| تعداد نشریات | 285 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 83 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,800 |
| تعداد مقالات | 31,788 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 40,293,925 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 17,741,446 |
بررسی میدان جریان نزدیک شونده به عرشه پل در مقاطع مرکب با پوشش گیاهی | ||
| تحقیقات مهندسی سازه های آبیاری و زهکشی | ||
| دوره 24، شماره 92، اسفند 1402، صفحه 69-87 اصل مقاله (1.83 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/idser.2024.364964.1573 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی دان کو1؛ حجت الله یونسی* 2؛ مجتبی صانعی3 | ||
| 1کارشناس شرکت آب منطقه ای استان قزوین | ||
| 2عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه لرستان | ||
| 3عضو هیات علمی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در زمان بروز پدیده سیلاب در رودخانهها و افزایش تراز سطح آب، اکثراً عرشه پلها مستغرق خواهد شد. در این شرایط جریان عبوری از زیر عرشه بهصورت تحت فشار رفتار خواهد کرد. پیش بینی میدان جریان در کانالهای مرکب به علت ماهیت سه بُعدی جریان برای مهندسین هیدرولیک امری دشوار تلقی میشود. شرایط تحت فشار و اختلاف زبری بین کانال اصلی و سیلابدشتها از عوامل پیچیدهتر شدن تحلیل پارامترهای هیدرولیکی جریان در کانالهای مرکب میباشد. در این پژوهش، آزمایشها با پوشش گیاهی صُلب غیرمستغرق و با سه عرض مختلف سیلابدشت و چهار تراکم مختلف پوشش گیاهی با سه عمق نسبی متفاوت انجام شده است. نتایج نشان داد افزایش تراکم پوشش گیاهی باعث افزایش سرعت طولی در کانال اصلی و کاهش آن در سیلابدشت میشود و همچنین افزایش تراکم پوشش گیاهی، بهطور متوسط باعث کاهش 17 درصد مشارکت سیلابدشت در عبور دبی عبوری از مقطع کانال مرکب میگردد. وجود عرشه پل و شرایط جریان تحت فشار باعث پسزدگی جریان شده که منتج به کاهش سرعت جریان و دبی جریان عبوری از زیر عرشه پل می شود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| سرعت میانگین عمقی؛ مقاطع مرکب؛ پایه پل؛ ضریب تصحیح انرژی؛ تصحیح اندازه حرکت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the flow field approaching the bridge deck in compound open channels with vegetation | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| ali dankoo1؛ Hojjat Allah Yonesi2؛ Mojtaba Saneie3 | ||
| 1Expert of regional water company of Qazvin province | ||
| 2Lorestan University, Water Engineering Department | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of River and Coastal Engineering, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute (SCWMRI), | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction With the occurrence of flood, the velocity and depth of the flow in the river increases and the flow enters the flood plains. The velocity difference between the deeper section and the shallow area causes the transfer of momentum between these areas and complicates the flow structure. The formation process of secondary flows and its pattern in compound channels have been investigated by researchers such as:Tominaga & Nezu, 1991. The presence of vegetation on flood plains causes complexity in the analysis of hydraulic problems of compound channels. For example, Hamidifar et al. (2012, 2014), using laboratory measurements, showed that the presence of vegetation reduces the flow through the cross section by about 30%. At the same time as the water level rises during the flood, the deck of the bridges will go under water and the current passing under it will be pressurized. In this condition, the flow field is affected by the presence of vegetation, compound channel and pressurized flow. In this research, the laboratory investigation of these complex conditions has been done. Methodology The experiments of this research were done with 3 geometric ratios of the compound cross-section, 3 relative depths, 3 vegetation densities, and control experiments in a compound channel with a length of 10 meters and a width of 1.5 meters. The measurement of the flow velocity parameter, the scouring rate of the bridge pier in the conditions of pressurized flow has been done according to the variables mentioned above. Results and Discussion Comparison of depth velocity and logarithmic velocity distribution in the condition without vegetation on the flood plain, the sign shows that in all sections, the distance between the channel bed and the water surface, the difference between the measured velocity values with the logarithmic distribution of the velocity increases. This difference is due to the presence of the bridge deck and the flow retardation. Also, vegetation causes the depth distribution profile of flow velocity to deviate from the curve of logarithmic flow velocity, and the biggest difference will occur in the upstream area between the interface of main channel and flood plain. This phenomenon increases the amount of apparent shear stress between the main channel and the floodplain. With the increase in the density of vegetation, the percentage of floodplain participation in the total discharge is reduced by 20%. The highest participation percentage of floodplain is about 30% in the state without vegetation. In different densities of vegetation with an increase in relative depth from 0.3 to 0.5, the percentage of floodplain participation in the total discharge is less than 10%. With the increase in the density of vegetation, the difference between the percentage of floodplain participation in different cross section widths has decreased. Conclusions The findings of recent research to check hydraulic parameters can be summarized as follows: - Increasing the density of vegetation increases the longitudinal velocity in the main channel and decreases it in the floodplain. - Longitudinal velocity and averaged- depth velocity in the main channel in the case without vegetation is lower than the case with vegetation. - Increasing the relative depth increases the percentage of floodplain participation by an average of 5%, and the increase in vegetation density causes a decrease of 17% in the floodplain participation. - With the increase in the vegetation density of the floodplain, the velocity changes in the floodplain decrease compared to the main channel. - Examining the profiles of the depth distribution of the flow shows that due to the presence of the bridge deck and the retardation of the flow, the depth distribution differs greatly from the logarithmic distribution of the velocity . This is despite the fact that in the conditions without the presence of the bridge deck, this amount of difference reaches its minimum. - The presence of the bridge deck and the creation of backwaters reduce the difference in flow velocity in the main channel and floodplain upstream of the bridge, and this in turn reduces the strength of the secondary currents between floodplain and the main channel. - The difference between the global average velocity of the flow and the local velocities increases the slope of the (a-1) and (b-1) lines due to the flow retardation. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Depth average velocity, compound channel, bridge pier, Energy correction coefficient, momentum correction coefficient | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ackers, P. (1993). Flow Formulae for straight two-stage channels. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 31(4), 509- 531. Ahmad, M., Ghani, U., Anjum, N., Pasha, G. A., Ullah, M. K. & Ahmed, A. (2020). Investigating the flow hydrodynamics in a compound channel with layered vegetated floodplains. Civil Engineering Journal, 6(5), 860-876. Chao, W., Sha-Sha, ZH., Pei-fang, W. & Jun, H. (2015). Interaction betwee vegetation, waterflow and sedimenttransport. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 27(1), 24-37. Choi, S. U. & Kang, H. (2004). Reynolds stress modeling of vegetated open-channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 42(1), pp. 3-11. Chow, V. T. (1959). Open channel hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, London, International Student Edition. Darby, S. E. & Thorne, C. R. (1996). Predicting stage-discharge curves in channels with bank vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 122(10), 583-586. Drikvaandi,K., Fathi Moghadam,M.,Masjedi,A.R.& Bina,M.(2012). Evaluation Effect of Density and Flaxibility of Non-Submerged Vegetation on River Banks and Floodplains on the Friction Factors. Journal of IranWater Resources Research,8(2),24-35. Fathi-Moghadam, M. & Drikvandi, K. (2012). Manning roughness coefficient for rivers and flood plains with non-submerged vegetation. International. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1(1), 1-4. Ghisalberti, M. & Nepf, H. M. (2004). The limited growth of vegetated shear layers”, Water Resources Research, 40(7), 2004. Gholi nejad,j., Zahiri,A.R.,Dehghani,A.A.& Mahdavi,E.(2011). Investigating the effect of vegetation on flow hydraulics in floodplains. . The first national conference on civil development, Rasht, Islamic Azad University-Zibakonar. Hamidifar, H., Omid, M.H. & Keshavarzi, A.R. (2013). Mean Flow and Turbulence in Compound Channels with Vegetated Floodplains. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 14(3), 51-66. Hamidifar, H., Omid, M.H. & Keshavarzi, A.R. (2015). Effect of Floodplain Submerged and Non-submerged Vegetation on the Transverse Mixing Coefficient of Pollutants, Journal of Hydraulics,10(1),13-23. Knight, D. W. & Hamed, M. E. (1984). Boundary shear in symmetrical compound channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110(10), 1412-1430. Koftis, T. & Prinos, P. (2018). Reynolds stress modelling of flow in compound channels with vegetated floodplains. Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research, 6(1), 17-27. Liu, C., Luo, X., Liu, X. & Yang, K. (2013). Modeling depth-averaged velocity and bed shear stress in compound channels with emergent and submerged vegetation. Advances in Water Resources, 60, 148-159. Liu, C., Shan, Y., Yang, K., Liu, X. (2013). The characteristics of secondary flows in compound channels with vegetated floodplains. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 25(3), 422-429. Mohseni, M., Valisamani,J.M.& Ayyoubzadeh,S.A. (2014). Depth-averaged Velocity Distribution in Compound Channel with Vegetated Floodplains, Rigid Vegetation on Floodplain, Journal of Hydraulics,8(3),63-75. Mohseni, M. (2017). Velocity Distribution and Boundary Shear Stress in a Compound Channel with Emergent, Rigid Vegetation on Floodplain, 8th National Conference on Watershed and Soil and Water Resources Management. Mohseni, M.& Tavakoli nezhadallahabadi,F. (2021). Experimental Study of Vertical velocity profiles in compound channels with vegetation on floodplains, Journal of Hydraulics,15(4),31-45. Montakhab, A., Yusuf, B., Ghazali, A. H. & Mohamed, T. A. (2012). Flow and sediment transport in vegetated waterways. a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 11(3), 275-287. Myers, R. C. & Elsawy, E. M. (1975). Boundary shear in channel with flood plain. Journal of the hydraulics Division, 101(7), 933-946. Myers, W. R. C., Lyness, J. F. & Cassells, J. (2001). Influence of boundary roughness on velocity and discharge in compound river channels. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 39(3), 311-319. Naot, D., Nezu, I. & Nakagawa, H. (1993). Hydrodynamic behavior of compound rectangular open channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 119(3), 390-408. Nepf, H. M. & Vivoni, E. R. (2000). Flow structure in depth‐limited, vegetated flow. Journal of Geophysical Research. Oceans, 105(12), 28547-28557. Nezu, I., Tominaga, A. & Nakagawa, H. (1993). Field measurements of secondary currents in straight rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 119(5), 598-614. Pasche, E. & Rouve, G. (1985). Overbank flow with vegetatively roughened flood plains. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 111(9), 1262-1278. Samadirahim, A.,Yonesi, HA., Shahinejad, B. & Torabipoudeh, H. (2021). Experimental Investigation of Floodplain Vegetation Density Effect on Flow Hydraulic in Divergent Compound Channels. Journal of Hydraulics, 16(1), 111-130. 10.30482/JHYD.2021.266367.1502 Sellin, R. H. J. (1964). A laboratory investigation into the interaction between the flow in the channel of a river and that over its flood plain. La Houille Blanche, 7, 793-802. Shiono, K. & Knight, D W. (1991). Turbulent open-channel flows with variable depth across the channel, J of Fluid Mech, 222.17-646. https.//doi.org/10.1017/S0022112091001246. Struve, J., Falconer, R. A. & Wu, Y. (2003). Influence of model mangrove trees on the hydrodynamics in a flume. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 58(1), 163-171. Sun, X., Shiono, K., Fu, X. Y., Yang, K. J. & Huang, T. L. (2013). Application of Shiono and Knight method to compound open channel flow with one-line emergent vegetation”, In Advanced Materials Research, 663, 930-935. Tominaga, A. & Nezu, I. (1991). Turbulent structure in compound open-channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 117(1), 21–41. Yang, K., Cao, S. & Knight, D.W. (2007). Flow patterns in compound channels with vegetated floodplains. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133(2), 148-159. Yang, Z., Li, D., Huai, W. & Liu, J. (2019). A new method to estimate flow conveyance in a compound channel with vegetated floodplains based on energy balance. Journal of Hydrology, 575, 921-929. Yonesi,H.A., Omid,M.H& Ayyoubzadeh,S.A.(2019). Investigation of hydraulic flow and sediment transport in non-prismatic compound channels, Journal of Hydraulics,14(2),89-104. Zhang, M., Jiang, C., Huang, H., Nanson, G. C., Chen, Z. & Yao, W. (2017). Analytical models for velocity distributions in compound channels with emerged and submerged vegetated floodplains. Chinese Geographical Science, 27(4), 577-588. Zong, L. & Nepf, H. (2011). Spatial distribution of deposition within a patch of vegetation. Water Resources Research, 47(3). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 55 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 71 |
||