| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,049 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,082 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 46,517,680 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 77,568,082 |
عوامل موثر بر بروز عارضه اختلال در غلافبندی و عملکرد دانه سویا [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] در استان گلستان | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| دوره 39، شماره 1، فروردین 1402، صفحه 92-67 اصل مقاله (1.25 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/spj.2023.363200.1317 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ابوالفضل فرجی* 1؛ مجتبی سوخته سرایی2؛ حمید نجفی خان ببین2؛ ثمانه ملک شاهکویی3؛ حسین عجم نوروزی4؛ محمدرضا داداشی5؛ کمال پیغام زاده6؛ مریم غزاییان7 | ||
| 1استاد، بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران | ||
| 2دکترای زراعت، سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان گلستان | ||
| 3دکترای حشره شناسی کشاورزی، سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان گلستان | ||
| 4دانشیار، گروه زراعت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد گرگان،گرگان، ایران | ||
| 5استادیار، گروه زراعت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد گرگان،گرگان، ایران | ||
| 6استادیار، بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران | ||
| 7کارشناس ارشد، بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در چهار دهه گذشته، عارضه اختلال در غلافبندی یکی از مهمترین عوامل موثر درکاهش عملکرد دانه و تولید سویا در استان گلستان بوده است. بهمنظور بررسی تاثیر عوامل مدیریتی بر پیشگیری از عارضه اختلال در غلافبندی و کاهش عملکرد دانه سویا، 80 مزرعه سویا در دو منطقه گرگان و علی‌آباد که رقم کتول را کشت کرده بودند، در سالهای 1397 و1398 ، انتخاب شدند. تجزیه رگرسیونی گام به گام نشان داد که از بین متغیرهای مختلف، مدل عملکرد دانه با سه متغیر و بهصورتYield = -442.5 + 6.9 X1 + 180.2 X2 + 866.2 X3 بود، که در آن X1 مصرف کود پتاسیم، X2 تعداد دفعات آبیاری و X3 تعداد دفعات سمپاشی علیه آفات می باشند. از بین اجزای شکاف عملکرد دانه، سهم مصرف پتاسیم 19/2درصد، تعداد دفعات آبیاری 18/7درصد و تعداد دفعات سمپاشی علیه آفات 62/1درصد بود که نشاندهنده درجه اهمیت عوامل ذکر شده جهت بهبود عملکرد دانه بود. از 80 مزرعه مورد بررسی، 15 مزرعه دچار عارضه اختلال در غلافبندی کامل و 18 مزرعه نیز دچار درصدهایی از عارضه شده بودند. میانگین عملکرد دانه در مزارع سالم 3039 کیلوگرم در هکتار و در مزارع با درصدهایی متفاوت از عارضه 848 کیلوگرم در هکتار بود. نتایج این مطالعه نشان دهنده اهمیت مدیریت صحیح آفات در کنترل و پیشگیری از عارضه اختلال در غلافبندی سویا بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| سویا؛ مدیریت مزرعه؛ کود پتاسیم؛ کنترل آفات؛ شکاف عملکرد | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Factors Affecting the Incidence of Pod Anomaly Disorder and Seed Yield of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] in Golestan Province in Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| A. Faraji1؛ M. Souktehsaraei2؛ H. Najafi Khanbebin2؛ S. Malek Shahkouei3؛ H. Ajamnourouzi4؛ M. R. Dadashi5؛ K. Peyghamzadeh6؛ M. Ghazaeian7 | ||
| 1Professor, Field and Horticultural Crops Sciences Research Depatment, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Oganization. Gorgan, Iran | ||
| 2Agronomist, Jehad-e-Agriculture Organization of Glosten province, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| 3Agricultural Entomologist, Jehad-e-Agriculture Organization of Glosten province | ||
| 4Associte Professor, Gorgan Baranch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| 5Assistant Professor, Gorgan Baranch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| 6Assistant Professor, Field and Horticultural Crops Sciences Research Depatment, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Oganization, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| 7Researcher, Soil and Water Research Department, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Oganization. Gorgan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Over the past four decades, pod anormaly disorder has been one of the most important factors affecting soybean seed yield and production in Golestan province in Iran. To assess the role of crop management factors on soybean pod anormaly and seed yield, 80 soybean fields were selected randomly during 2018 and 2019 in Gorgan and Aliabad in Glestan province. Stepwise regression analysis showed that seed yield model (Yield = -442.5 + 6.9 X1 + 180.2 X2 + 866.2 X3) was determined with three factors of potassium fertilizer (X1), number of irrigation (X2) and insect pest management (X3). Potassium fertilizer, number of irrigation and insect pest management explained 19.2%, 18.7% and 62.1% of the yield gap components, respectively, and reflected the importance of these factors for increasing soybean seed yield. Among 80 soybean fields, 15 and 18 fields had full and partial pod anomaly disorder symptoms, respectively. The mean soybean seed yield for fields without and partial pod anomaly disorder was 3039 and 848 kg ha-1, respectively. The results of this study showed the importance of optimum insect pest management to prevent and control the incidence of soybean pod anomaly disorder in Goletan province in Iran. Keywords: Soybean, crop management, insect pest management, potassium fertilizer, yield gap. Introduction Over the past four decades, pod anomaly disorder has been one of the most important factors affecting soybean seed yield and production in Golestan province in Iran (Payghamzadeh, 2017; Malek Shahkouei et al., 2019; Faraji et al., 2023). This conditions has led to disorders in the flower and pod system of the soybean plant which ultimately causes no or low pod set, modified of pods shape, stay-green plants, and so called by the farmers, fodder plants In fact, in the affected plants, a mechanism prevents the transfer of assimilates from leaves to seeds, hence the leaves remain green and the plants continue vegetative growth. In 2015, about 13765 hectares out of the total of 35107 hectares (about 39% of the soybean growing areas) suffered from this disorder. Due to luck of adequate quantitative information on the role of each of the factors in the incidence of this disorder and seed yield reduction, it would be necessary to investigate the effect of each of these factors on reduction of the soybean seed yield to enable farmers to overcome these limiting disorders by adopting appropriate crop management strategies. Materials and methods In order to investigate the role of management factors affecting the seed yield and incidence of pod abnormality disorder in soybean, during the years 2018 and 2019, 80 soybean fields in the two cities of Gorgan and Aliabad, were determined and investigated. These fields included good, medium and poor fields and even seed production ones. Soybean variety cultivated in all investigated fields was Katul. During the growing season, the stages of development, including the date of planting, emergence, beginning and end of flowering, podding, seed filling, physiological maturity and harvest maturity were determined (Fehr et al., 1971). For data analysis, the collected information was normalized (SAS, 1997). To determine the yield model, qualitative variables were coded as zero and one. Then, the relationship between all quantitative and qualitative measured variables with yield was investigated through step wise regression method and data analysis was performed using the statistical method of yield comparison analysis (Soltani et al., 2009). Finally, using the yield model and parameter values, potential yield, yield gap and the contribution of each factor causing the yield gap were determined. Results and Discussion Out of 80 studied soybean fields, 47 fields had completely normal soybean plants and no pod anomaly disorder, 18 fields had moderate pod anomly disorder and 15 fields had completely affected by pod anomaly disorder. Mean seed yield in fields without disorder, with moderate disorder and complete disorder was 3039, 848 and 0 kg ha-1, respectively, indicating considerable sedd yield reduction of 72% and 100% in fields with moderate and complete disorder in comparison with fields without disorder. These results reflected the importance of pod anomaly disorder in reducing soybean seed yield. The seed yield model estimated the average and maximum seed yields as 2003 and 4792 kg ha-1, respectively. The estimated yield gap was 2789 kg ha-1 that with approperiate crop management particularly effective insect pest control, adequate potassium fertilizers application and adequate number of irrigations can be narrowed and even closed. The results of this two-year field study showed that under the conditions of Golestan province, it is possible to significantly increase soybean seed yield by application and adoption of appropriate crop management startegies and techniques. References Board, J.E., 2002. A regression model to predict soybean cultivar yield performance at late planting dates. Agronomy Journal, 94, pp.483-492. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2002.0483 Fehr, W.R., Caviness, C.E., Burmood, D.T. and Pennington, J.S., 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybean (Glycine max). Crop Science, 11, pp.929-931. DOI: org/10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100060051x. Malek Shahkouei, S., Mohajer, A.R., Faraji, A., Keyhanian, A.A. and Mobasheri, M.T., 2019. Suckering insect management to prevent pod abnormality in soybean. Technical publication No 56238. National Plant Medicine Research Institute. 10 pp. (In Persian). Payghamzadeh, K., 2017. Investigation of soybean pod distortion syndrome by proteomics and bioinformatics approaches. Ph. D. Thesis. Tabriz University. 153 pp. (In Persian). | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Anonymous., 2022. Knowledge based document of Iran food. Agricultural Section. Iran Capital Council of Cultural Revoulation security. 35 pp. (In Persian).
Asadi, M.E., and Faraji, A., 2009. Applied principles of oilseeds (soybean, cotton, canola, sunflower) cultivation. Agricultural Science of Iran Press. 84 pp. (In Persian).
Asala, S.W., Olubusuyi, P.T. and Abdulrazaq, S., 2016. Evaluation of insect
Board, J.E., 2002. A regression model to predict soybean cultivar yield
Board, J.E., Kang, M.S. and Harville, B.G., 1999. Path analyses of the yield formation process for late-planted soybean. Agronomy Journal, 91, pp.128-135. DOI: 10.2134/agron j1999.00021962009100010020x.
Cooper, W.R., Nicholson, S.J. and Puterka, G.J., 2013. Salivary proteins of
Darvish Mojeni, T. and Kiani, A.R., 2001. The effect of rain and drip irrigation methods on the population of sucking pests in cotton fields of Golestan province. Agricultural Engineering Research Journal, 20, pp.59-70. (In Persian). DOI: 10.32404/rean.v10i2. 7253.
Egli, D.B. and Bruening, W.P., 2000. Potential of early-maturing soybean cultivars in late plantings. Agronomy Journal, 92, pp.532–537. DOI: org/10.2134/agronj2000.923532x.
Elmore, J.C., 1955. The nature of Lygus bug injury to lima beans. Journal of Economic Entomology, 48, pp.148-151. DOI: org/10.1093/jee/48.2.148.
Faraji, A., Raeisi, S., Hezarjeribi, E. and Mobasser, S., 2012. Oil crops. Nourozi Press. 542 pp. (In Persian).
Faraji, A., and Raeisi, S., 2016. Pod abnormality in soybean crop. Technical Publication No. 49518. Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Gorgan, Iran. 19 pp. (In Persian).
Faraji, A., Raeisi, S., Mohammadzadeh, J., Razi Nataj, M., Fathi, M. and Mohammadpour zaydi, L., 2016. The soybean, botany, production and uses. Nourozi Press. 446 pp. (in Persian).
Faraji, A., Mohajer, A.R. and Shamlei, S., 2018. Evaluation some factors effecting soybean pod abnormality in Golestan province. Technical Publication No 57197. Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Gorgan, Iran. 80 pp. (In Persian).
Faraji, A., Sokhtehsaraei, M., Najafi, H., Malek Shahkouei, S., Mobasheri, M.T., Ghazaeian, M., Shamlei, S., Alimohamadzadeh, S., Nemati, H., Raeisi, S., Imani, M., Mohajer, A.R., Mousakhani, A., Younesabadi, M., Bohlol, H., Fayzbakhsh, M.T., Kayhanian, A.A., Hagighi, A.A., Ebrahimi, H., Payghamzadeh, K., Haghnama, K., Alazmani, A.R., Sharbati, M.M., Bazi, A., Delavaran, H., Behmaneh, B., Hosaini, A., Askari, M., Kiani, A., Zohri, H. and Aghatabay, A., 2023. Soybean pod abnormality management in Golestan province. Technical Publication No 63871. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran. 12 pp. (In Persian).
Fehr, W.R., Caviness, C.E., Burmood, D.T. and Pennington, J.S., 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybean (Glycine max). Crop Science, 11, pp929-931. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100060051x.
Ghayeb Zamharir, M., Shameli, S. and Bertaccini, A., 2022a. Epidemiology of soybean bud proliferation and seed pod abortion disease in Iran. Australasian Plant Pathology, 51, pp.383-390. DOI: org/10.1007/s13313-022-00866-9.
Ghayeb Zamharir, M., Shameli, S. and Bertaccini, A., 2022b. Molecular evidence of seed transmission of soybean bud proliferation and seed pods abortion phytoplasma disease. Indian Phytopathology, 75, pp.889-893. DOI: 10.1007/s42360-022-00518-4.
Giacometti, R., Barneto, J., Barriga, L. G., Sardoy, P.M., Balestrasse, K., Andrade, A.M., Pagano, E.A., Alemano, S.G. and Zavala, J.A., 2015. Early perception of stink bug damage in developing seeds of field-grown soybean induces chemical defences and reduces bug attack. Pest Management Scince, 72, pp.1585-1594. DOI: 10.1002/ps.4192.
Giacometti, R. and Zavala, J.A., 2016. Soybean response to pest attack. Pp.35-62. In: Fletchr, B. (ed.) Soybeans: Cultivation, Nutritional Properties and Effects on Health. Nova Science publishers, Inc. New York.
Han, T., Wu, C., Tong, Z., Mentreddy, R.S., Tan, K. and Gai, J., 2006. Post flowering photoperiod regulates vegetative growth and reproductive development of soybean. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 55, pp.120-129. DOI: org/10.1016/j.envexpbot. 2004.10.006.
Kiani, A.R. and Sedaghat Dost, A., 2016. Water productivity and its improvement. Extension Publication Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Thehran, Iran. 72 pp. (In Persian).
Korte, L. Specht, L., Williams, J.E. and Sorensen, R.C., 1983. Irrigation of soybean genotypes during reproductive ontogeny II. Yield component responses. Crop Science, 23, pp.528-533. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300030020x.
Krupke, C.H., Obermeyer, J. and Larry Bledsoe, W., 2016. Soybean insect control recommendations. Extension Entomologists. 8 pp.
Kumudini, S., Hume, D.J. and Chu, G., 2002. Genetic improvement in Short-season soybean. Nitrogen accumulation, remobilization and partitioning. Crop Science, 42, pp.141-145. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2002.1410.
Malek Shahkouei, S., Mohajer, A.R., Faraji, A., Keyhanian, A.A. and Mobasheri, M.T., 2019. Suckering insect management to prevent pod abnormality in soybean. Technical publication No 56238. National Plant Medicine Research Institute. 10 pp. (In Persian).
Mardi, M., Nekuei, A.R., Vafabakhsh, J., Karimi, M., Khaeyam Nekuei, M., Ghorbani, M., Abbasi, F., Mohajer, A.R., Bromandi, M.M., Faryadres, V., Damavandi Neghad, H., Ahmadi Soumeh, K., Jafari, H., Ebrahimi, A., Balali, M.R. and Aziz Karimi, F., 2022. Cropping pattern program of field crops. Technical Publication No. 62342. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran. 324 pp. (In Persian).
Maurício C.M., Favoreto, L., Klepker, D., Francismar C. and Marcelino, G., 2017. Soybean green stem and foliar retention syndrome caused by Aphelenchoides besseyi. Tropical plant pathology, 42, pp403-409. DOI:10.1007/s40858-017-0167-z.
Mitchell, P.L., 2004. Heteroptera as Vectors of Plant Pathogens. Neotropical Entomology, 33, pp.519-545. DOI: 10.159.0/S1519-566X2004000500001. Payghamzadeh, K., 2017. Investigation of soybean pod distortion syndrome by proteomics and bioinformatics approaches. Ph. D. Thesis. Tabriz University. 153 pp. (In Persian).
Payghamzadeh, K., Toorchi, M. and Shobbar, Z.S., 2017. Proteome alteration of soybean as a function of pod distortion syndrome. Legume Research, 40, pp.1-10. DOI: 10.18805/ lr.v0i0.7836.
Salahi, F., Latifi, N. and Amjadian, M., 2006. The effect of planting date on the yield and yield components of soybean (Glycine max) in Gorgan region. Journal of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, 13, pp.1-7. (In Persian).
SAS., 1997. ‘SAS/STAT”. Users guid. [Version 6.12], Cary, NC, SAS Institut.
Scott, H., Ferguson, D. and Wood, L.S., 1987. Water use, yield, and dry matter accumulation by determinate soybean grown in a humid region. Agronomy Journal, 79, pp.870–875. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900050023x.
Shameli, S., Rakhshandehroo, F. and Safarnejad, M.R., 2018. Effect of tobacco streak virus on in different soybean cultivars in greenhouse conditions. Journal of Pest and Desiease, 86, pp.133-145. (In Persian). DOI: 10.22092/jaep.2018.121190.1216.
Smiciklas, K.D., Mullen, R.E., Carlson, R.E. and Knapp, A.D., 1992. Soybean seed quality response to drought stress and pod position. Agronomy Journal, 84, pp.166-170. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400020008x.
Soltani, A., 2009. Mathematics modeling in crops. Mashhad Jihad Daneshgahi Press. 175 pp. (In Persian).
Rezaei, R., Safa, L. and Ganjkhanloo, M.M., 2020. Understanding farmers’ ecological conservation behavior regarding the use of integrated pest management- an application of the technology acceptance model. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, pp.1-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00941 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 361 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 258 |
||