| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,846 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,300 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 41,387,197 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 18,562,199 |
تاثیر مداخله علف‌های‌هرز بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد لوبیا (Phaseolus vulgaris) | ||
| دانش علف‌های هرز ایران | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 9، شماره 1، شهریور 1392، صفحه 65-78 اصل مقاله (383.32 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمدرضا لک1؛ حمیدرضا دری1؛ لیلا فراهانی2 | ||
| 1مرکز تحقیقات استان مرکزی | ||
| 2دانشگاه آزاد اراک | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به منظور بررسی تاثیر مداخله علف‌های هرز بر عملکرد و اجزاء عملکرد لوبیا (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)، آزمایشی به صورت طرح کرت‌های خرد شده در قالب بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با چهار تکرار در ایستگاه ملی تحقیقات لوبیا در خمین طی سال های 1378 و 1379 اجرا شد. کرت‌های اصلی شامل آلودگی طبیعی به علف‌های هرز و کنترل کامل علف‌های هرز در تمام فصل رشدی لوبیا و کرت‌های فرعی شامل هشت رقم/لاین لوبیا شامل دهقان، دانشکده، ناز، گلی، تلاش، صدری، محلی خمین و COS16 بود. مقایسه میانگین صفات نشان داد که تداخل علف‌های هرز عملکرد، تعداد دانه در بوته، تعداد دانه در غلاف و تعداد غلاف در بوته را به ترتیب 45%، 39%، 5% و 36% کاهش داد. رقم گلی و تلاش با بیشترین شاخص تحمل رقابت به علف های ارقام برتر شناخته شد. بررسی ضرایب همبستگی نشان دهنده همبستگی منفی و بسیار معنی‌دار وزن خشک علف‌های هرز با عملکرد و اجزاء عملکرد ارقام لوبیا بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تجزیه مرکب؛ علف هرز؛ عملکرد؛ لوبیا؛ همبستگی صفات | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of weeds Interference on Yield and Yield Components of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| mohammad Reza lake1؛ hamid Reza Dorrii1؛ liela Farahani2 | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In order to determine the effect of weeds on yield and yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), this research was carried out as split plot in randomized complete block, with four replications, in Khomein Bean Research Station during 1999 and 2000. There were two plots including naturally contaminated with weeds, and complete weed control. There were also eight subplots containing the following ban cultivars/lines: Dehghan, Daneshkadeh, Naz, Goli, Talash, Mahali Khomein, Sadri and Coc16 bean. Mean comparisons of traits showed that presence of weeds caused loss of 45% in yield, 39% in number of seeds for plant, 5.1% number of seeds per pod, 36% number of pods in studied cultivars/lines. Goli and Talash with the highest ability of weed competition were superior among studied cultivars. The coefficients of correlation indicated negative and significant correlation of weed dry weight with yield. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Bean, compound analysis, correlation of traits, weed, yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Akbari, G. A., Irannejad, H., Hoseinzadeh, K., Zand, E., Hejazi, A. and Bayat, A. A. 2010. Effect of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) interference on yield and growth indexes of canola (Brassica napus L.). Iranian J. Field Crop Sci. 41: 329-343. (In Persian with English summary). Baghestani, M. A. and Zand, E. 2004. Evaluation of competitive ability of some winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes against weeds with attention on Goldbachia laevigata DC. and Avena ludoviciana Dur. In Karaj. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology. 72:91-111. (In Persian with English summary). Baghestani, M.A., Lemieux, C., Leroux, G.D., Baziramakenga, R. and Simard, R.R. 1999. Determination of allelochemicals in spring cereal cultivars of different competitiveness. Weed Sci. 47:498-504. Baghestani, M.A., Zand, E. and Soufizadeh, S. 2006. Iranian winter wheat’s (Triticum aestivum L.) interference with weeds: I. Grain yield and competitive index. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 12: 119-129. Bayat, M. L. 1998. Effect of density and contest of weeds on morphologic and agronomic traits of Daneshjoo cultivar of Chiti bean. MSc Thesis. University of Shiraz, Iran. (In Persian with English summary). Blachshaw, R. E. 1991. Hairy nightshade (Solanum sorrachoides) interference in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 39: 48-53. Bussan, A. J., Burnside, O. C., Orf, J. H., Ristau, E. A. and Puettmann, K. J. 1997. Field evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) genotypes for weed competitiveness. Weed Sci. 45: 31-37. Chikoy, D., Weise, F. S. and Swanton, C. J. 1995. Influence of common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) time of emergence and density on white bean. Weed Sci. 43: 375-380. Dawson, J. H. 1964. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds. 12: 206-208. Dunan, M. C. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1991. Competitive ability of wild oats (Avena fatua) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Weed Sci. 39: 558-563. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. J. and Feltner, K. 1967. Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida, and venice mallow in soybean. Weed Sci. 24: 224-228. Farbodnia, A., Baghestani, M. A., Zand, E. and NoorMohamadi, G. 2010. Comparative analysis of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) against Descurainia Sophia. Iranian Journal of Plant Protection. 23: 74-81. (In Persian with English summary). Lak, M. R., Dorei, H. R., Ramazani, M. K. and Hadizadeh, M. H. 2005. Determination of the critical period of weed control in Chitti bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). J. Sci. and Technol. Agric. and Natur. Resour. 9: 161-169. (In Persian with English summary). Malik, V. S., Swanton, C. J. and Michaels, T. E. 1993. Interaction of white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars, row spacing and seed density with annual weeds. Weed Sci. 41: 62-68 Mousavi, S. K., Nazer Kakhki, S. H., Lak, M. R., Tabatabaii, R. and Behrozi, D. 2010. Evaluation of Imazetapyr herbicide efficiency for weed control in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Iran. J. Pulses Res. 1: 111-122. (In Persian with English summary). Naroui Rad, M. R., Abbasi, M. R. and Fanaei, H. R. 2006. Evaluation of drought stress tolerance using stress tolerance indices in sorghum germplasms of National Plant Gene Bank of Iran. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi. 82: 11-18. (In Persian with English summary). Rose, S. J., Bunside, O. C., Spetch, J. E. and Swisher, B. A. 1984. Competition and allelopathy between soybeans and weeds. Agron. J. 76: 523-528. Schweizer, E. E. and Dexter, A. G. 1987. Weed control in sugar beets (Beta vulgaris) in North America. Review of Weed Science. 3: 113-133. Shurtleff, J. L. and Coble, H. D. 1985. Interference of certain broadleaf weed species in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33: 654-657. Swanton, C. J. and Murphy, S. D. 1996. Weed science beyond the weeds: The role of integrated weed management in agro ecosystem health. Weed Sci. 44: 437-445. Van Gessel, M. J. 1996. Successes of integrated weed management- A symposium. Weed Sci. 44: 408. Wilson, R. G. 1993. Wild Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) interference in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 41: 607-610. Wilson, R. G., Wick, G. A. and Fenster, C. R. 1980. Weed control in field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in western Nebraska. Weed Sci. 28: 295-299. Wyse, D. L. 1994. New technologies and approaches for weed management in sustainable agriculture systems. Weed Technol. 8: 403-407. Zollinger, R. K. and Kells, J. J. 1993. Perennial Sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis) interference in soybean (Glycine max) and dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 7: 52-57. Zimdahl, R. L. 1995. Weed science in sustainable agriculture. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 10:138-142. Zimdahl, R. L. 2004. Weed Crop Competition, a review. A review Corvallis, OR: Int. Plant Protection Center . Oregon State University. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,655 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 968 |
||