- همه نشریات
- نشریات علمی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویچ کشاورزی
- مجلات ترویجی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- سایر نشریات سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- نشریات علمی انجمن ها
- علوم آب و خاک
- علوم اقتصاد و ترویج کشاورزی
- علوم جنگل, مرتع و آبخیزداری
- علوم دامی و شیلات
- علوم زراعی و باغی
- علوم گیاهپزشکی
- علوم مهندسی و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی
- نشریات با زبان انگلیسی
- نشریات با زبان فارسی
- نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
- نشریات علمی
پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 283 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 81 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,728 |
| تعداد مقالات | 31,071 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 28,572,579 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,294,991 |
استهلاک انرژی در سرریزهای کلیدپیانویی مستطیلی و ذوزنقه ای | ||
| تحقیقات مهندسی سازه های آبیاری و زهکشی | ||
| دوره 24، شماره 90، خرداد 1402، صفحه 17-32 اصل مقاله (923.71 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/idser.2023.362286.1545 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حسین سهراب زاده انزانی* 1؛ مسعود قدسیان2 | ||
| 1دانشگاه تربیت مدرس تهران | ||
| 2دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| چکیده | ||
| سرریزهای کلیدپیانویی از جدیدترین سرریز های غیرخطی می باشند که نسبت به سرریزهای لبه تیزخطی، دارای طول تاج بیشتری هستند و برای تنظیم و کنترل جریانِ رودخانه ها، کانال ها و سدها بکار گرفته می شوند. مطالعات فراوانی برای بهبود ضریب آبگذری سرریز های کلید پیانویی صورت گرفته است؛ اما مقایسه ای بین استهلاک انرژی سرریزهای کلیدپیانویی مستطیلی و ذوزنقه ای صورت نپذیرفته است. در مطالعه پیشرو به بررسی و مقایسه استهلاک انرژی و ضریب آبگذری سرریزهای کلیدپیانویی مستطیلی و ذوزنقه ای پرداخته می شود. آزمایشات در آزمایشگاه هیدرولیک دانشگاه تربیت مدرس؛ در فلومی به ابعاد ۰٫۹ ×۱۰×۰٫۷۵ متر انجام پذیرفته است. مطابق مشاهدات آزمایشگاهی، در سرریز کلیدپیانویی مستطیلی و ذوزنقه ای برخی تفاوت‌ها در میدان جریان مشاهده‌شده است. در هدهای خیلی کم هوادهی در هیچ‌یک از سرریز مشاهده نشده و پرش هیدرولیکی نیز در انتهای کلید های خروجی سرریز رخ نداده است، اما با افزایش هد یک پرش هیدرولیکی در انتهای کلیدهای سرریز تشکیل می گردد که در دبی های بالاتر اثری از آن یافت نمی شد. همچنین مشخص گردید، سرریز کلیدپیانویی ذوزنقه ای در استهلاک انرژی عملکرد بهتری از سرریز مستطیلی دارد، بطوریکه عملکرد آن حدود ۳ درصد بیشتر از سرریز کلیدپیانویی مستطیلی می باشد. افزون براین متوسط ضریب آبگذری سرریز کلیدپیانویی ذوزنقه ای در مقایسه با سرریز کلیدپیانویی مستطیلی ۱۱ درصد بیشتر می‌باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| استهلاک انرژی؛ سیلاب؛ سرریز کلیدپیانویی؛ ضریب آبگذری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Energy Dissipation of Rectangular and Trapezoidal Piano Key Weir | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hossein Sohrabzadeh-Anzani1؛ Masoud Ghodsian2 | ||
| 1Tarbiat Modares University | ||
| 2Tarbiat Modares University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction Piano key weirs are a kind of non-linear weirs, initially introduced by Hydrocoop (Blanc and Lempérière, 2001). Piano key weirs (PKWs) include inlet and outlet keys as well as an inclined surface. They are also a part of the crest, extending beyond the weir base and, thus, creating bulges upstream and downstream (Eslinger and Crookston, 2020). Due to their high compatibility with the site and their economic and hydraulic performance, PKWs have been used in more than 34 structures in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia on gravity dams (e.g., Malarce Dam, France), embankment dams (e.g. Lake Peachtree Dam, GA, USA), and river structures (e.g. Dakmi 2 and Van Phong Barrage, Vietnam). There is a wide range of studies addressing the discharge coefficient of PKWs, but the energy dissipation of rectangular, and trapezoidal PKWs has not been compared so far. Hence, it seems necessary to evaluate the energy dissipation of these three plans. Methodology Tests were conducted in the hydraulic lab of Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran to assess the energy dissipation and flow properties downstream of rectangular and trapezoidal PKWs. Tests were performed using a 10×0.75×10 m flume (Fig. 1). The water was provided by an underground sump. PK weir was installed and sealed at 4 m away from the flume inlet, so the minimum flow turbulence was achieved. The discharge flow was adjusted by changing the speed of the pumps using a control panel. The upstream and downstream flow depths were measured at 4P (Crookston, 2010) and 10P (Eslinger and Crookston, 2010) away from the weir upstream and downstream, respectively, using digital point gage with an accuracy of ±0.1 mm. The weir specifications are listed in Table 1. Experiments were conducted for various discharges and approach flow depths. Results and Discussion The flow field upstream of PKWs was almost uniform and no turbulence was observed on the water surface. The flow deviated near the PKW with streamlines along inlet and outlet keys and over the weir walls. Flow deviation led to an increased unit discharge in the outlet keys. Meanwhile, the local velocity was increased, leading to a positive acceleration. The observations showed that this was accompanied by water level decline and increased downstream turbulence. The upper front of the PKW and the upstream overhang length contributed to energy dissipation. The flow jet passing over the crest was accompanied by the interaction of three colliding jets. The interaction was the result of the collision between the flow nappies from lateral crests and the flow in the outlet keys (Fig. 4). The resulting interactions led to significant turbulence, and expansion of flow at the downstream. As the head increased, the outlet key discharge (in the space between two side walls of the PKW outlet key) were increased, and energy dissipation was limited. Fig. 5 shows variations of the energy dissipation for rectangular and trapezoidal PKWs. The relative energy dissipation by the trapezoidal PKW was more than that of rectangular PKW, by average of abbot 3%. Fig. 6 shows the residual energy of the PKW versus discharge for rectangular and trapezoidal PKWs. It is clear that as the discharge increased, E1/E2 increased. Furthermore, the ascending rate of E1/E2 was higher for lower discharges. This is due to the local submersion upstream of the weir at high discharge. Conclusion Energy dissipation of trapezoidal PKWs are higher than rectangular PKWs. The average discharge coefficient for trapezoidal PKWs is higher than rectangular PKW. The flow characteristics is different for rectangular and trapezoidal PKWs. For Ht/P≤0.15, no aeration is occurred. For 0.15<Ht/P<0.45, a week hydraulic jump is formed at the end of the weir outlet keys. New equation was obtained for estimation of energy dissipation. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Energy Dissipation, Flood, Piano Key Weir, Discharge Coefficient | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Akbariyan, A. 2009. Design of Hydraulic Structures Canals. Amidi Pub. (In Persian).
Anderson, R. M. & Tullis, B. 2012. Comparison of piano key and rectangular labyrinth weir hydraulics. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering-ASCE. 138(4): 358-361.
Akbari, M., Karami Moghadam, M., Sabzevari, T., & Ghadampour, Z. 2020. Experimental study of effect of sidewall angle and weir height on total head and discharge coefficient in trapezoidal piano key weir. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 21(79), 93–110. (in persian).
Blanc, P. and Lempérière, F. 2001. Labyrinth spillways have a promising future. International Journal on Hydropower & Dams, 8(4), 129-131.
Chanson, H. 1994. Comparison of energy dissipation between nappe and skimming flow regimes on stepped chutes. Journal of Hydraulic Research. IAHR, 32, 213–218.
Chanson, H. 1995. Hydraulic design of stepped cascades, channels, weirs, and spillways; Pergamon: Oxford, UK.
Chamani, M., & Rajaratnam, N. 1995. Energy loss at drops. Journal of Hydraulic Research. IAHR,33, 373–384.
Crookston, B.M., Erpicum, S., Tullis, B.P., & Laugier, F. 2019. Hydraulics of labyrinth and piano key weirs: 100 years of prototype structures and future research needs. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. ASCE, 145.
Crookston, B.M., Anderson, R.M., & Tullis, B.P. 2018. Free-flow discharge estimations for piano key weir geometries. Journal of Hydro-environmental Research. 19, 160–167.
Erpicum, S., Laugier, F., Pfister, M., Pirotton, M., Cicero, G., & Schleiss, A.J. 2013. Labyrinth and piano key weirs II—PKW 2013; CRC Press: London, UK.
Eslinger, K. & Crookston, B.M. 2020. Energy dissipation of type a piano key weirs. Water. 28; 12(5):1253.
Erpicum, S., Laugier, F., Boillat, J.L., Pirotton, M., Reverchon, B., & Schleiss, A.J. 2013. Labyrinth and piano key weirs—PKW; CRC Press: London, UK.
Erpicum, S., Laugier, F.; Ho Ta Khanh, M.; Pfister, M. 2017. Labyrinth and piano key weirs III—PKW 2017; CRC Press: London, UK.
Ghodsian, M. Ehsanifar, A. 2020. Experimental investigation of flow over piano key weir with rectangular, triangular and trapezoidal plans. 18th Iranian Hydraulic Association Conference. Tehran. Iran. (In Persian).
Ghodsian, M., & Sohrabzadeh Anzani, H. 2023. Experimental study on flow over rectangular piano key weirs with sloped side crests. Modares Civil Engineering journal, 23(2): 165-175. (In Persian)
Gill, M.A. 1979. Hydraulics of rectangular vertical drop structures. Journal of Hydraulic Research. IAHR,17, 289–302.
Kumar, M., Sihag, P., Tiwari, N., & Ranjan, S. 2020. Experimental study and modelling discharge coefficient of trapezoidal and rectangular piano key weirs. Journal of Applied Water Science. 10: 1–9.
Leite Ribeiro, M. Pfister, M. Schleiss, A.J., & Boillat, A.L. 2012. Hydraulic design of A-type piano key weirs. Journal of Hydraulic Research. IAHR,50, 400–408.
Lempérière, F. & Ouamane, A. 2003. The piano key weir: A new cost-effective solution for spillways. Journal of Hydropower and Dams, 10, 144–149.
Lempérière, F. & Vigny, J. 2011. General comments on labyrinth and piano keys weirs–The future. In Proc. Int. Conf. Labyrinth Piano Key Weirs-PKW20111, London Taylor Fr., London: Taylor & Francism. 289-94.
Moore, W.L. 1943. Energy loss at the base of free overfall. Trans. ASCE 1943, 108, 1343–1360.
Machiels, O., Pirotton, M., Archambeau, P., Dewals, B.J., & Erpicum, S. 2014. Experimental parametric study and design of piano key weirs. Journal of Hydraulic Research. IAHR, 52, 326–335.
Mansouri, K. & Ahadiyan, J. 2015. Obstruction of piano key weirs in debris flow in individual experiments system. Irrigation Science Engineering. 5(3): 163-172. (In Persian).
Poshteh-Shirani, M. Rahimpour, M. & Ahmadi, M.M. 2018. The effect of upstream overhang on debris blocking and discharge capacity of piano key weirs. Journal of Ferdowsi Civil Engineering. 44-33: (2)30. (In Persian).
Qanavati, M., Sajjadi, S. M., and Ahadiyan, J. 2016. The effect of block height on flow hydraulic behaviour in rectangular piano key weir with baffled outlet key. The 3rd International Conference on Geographical Science. Nov. 3. Shiraz University. Shiraz, Iran. (In Persian).
Rand,W. 1953. Flow geometry at straight drop spillways. Proc. ASCE. 81, 1–13.
Rezaei Ahvanooei, A., Mousavi, SF., & Karami, H. 2019. Improvement of hydraulic performance of nonlinear piano-key weirs in plan. Modares Civil Engineering journal, 19(4): 71-82. (In Persian).
Ribeiro, M. L., Pfister, M., Schleiss, A. J., and Boillat, J. L. 2012. Hydraulic design of A-type piano key weirs. Journal of Hydraulic Research, IAHR, 50(4), 400-408.
Sohrabzadeh-Anzani, H. Ghodsian, M. 2022. Experimental study of the effect of sidewall slope over triangular PK weir. Journal of Hydraulics. Iranian Hydraulic Association, 17(4), 17-30. (In Persian).
Sohrabzadeh-Anzani., H. & Ghodsian, M. 2023a. Energy dissipation of triangular piano key weir. Journal of Hydraulic, Iranian Hydraulic Association, 18(3), 183. (In Persian).
Sohrabzadeh-Anzani, H., & Ghodsian, M. 2023b. Laboratory investigation of the discharge coefficient of the rectangular piano key weir with a discontinuous sloping crest. Journal of Hydraulics. Iranian Hydraulic Association, Oct 16. 1613. (In Persian).
Silvestri, A., Archambeau, P., Pirotton, M., Dewals, B., Erpicum, S. 2013. Comparative analysis of the energy dissipation on a stepped spillway downstream of a piano key weir. Labyrinth and piano key weirs II, CRC Press: London, UK.111-120.
Sangsefidi, Y., Tavakol-Davani, H., Ghodsian, M., Mehraein, M., & Zarei, R,. 2021. Hydrodynamics and free-flow characteristics of piano key weirs with different plan shapes. Water, 13(15), 2108.
Toozandehjani, M., & Kashefipour, M. 2012. Investigation of the head loss of ogee spillway and the length of hydraulic jump due to the confliction of the stream lines over the body of ogee spillway. Irrigation and Water Engineering, 2(4), 1-13.
Qanavati, M., Sajjadi, S. M., & Ahadiyan, J. 2016. The effect of block height on flow hydraulic behaviour in rectangular piano key weir with baffled outlet key. The 3rd International Conference on Geographical Science. Nov. 3. Shiraz University. Shiraz, Iran. (In Persian).
Zounemat-Kermani, M. & Mahdavi-Meymand, A. 2019. Hybrid meta-heuristics artificial intelligence models in simulating discharge passing the piano key weirs. Journal of Hydrology 569: 12-21.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 99 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 105 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب