Related Links
Evaluation of the Effects of Terminal Drought Stress on yield and Some Traits of Winter Oilseed Rape Genotypes | ||
| پژوهش های کاربردی زراعی | ||
| Volume 35, Issue 3 - Serial Number 136, September 2022, Pages 66-46 PDF (752.83 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22092/aj.2023.355332.1555 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Elahe Shadan* 1; hamid najafi zarini1; Bahram Alizadeh2; Ghaffar Kiani3; Gholamali Ranjbar1 | ||
| 1Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran | ||
| 2Mahdasht Ave. Nahal-o-Bazr Township Oilseeds Research Department | ||
| 3Department of Plant Breeding, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Introduction Rapeseed is a main oilseed crop in the world. Water deficiency is the main cause of reduced crop yield under drought stress. The highest rapeseed yield reduce was resulted when water deficit occurred at flowering and pod developmental stages (Kahrizi and Allahvarand, 2012). Knowing about the traits that affect grain yield, so that by improving these traits, grain yield can be increased, plays an important role for being successful breeding programs. Factor analysis of multivariate statistical methods is for a deeper understanding of the relationships between traits and is an effective statistical method in reducing data volume (Cooper, 1983). The aim of this study was to study the effect of late-season drought stress on some traits affecting the yield of studied rapeseed genotypes and to identify genotypes compatible with normal and drought stress conditions using some stress tolerance indices. Material and Methods This experiment was carried out at the research field of Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran, on 2016-2018 growing seasons under full irrigation conditions and late-season drought stress (from beginning pod setting stage) on new winter rapeseed genotypes in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Some of morphological, physiological, phenological traits, yield and yield components were measured. Factor analysis was performed to determine the most influential variables. To identify drought tolerance genotypes, drought tolerance indices such as tolerance index (TOL), stress susceptibility index (SSI), mean productivity (MP), geometric mean productivity (GMP), harmonic mean (HMP), stress tolerance index (STI), Yield index (YI), Sensitivity drought index (SDI) and yield stability index (YSI) were used. Results and Discussion The combined analysis of variance showed that the effect of drought stress on all evaluation traits was significant except for height of the first branch, days to end of flowering, flowering period and oil percentage. The results showed that drought stress decreased Grain yeald, Pods per plant, Seeds per pod, 1000 Seed weight, plant height, Chlorophyll a and b, Cartenoid, Relative water content and Days to maturity; while it increased Chlorophyll Index (SPAD). The results of factor analysis exhibited three factors in normal and drought stress conditions, which explained 79.7% and 82.51% of the variation, respectively. This factors in normal conditions were named "Yield", "Plant pigment", "Phenological traits" respectively, and in stress conditions were named " productivity", "Plant pigment" and " sink" , respectively. It seems that its seams possible to use these traits as selection criteria in breeding programs for improve grain yield of winter rapeseed genotypes results showed that GMP, MP, HMP and STI indices were positively correlated with grain yield under both stress and non-stress conditions. Therefore, they can be exploited not only to screen drought tolerance but also to identify superior genotypes for both stress and non-stress field conditions (Fernandez, 1992). Principal component analysis using grain yield under both conditions and drought tolerance indices showed that the genotypes Nafis, Vesuvio, Medea, HL3721 and HL2012 were the most tolerant genotypes to drought conditions, while the genotypes Extorm, Excalibur, Danube and Expower were the most sensitive genotypes. With cluster analysis using WARD procedure based on drought tolerance, the studied genotypes were grouped in 3 separate clusters. The first group consisted of genotypes that have high yield and drought tolerant and had appropriate and reliable values of indices such as STI, MP, GMP, HMP. Therefore, this group (genotypes Nafis, Vesuvio, Medea, HL3721 and HL2012) are drought tolerant group. The second group had genotypes with low values of STI, MP, GMP, HMP as well as Ys and Yp and higher values of SSI. Therefore, genotypes Danube, Excalibur, Expower, Harnus and Extorm with low yield and drought sensitivity were placed in this cluster. The next group (Okapi, Ahmadi, Nima, Natalie, SLM046, Artist) with average yield in both non-stress and stress conditions, and less sensitivity to drought stress condition, were stable in yield, and therefore considered as semi-resistant cultivars. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Bi-plot; Multivariate analysis; Agronomic traits; Physiological traits; Stress tolerance indices | ||
| References | ||
|
Arnon, A. N. 1967. Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agronomy Journal, 23:112-121. Atlasipak, V., Maskarbashi, M., Mamaghani, R., and Nabipur, M. 2006. The effect of planting pattern on light use efficiency and dry matter accumulation in canopy of three spring rapeseed cultivars. Journal of plant productions, 29 (4):139-152. (In Farsi), Bilgrami, S.S., Fakheri, B.A., Shariati, V., Razavi, KH., Mahdinezhad, N., Tavakol, E., Ramandi, H.D., and Ghaderian, M. 2018. Evaluation of agro-morphological traits related to grain yield of Iranian wheat genotypes in drought-stress and normal irrigation conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 12: 738-748. Clark, J.M., Depauw, M., and Ownley-Smith, T.F. 1992. Evaluation of methods for quantification of drought tolerance in wheat. Crop Science, 32: 723-728. Cooper, J. C. B. 1983. Factor analysis. An overview. The American Statistician, 37: 141–147. Dehghani, Z., Nikkhah, H.R., and Frouzesh, P. 2020. Evaluation of drought tolerance in promising barley lines under controlled and field conditions. Seed and Plant, 36(2): 161-182. (In Persian with English Summary). Elferjani, R., and Soolanayakanahally, R. 2018. Canola responses to drought, heat, and combined stress: shared and specific effects on carbon assimilation, seed yield, and oil composition. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9:1224. Eyni Nargeseh, H., Agha Alikhani, M., Shirani Rad, A. H., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A., and Modarres, S.A.M. 2019. Physiological and agronomic response of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes to late-season drought stress under Karaj climatic condition. journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 29(2): 80-95. (In Persian with English Summary). Fernandez, G.C. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In C. G. Kuo (ed). Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crop to Temperature and Water Stress. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan. p. 257. Fisher, R. A., and Maurer, R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars Grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29: 897-912. Goldani, M. 2012. Effect of irrigation intervals on some growth indices ecotypes basil Guerrini, L., Napoli, M., Mancini, M., Masella, P., Cappelli, A., Parenti, A., and Orlandini, S. 2020. Wheat grain composition, dough rheology and bread quality as affected by nitrogen and sulfur fertilization and seeding density. Agronomy, 10: 233. Kaboosi, K., and Nodehi, A. 2016. The effects of salinity stress levels on quantity and quality traits of different cultivars of canola under application of vermicompost. Journal of Crop Production, 9(3): 133-151. (In Persian with English Summary). Kahrizi, D., and Allahvarand, T., 2012. Estimation and interrelationships of genetic Kranner, I., Beckett, R.P., Wornik, S., Zorn, M., and Pfeifhofer, H.W. 2002. Revival of a resurrection plant correlates with its antioxidant status. The Plant Journal, 31: 13-24. Jahangiri, S., and Kahrizi, D. 2015. Study of Genetic variation and drought tolerance in commercial rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Journal of Genetic Resources, 1:73-82. Liu, H., Searle, L.R., Mather, D.E., Able, A.J., and Able, J.A. 2015. Morphological, physiological and yield responses of durum wheat to pre-anthesis water-deficit stress are genotype-dependent. Crop and Pasture Science, 66: 1024–1038. Pessarkli, M. 1999. Hand book of Plant and Crop Stress. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York. p. 697. Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Mohammadi, R., Etminan, A., Shooshtari, L., Maleki-Tabrizi, N., and Poczai, P. 2020. Effects of drought stress on some agronomic and morpho-physiological traits in durum wheat genotypes. Sustainability, 12:5610. Rouhi, M., Banayan Aval, M., and Shirani Rad, A. H. 2021. Study of ecophysiology of reaction of wintering rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars to end of season drought stress in delayed culture. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 14(1): 13-26. (In Persian with English Summary). Safavi Fard, N., Shirani Rad, A.H., Daneshian, J., Shahsavari, N., and Ghaffari, M. 2020. Response of canola cultivars and hybrids to winter cultivation under late season drought stress. journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 30(4): 185-198. (In Persian with English Summary). Salehi, M., Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Koocheki, A. 2003. Leaf nitrogen and chlorophyll as indicators for salt stress. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 1: 199-205. (In Persian with English Summary). Schnider, K.A., Rosales-Serna, R., Ibarra-Perez, F., Cazares-Enriques, B., Acosta Gallegos, J.A., Ramirez-Allejo, P., Wassimi, N., and Kelly, J. D. 1997. Improving common bean performance under drought stress. Crop Sciences, 37: 43-50. Shahsavari, N., and Dadrasnia, A. 2016. Effect of zeolites and zinc on the physiological characteristics of canola under late-season drought stress. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 47: 2077- 2087. Sharifi, Y., Majidi, M. M., Jafarzadeh, M., and Mirlohi, A. 2015. Multivariate Analysis of Genetic Variation in Winter Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 17: 1319-1331. Shirani Rad, A.H., Naeemi, M., and Nasr Esfahani, S.H. 2010. Evaluation of terminal drought stress tolerance in spring and winter rapeseed genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 12 (2): 112-126. (In Persian with English Summary). Sinaki, J., Majidi Heravan, M.E., Shirani Rad, A.H., Noormohammadi, G.H., and Zarei, G.H. 2007. The effects of water deficit during growth stages of canola. American Eurasian Journal Agricultural Biological Science, 2:417- 422. Yadav, R.S., and Bhushan, C. 2001. Effect of moisture stress on growth and yield in rice genotypes. Indian Journal Agricultural Research, 2: 104-107. Yadava, U. 1989. A rapid and nondestructive method to determine chlorophyll in intact leaves. Horticulture Science, 21: 1449-1450. Zabet, M., Hosein Zade, A.H., Ahmadi, A., and Khialparast, F. 2003. A Study of variation and comparison of yield and its components under two irrigation conditions in mung bean. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 33(3): 561-571. (In Persian with English Summary). Zabet, M., Seddigh, S., and Samadzade, A. 2016. The effect of drought stress on yield and yield components in 10 genotypes of rapeseed under Birjand climate conditions. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 9: 121-127. (In Persian with English Summary). Zareei Siahbidi, A., and Rezaeizad, A. 2020. Study on response of some oilseed rape genotypes to drought stress. Applied Research in Field Crops, 32(4): 59-75. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 738 PDF Download: 522 |
||
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb