اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات285
تعداد نشریات سازمان83
تعداد شماره‌ها3,087
تعداد مقالات34,477
تعداد مشاهده مقاله49,207,332
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله79,676,446
براتی زانیانی, مرضیه, حسین پور, علی رضا, صالحی, محمد حسن, جعفری, اعظم. (1404). پویایی پتاسیم خاک و ارتباط آن با کانی‌شناسی رس‌ها در خاک‌های زراعی دشت دامنه‌ای شهرکرد. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, (), 287-302. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2025.370593.786
مرضیه براتی زانیانی; علی رضا حسین پور; محمد حسن صالحی; اعظم جعفری. "پویایی پتاسیم خاک و ارتباط آن با کانی‌شناسی رس‌ها در خاک‌های زراعی دشت دامنه‌ای شهرکرد". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, , , 1404, 287-302. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2025.370593.786
براتی زانیانی, مرضیه, حسین پور, علی رضا, صالحی, محمد حسن, جعفری, اعظم. (1404). 'پویایی پتاسیم خاک و ارتباط آن با کانی‌شناسی رس‌ها در خاک‌های زراعی دشت دامنه‌ای شهرکرد', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, (), pp. 287-302. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2025.370593.786
براتی زانیانی, مرضیه, حسین پور, علی رضا, صالحی, محمد حسن, جعفری, اعظم. پویایی پتاسیم خاک و ارتباط آن با کانی‌شناسی رس‌ها در خاک‌های زراعی دشت دامنه‌ای شهرکرد. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; (): 287-302. doi: 10.22092/ijsr.2025.370593.786

پویایی پتاسیم خاک و ارتباط آن با کانی‌شناسی رس‌ها در خاک‌های زراعی دشت دامنه‌ای شهرکرد

پژوهش های خاک
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 01 آذر 1404    اصل مقاله (1.67 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijsr.2025.370593.786
نویسندگان
مرضیه براتی زانیانی* 1؛ علی رضا حسین پور2؛ محمد حسن صالحی2؛ اعظم جعفری3
1گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهرکرد، شهرکرد. ایران
2گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک. دانشکده کشاورزی. دانشگاه شهرکرد. شهرکرد. ایران
3گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک. دانشکده کشاورزی. دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان. کرمان. ایران
چکیده
شناسایی انواع کانی‌های رسی در خاک از اهمیت ویژه‌ای برخوردار است، زیرا نقش تعیین‌کننده‌ای در پویایی پتاسیم و توانایی خاک در تأمین این عنصر برای گیاهان ایفا می‌کند. مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه بین شکل‌های مختلف پتاسیم (محلول، تبادلی و غیرتبادلی) و مقدار پتاسیم غیرتبادلی آزاد شده به‌عنوان تابعی از کانی‌شناسی رس، در خاک‌های زراعی انجام شد. بدین منظور، 15 نمونه خاک براساس تنوع در مقدار پتاسیم تبادلی، پتاسیم غیر‌تبادلی، ظرفیت تبادل کاتیونی و درصد رس، از عمق 30- 0 سانتی‌متری خاک­های زراعی دشت دامنه‌ای شهرکرد جمع­آوری شد. ویژگی‌های فیزیکی و شیمیایی خاک، شکل‌های مختلف پتاسیم، مقدار آزادسازی پتاسیم غیرتبادلی پس از 2017 ساعت به روش عصاره‌گیری متوالی و ترکیب کانی‌های رسی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که دامنه تغییرات مقدار پتاسیم محلول، تبادلی و غیرتبادلی، به‌ترتیب؛ 99/7 - 11/5، 612/7 - 108/5 و 2065 - 491 میلی‌گرم بر کیلوگرم بود. مقدار پتاسیم غیرتبادلی آزاد شده پس از 2017 ساعت نیز در دامنه، 479/0 - 225/5 میلی‌گرم بر کیلوگرم متغیر بود. کانی‌های غالب خاک، شامل؛ میکاها، کلریت‌ها، کائولینیت، اسمکتیت‌ها، کوارتز و کانی مختلط میکاها-کلریت‌ها بودند که از نظر مقدار نسبی تفاوت‌هایی با یکدیگر داشتند. در خاک‌هایی با مقدار رس و سیلت مشابه، تفاوت در رفتار آزادسازی پتاسیم عمدتاً ناشی از نوع و نسبت کانی‌های رسی است. فراوانی شکل‌های مختلف پتاسیم رابطه معناداری با برخی ویژگی‌های خاک داشت؛ غلظت پتاسیم محلول، غیرتبادلی و مقدار پتاسیم غیرتبادلی آزاد شده پس از 2017 ساعت، با قابلیت هدایت الکتریکی همبستگی مثبت داشت (به‌ترتیب؛ **0/54=r، **0/45=r و **0/25=r)، پتاسیم محلول و غیرتبادلی با ظرفیت تبادل کاتیونی همبستگی منفی (به‌ترتیب؛ *0/18-=r و *0/26-=r)، پتاسیم محلول با ماده آلی همبستگی مثبت (*0/21=r) و پتاسیم تبادلی با کربنات کلسیم معادل همبستگی منفی (**0/34-=r) داشت. شکل‌های مختلف پتاسیم و مقدار پتاسیم غیرتبادلی آزاد شده پس از 2017 ساعت با مقدار کل رس همبستگی معنی‌داری نداشتند، که نشان می‌دهد دینامیک پتاسیم در این خاک‌ها بیش از آنکه تحت تأثیر میزان رس باشد، تحت تأثیر نوع و ترکیب کانی‌های رسی قرار دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
اسمکتیت‌ها؛ پتاسیم تبادلی؛ پتاسیم غیرتبادلی؛ دشت دامنه‌ای؛ میکا‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Soil Potassium Dynamics and its Relationship with Clay Mineralogy in Agricultural Soils of Shahrekord Piedmont Plain
نویسندگان [English]
Marzieh Barati Zanyani1؛ Alireza Hossienpur2؛ Mohammad Hasan Salehi2؛ Azam Jafari3
1Department of Soil Science and Engineering. Faculty of Agriculture. Shahrekord University. ShahreKord. Iran
2Department of Soil Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
3Department of Soil Science Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
چکیده [English]
Background and Objectives:  The identification of the type and composition of clay minerals in soil is of particular importance, as these minerals play a fundamental role in potassium dynamics and the soil’s capacity to supply this essential element to plants. Clay minerals can influence the uptake, retention, and release of potassium, and therefore play a crucial role in fertilization management and maintaining soil fertility. The present study aims to investigate the relationship between different forms of soil potassium, including soluble, exchangeable, and non-exchangeable potassium, as well as the amount of released non-exchangeable potassium, in relation to the clay mineral composition of agricultural soils.
 
Materials and Methods:  15 soil samples were collected from the 0–30 cm depth of agricultural soils in the Shahrekord Piedmont Plain, based on variations in exchangeable potassium, non-exchangeable potassium, cation exchange capacity and clay content. The physical and chemical properties of the soils were analyzed. Also, the exchangeable potassium of the soils was determined using 1 N ammonium acetate, and the non-exchangeable potassium was determined using 1 M boiling nitric acid. The amount of non-exchangeable potassium released after 2017 hours using the sequential extraction method with 0.01 M calcium chloride (CaCl₂). The composition of clay minerals were examined. The clay samples were saturated with potassium and magnesium, and to identify the types of clay minerals, Mg, Mg–ethylene glycol, Mg–glycerol, K, and K-heated treatments at 110, 350, and 550 °C were analyzed using an X-ray diffraction (XRD) instrument.
 

 



Results: The results showed that the range of soluble, exchangeable, and non-exchangeable potassium concentrations were 11.5–99.7, 108.5–612.7, and 491- 2065 mg kg⁻¹, respectively. The range of non-exchangeable potassium released after 2017 hours varied from 225.5 to 479.0 mg kg⁻¹. The dominant soil minerals included; micas, chlorites, kaolinite, smectites, quartz, and a small amount of mixed mica–chlorite minerals, with variations in their relative abundances. In soils with similar clay and silt contents, differences in potassium release behavior are mainly attributed to the type and proportion of clay minerals. Soils with the lowest levels of exchangeable and non-exchangeable potassium exhibited the highest non-exchangeable potassium release, whereas soils with high non-exchangeable potassium content showed a lower release percentage. The results showed that different forms of potassium had significant relationships with certain soil properties; Soluble and non-exchangeable potassium, as well as the cumulative amount of non-exchangeable potassium released after 2017 hours, were positively correlated with electrical conductivity (r=0.54**, r=0.45**, r=0.25**); soluble and non-exchangeable potassium were negatively correlated with cation exchange capacity (r=-0.18* , r=-0.26*); soluble potassium was positively correlated with organic matter (r=0.21*); and exchangeable potassium was negatively correlated with calcium carbonate equivalent (r=-0.34**). The different forms of potassium and the amount of non-exchangeable potassium released after 2017 hours showed no significant correlation with the total clay content. Different forms of potassium and the amount of non-exchangeable potassium released after 2017 hours showed no significant correlation with total clay content, indicating that potassium dynamics in these soils are influenced more by the type and composition of clay minerals than by the clay content itself.
 
Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that potassium dynamics in the agricultural soils of the Shahrekord plain are primarily influenced by the type and composition of clay minerals. In other words, the quantity and rate of non-exchangeable potassium release in soils depend more on the abundance and type of potassium-bearing minerals, such as micas and smectites, rather than merely the total clay content. Soils with high smectites content exhibited faster non-exchangeable potassium release, whereas micas-rich soils had high non-exchangeable potassium content but a lower release rate. These findings highlight the importance of understanding clay mineralogy and the different forms of potassium for designing optimal potassium fertilization programs. To meet crop potassium requirements and avoid excessive fertilizer application, it is necessary to consider not only exchangeable and non-exchangeable potassium levels but also the clay mineral composition and the behavior of potassium release.
 

 
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Available Potassium, Mica, Non-exchangeable Potassium, Piedmont Plain, Smectite
مراجع
  1. Alamdari, p., Kamrani, V., and Mohammadi, M. H. 2015. Clay Mineralogy Relationships with Potassium Forms in Different Physiographic Units. Water and Soil,  29(6): 1578-1589. https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v29i6.34905 (In Persian).
  2. Al-Kanani, T., Mackenzie, A. F., and Ross, G. J. 1984. Potassium status of some Quebec soils: K released by nitric acid and sodium tetraphenylboron as related to particle size and mineralogy. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 64(1): 99-106.
  3. Barre, P., Montagnier, C., Chenu, C., Abbadie, L., and Velde, B. 2008. Clay minerals as a soil potassium reservoir: observation and quantification through X-ray diffraction. Plant and Soil,  302(1): 213-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9471-6
  4. Bohn, H. L., McNeal, B. l., and Connor, A. O. 1985. Soil Chemistry. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  5. Bertsch, P. M., and Thomas, G. W. Potassium status of temperate region soils. Potassium in agriculture, 129-162.
  6. Bhat, M. A., Tomar, D., Grewal, K. S., Sahoo, J., & Dar, E. A. (2023). Non-exchangeable potassium release and supplying power of soils of Haryana, Northwest India. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 46(17), 4140-4155. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2023.2221683
  7. Bhonsle, N. S., Pal, S. K. and Sekhon. G. S. 1992. Relationship of K forms and release characteristics with clay Geoderma. 54(1): 285-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016- 7061(92)90110-S
  8. Dixon, J. B., and Weed, S.B. 1992. Minerals in soil environments. 2nd ed. Soil Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A. 1244p.
  9. Fanning, D. S., Keramidas, V. Z., and El-Desokey, M. A. 1992. Micas. PP. 552–634. In: Dixon, J. B, Weed, S. B. (Eds.) Minerals in Soil Environments, Soil Science Society of America Book Ser 1. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
  10. Gunal, H. and Ransom, M. D. 2006. Genesis and micromorphology of loess-derived soils from central Kansas. Catena, 65(3): 222-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2005.11.018
  11. Gee, G. W., and Bauder, J. W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis: Part I-Physical and mineralogy methods. Agron. Monogr. 9. 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 383-412.
  12. Gurav, P. P., Ray, S. K., Datta, S. C., Choudhari, P. L., & and Hartmann, C. Role of clay cation exchange capacity, location of charge, and clay mineralogy on potassium availability in Indian Vertisols. Clays and Clay Minerals, 72, e3. https://doi.org/10.1017/cmn.2024.6
  13. Hosseinpur, A. R. 2004. Evaluation of Several Extractants for Determining Available Potassium Garlic in some Soils of Hamedan. Journal of Water and Soil Science. 8(2), 45-57. http://jstnar.iut.ac.ir/article-1-424-fa.html. (In Persian).
  14. Han, G. Z., Fan, H. Z., Han, B. S., Huang, L. M., Cao, X. M., & Yang, F. (2024). Paddy management controls potassium release from minerals in purple soils after 40 years of cultivation. European Journal of Soil Science, 75(3), e13492. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13492
  15. Jalali, M. 2005. Release kinetics of nonexchangeable potassium in calcareous soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 36(13-14):1903-1917. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-200062490
  16. Jini, D., Ganga, V. S., Greeshma, M. B., Sivashankar, R., and Thirunavukkarasu, A. 2024. Sustainable agricultural practices using potassium-solubilizing microorganisms (KSMs) in coastal regions: a critical review on the challenges and opportunities. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(6), 13641-13664.
  17. Kittrick, J. A., and Hope, E. W. 1963. A procedure for the particle-size separation of soils for X-ray diffraction analysis. Soil Science, 96(5): 319-325.
  18. Knudsen, D., Peterson, G. A., and Pratt, P. F. 1982. Lithium, Sodium and Potassium. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. (2nd ed.). American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin. 225-246.
  19. Khormali, F., and Abtahi, A. 2003. Origin and distribution of clay minerals in calcareous arid and semi-arid soils of Fars Province, southern Iran. Clay minerals, 38(4): 511-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1180/0009855023740112
  20. Kaur, H. 2019. Forms of potassium in soil and their relationship with soil properties: A review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(10): https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.184
  21. Loeppert, R. H., and Suarez, D. L. Carbonate and gypsum In: Sparks D.L. (ed.) Chemocal Methods of Soil Analysis. Soil Science Society of America Madison pp. 437-447.
  22. Martin, H. W., & Sparks, D. L. 1983. Kinetics of nonexchangeable potassium release from two coastal plain soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 47(5): 883-887.
  23. Mustscher, H. 1995. Measurement and assessment of soil potassium. International potash institute Research Topics Number 4”.
  24. Mouhamad, R., Alsaede, A., and Iqbal, M. 2016. Behavior of potassium in soil: a mini review. Chemistry International, 2(1): 58-69.
  25. Murrell, T. S., Mikkelsen, R. L., Sulewski, G., Norton, R., and Thompson, M. L. 2021. Improving potassium recommendations for agricultural crops (p. 455). Springer Nature.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59197-7
  26. Nelson, D. W., and Sommers, L. E. Carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks D.L. (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis. Soil Science Society of America, Madison. pp. 961-1010.
  27. Najafi-Ghiri, M., Owliaie, H. R., and Boostanic, H. R. 2019. Factors affecting potassium pools distribution in some calcareous soils of Kohgilouye and Boyerahmad province. Applied Soil Research, 7(2), 196-207.(In Persian).
  28. Prajapati, K., and Modi, H. A. 2012. The importance of potassium in plant growth–a review. Indian journal of plant sciences, 1(02-03): 177-186.
  29. Rhoades, J. D. 1996. Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In: Sparks, D.L.,(Eds.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 3- Chemical Methods. Agronomy Monograph, vol. 9. Amerirican Society Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 417-435.
  30. Ross, G. J., Gamble, D. S., and Cline, R. A. 1989. Potassium exchange and fixation in some southern Ontario soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 69(3): 649-661
  31. Srinivasarao, C., Rupa, T. R., Subba Rao, A., Ramesh, G., & Bansal, S. K. (2006). Release kinetics of nonexchangeable potassium by different extractants from soils of varying mineralogy and depth. Communications in soil science and plant analysis,37(3-4),473-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620500449351
  32. Srinivasarao, C., R. N. Singh, A. N. Ganeshamurthy, G. Singh and A. Masood. 2007. Fixation and recovery of added phosphorus and potassium in different soil types of pulse growing regions of India. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 38: 449-http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103620601174080
  33. Sumner, M. E., and Miller, W. P. 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods, 5: 1201-1229.
  34. Sparks, D. L. 1987. Potassium dynamics in soils. In Advances in soil science (pp. 1-63). New York, NY: Springer New York.
  35. Simonsson, M., Hillier, S., and Oborn, I. 2009. Changes in clay minerals and potassium fixation capacity as a result of release and fixation of potassium in long-term field experiments. Geoderma, 151(3-4), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.209.03.018
  36. Sadri, N., Owliaie, H. R., Adhami, E., and Najafi Ghiri, M. 2016. Investigation of Different Forms of Potassium as a Function of Clay Mineralogy and Soil Evolution in Some Soils of Fars Province. Water and Soil.30(1):172-185. https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v30i1.38048 )In Persian(.
  37. Salehi, M. , Khademi, H., and Karimian Eqbal, M. 2003. Identification and formation processes of clay minerals in the soils of Farrokhshahr region, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province. Journal of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, 7(1), 73–89. (In Persian).
  38. Thomas, G.W. 1996. Soil pH and soil activity. In. Sparks, D.L. (Eds), Methods of soil analysis, Part 3- Chemical Methods.Agronomy Monograph, vol. 9. Amerirican Society Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 475-490
  39. Wang, J. G., Zhang, F. S., Cao Y. P., and Zhang. X. L. 2000. Effect of plant types on release of mineral potassium from gneiss. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems56:3744.http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009826111929
  40. Zareian, Gh. R., HadiFarpoor, M., Hejazi-Mehrizi, M., and Jafari, A. 2018 . Kinetics of Non-exchangeable Potassium Release in Selected Soil Orders of Southern Iran. Soil and Water Research.13(4):200-207. https://doi.org/10.17221/138/2017-SWR.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 43
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 68


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب