اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات286
تعداد نشریات سازمان84
تعداد شماره‌ها2,889
تعداد مقالات32,722
تعداد مشاهده مقاله42,984,203
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله19,594,261
Younis, Jotyar, Karadas, Filiz, BESKI, Sleman. (1403). THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LEVEL OF SYNBIOTIC SUPPLEMENTATION IN DIET OF BROILER ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE, INTESTINAL HISTOLOGY AND MICROBIAL COLONY. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 79(6), 1227-1234. doi: 10.32592/ARI.2024.79.6.1227
Jotyar Hasan Younis; Filiz Karadas; Sleman Said Mohammed BESKI. "THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LEVEL OF SYNBIOTIC SUPPLEMENTATION IN DIET OF BROILER ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE, INTESTINAL HISTOLOGY AND MICROBIAL COLONY". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 79, 6, 1403, 1227-1234. doi: 10.32592/ARI.2024.79.6.1227
Younis, Jotyar, Karadas, Filiz, BESKI, Sleman. (1403). 'THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LEVEL OF SYNBIOTIC SUPPLEMENTATION IN DIET OF BROILER ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE, INTESTINAL HISTOLOGY AND MICROBIAL COLONY', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 79(6), pp. 1227-1234. doi: 10.32592/ARI.2024.79.6.1227
Younis, Jotyar, Karadas, Filiz, BESKI, Sleman. THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LEVEL OF SYNBIOTIC SUPPLEMENTATION IN DIET OF BROILER ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE, INTESTINAL HISTOLOGY AND MICROBIAL COLONY. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 79(6): 1227-1234. doi: 10.32592/ARI.2024.79.6.1227

THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LEVEL OF SYNBIOTIC SUPPLEMENTATION IN DIET OF BROILER ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE, INTESTINAL HISTOLOGY AND MICROBIAL COLONY

Archives of Razi Institute
دوره 79، شماره 6، بهمن و اسفند 2024، صفحه 1227-1234    اصل مقاله (333 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.32592/ARI.2024.79.6.1227
نویسندگان
Jotyar Hasan Younis* 1؛ Filiz Karadas2؛ Sleman Said Mohammed BESKI3
1Department of Feeds and Animal Nutrition,Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science,van,turkey
2Department of Feeds and Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science,van,turkey
3Dept. of Animal Production, College of Agriculture, University of Duhok, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
چکیده
This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of the supplementation of
different levels of synbiotic on growth performance and intestinal physiology of broiler
chickens. A total of 360-day-old broiler chicks were randomly assigned to 6 different
treatments of 4 replicates, with 15 birds per each replicate. Treatments were control (not
any supplement), (zinc bacitracin 0.04 g/kg), and the remaining four treatments were
supplemented with four different levels (0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 g/kg) of synbiotic to the
basal diets.
At day 10 and throughout the experimental period, body weight and weight gain
significantly were increased (P< 0.05) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) significantly was improved by rising
level of synbiotic. The control group recorded the poorer FCR than other experimental
groups (P<0.05). Up to 10 days, feed intake significantly increased in birds on diets
supplemented with 0.25 and 0.75 g/kg synbiotic. However, when assessed over the 35
days of the experimental period, feed intake significantly decreased (P< 0.05) in birds
that received 0.75g/kg of synbiotic compared to the other experimental groups. The
relative weight of internal organs was not affected by dietary treatments. Carcass yield
and breast meat significantly were increased (P < 0.05) by rising levels of dietary
synbiotic. Villi length was significantly affected by treatment, indicating the longer villi
in birds on diets supplemented with 0.5 g/kg of synbiotic compared to the control.
Significantly the shorter villi were observed in birds that received the highest
supplement (1 g/kg) level of synbiotic. The number of E. coli in the ileum were not
affected by dietary treatments.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Broiler؛ Symbiotic؛ Growth performance؛ Intestinal Histology؛ Microbial Colony
عنوان مقاله [English]
اثرات سطوح مختلف سینبایوتیک مکمل در جیره غذایی جوجه های گوشتی در رشد عملکرد، بافت شناسی روده و کلونی میکروبی
چکیده [English]
این مطالعه به منظور بررسی اثر مکمل‌سازی انجام شد
سطوح مختلف سین بیوتیک بر عملکرد رشد و فیزیولوژی روده جوجه های گوشتی
جوجه ها در مجموع جوجه های گوشتی 360 روزه به طور تصادفی به 6 قطعه مختلف تقسیم شدند.
تیمارهای 4 تکرار، با 15 پرنده در هر تکرار. درمان ها کنترلی بودند (نه
هر مکمل)، (زینک باسیتراسین 0.04 گرم بر کیلوگرم)، و چهار تیمار باقی مانده
مکمل با چهار سطح مختلف (0.25، 0.5، 0.75 و 1 گرم بر کیلوگرم) سین بیوتیک به
رژیم های غذایی پایه
در روز 10 و در طول دوره آزمایشی، وزن بدن و افزایش وزن
به طور قابل توجهی افزایش یافت (05/0 P<) و ضریب تبدیل خوراک (FCR) به طور قابل توجهی با افزایش بهبود یافت.
سطح سین بیوتیک گروه کنترل FCR ضعیف تری را نسبت به سایر گروه های تجربی ثبت کردند
گروه ها (P<0.05). تا 10 روز، مصرف خوراک به طور قابل توجهی در پرندگان رژیم غذایی افزایش یافت
مکمل با 0.25 و 0.75 گرم بر کیلوگرم سین بیوتیک. با این حال، هنگامی که بیش از 35 ارزیابی شد
در روزهای دوره آزمایش، مصرف خوراک در پرندگان به طور معنی‌داری کاهش یافت (05/0 P<).
که 75/0 گرم بر کیلوگرم سین بیوتیک در مقایسه با سایر گروه های تجربی دریافت کردند. این
وزن نسبی اندام های داخلی تحت تاثیر تیمارهای غذایی قرار نگرفت. عملکرد لاشه
و گوشت سینه به طور معنی داری با افزایش سطوح رژیم غذایی افزایش یافت (05/0 > P).
سین بیوتیک طول پرز به طور قابل توجهی تحت تاثیر درمان قرار گرفت، که نشان دهنده بلندتر بودن پرزها است
در پرندگانی که در جیره غذایی حاوی 0.5 گرم بر کیلوگرم سین بیوتیک در مقایسه با شاهد بودند.
به طور قابل توجهی پرزهای کوتاهتر در پرندگانی مشاهده شد که بیشترین میزان را دریافت کردند
مکمل (1 گرم در کیلوگرم) سطح سین بیوتیک. تعداد E. coli در ایلئوم نبود
تحت تاثیر درمان های غذایی
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
جوجه گوشتی, همزیستی, عملکرد رشد, بافت شناسی روده, میکروبی مستعمره
مراجع
  1. Abdel-Hafeez, H.M., Saleh, E.S., Tawfeek, S.S., Youssef, I.M., Abdel-Daim, AS. Effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on performance, hematological indices and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2017;30(5), 672-682.
  2. Awad, WA, Ghareeb, K, Abdel-Raheem S, Bohm J. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2009;88: 49-55.
  3. Beski SS, Al-Sardary SY. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Probiotic and Synbiotic on Broiler Chickens Hematology and Intestinal Integrity. International Journal of Poultry Science. 2015;14: 31-6.
  4. Beski, S,R.A., Swick, P.I. Effect of dietary inclusion of spray‐dried porcine plasma on performance, some physiological and immunological response of broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella sofia. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2016;100(5): 957-966.
  5. Beski SSM., Physiological and immunological responses of Japanese quails to oleobiotic. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2018;49(2): 291-299.
  6. Chen Y., Cheng Y., Wen C., Kang Y., Wang A., Zhou Y. Effects of Dietary Synbiotic Supplementation as an Alternative to Antibiotic on the Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality, Immunity, and Oxidative Status of Cherry Valley Ducks. J Poult Sci. 2018;55(3):182-189.
  7. Dibaji, S.M., Seidavi, A., Asadpour, L., Da Silva, F.M., Effect of a synbiotic on the intestinal microflora of chickens. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2014;23: 1-6.
  8. Enas, A. E. E-K., Asmaa, S., Garmian, A.O., Effect of antibiotic alternatives inclusion in broilers diet on productive performance, carcass yield and intestinal histology. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal. 2019;39(3): 673-688.
  9. Fuller, R., A Review: Probiotics in Man and Animals. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 1989;66: 365-378.
  10. Gaggìa, F., Mattarelli, P., Biavati, B., Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2010;141: 15-28.
  11. Ghasemi, H.A. and Taherpour, K. Comparative effects of probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic supplements on performance, jejunal morphology, serum lipid profile and antibody response of broiler chicks. Journal of Life Science and Technology. 2013;1:20-27.
  12. Gibson, G.R., Roberfroid, M.B., Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota, introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal of Nutrition. 1995;125: 1401-1412.
  13. Gruzauskas, R., Lekavicius, R., Raceviciute-Stupeliene, A., Sasyte, V., Guarner, F., Inulin and oligofructose: Impact on intestinal diseases and disorders. British Journal of Nutrition, 2004;93: 61-5.
  14. Kamel, E.R., Mohamed, I.S., Effect of dietary supplementation of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, organic acids and enzymes on productive and economic efficiency of broiler chicks. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2016;50(1): 8-17.
  15. Maiorano, G., Bednarczyk, M., Prebiotics and synbiotics in broiler chicken production: in vivo performance and meat quality aspects: A review. Slovak Journal of Animal Science. 2016;49(4): 151-156.
  16. Maiorano, G., Stadnicka, K., Tavaniello, S., Abiuso C., Bogucka, J., Bednarczyk, M., In ovo validation model to assess the efficacy of commercial prebiotics on broiler performance and oxidative stability of meat. Poultry Science. 2017;96:511-518.
  17. Naghi, S. A., Ghasemi, H. A., Taherpour, K., Evaluation of Aloe vera and synbiotic as antibiotic growth promoter substitutions on performance, gut morphology, immune responses and blood constitutes of broiler chickens. Animal Science Journal. 2017;88: 306-313.
  18. Nazarizadeh, H, S., Hosseini, M., Pourreza, J.,. Effect of plant extracts derived from thyme and chamomile on the growth performance, gut morphology and immune system of broilers fed aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A contaminated diet. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2019;18(1): 1073-1081
  19. Qing, X., Zeng, D., Wang, H., Ni, X., Liu, L., Lai, J., Khalique, A., Pan, K., Jing, B. Preventing subclinical necrotic enteritis through Lactobacillus johnsonii BS15 by ameliorating lipid metabolism and intestinal microflora in broiler chickens. AMB Express, 2017;7: 139.
  20. Raksasiri, B.V., Paengkoum, P., Paengkoum, S., Poonsuk, K.,. The effect of supplementation of synbiotic in broiler diets on production performance, intestinal histomorphology and carcass quality. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 2018;14(7): 1743-1754.
  21. Saad, N., Delattre, C., Urdaci, M., Schmitter, J. M., Bressollier, P., An overview of the last advances in probiotic and prebiotic field. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2013;50: 1-16.
  22. Salehimanes, A., Mohammadi, M., Roostaei-Ali, M.,. Effect of dietary probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic supplementation on performance, immune responses, intestinal morphology and bacterial populations in broilers. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2016;100: 694-700.
  23. Sadeq SAM, Wu SB, Choct M, Forder R, Swick RA. Use of yeast cell wall extract as a tool to reduce the impact of necrotic enteritis in broilers. Poultry science. 2015;94(5):898-905.
  24. Tufan T., Bolacali, M., Effects of dietary addition of synbiotic on the performance, carcass traits, and serum parameters of Japanese quails. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2017;46(10), 805-813.
  25. Turndige, J., Antibiotic use in animals-prejudices, perceptions and realities. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2004;53: 26-27.
  26. Yitbarek, A.; Rodriguez-Lecompte, J.C.; Echeverry, H.M.; Munyaka, P.; Barjesteh, N.; Sharif, S.; Camelo-Jaimes, G. Performance, histomorphology, and toll-like receptor, chemokine, and cytokine profile locally and systemically in broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with yeast-derived macromolecules. Poult. Sci. 2013;92: 2299–2310.
  27. Zuamí, Villagrán-de la Mora , Karla Nuño , Olga Vázquez-Paulino, Hugo Avalos, Javier Castro-Rosas , Carlos Gómez-Aldapa, Carlos Angulo , Felipe Ascencio, and Angélica Villarruel-López. Effect of a Synbiotic Mix on Intestinal Structural Changes, and Salmonella Typhimurium and Clostridium Perfringens Colonization in Broiler Chickens. Animals, 2019;9: 777.
  28. Akoy, R., Merrifield D., Davies S. and Beal J. (‘Effect of Probiotic, Prebiotic and Synbiotic Supplementation in the Diet on Performance, Intestinal length and Histology and Gut Microflora of Broiler Chickens . 2015).
  29. Vandenplas, Y., De Greef, E., Devreker, T., Veereman-Wauters, G., Hauser, B., Probiotics and prebiotics in infants and children. Current Infectious Disease Reports, 2013;15: 251-262.
  30. Underdahl, N. R., Torres-Median, A., Doster, A. R.,. Effect of streptococcus faecium C-68 in the control of escherichia coli-induced diarrhea in gnotobiotic pigs. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 1982;43: 2227-2232.
  31. Abdel-Raheem, S. M., Abd-Allah, S. M. S., Hassanein, K. M. A., The effects of prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on intestinal microbial ecology and histomorphology of broiler chickens. International Journal for Agro Veterinary and Medical Sciences, 2012;6: 277-289.
  32. Min, Y. N., Yang, H. L., Xu, Y. X., Gao, Y. P., Effects of dietary supplementation of synbiotics on growth performance, intestinal morphology, sIgA content and antioxidant capacities of broilers. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2016;100: 1073-1080.
  33. Tayeri V, Seidavi A, Asadpour L, Phillips CJ. A comparison of the effects of antibiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and prebiotics on the performance and carcass characteristics of broilers. Veterinary Research Communications. 2018;42(3):195-207.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 109
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 217


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب