| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,873 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,555 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 42,415,903 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 19,191,806 |
ارزیابی مقاومت ارقام چغندرقند به پوسیدگی ریزوکتونیایی ریشه در شرایط گلخانه و مزرعه | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 37، شماره 1، شهریور 1400، صفحه 1-10 اصل مقاله (807.57 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کامل علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2022.355407.1282 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهیار شیخ الاسلامی آل آقا* 1؛ علی جلیلیان2؛ حسن یونسی3 | ||
| 1استادیار بخش تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات،آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمانشاه، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار پژوهشی بخش تحقیقات چغندرقند مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی،کرمانشاه، ایران. | ||
| 3مربی بخش تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمانشاه، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بیماری پوسیدگی ریزوکتونیایی ریشه و طوقه چغندرقند در ایران عمدتاً توسط Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2 وR. solani AG-4 ایجاد میشود. در این پژوهش مقاومت ارقام تجاری خارجی و داخلی در دسترس کشاورزان در برابر هر دو گروه آناستوموزی AG 2-2 و AG 4 بیمارگر در شرایط گلخانه و مزرعه بررسی شد. در شرایط گلخانه بذر 18 رقم به همراه یک رقم شاهد (جلگه) در گلدان کاشته شد و پس از رسیدن بوتهها به سن هشت هفتگی، توسط دانههای ذرت آلوده به جدایههای R. solani AG 2-2 و R. solani AG 4 مایهزنی شدند. شش هفته بعد از مایهزنی شدت آلودگی روی ریشه هر بوته با مقیاس نه گانه (1 تا 9) اندازه‌گیری شد. در ارزیابی مزرعهای، ارقام در یک مزرعه با سابقه آلودگی هریک در سه تکرار در خطوط 50 متری کشت شدند و در زمان برداشت، شدت آلودگی روی ریشهها بررسی شد. نتایج نشان داد که در هر دو شرایط گلخانهای و مزرعهای بین ارقام مختلف با شاهد حساس و همچنین بین خود ارقام از نظر آماری اختلاف معنیدار وجود داشت. همچنین واکنش کلی ارقام به هر دو گروه آناستوموزی مشابه بود. در مجموع ارقام اکباتان، IRIS، AIGRETTE، NOVODORO، IVANO، NOVELLA، TOURELLE، MODEX، EFESOS و CADET کمترین آلودگی را در شرایط مختلف آزمایش داشتند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| پوسیدگی ریزوکتونیایی ریشه؛ چغندرقند؛ رقم؛ گروه آناستوموزی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of sugar beet commercial cultivars resistance to rhizoctonia root rot in greenhouse and field conditions | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| M. Shekholeslami1؛ A. Jalilian2؛ H. Younesi3 | ||
| 1Assistant professor of Plant Pests and Diseases Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate professor of Sugar Beet Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| 3Instructor of Plant Pests and Diseases Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Rhizoctonia root rot mainly caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2 and R. solani AG-4 is a sugar beet disease in Iran. In this study, the resistance of foreign and domestic commercial cultivars, available to farmers, against both pathogenic groups of AG 2-2 and AG 4 was evaluated in greenhouse and field conditions. Under greenhouse condition, 18 cultivars were planted in pots along with a control cultivar (Jolgeh) and after 8-weeks, seedlings were inoculated with corn seeds infected with R. solani AG 2-2 and R. solani AG 4 isolates. Six weeks after inoculation, the intensity of contamination on the roots of each plant was measured based on a nine-point scale (1 to 9). For field evaluation, cultivars were planted in a contaminated field in 50-m-long rows with three replications and the intensity of root infection was evaluated at harvest. Results showed that there was a significant difference between cultivars and susceptible control and also among cultivars in both greenhouse and field conditions. Also, the general response of cultivars to both pathogenic groups was similar. In total, Ekbatan, Iris, Aigrette, Novodoro, Ivano, Novella, Tourelle, Modex, Efesos and Cadet cultivars had the lowest infection under different trial conditions. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Cultivar, Pathogenic group, Rhizoctonia root rot, Sugar beet | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Afzali H. Distribution of Phytophthora root rot of sugar beet caused by agricultural running waters in Marvdasht water basin (MSc thesis). College of Agriculture. University of Shiraz. Shiraz, Iran. 149p. 1998. (in Persian, abstract in English) Afzali H. A new record of a species of Pythium as a causal agent of sugar beet root rot in Iran. Proceedings of 14th Iranian plant protection congress; 2000 Sep 5-8; Isfahan, Iran; 2000. P. 254. (in Persian, abstract in English) Anonymous (1). National list of plant cultivars of Iran. Office of business regulations and standards. Deputy of commercial development and agricultural industries. Ministry of agriculture. 2018; Report No. 97/502/4526. (in Persian) Anonymous (2). Sugar beet cultivars. Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute. 2020; http://www.spcri.ir › page-Main › form › pId477. (in Persian) Bartholomäus A, Mittler S, Märländer B, Varrelmann M. Control of Rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet and effect of fungicide application and plant cultivar on inoculum potential in the soil. Plant Disease. 2017; 101: 941-947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-16-1221-RE Büttner G, Pfahler B, Marlande B. Greenhouse and field techniques for testing sugar beet for resistance to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot. Plant Breeding. 2004; 123: 158-166. Ebrahimi Koulaee H, Mahmoudi SB, Hasani M. Evaluation of the resistance of sugar beet breeding lines to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot. Journal of Sugar Beet 2010; 26(1): 31-42. (in Persian, abstract in English) Ershad D. Fungi of Iran. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran. 2009; 531pp. (in Persian) Fattahi Sh, Zafari D, Mahmoudi SB. Evaluation of superior sugar beet genotypes for resistance to important root rot pathogens in the greenhouse. Journal of Sugar Beet 2003; 27(1): 25-38. (in Persian, abstract in English) Cornelissen BJC, Does MP, Melchers LS. Strategies for molecular resistance breeding (transgenic plants). 1996; In: Rhizoctonia species: Taxonomy, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Pathology and Disease Control, eds. Sneh B, Jabaji-Hare S, Neate S, Dijst G. pp. 529-536. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht. Gaskill JO, Mumford DL, Ruppel EG. Preliminary report on breeding for combined resistance to leaf spot, curly top and Rhizoctonia. Journal of American Socity Sugar Beet Technology. 1970; 16: 207-213. Harveson RM, Rush CM. Evaluation of fumigation and Rhizomania tolerant cultivars for control of a root disease complex of sugar beets. Plant Disease. 1994; 78: 1197-1202. Harveson RM, Nielsen KA, Eskridge KM. Utilizing a preplant soil test for predicting and estimating root rot severity in sugar beet in the central high plains of the United States. Journal of American Phytopathology Society. 2014; 98: 1248-1252. Hecker RJ, Ruppel EG. Rhizoctonia root rot resistance in sugar beet: breeding and related research. Journal of American Socity Sugar Beet Technology. 1977; 19: 246-256. Jacobsen B, Kephart K, Zidack N, Johnston M, Ansley J. Effect of fungicide and fungicide application timing on reducing yield loss to Rhizoctonia crown and root rot. Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT. USA; Sugar Beet Research and Extension Reports. 2005; 35: 224-226. Lewellen RT. Registration of CN12 and CN72 sugar beet germplasm populations with resistance to cyst nematode. Crop Science. 2006. 46: 1144-45. Liu Y, Khan MFR. Utility of fungicides for controlling Rhizoctonia solani on sugar beet. Journal of Crop Protection. 2016; 5(1): 33-38. doi: 10.18869/modares.jcp.5.1.33. Mahmoudi SB, Afzali H, Banihashemi M. Sugar beet root rot caused by Phytophthora megasperma in Khuzestan province. Proceedings of 15th Iranian plant protection congress; 2002 Sep 7-11; Kermanshah, Iran; 2002. P. 59. (in Persian, abstract in English) Mahmoudi SB, Mesbah M, Alizadeh A, Ebrahimi-koulaii H. Comparison of different methods for evaluation of resistance to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot in selected genotypes of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2003; 19(1): 23-35. (in Persian, abstract in English) Mahmoudi SB, Mesbah M, Alizadeh A. Pathogenic variability of sugar beet isolates of Rhizoctonia solani. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology. 2004; (40)3-4: 253-280. (in Persian, abstract in English) Mahmoudi SB, Soltani J. Sugar beet root rot in Iran. Newsletter of training center for studying sugar industry in Iran. 2005; 178: 14-18. Mahmoudi SB, Ghashghaie S. Reaction of sugar beet S1 lines and cultivars to different isolates of Macrophomia phaseolina and Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2-IIIB 2012; Euphytica. Springer. ISSN 0014-2336. Mahmoudi SB, Norouzi P, Khayamim S, Bazrafshan M, Mansouri H, Ahmadi M, Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S, Aghaeezadeh M. Identification of proper maternal parent for producing sugar beet cultivars resistant to major soil borne diseases. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2020; 36(1): 1- 13. (in Persian, abstract in English) Panella LW, Ruppel EG, Hecker RJ. Registration of four multigerm sugar beet germplasms resistance to Rhizoctonia root rot FC716, FC717, FC718 and FC719. Crop Science. 1995; 35: 291-292. Panella LW, Ruppel EG. Registration of sugarbeet germplasms FC721 and FC721 CMS resistant to Rhizoctonia root rot and moderately resistant to beet curly top virus. Crop Science. 1997; 37: 1675-1676. Pourrahim R, Najafi H, Farzadfar Sh, Ardeh MJ, Sheikholeslami M, Fatemy S, Ghasemi A, Arbabi M. Sugar beet Handbook (Plant Protection). Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran, Registration No. 50954. 2016; 157pp. (in Persian) Rother B. Situation of Rhizoctonia in Europe. International Institute for Sugar Beet Research Info 1999; 4: 2-6. Sheikholeslami M, Younesi H, Safaei D. Determination of fungi involved in sugar beet root rot and their distribution in Kermanshah province. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2005; (21)1: 99-100. (in Persian, abstract in English) Sheikholeslami M, Naeimi Sh, Mahmoudi SB, Jalilian A. Evaluation of the Rouin1 biological fungicide in management of Rhizoctonia root rot of sugar beet. Iranian Journal of Plant Protection Science. 2021; (55)2: 87-95. Sneh B, Burpee L, Ogoshi A. Identification of Rhizoctonia species. APS Press, St Paul, Minnesota, USA. 1991; 133 pp. Soltani Nezhad S, Mahmoudi SB, Farokhi Nezhad RF. Characterization of sugar beet Rhizoctonia isolates in Iran. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2007; 23(2): 135-150. (in Persian, abstract in English) Uchino H, Watanabe H, Kanzawa K. Controlling root diseases of sugar beet by applying Azoxystrobin. Proceedings of Japanese Society of Sugar Beet Technologists. 1997; 39: 73-79. Whitney ED, Duffus JE. Compendium of Beet Diseases and Insects. 1989; APS Press, USA. Windels CE, Nabben DJ. Characterization and pathogenicity of anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani isolated from Beta vulgaris. Phytopathology. 1989; 79: 83-88. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 451 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 409 |
||