| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,944 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,229 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 43,862,674 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 20,369,105 |
شناسایی و تحلیل پیشران‌های کلیدی مؤثر بر توسعه جنگل‌داری اجتماعی در جنگل‌های استان گلستان با رویکرد آینده‌پژوهی | ||
| تحقیقات حمایت و حفاظت جنگلها و مراتع ایران | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 21، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 41، شهریور 1402، صفحه 90-106 اصل مقاله (649.26 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijfrpr.2023.361275.1567 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| عیسی عبداللهی1؛ یاسر قاسمی آریان* 2؛ محمدرضا شهرکی1 | ||
| 1کارشناس اداره کل منابع طبیعی و آبخیزداری استان گلستان، گلستان، ایران | ||
| 2دکتری تخصصی/ مهندسی منابع طبیعی – بیابان زدائی موسسه تحقیقات جنگل ها و مراتع کشور | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با توجه به ناکارآمدی سیستم‌های متعارف و سنتی حفاظت جنگلها، تغییر سیاست‌های دولت‌محور به جامعه‌محور در مدیریت آنها در قالب جنگل‌داری اجتماعی، ضرورت استفاده از تحلیل‌های ساختاری با رویکرد آینده‌پژوهی را دوچندان می‌کند. بر همین اساس پژوهش پیش‌رو با هدف شناسایی و تحلیل پیشران‌های کلیدی مؤثر بر توسعه جنگل‌داری اجتماعی با رویکرد آینده‌پژوهی در جنگل‌های استان گلستان انجام شد. این پژوهش از نوع آمیخته (کیفی و کمی ) است و از طریق فن پیمایش انجام گردید. کارشناسان و نیروهای حفاظت از جنگل در استان گلستان، جمعیت مورد مطالعه را تشکیل می‌دادند که 50 نفر از آنها به‌عنوان تعداد نمونه به روش قضاوتی هدفمند انتخاب شدند. پس از گردآوری اطلاعات با بهره‌گیری از تکنیک اثرهای متقاطع و با استفاده از نرم‌افزار MicMac به تحلیل 20 شاخص مستخرج از روش دلفی پرداخته شد. نتایج حاصل نشان داد، مؤلفه اجتماعی بیشترین و مؤلفه اقتصادی کمترین تأثیرگذاری را در توسعه جنگل‌داری اجتماعی جنگل‌های استان گلستان دارد. بر‌اساس نتایج به‌دست‌آمده پنج عامل «تغییر سیاست‌گذاری متمرکز دولت‌محور و تلفیق آن با مدیریت جامعه‌محور» و «بهره‌مندی از حمایت و پشتیبانی اقتصادی و بودجه‌ای دولت» از مؤلفه سیاست‌گذاری- مدیریتی، «انجام فعالیت‌های تسهیل‌گری و استفاده از مروجان روستایی در جهت انجام مدیریت جامعه‌محور» و «شناسایی پیشروان روستایی و به‌کارگیری آنها در مدیریت جامعه‌محور جنگل» از مؤلفه اجتماعی و «توانمندسازی جوامع محلی از طریق ایجاد فرصت‌های شغلی جدید و تقویت منابع درآمدی» از مؤلفه اقتصادی مهمترین پیشران‌های کلیدی در توسعه جنگل‌داری اجتماعی در مدیریت جنگل‌های استان گلستان ارزیابی شد. با توجه به نتایج به‌دست‌آمده، تدوین و تهیه سند چشم‌انداز بلندمدت با در نظر گرفتن سه بعد حفاظت جنگل، جوامع محلی، معیشت و توانمندسازی با رویکرد آینده‌نگری پیشنهاد شد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| مدیریت پایدار؛ جنگل‌داری اجتماعی؛ مشارکت؛ جوامع محلی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identification and analysis of key drivers effective on the development of social forestry in the forests of Golestan province with a future research approach | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Esa Abdollahi1؛ ghasemiaryan Y.2؛ mohammadreza shahraki1 | ||
| 1Executive Expert, General Department of Natural Resources and Watershed, Golestan Province, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In light of the inefficiency of conventional and traditional forest conservation systems, the shift from government-centered to community-centered policies in forest management through social forestry becomes increasingly essential. Accordingly, the necessity for employing structural analyses with a futures-oriented approach is emphasized. Based on this premise, the present study aimed to identify and analyze the key drivers influencing the development of social forestry using a futures-oriented approach in the forests of Golestan Province. This research employed a mixed-method (qualitative and quantitative) design and was conducted through survey technique. The study population consisted of experts and forest protection personnel in Golestan Province. A total of 50 participants were purposefully selected as the sample. After data collection, 20 indicators derived from the Delphi method were analyzed using the MicMac software, incorporating cross-impact analysis. The results indicated that the social component has the highest impact, while the economic component has the least impact on the development of social forestry in Golestan Province's forests. Based on the obtained results, two factors, namely "Shifting from Centralized Government-Centered Policy to Integrated Community-Centered Management" and "Benefitting from Governmental Economic and Budgetary Support," from the policy-management component, "Conducting Facilitative Activities and Utilizing Village Promoters for Community-Centered Management" and "Identifying Rural Leaders and Involving Them in Community-Centered Forest Management" from the social component, and "Empowering Local Communities through New Job Opportunities and Strengthening Income Resources" from the economic component, were identified as the most influential key drivers for the development of social forestry in Golestan Province's forest management. In light of the findings, the development of a long-term vision document considering the three dimensions of forest protection, local communities, livelihood, and empowerment, with a future-oriented perspective, is recommended. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Sustainable Management, Social Forestry, Participation, Local Communities | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Afroz, S., Cramb, R. and Grünbühel, C., 2016. Ideals and institutions: Systemic reasons for the failure of a social forestry program in south-west Bangladesh. Geoforum, 77: 161-173.
- Ahmadzai, M.R., Zaki, P.H., Ismail, M.H., Bawon, P. and Karam, D.S., 2023. The societal and economic impact of reforestation strategies and policies in Southeast Asia—A review. Forests, 14(1): 1.
- Apipoonyanon, C., Kuwornu, J.K., Szabo, S. and Shrestha, R.P., 2020. Factors influencing household participation in community forest management: evidence from Udon Thani Province, Thailand. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 39(2): 184-206.
- Asmina, F., 2021. Social forestry ans natural resource management in West Sumatra. In Workshop on Geography Education at State University of Padang, 18 September 2021, 16p. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354672604_Social_Forestry_And_Natural_Resource_Management_In_West_Sumatra
- Baynes, J., Herbohn, J., Smith, C., Fisher, R. and Bray, D., 2015. Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries. Global Environmental Change, 35: 226-238.
- Bong, I.W., Moeliono, M., Wong, G.Y. and Brockhaus, M., 2019. What is success? Gaps and trade-offs in assessing the performance of traditional social forestry systems in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 3(1): 1-21.
- Budi, B., Kartodihardjo, H., Nugroho, B. and Mardiana, R., 2021. Implementation of social forestry policy: A review of community access. Forest and Society, 5(1): 60-74.
- Chilagane, N.A., Kashaigili, J.J., Mutayoba, E., Lyimo, P., Munishi, P., Tam, C. and Burgess, N., 2021. Impact of land use and land cover changes on surface runoff and sediment yield in the Little Ruaha River Catchment. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology, 11(3): 54-74.
- Chiwaya, C. and Mzuza, M.K., 2022. Factors influencing community participation in forestry management in Chiradzulu district, Malawi. Open Journal of Forestry, 12(2): 177-184.
- Dongre, P., 2011. Role of social forestry in sustainable development a micro level study, International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 3(1): 351-364.
- Ekanayake, E.M.B.P., Xie, Y. and Ahmad, S., 2021. Rural residents’ participation intention in community forestry-challenge and prospect of community forestry in Sri Lanka. Forests, 12(8): 1050.
- Emami, N., Ahmadpour, A., Sarvestani, A.A. and Shahraki, M.R., 2018. Investigating the effect of carbon sequestration project on local community empowerment: A case of Tilabad watershed in Golestan province. Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 10(4): 23-36 (in Persian).
- Gilmour, D., 2016. Forty years of community-based forestry: A review of its extent and effectiveness. FAO forestry paper, 176.
- Galudra, G., 2019. Focusing on facilitation: Issues and challenges of capacity development in Indonesia’s social forestry reforms. Forest and Society, 3(1): 133-136.
- Guillén, L.A., Wallin, I. and Brukas, V., 2015. Social capital in small-scale forestry: A local case study in Southern Sweden, Forest Policy and Economics, 53: 21-28.
- Hasegawa, M., Pulhin, J.M. and Inoue, M., 2013. Facing the challenge of social forestry in Japan: The case of reviving harmonious coexistence between forest and people in Okayama prefecture. Small-Scale Forestry, 12(2): 257-275.
- Johansson, M.U., Abebe, F.B., Nemomissa, S., Bekele, T. and Hylander, K., 2021. Ecosystem restoration in fire-managed savanna woodlands: Effects on biodiversity, local livelihoods and fire intensity. Ambio, 50(1): 190-202.
- Karamidehkordi, E., Mansori Nejad, R. and Rahimian, J., 2018. Participation of rural communities in decision making, monitoring and evaluation of the oak forest trees dieback management in the Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province. Iranian Journal of Forest and Range Protection Research, 15(2): 156-175 (in Persian).
- Khedrizadeh, M., Malelniya, R., Adeli, K. and Henareh, J., 2017. Survey of barriers and potential field to involve local people in the forest management process (Case study: local communities in Nameshir, Baneh). Journal of Wood and Forest Science and Technology, 24(3): 35-48 (in Persian).
- Lata, L.N. and Rashid, A.M., 2020. Social forestry: Principles, evolution, and implications for sustainable development. In Life on land (pp. 881-891). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Maryudi, A., Devkota, R.R., Schusser, C., Yufanyi, C., Salla, M., Aurenhammer, H. and Krott, M., 2012. Back to basics: considerations in evaluating the outcomes of community forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 14(1): 1-5.
- Moayeri, M., Abedi, A., Shahraki, M. and Mastouri, A., 2022. Detection of social forestry approaches and its impact on managing forestry plans in Golestan province. Journal of Wood and Forest Science and Technology, 28(4): 1-24 (in Persian).
- Mohammadi Tameri, Z.M. and Ahmadvand, M., 2015. Strategic analysis of social forestry by using SWOT and entropy: the case of villages of Margon, Boyer-Ahmad. Rural Development Strategies, 2(3): 299-317 (in Persian).
- Moktan, M. R., Norbu, L. and Choden, K., 2016. Can community forestry contribute to household income and sustainable forestry practices in rural area? A case study from Tshapey and Zariphensum in Bhutan. Forest Policy and Economics, 62: 149-157.
- Nagahama, K., Tachibana, S. and Rakwal, R., 2022. Critical aspects of people’s participation in community-based forest management from the case of Van Panchayat in Indian Himalaya. Forests, 13(10): 1667.
- Ota, L., Mukul, S.A., Gregorio, N. and Herbohn, J., 2021. Community based management of tropical forests: lessons learned and implications for sustainable forest management. Achieving Sustainable Management of Tropical Forests. Burleigh Dodds, Cambridge, UK, doi, 10.
- Parsiani, S., Mahboobi, M.R., Abdollahzade, G. and Sharifi, M., 2021. The role of facilitators in promoting women's entrepreneurship: Implications for facilitation training. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research, 13(57): 28-53 (in Persian).
- Robson, J.P., Wilson, S.J., Sanchez, C.M. and Bhatt, A., 2020. Youth and the future of community forestry. Land, 9(11): 406.
- Sirimorok, N. and Rusdianto, E., 2020. Conditions for success in a community based conservation initiative: An analysis of triggering moments and catalytic elements in Nuha. Forest and Society, 4(1): 127-141.
- Soe, K.T. and Yeo-Chang, Y.O.U.N., 2019. Perceptions of forest-dependent communities toward participation in forest conservation: A case study in Bago Yoma, South-Central Myanmar. Forest Policy and Economics, 100: 129-141.
- Sulser, T.B., Beach, R.H., Wiebe, K.D., Dunston, S. and Fukagawa, N.K., 2021. Disability-adjusted life years due to chronic and hidden hunger under food system evolution with climate change and adaptation to 2050. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 114(2): 550-563.
- Wiersum, K.F., Humphries, S. and Van Bommel, S., 2011. Certification of community forestry enterprises: experiences with incorporating community forestry in a global system for forest governance. Small-scale Forestry, 12(1): 15-31.
- Yaghoubi Farani, A., Karimi, S. and Permozeh, F., 2017. Factors affecting people’s participation in forest protection plans in Gilan-e Gharb. Journal of Wood and Forest Science and Technology, 24(2): 33-46 (in Persian).
- Yahya, H., Amir, H.M., Lintangah, W., Hamdan, D.M., Fadzwi, F.M. and Thomas, G.J., 2022. A systematic review on linking community livelihood in social forestry with food security. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1053(1): 012018.
- Zhu, G., Cao, X., Wang, B., Zhang, K. and Min, Q., 2022. The Importance of Spiritual Ecology in the Qingyuan Forest Mushroom Co-Cultivation System. Sustainability, 14(2): 865: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020865 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 218 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 244 |
||