| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,920 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,916 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 43,320,247 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 19,812,427 |
تاثیر پوشش دهی شیمیایی و زیستی بذر بر مهار بیماری مرگ گیاهچه چغندرقند در شرایط گلخانه | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 39، شماره 1، شهریور 1402، صفحه 53-66 اصل مقاله (662.72 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کامل علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2024.362328.1329 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سیدباقر محمودی* 1؛ مجتبی رستم آبادی2؛ سعید صادق‌زاده‌حمایتی3؛ مژده کاکوئی نژاد4 | ||
| 1دانشیار مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند- سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد بیماری‌شناسی گیاهی، شرکت فناوری زیستی طبیعت گرا (بایوران(، کرج، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند- سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران | ||
| 4استادیار مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به‌منظور افزایش استقرار بوته‌ی چغندرقند در مزرعه، کاربرد هم‌زمان آفت‌کش‌ها و مواد زیستی در پوشش بذر مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. دو حشره‌کش گائوچو و کروزر، دو قارچ‌کش ویتاواکس و لاماردور و سه ترکیب زیستی پروببو 96، بایوفارم و تریکوران در قالب 19 تیمار روی بذر چغندرقند رقم شریف پوشش‌دهی شدند. سپس تیمارها در خاک آلوده به بیمارگر ریزوکتونیا (Rhizoctonia solani) و پیتیوم (Pythium aphanidermatum)و همچنین خاک سالم و بدون آلودگی در شرایط گلخانه کشت شدند. آزمایش به‌صورت کرت‌های یکبار خرد شده بر مبنای طرح کاملاً تصادفی در سه تکرار در گلخانه انجام شد. درصد سبز شدن و وزن تر و خشک بوته اندازه‌گیری شد. نتایج نشان داد که در شرایط آلوده به پیتیوم تیمارهای بایوفارم+ ویتاواکس+ کروزر و پروببو 96+ ویتاواکس + کروزر و در شرایط آلوده به ریزوکتونیا تیمار بایوفارم + لاماردور + کروزر برتر بودند. در شرایط خاک بدون آلودگی تیمار بایوفارم+ لاماردور+ کروزر از وزن خشک بیشتری برخوردار بود. به این ترتیب به نظر می‌رسد که ترکیب هم‌زمان حشره‌کش کروزر، قارچ‌کش‌های ویتاواکس و لاماردور و مواد زیستی بایوفارم و پروبیو 96روی بذر چغندرقند موجب افزایش درصد سبزشدن و رشد بوته می‌شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| پوشش بذر؛ تیمار بذر؛ چغندرقند؛ قارچ‌کش؛ محرک رشد؛ مهار زیستی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of chemical and biological seed coating on control of sugar beet damping off under greenhouse condition | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| S.B. Mahmoudi1؛ M. Rostamabadi2؛ S. Sadeghzadeh Hemayati3؛ M. Kakueinezhad4 | ||
| 1Associate professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 2Ms. of Plant pathologist, Nature Biotechnology company (Biorun), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 4Assistant professor of Seed and Plant Improvement Institute- Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In order to increase plant establishment in the field, the simultaneous application of pesticides and biological agents on seed coating of sugar beet was evaluated. Two insecticides namely Gaucho and Cruiser, two fungicides called Vitavax and Lamardor and three biological compounds including Probio 96, Biofarm and Trichran were coated on sugar beet seeds of cultivar Sharif in the form of 19 treatments. Treatments were grown in soil contaminated with Rhizoctonia solani and Pythium aphanidermatum, pathogens as well as healthy and uncontaminated soil under greenhouse conditions. The experiment was conducted in split plot based on a completely randomized design with three replications in the greenhouse. Germination percentage, and fresh and dry weight of the plant were measured. Results showed that under Pythium contamination, combination of Biofarm, Vitavax and Cruiser and combination of Probo96, vitavax and Cruiser were superior, and under R. solani contamination, combination of Biofarm, Lamardor and Cruiser were superior. Under uncontaminated soil condition, combination of Biofarm, Lamardor, Cruiser resulted in higher dry weight. Therefore, it seems that the simultaneous combination of Cruiser insecticide, Vitavax and Lamardor fungicides and Biofarm and Probio96 biological agents on sugar beet seed results in increase in germination percentage as well as plant growth. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Biocontrol, Fungicide, Growth promoter, Seed treatment, Sugar beet | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abrinbana M, Babai-Ahary A, Madjidi Heravan I. Assessment of resistance in sugarbeet lines to damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum Trow var. ultimum under greenhouse conditions. Plant Pathology Journal, 2007; 6:266-270. doi:10.3923/ppj.2007.266.270. Ahmadinejad A. Seedling diseases of sugar beet in Iran and the effects of some fungicides on the causal agents. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology. 1973; 9(3-4):129-141. [In Persian] Akbari AR, Gharanjik S, Koobaz P, Karimi E, Sadeghi A. Evaluation of mutual effect of ectoine(s) producing Streptomyces and wheat at salt condition. Crop Biotechnology. 2016; 13:57-68. doi: 20.1001.1.22520783.1395.6.13.5.7. Bahramian F, Abbasi Surki A, Jamali Zavare A, Sharaifzadeh F. Effect of bio-priming on germination and growth of sugar beet cultivars (Beta vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Seed Science and Technology. 2018; 6(2):241-255. doi:10.22034/IJSST.2018.116809. [In Persian] Bashan Y, Holguin G, de-Bashan LE. Azospirillum- plant relationships: Physiological, molecular, agricultural and environmental advances. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2004; 50: 521-577. doi:10.1139/w04-035. Bennett AJ, Whipps JM. Beneficial microorganism survival on seed, roots and in rhizosphere soil following application to seed during drum priming. Biological Control. 2008; 44 (3):349-361. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.11.005. Copeland LO, McDonald MF. Principles of seed science and technology. S.L. Springer; 2012. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1619-4. Ehteshami S, Hakimian F, Yousefi Rad M, Chaichi M. Effect of Integrated management of phosphorus fertilizer on grain yield and its components in two varieties of winter barley. Pajohesh and Sazandegi. 2013; 101:193-201. [In Persian] Ghadiri V, Arjmand M. Comparison of three control methods, spraying, usual seed treatment and seed treatment plus pelleting in order to control beet flea beetle, beet root weevil and beet leaf weevil in the Karaj area. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2000; 15(1):72-83. doi:10.22092/JSB.2000.109553. [In Persian] Hansen Al, Raaijmakers E, Antoons K, Wauters A, Kempl F, Stevens M, Boyer F, Varrelmann M. Effect of insecticides and strategies of insecticide application on the control of Atomaria linearis and other soil borne pests. 77th IIRB Congress, 2020, Brussels. P.17. Harveson RM, Windels CE, Smith JA, Brantner JR, Cattanach AW, Giles JF. Fungicide Registration and a Small Niche Market: A case history of Hymexazol seed treatment and the U.S. sugar beet industry. Plant Disease. 2007; 91(7):780–90. doi:10.1094/PDIS-91-7-0780. Johnson EN, Miller PR, Blackshaw RE, Gan Y, Harker KN, Clayton GW. Seeding date and polymer seed coating effects on plant establishment and yield of fall-seeded canola in the Northern Great Plains. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2004; 84(4):955–63. doi.org/10.4141/P04-005. Kakueinezhad M, Mahmoudi SB, Chegini MA. Investigation on the effect of a combination of several fungicides in controlling Pythium aphanidermatum, the causal agent of sugar beet damping off. Second National Seed Technology Conference, Department of Agriculture Mashhad Branch of Islamic Azad University, 2011, Mashhad. P.2167-2170. [In Persian] Kakueinezhad M, Mahmoudi SB, Noroozi P, Soltani J. Pathogenic variability of Pythium aphanidermatum isolates the causal agent of sugar beet root rot in Iran. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology. 2013; 80(2): 131-144. doi:10.22092/jaep.2013.100566. Karimi E, Safaie N, Shamsbakhsh M, Mahmoudi SB. Control of seedling damping-off disease on sugar beet caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2 by endophytic fungi and resistance inducer compounds as seed treatment. Plant Protection (Scientific Journal of Agriculture). 2015; 38(4):33-52. doi: 10.22055/PPR.2015.11391. [In Persian] Kaufman G. Seed coating: a tool for stand establishment; a stimulus to seed quality. Hort Technology. 1991; 1:98-102. doi:10.21273/HORTTECH.1.1.98. Kiewnick S, Jacobsen BJ, Braun-Kiewnick A, Eckhoff JL, Bergman J. Integrated control of Rhizoctonia crown and root rot of sugar beet with fungicides and antagonistic bacteria. Plant Disease. 2001; 85(7):718-22. doi:10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.7.718. Mahmoudi B, Toudeh FallahM, Arjmand MN, Nihlgaard M. Ethiological studies of fungal agents of sugar beet root rot in Karadj and their role on postharvest decay of roots. 14th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, Esfahan Technology University.2000; P. 256. [In Persian] Mahmoudi SB, Mesbah M, Rahimian H, Alizadeh A, Noruzi P. Genetic diversity of sugar beet isolates of Rhizoctonia solani revealed by RAPD-PCR and ITS-rDNA analysis. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology. 2005; 41:523-542. [In Persian] Mahmoudi SB, Soltani J. Sugar beet root rot in Iran. Newsletter of Iranian Sugar Industries Research and Training Center. 2005; 16(178):14-18. [In Persian] Mirzaei MR. Effect of using different fungicides and insecticides in sugar beet seed coating on germination traits. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2020; 36(1):57-70. doi:10.22092/JSB.2021.341621.1233. [In Persian] Mirzaei MR. Effect of using different fungicides and insecticides in maize seed coating on germination traits. Iranian Journal of Seed Science and Technology. 2021; 10(1):69-82. doi:10.22092/jsb.2021.341621.1233. Maude RB, Shuing CG. Seed treatments with vitavax for the control of loose smut of wheat and barley. Annals of Applied Biology. 1969; 64(2):259-263. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1969.tb02876.x. Orazizadeh MR, Sharifi H, Sadeghian SY, Aghaeezadeh M, Vahedi S, Habib Khodaee A. Sharif, a new bolting tolerant sugar beet variety suitable for autumn sowing. Journal of Sugar beet. 2015; 31 (2):131-140. doi: 10.22092/JSB.2016.105778. [In Persian] Papavizas GC, Davey CB. Isolation and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia saprophytically existing in soil. Phytopathology. 1962; 52:834-40. Ramezani- Moghaddam M, Jahanbakhsh V, Mehdikhani-Moghaddam S, Baghaie-Ravari S, Rouhani H. Investigation on plant growth promoter isolates of Bacillus on colonization of tomato roots and its effects on decreasing population density of Meloidogyne javanica. Journal of Plant Protection. 2014; 28(1):79-86. [In Persian] Rezalou Z, Shahbazi S, Askari H. Effect of biopriming with Trichoderma on germination and vegetative characteristics of sweet corn, sugar beet and wheat. Iranian Journal of Seed Science and Technology. 2020; 8(2):199-210. doi:10.22034/ijsst.2018.121197.1182. [In Persian] Sacristán- Pérez- Minayo G, López- Robles DJ, Javier C, Miranda-Barroso L. Microbial inoculation for productivity improvements and potential biological control in sugar beet crops. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020; 11. doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.604898. Safaie D, Younesi H, Sheikholeslami M, Nasrollahi M, Shetab- Bushehri M, Razavi M, Kazemi H. Introduction of the new fungicides, Lopcel and Lamardor, to control common bunt of wheat under irrigated conditions. In: Proceedings of the 19th Iranian Plant Protection Congress; 2010. [In Persian] Sheikhi Garjan A, Najafipour H, Abbasi S, Azimi H, Moradi M. A guide to chemical and organic pesticides in Iran. Tehran: Rahdan Publishing. 2023. [In Persian] Sindhu SS, Jangu OP. Differential response of inoculation with indole acetic acid producing Pseudomonas sp. in green gram (Vigna radiata L.) and black gram (Vigna mungo L.). Microbiol Journal. 2011; 1(5):159-73. doi:10.3923/mj.2011.159.173. Taleghani D, Alimoradi I, Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S, Mohammadian R, Mahmoudi SB, Determining sugar beet potential yield at different growth stages. Bimeh va Keshavarzi (Insurance and Agriculture), 2014; 10(38): 9-30. [In Persian] Tork N, Mahmoudi SB, Rezapanah MR, Pirnia M. Study of antagonistic effects of Trichoderma isolates to control of sugar beet damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia solani and Pythium aphanidermatum. 7th congress on advances in Agriculture Research. 2014; Kurdestan, 204-208. [In Persian] Tuğrul KM. Sugar beet seed and seed processing. Scholars’ press. 2022; pp. 48. Wang H, Davis M, Mauk P. Effects of irrigation, planting depth, and fungicide seed treatment on sugar beet stand establishment. Journal of Sugar Beet Research. 1995; 32(1):1–7. Van der Plaats-Niterink AJ. Monograph of the genus Pythium. Studies in Mycology. 1981; 21:1-242. Zeybek A, Dogan T, Özkan, İ. The effects of seed coating treatment on yield and yield components in some cotton (Gossypiumhirsitum L.) varieties. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2010 23;9(37):6078–84. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 157 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 184 |
||