, K.Z. and Seleiman, M.F., 2023. Effect of co-application of Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobium pisi on wheat performance and soil nutrient status under deficit and partial root drying stress. Plants, 12(17), p.3141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173141
13. Alomran, A.M. and Louki, I.I., 2024. Impact of irrigation systems on water saving and yield of greenhouse and open field cucumber production in Saudi Arabia. Agricultural Water Management, 302, p.108974.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108974

14. Aswini, M., Ganesan, K. and Ezhilarasi, T., 2023. The correlation between green fodder yield and fodder quality traits in hybrids of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 35, pp.1975-1983.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i193749

15. Badr, M., El-Tohamy, W., Abou-Hussein, S., and Gruda, N. 2018. Tomato yield, physiological response, water and nitrogen use efficiency under deficit and partial root zone drying irrigation in an arid region. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 91, pp.332-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2018.091.042
16. Bhattarai, B., Singh, S., West, C.P., Ritchie, G.L. and Trostle, C.L., 2020a. Effect of deficit irrigation on physiology and forage yield of forage sorghum, pearl millet, and corn. Crop Science, 60(4), pp.2167-2179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20171
17. Bhattarai, B., Singh, S., West, C.P., Ritchie, G.L., Trostle, C.L. and Trostle, C.L., 2020b. Water depletion pattern and water use efficiency of forage sorghum, pearl millet, and corn under water limiting condition. Agricultural Water Management, 238, p.106206.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106206

18. Bhattarai, B., Singh, S., West, C.P. and Saini, R., 2019. Forage potential of pearl millet and forage sorghum alternatives to corn under the water‐limiting conditions of the Texas high plains: A review. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management, 5, pp.1-12.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/cftm2019.08.0058

19. Chakraborty, A., Viswanath, A., Malipatil, R., Semalaiyappan, J., Shah, P., Ronanki, S., Rathore, A., Singh, S.P., Govindaraj, M., Tonapi, V.A. and Thirunavukkarasu, N., 2022. Identification of candidate genes regulating drought tolerance in pearl millet. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(13), p.6907.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23136907

20. Chen, C.H., Lin, K.H., Chang, Y.S. and Chang, Y.J., 2023. Application of water-saving irrigation and biostimulants on the agronomic performance of maize (Zea mays). Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 177, pp.1377-1386.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.08.008

21. Cheng, M., Wang, H., Fan, J., Zhang, F. and Wang, X., 2021. Effects of soil water deficit at different growth stages on maize growth, yield, and water use efficiency under alternate partial root-zone irrigation. Water, 13, p.148.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020148

22. Crookston, B., Blaser, B., Darapuneni, M. and Rhoades, M., 2020. Pearl millet forage water use efficiency. Agronomy, 10, p.1672.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111672

23. Elhani, S., Haddadi, M., Csákvári, E., Zantar, S., Hamim, A., Villányi, V., Douaik, A. and Bánfalvi, Z., 2019. Effects of partial root-zone drying and deficit irrigation on yield, irrigation water-use efficiency and some potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) quality traits under glasshouse conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 224, p.105745.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105745

24. Farhadi, A., Paknejad, F., Golzardi, F., Ilkaee, M.N. and Aghayari, F., 2022. Effects of limited irrigation and nitrogen rate on the herbage yield, water productivity, and nutritive value of sorghum silage. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 53, pp.576-589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2021.2017959
25. Faroq, M., Hauuain, M., Ul-Allah, S. and Siddique, K.H.M., 2019. Physiological and agronomic approaches for improving water-use efficiency in crop plants. Agricultural Water Management, 219, pp.95-108.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.04.010

26. Fatemi, S.N., Maghsoodi Mood, A.A. and Mohammadi Nejad, G., 2021. Agro-physiological responses of different pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) cultivars to water deficit in Kerman climatic conditions. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 14(4), pp.465-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30495/jcep.2021.679975
27. Production Quantities of Millet by Country. FAOSTAT, Crops. 2020. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize (accessed on 22 October 2020).
28. Gao, H., Ge, W., Bai, L., Zhang, T., Zhao, L., Li, J., Shen, J., Xu, N., Zhang, H., Wang, G. and Lin, X., 2023. Proteomic analysis of leaves and roots during drought stress and recovery in Setaria italica L. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, p.1240164.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1240164

29. Ghalkhani, A., Golzardi, F., Khazaei, A., Mahrokh, A., Illés, Á., Bojtor, C., Mousavi, S.M.N. and Széles, A., 2023. Irrigation management strategies to enhance forage yield, feed value, and water-use efficiency of sorghum cultivars. Plants, 12, p.2154.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112154

30. Ghatak, A., Chaturvedi, P., Bachmann, G., Valledor, L., Ramšak, Ž., Bazargani, M.M., Bajaj, P., Jegadeesan, S., Li, W., Sun, X. and Gruden, K., 2021. Physiological and proteomic signatures reveal mechanisms of superior drought resilience in pearl millet compared to wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, p.600278.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.600278

31. Ghatak, A., Chaturvedi, P., Nagler, M., Roustan, V., Lyon, D., Bachmann, G., Postl, W., Schröfl, A., Desai, N., Varshney, R. and Weckwerth, W., 2016. Comprehensive tissue-specific proteome analysis of drought stress responses in Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. (Pearl millet). Journal of proteomics, 143, pp.122-135.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2016.02.032

32. Grecksch, K., 2019. Scenarios for resilient drought and water scarcity management in England and Wales. International Journal of River Basin Management, 17(2), pp.219-227.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2018.1461106

33. Hooshmand, M., Albaji, M., Nasab, S. and Ansari, N., 2019. The effect of deficit irrigation on yield and yield components of greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in hydroponic culture in Ahvaz region, Iran. Scientia Horticulturae, 254, pp.84-90.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCIENTA.2019.04.084

34. Hosseinian, S., Khaledian, M., Biglouei, M., and Shahinrokhsar, P. 2016. Technical and economical evaluation of tape drip and drip line irrigation systems in a strawberry greenhouse. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 107, pp.55-64.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14720/AAS.2016.107.1.06

35. Hou, S., Men, Y., Wei, M., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Sun, Z. and Han, Y., 2022. Total protein content, amino acid composition and eating-quality evaluation of foxtail millet (Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv). Foods, 12(1), p.31.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12010031

36. Iqbal, R., Andersen, M.N., Raza, M.A.S., Rashid, M.A. and Ahmad, S., 2019a. Physiological manipulation and yield response of wheat grown with split root system under deficit irrigation. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 32, pp.514-526

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2019/32.3.514.526

37. Iqbal, R., Muhammad, A.S.R., Muhammad, F.S., Imran, H.K., Salman, A., Muhammad, S.Z., Muhammad, U. and Imran, H., 2019b. Physiological and biochemical appraisal for mulching and partial rhizosphere drying of cotton. Journal of Arid Land, 11, pp.785-794.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-019-0014-9

38. Ismail, S., El-Nakhlawy, F. and Basahi, J., 2018. Sudan grass and pearl millet productivity under different irrigation methods with fully irrigation and stresses in arid regions. Grassland Science, 64, pp.29-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/GRS.12179
39. Ismail, S.M., 2012. Optimizing productivity and irrigation water use efficiency of pearl millet as a forage crop in arid regions under different irrigation methods and stress. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7, pp.2509-2518.
40. Jahanzad, E., Jorat, M., Moghadam, H., Sadeghpour, A., Chaichi, M.-R. and Dashtaki, M., 2013. Response of a new and a commonly grown forage sorghum cultivar to limited irrigation and planting density. Agricultural Water Management, 117, pp.62-69.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.11.001

41. Jahansouz, M.R., Keshavarz Afshar, R., Heidari, H. and Hashemi, M., 2014. Evaluation of yield and quality of sorghum and millet as alternative forage crops to corn under normal and deficit irrigation regimes. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(4), pp.699-715.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12816/0031747

42. Jiao, F., Ding, R., Du, T., Kang, J., Tong, L., Gao, J. and Shao, J., 2024. Multi-growth stage regulated deficit irrigation improves maize water productivity in an arid region of China. Agricultural Water Management, 297, p.108827.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108827

43. Khaleghi, M., Hassanpour, F., Karandish, F. and Shahnazari, A., 2020. Integrating partial root-zone drying and saline water irrigation to sustain sunflower production in freshwater-scarce regions. Agricultural Water Management, 234, p.106094.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106094

44. Kumar, P. and Kumar, A., 2021. Water management for improving pearl millet production under irrigated environment: A review. Agricultural Reviews, 42, pp.225-229.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/AG.R-1990

45. Lawlor, D.W. and Cornic, G., 2002. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 25, pp.275-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00814.x
46. Li, W., Jia, L. and Wang, L., 2017. Chemical signals and their regulations on the plant growth and water use efficiency of cotton seedlings under partial root-zone drying and different nitrogen applications. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 24, pp.477-487.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.01.015

47. Lima, R.S.N., Assis Figueiredo, F.A.M.M., Martins, A.O., Deus, B.C.S., Ferraz, T.M., Assis Gomes, M.M., Sousa, E.F., Glenn, D.M. and Campostrini, E., 2015. Partial rootzone drying (PRD) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) effects on stomatal conductance, growth, photosynthetic capacity and water-use efficiency of papaya. Scientia Horticulturae, 183, pp.13-22.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.12.005

48. Liu, F., Shahnazari, A., Andersen, M.N., Jacobsen, S.E. and Jensen, C.R., 2006. Physiological responses of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to partial root-zone drying: ABA signaling, leaf gas exchange, and water use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57, pp.3727-3735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9755/EJFA.2018.V30.I5.1678
49. Lu, J., Shao, G., Cui, J., Xiaojun, W. and Keabetswe, L., 2019. Yield, fruit quality and water use efficiency of tomato for processing under regulated deficit irrigation: A meta-analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 222, pp.301-312.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGWAT.2019.06.008

50. Machado, J., Vasconcelos, M.W., Soares, C., Fidalgo, F., Heuvelink, E. and Carvalho, S.M., 2023. Young tomato plants respond differently under single or combined mild nitrogen and water deficit: an insight into morphophysiological responses and primary metabolism. Plants, 12(5), p.1181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051181
51. Machekposhti, M.F., Shahnazari, A., Yousefian, M., Ahmadi, M.Z., Sarjaz, M.R., Arabzadeh, B., Akbarzadeh, A. and Leib, B.G., 2023. The effect of alternate partial root-zone drying and deficit irrigation on the yield, quality, and physiochemical parameters of milled rice. Agricultural Water Management, 289, p.108546.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108546

52. Machicek, J.A., Blaser, B.C., Darapuneni, M. and Rhoades, M.B., 2019. Harvesting regimes affect brown midrib sorghum-sudangrass and brown midrib pearl millet forage production and quality. Agronomy, 9, p.416.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9080416

53. Marviya, G.V. and Vakharia, D.N., 2016. Effect of terminal water stress and benzyl adenine on osmoregulants in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] Genotypes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Biochemistry, 29(1), pp.9-16.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4479.2016.00002.2

54. Martin-Vertedor, A.I. and Dodd, I.C., 2011. Root-to-shoot signalling when soil moisture is heterogeneous: Increasing the proportion of root biomass in drying soil inhibits leaf growth and increases leaf abscisic acid concentration. Plant, Cell & Environment, 34, pp.1164-1175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02315.x
55. Mason, S.C., Maman, N. and Pale, S., 2015. Pearl millet production practices in semi-arid West Africa: A review. Experimental Agriculture, 51, pp.501-521.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479714000441

56. Moloi, S.J. and Ngara, R., 2023. The roles of plant proteases and protease inhibitors in drought response: a review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, p.1165845.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1165845

57. Moridi, A., 2017. State of water resources in Iran. International Journal of Hydrology, 1(4), pp.111-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/IJH.2017.01.00021
58. Negarestani, M., Tohidi-Nejad, E., Khajoei-Nejad, G., Nakhoda, B. and Mohammadi-Nejad, G., 2019. Comparison of different multivariate statistical methods for screening the drought tolerant genotypes of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Agronomy, 9, p.645.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9100645

59. Nikolaou, G., Neocleous, D., Christou, A., Kitta, E. and Katsoulas, N., 2020. Implementing sustainable irrigation in water-scarce regions under the impact of climate change. Agronomy, 10(8), p.1120.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081120

60. Pan, J., Li, Z., Wang, Q., Garrell, A.K., Liu, M., Guan, Y., Zhou, W. and Liu, W., 2018. Comparative proteomic investigation of drought responses in foxtail millet. BMC Plant Biology, 18, pp.1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1533-9
61. Pareek, P., Patel, M., Patel, H. and Patel, P., 2015. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen levels on forage yield and quality of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.]. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11, pp.264-267.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAS/11.2/264-267

62. Qi, D.L., Hu, T.T. and Song, X., 2020. Effects of nitrogen application rates and irrigation regimes on grain yield and water use efficiency of maize under alternate partial rootzone irrigation. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19, pp.2792–2806.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119 (20)63205-1

63. Raghib Bakheit Alwafy, B., Ali, M.B., Elsaid Mahdy, R. and Kandeel, M.N., 2021. Performance of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) genotypes for forage yield and its components under normal and water stress irrigation. Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 52, pp.45-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/ajas.2022.113072.1076
64. Raval, C., Patel, A., Rathore, B., Vyas, K. and Bedse, R., 2014. Productivity, quality and soil fertility status as well as economics of multi-cut summer forage pearl millet as influenced by varying levels of irrigation and nitrogen. Research on Crops, 15, pp.785-789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2348-7542.2014.01412.0
65. Ren, J., Liu, Y., Mao, J., Xu, Y., Wang, M., Hu, Y., Wang, S., Liu, S., Qiao, Z. and Cao, X., 2024. Metabolomics and physiological methods revealed the effects of drought stress on the quality of broomcorn millet during the flowering stage. Agronomy, 14(2), p.236.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14020236

66. Rostamza, M., Chaichi, M.-R., Jahansouz, M.-R. and Alimadadi, A., 2011. Forage quality, water use and nitrogen utilization efficiencies of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) grown under different soil moisture and nitrogen levels. Agricultural Water Management, 98, pp.1607-1614.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGWAT.2011.05.014

67. Sachan, N. and Shah, P., 2023. Nutritional health benefits of pearl millet. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 18(2), pp.167-176.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15740/has/ijps/18.2/167-176

68. Sadras, V. 2009. Does partial root-zone drying improve irrigation water productivity in the field? A meta-analysis. Irrigation Science, 27, pp.183-190.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0141-0

69. Samake, O., Stomph, T., Kropff, M. and Smaling, E., 2006. Integrated pearl millet management in the Sahel: Effects of legume rotation and fallow management on productivity and Striga hermonthica infestation. Plant and Soil, 286, pp.245-257.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9041-3

70. Sanatawy, E.A.M., Ash-Shormillesy, S.M.A.I., Qabil, N., Awad, M.F., Mansour, E. and Seed, H., 2021. Priming improves seedling vigor, grain yield, and water use efficiency of maize under varying irrigation regimes. Water, 13, p.2115.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152115

71. Sepaskhah, A., and Ahmadi, S. 2010. A review on partial root-zone drying irrigation. International Journal of Plant Production, 4, pp.241-258.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22069/IJPP.2012.708

72. Shahnazari, A., Liu, F., Andersen, M.N., Jacobsen, S.E. and Jensen, C.R., 2007. Effects of partial root-zone drying on yield, tuber size and water use efficiency in potato under field conditions. Field Crops Research, 100, pp.117-124.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.05.010

73. Shrestha, N., Hu, H., Shrestha, K. and Doust, A.N., 2023. Pearl millet response to drought: A review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, p.1059574.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1059574

74. Sivasakthi, K., Tharanya, M., Choudhary, S., Garin, V., Vadez, V., and Kholová, J., 2024. Drought adaptation in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.): Physiological, molecular and genetic approaches. p. 69-83. In R.K. Srivastava, C.T. Satyavathi, and R.K. Varshney (eds.) the Pearl Millet Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56976-0_5
75. Stagno, F., Brambilla, M., Roccuzzo, G. and Assirelli, A., 2024. Water Use Efficiency in a deficit-irrigated orange orchard. Horticulturae, 10, p.498.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10050498

76. Talasila, V., Singh, R., Kishore, C. and Singh, A., 2019. Effect of planting density and nitrogen levels on growth and yield of fodder pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 8(7), pp.312-318.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/IJCMAS.2019.807.038

77. Wakrim, R., Wahbi, S., Tahi, H., Aganchich, B. and Serraj, R., 2005. Comparative effects of partial root drying (PRD) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) on water relations and water use efficiency in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 106(2-3), pp.275-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.10.019
78. Wasaya, A., Affan, M., Yasir, T.A., ur-Rehman, A., Mubeen, K., ur-Rehman, H., Ali, M., Nawaz, F., Galal, A., Iqbal, M.A., Sohidul Islam, M., El-Sharnouby, M., Ur Rahman, M.H. and El Sabagh, A., 2021. Foliar potassium sulfate application improved photosynthetic characteristics, water relations and seedling growth of drought-stressed maize. Atmosphere, 12, p.663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ atmos12060663
79. Wu, Y., Zhao, Z., Liu, S., Huang, X. and Wang, W., 2020. Does partial root-zone drying have advantages over regulated deficit irrigation in pear orchard under desert climates? Scientia Horticulturae, 262, p.109099.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109099

80. Xu, B., Gao, X., Dong, K., Li, X., Yang, P., Yang, T. and Feng, B., 2020. Grain protein content comparison and proteomic analysis of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) seed response to different drought stress levels. Acta physiologiae plantarum, 42(2), p.20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2999-2
81. Yang, X., Liu, R., Jing, M., Zhang, N., Liu, C. and Yan, J., 2023. Variation of root soluble sugar and starch response to drought stress in foxtail millet. Agronomy, 13(2), p.359.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020359

82. Yazar, A., Gokcel, F. and Sezen, M., 2009. Corn yield response to partial root zone drying and deficit irrigation strategies applied with drip system. Plant, Soil & Environment, 55(11), pp.494-503. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/96/2009-PSE
83. Zhang, J., Liu, H.X., Pang, X.P., Yu, C., Wang, Q., Zhou, Y.P., Lin, L.G. and Guo, Z.G., 2019. Effect of partial root-zone drying irrigation (PRD) on the gas exchange and antioxidant enzymatic activities in alfalfa. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 19, pp.127-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-0018-8
84. Zhang, J., Liu, H.X., Wei, X.X. and Guo, Z.G., 2023. Effect of partial root-zone drying irrigation (PRDI) on alfalfa available soil P. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 69, pp.2631-2644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2023.2169915
85. Zhenchang, W., Xiaofei, Y., Liang, F. and Jianbin, Z., 2016. Partial rootzone drying irrigation increases root surface area, root hydraulic conductivity and water use efficiency in maize. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis, 4, p.146.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJEMA.20160406.12

86. Zhou, L., Tian, X., Cui, B. and Hussain, A., 2021. Physiological and biochemical responses of invasive species Cenchrus pauciflorus benth to drought stress. Sustainability, 13(11), p.5976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13115976
87. Zooleh, H.H., Jahansooz, M.R., Yunusa, I., Hosseini, S.M., Chaichi, M.R. and Jafari, A.A., 2011. Effect of alternate irrigation on root-divided foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(2), pp.205-213. ISSN: 1835-2707.

DOI: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:59380346