| تعداد نشریات | 283 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 81 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,766 |
| تعداد مقالات | 31,497 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 39,698,992 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 17,254,071 |
ارزیابی اثر تاریخ کاشت و برداشت بر عملکرد دو رقم چغندر علوفهای در منطقه جیرفت | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 39، شماره 1، شهریور 1402، صفحه 33-47 | ||
| نوع مقاله: کامل علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2024.364177.1338 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مرتضی اشراقی نژاد* 1؛ مهدی صادقی شعاع2؛ احمد آئین3 | ||
| 1استادیار بخش تحقیقات زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی جنوب استان کرمان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، جیرفت، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار بخش تحقیقات زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی جنوب استان کرمان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اجیرفت، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به‌منظور تعیین رقم مناسب چغندر علوفهای و بهترین تاریخ کاشت و برداشت در منطقه جیرفت، آزمایشی با دو رقم 1025 و لاسینیا در چهار تاریخ کاشت (20 شهریور، 10 مهر، 30 مهر و 20 آبان) و دو تاریخ برداشت (15 اردیبهشت و 15 خرداد) به‌صورت اسپلیت پلات فاکتوریل در دو سال زراعی 1401-1400 و 1401-1402 در مزرعه تحقیقاتی مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی جنوب کرمان اجرا شد. تاریخ کاشت در کرتهای اصلی و تاریخ برداشت و رقم به‌صورت تصادفی در کرتهای فرعی قرار گرفتند. نتایج تجزیه واریانس نشان داد اثر تاریخ کاشت و برداشت بر عملکرد کل، عملکرد ریشه و اندام هوایی، عملکرد ماده خشک ریشه و اندام هوایی، معنیدار بود (P˂ 0.01). اثر رقم بر روی عملکرد ریشه، ماده خشک اندام هوایی و طول ریشه(P˂ 0.01) و ماده خشک ریشه(P˂ 0.05) معنیدار بود. اثر متقابل سهگانه بر عملکرد ریشه، نیز در سطح احتمال یک درصد و عملکرد کل، عملکرد ماده خشک کل، عملکرد ماده خشک ریشه و عملکرد ماده خشک اندام هوایی در سطح اختمال پنج درصد آماری معنیدار بود. ساقهروی تحت تأثیر تاریخ کاشت، رقم و برهم‌کنش آنها قرار گرفت. رقم لاسینیا در همه تاریخهای کاشت نسبت به ساقهروی مقاوم بود. مقایسه اثر میانگین سهگانه نشان داد که بیشترین عملکرد کل (187/38)، عملکرد ریشه (136/77)، ماده خشک کل (69/27)، ماده خشک ریشه (20/39) و ماده خشک اندام هوایی (7/30) بر حسب تن در هکتار مربوط به رقم لاسینیا در تاریخ کاشت 10 مهر و تاریخ برداشت 15 خردادماه بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اندام هوایی؛ چغندر علوفهای؛ ریشه ذخیرهای؛ ماده خشک | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of the effect of sowing and harvesting date on the yield of two fodder beet varieties in Jiroft region | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Morteza Eshraghi-Nejad1؛ Mehdi Sadeghi-shoae2؛ Ahmad Aien3 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor of Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Southern Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Jiroft, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Southern Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Jiroft, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In order to determine the suitable fodder beet variety and the best planting and harvest dates in Jiroft region, an experiment was performed. Treatments consisted of two cultivars called 1025 and Lacinia, four planting dates (11 September, 02 October, 22 October, and 11 November) and two harvest dates (5 May and 5 June) evaluated in factorial split plot in 2021-2022 and 2022-23 in the research farm of the South Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center. Planting dates were assigned in main plots and harvest dates and genotype were randomly placed in sub-plots. Results of analysis of variance showed that the effect of planting and harvest dates on all studied traits including total yield, root and shoot yield, as well as root and shoot dry matter yield were significant (P ˂ 0.01). The effect of cultivar on root yield, root length, shoot dry matter (P ˂ 0.01) and root dry matter (P ˂ 0.05) was significant. The triple interaction effect was significant on all studied traits, except for shoot yield. Bolting was affected by planting date, variety and their interaction. Lacinia was resistant to bolting in all sowing dates. Comparison of the triple mean effect showed that the highest total yield (187.38 tha-1), root yield (136.77 t ha-1), total dry matter (27.69 tha-1), root dry matter (20.39 t ha-1) and shoot dry matter (7.30 tha-1) was related to the Lacinia on planting date of 10 October and harvesting date of 5 June. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Dry matter, Fodder beet, Root length, Shoot, Storage root | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Al Jbawi E, Shamsham S, Shams Aldeen H. The response of some productivity and quality traits of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to organic and potassium fertilizers in Syria. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2018;34(1):121-130. doi:10.22092/JSB.2018.121594.1190. [In Persian]
Alami L, Terouzi W, Otmani M, Abdelkhalek O, Salmaoui S, Mbarki M. Effect of sugar beet harvest date on its technological quality parameters by exploratory analysis. Journal of Food Quality. 2021;2021:1-8. doi:10.1155/2021/6639612
Albayrak S, Camas N. Effects of temperature and light intensity on growth of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. crassa Mansf.). Bangladesh Journal of Botany. 2007;36(1):1-12.
Albayrak S, YÜKSEL O. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and harvest time on root yield and quality of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris var. crassa Mansf.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2010;15(1):59-64.
Al-Jbawi E, Bagdadi M, Nemr Y. The effect of plant spacing on some quality traits of fodder beet (Beta Vulgaris var. crassa) varieties. International Journal Of Environment. 2014;3(3):286-293.
Al-Jbawi E, Bagdadi M, Nemr Y. The productivity of four fodder beet cultivars (Beta vulgaris var. crassa) affected by autumn and winter sowing. International Journal of Environment. 2015;4(3):121-129.
Boiffin J, Durr C, Fleury A, Marin-Laflèche A, Maillet I. Analysis of the variability of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) growth during the early stages. I. Influence of various conditions on crop establishment. Agronomie. 1992; 12(7):515-525.
Bonhomme R. Bases and limits to using ‘degree. day’units. European journal of agronomy. 2000;13(1):1-10. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00058-7
Brooking I. How does temperature influence crop yield? Weather and Climate. 1991; 11(2):139-142. doi:10.2307/44279812
Chakwizira E, Dellow S, Teixeira E. Quantifying canopy formation processes in fodder beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris var. alba L.) crops. European Journal of Agronomy. 2016; 74:144-154. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.12.003
Collie B, McKenzie B, editors. Dry matter accumulation of three turnip (Brassica campestris L.) cultivars sown on five dates in Canterbury. Proceedings Agronomy Society of New Zealand; 1998.
Dress AM, Hassan AM, Mostafa E. Physical and mechanical properties of fodder beet in related to cutting process. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 2014; 31(3):983-1000. doi:10.21608/mjae.2014.99107
Finch-Savage W, Steckel J, Phelps K. Germination and post-germination growth to carrot seedling emergence: predictive threshold models and sources of variation between sowing occasions. The New Phytologist. 1998; 139(3):505-516. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00208.x
Ghafari S, Sadeghi Shoae M, Mirhadi M, Ghasemkhan Ghajar F. Evaluation of the effect of nano-micronutrients and growth-promoting bacteria on quantitative and qualitative yield of different forage beet cultivars. . Tehran: Islamic Azad University, Research Sciences Branch; 2018. [In Persian]
Halvorson A, Hartman G. Response of Several Sugarbeet Cultivars to N Fertilization: Yield and Crown Tissue Production 1. Agronomy journal. 1980; 72(4):665-669. doi:10.2134/agronj1980.00021962007200040023x
Hassan KH, Hassany W. Effect of Sowing Dates and Method on Fodder Beet Productivity under Saline Conditions at Siwa Oasis, Egypt. Journal of Plant Production. 2017;8(11):1121-1125. doi:10.21608/jpp.2017.41128
Hosseinpour, Agha Alikhani M, Taleghani D, Sharifi H. The effect of length of growing season on water use efficiency and yield of two sugar beet cultivars in Khuzestan. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 2007; 30(2):89-105. [In Persian]
Hussein A, Field R. Effect of sovving date, plant population ‘and planting method on the growth and dry matter yield of sugar beet. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural. 1991;28(2).
Ibrahim Y. Ranges and forage In Arabic. Dar Azza for Publication, Khartoum, Sudan, 300p. 2005.
Jaggard K, Qi A, Ober E. Capture and use of solar radiation, water, and nitrogen by sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of experimental botany. 2009; 60(7):1919-1925. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp110
Khani Chegeni A, Sadeghi Shoae M, Habibi D. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative yield response and water use efficiency of fodder beet cultivars under different irrigation conditions. Karaj: Islamic Azad University; 2017. [In Persian]
Khaembah EN, Maley S, George M, Chakwizira E, Ruiter JD, Rob Zyskowski R, Teixeira E. Crop growth and development dynamics oftwo fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars sown on different dates in New Zealand, New ZealandJournal of Agricultural Research, 2020, 63(3)449-463.doi:10.1080/00288233.2019.1692042
Lauer JG. Sugar beet performance and interactions with planting date, genotype, and harvest date. Agronomy journal. 1997;89(3):469-475.doi:10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900030017x
Lee GS, Dunn G, Schmehl W. Effect of date of planting and nitrogen fertilization on growth components of sugar beet. American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists. 1987;24:80-100.
Martin R, Drewitt E, Sinton S, Tabley F, Nicoll A, editors. Effect of sowing date on the yield and sugar content of sugar beet and fodder beet at four sites. Proceedings Twelfth Annual Conference Agronomy Society of New Zealand; 1982. doi:10.1080/03015521.1983.10427753
Martin R. Radiation interception and growth of sugar beet at different sowing dates in Canterbury. New Zealand journal of agricultural research. 1986; 29(3):381-390. doi:10.1080/00288233.1986.10423490
Matthew C, Nelson N, Ferguson D, Xie Y. Fodder beet revisited. Agronomy New Zealand. 2011;41:39-48.
McCormick S, Thomsen D, editors. Beet production for ethanol in Waikato: yields and problems encountered in growing the crop. Proceedings Agronomy Society of New Zealand; 1983.
Ministry of Agriculture Jihad (MAJ). 2022. Communications and information technology center. Available at Web site http://amar.maj.ir/ [In Persian]
Moghadam J, Ebrahim P, Mahmoudi, Sohrab, M. Ahmadi. Effect of planting date and cultivar on yield and the early flowering in autumn sowing of sugar beet varieties. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breding 2017;13(2):43-57.
Morrison M, McVetty P. Leaf appearance rate of summer rape. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 1991;71(2):405-412. doi:10.4141/cjps91-056
Nelson J. Influence of planting date, nitrogen rate, and harvest date on yield and sucrose concentration of fall-planted sugarbeets in central Arizona. ASSBTJ. 1978; 20(1):25-32.
Pembleton K, Rawnsley R. Optimising the establishment of fodder beet to maximise yields on Tasmanian Dairy Farms. 2011.
Roberts D. The effects of feeding fodder beet to dairy cows offered silage ad libitum. Grass and Forage Science. 1987;42(4):391-395. doi:102.100.100/503978
Salama SAH, Zeid M. Fodder Beet (Beta Vulgaris L.) yield and quality attributes as affected by sowing date, age at harvest and boron application. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal. 2017; 38(January-March):1-12. doi:10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2017.1613
Sadeghi Shoae M, Aghaeezadeh M, Rahnamaeian M. Purification and Preparation of New Fodder Beet Masses; Final Report of Sugar Beet Seed Institute,(SBSI). Journal of Sugar Beet. 2019. [In Persian]
Scott R, editor The comparative productivity and utilisation of some winter forage crops. Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand; 1971.
Shalaby A, Rammah A, Abdul Aziz G, Beshay M. Fodder beet, a new forage in Egypt. 1. Productivity and the chemical analysis of some fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars sown at different locations in Egypt. Proceedings Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University (Egypt). 1990;1:133-1343.
Smit A. The influence of sowing date and plant density on the decision to resow sugar beet. Field Crops Research. 1993; 34(2):159-173. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(93)90004-7
Stocker N, Saldias B, Brosnahan R, Donnelly L, Gibbs SJ, editors. Effect of sowing date on plant count, true-leaf growth stage and vernalisation of fodder beet and sugar beet2016: Agronomy Society of New Zealand.
Ulrich A, Terry N. RS Loomis. Advances in Sugarbeet Production: Principles and Practices. 1971:19.
Wickson EJ. The California Vegetables in Garden and Field: A Manual of Practice with and Without Irrigation for Semitropical Countries: Pacific rural press; 1917. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 53 |
||