| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,046 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,068 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 46,483,791 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 77,542,913 |
بررسی آزمایشگاهی عملکرد سرریزهای کنگره‌ای مثلثی و نیم‌دایره‌ای همسان | ||
| تحقیقات مهندسی سازه های آبیاری و زهکشی | ||
| دوره 23، شماره 89، اسفند 1401، صفحه 83-97 اصل مقاله (815.17 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/idser.2023.362473.1547 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فارهه السادات ارحام نمازی1؛ جواد مظفری* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه علوم و مهندسی آب دانشگاه اراک | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه علوم و مهندسی آب دانشگاه اراک | ||
| چکیده | ||
| سرریز کنگره‌ای با افزایش طول تاج، ضریب آبگذری را افزایش می‌دهد و ارتفاع سیل را نسبت به سرریز خطی کاهش خواهد داد. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی سرریزهای کنگره‌ای نیم‌دایره‌ای و مثلثی همسان می‌باشد. بدین‌معنی که سرریز کنگره‌ای مثلثی تک سیکل با سرریز کنگره‌ای نیم‌دایره‌ای تک سیکل و سرریزهای دو سیکل با یکدیگر مقایسه می‌شوند و تعداد سیکل در مقایسه تاثیر نخواهد داشت. همچنین، پارامترL/W ثابت خواهد ماند و بنابراین فقط تغییرات زاویه راس سرریز و زاویه با جداره کانال موثر خواهد بود. آزمایش‌ها در کانالی با عرض 0/8 متر و در دبی 6 تا 70 لیتر بر ثانیه انجام گردید. 10 مدل با ضخامت 4 میلیمتر ساخته شدند که پنج مدل آن سرریز مثلثی و 5 مدل آن سرریز نیم‌دایره‌ای می‌باشند. ارتفاع سرریزها 15 سانتیمتر و طول سرریزها 126 سانتیمتر می‌باشد. مقایسه سرریزکنگره‌ای مثلثی با نیم‌دایره‌ای همسان، نشان داد که ضریب دبی سرریزهای کنگره‌ای مثلثی تا حدودی بالاتر می‌باشد. با افزایش تعداد سیکل، تداخل تیغه‌های ریزشی و استغراق موضعی افزایش یافته و ضریب دبی کاهش می‌یابد. زاویه راس سرریز کنگره‌ای نیم‌دایره‌ای رو به پایین (180 درجه) بیشتر از زاویه راس سرریزکنگره‌ای مثلثی (35/5 درجه) است که سبب برخورد جت‌های جریان در سرریز کنگره‌ای نیم‌دایره‌ای با زاویه بزرگتری شده و باعث ایجاد آشفتگی و کاهش راندمان بیشتر می‌شود. با قرارگیری راس سرریزکنگره‌ای به سمت بالادست، برخورد جت‌های جریان در راس حذف شده و زاویه سرریز با جدار کانال پایین‌دست نیز افزایش می‌یابد که نهایتا سبب افزایش راندمان سرریز می‌شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| سرریز کنگره‌ای نیم‌دایره؛ سرریزکنگره‌ای مثلثی؛ تیغه‌های ریزشی؛ استغراق موضعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Laboratory Investigation of the Performance of Triangular and Semi-circular Homologous Labyrinth Weirs | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Farehe sadat Arham Namazi1؛ Javad Mozaffari2 | ||
| 1MS.c. Student, Water engineering department, Arak University | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Water Science & Engineering, Arak University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Abstract Introduction Labyrinth weirs, compared to linear weirs, reduce the flood height. Labyrinth weirs have a longer length than linear weirs and therefore the flood will pass over it with a lower height. But different forms of Labyrinth weirs have different efficiency. Considering the many effective parameters in the discharge coefficient of Labyrinth weirs, in this research, semi-circular and triangular homologous labyrinth weirs are investigated. Therefore, only changes in the angle of the weir head and the angle with the channel wall will be compared and investigated. Methodology Experiments were performed in a channel with a width of 0.8 meters and a flow rate of up to 70 liters per second. Ten weir models with a thickness of 4 mm were made, five of which are triangular weirs and the others are semi-circular weirs. The height of the weirs is 15 cm and the ratio of the length of the weirs to the width of the channel (L/W) is equal to 1.58. Each triangular labyrinth weir was compared with its homologous semi-circular weir. This means that the single-cycle semi-circular Labyrinth weir with the upward apex will be compared with the triangular single-cycle Labyrinth weir with the upward apex. Other Labyrinth weirs will also be compared with their corresponding triangular Labyrinth weirs. This causes the angle of the head of the weir as well as the angle of the weir with the wall of the downstream channel to be investigated and other parameters effective in the discharge coefficient are constant in this investigation. Finally, according to the measured data, a relation for the discharge coefficient will be presented. Results and Discussion The comparison of the triangular labyrinth weir with the identical semi-circular weir showed that the discharge coefficient of the triangular weirs is generally higher. The maximum reduction of discharge coefficient for semi-circular labyrinth weir is for single-cycle semi-circular weir and about 9% compared to TL1 triangular labyrinth weir. With the increase of cycles and the placement of the weirs apex towards the upstream, the distance between the discharge coefficient of the identical semi-circular and triangular labyrinth weirs decreases and their efficiency becomes almost the same. The smaller angle of the semi-circular labyrinth weir with downward apex with channel wall causes more interference of Nappe with the channel wall and cause more local submergence and reduce its efficiency. Also, the angle of impact of the flow jets at the apex of the semi-circular labyrinth weir with downward apex is greater than that of the triangular labyrinth weir, which causes more turbulence and as a result reduces the efficiency more at the apex of the semi-circular labyrinth weir. By placing the apex of the labyrinth weir towards the upstream, the impact of the flow jets at the apex is eliminated and the angle of the weir with the wall of the downstream channel increases, which ultimately increases the efficiency of the weir. The increase in efficiency in a semi-circular weir with the apex towards the upstream is more than in a similar triangular weir, and as a result, the discharge coefficient of the two weirs is close to each other. For triangular labyrinth weir, the discharge coefficient is equal to -0.146Ln(HT/P)+0.4959 with a regression of 0.94 and for semicircular labyrinth weir, the discharge coefficient is equal to -0.158Ln(HT /P)+ 0.4731 with a regression of 0.9, which indicates that these relationships fit the data well. Conclusion The results showed that the labyrinth weirs with the upward apex have a better performance than the labyrinth weirs with the downward apex. Also, semi-circular labyrinth weirs have lower efficiency than triangular labyrinth weirs. Of course, with the placement of the apex of the labyrinth weirs upstream, the performance of the semi-circular labyrinth weirs increases and they approach the triangular labyrinth weirs. Therefore, in labyrinth weirs with upward apex, which have better performance, the use of each of semi-circular and triangular labyrinth weirs will not make much difference. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Semi-circular labyrinth weir, Triangular Labyrinth weir, Nappe Interference, local submergence | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbasi, S., Fatemi, S., Ghaderi, A., and Di Francesco, S. (2020). The effect of geometric parameters of the antivortex on a triangular labyrinth side weir. Water Journal, 13(1), 14. Bijankhan, M., and Kouchakzadeh, S. (2017). Unified discharge coefficient formula for free and submerged triangular labyrinth weirs. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation Journal, 57, 46-56. Christensen, N. A. (2013). Flow characteristics of arced labyrinth weirs. M.S. thesis, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT. Crookston, B.M. and Tullis, B.P. (2012). Labyrinth weirs. Nappe interference and local submergence. Journal of irrigation and drainage, 138(8):757-765. Dutta, D., Mandal, A., and Afzal, M. S. (2020). Discharge performance of plan view of multi-cycle W-form and circular arc labyrinth weir using machine learning. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation Journal, 73,101740. Esmaeili Varak, M., Safarrazavi Zadeh, M. (2013). Study of Hydraulic Features of Flow Over Labyrinth Weir with Semi-circular Plan form, Water and Soil Journal, 27(1), 224-234. (In Persian) Fili, J., Heidarnejad, M. Masjedi, A and Asadi Lor, M. (2022). Experimental Investigation of the Effect of the Geometry of Trapezoidal Arced Labyrinth Weirs on Flow Discharge Coefficient. Water Resources Engineering Journal, 14(51), 73-86. (In Persian) Karami, H., Karimi, S., Bonakdari, H., and Shamshirband, S. (2018). Predicting discharge coefficient of triangular labyrinth weir using extreme learning machine, artificial neural network and genetic programming. Neural Computing and Applications Journal, 29(11), 983-989. Misaghi, F., Seddigh, A., Amani, A. (2021). Flow rate coefficient in jap weir single-cycle by CFD, Water Engineering Journal, 8(4), 31-43. (In Persian) Monjezi, R., Heidarnejad, M., Masjedi, A., Purmohammadi, M. H. and Kamanbedast, A. (2018). Laboratory investigation of the discharge coefficient of flow in arced labyrinth weirs with triangular plans. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation Journal, 64, 64-70. Mousavi, S. (2011). Investigating the drainage coefficient in the labyrinth side weirs in the combined shapes of quarter circle and triangle. Master's thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University. (In Persian) Noori, B.M. and Aaref , N.T. (2017). Hydraulic Performance of Circular Crested Triangular Plan Form Weirs. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 11(4), 1-10. Qadri, A. and Daneshfaraz, R. and Hossein Jani, A., (2016), Numerical investigation of hydraulic performance of semi-circular labyrinth weir, 4th International Congress on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development, Tehran. (In Persian) Safarrazavi Zadeh, M., Esmaeili Varaki, M., and Biabani, R. (2021). Experimental study on flow over sinusoidal and semicircular labyrinth weirs. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 27(1), 304-313. Tullis, B.P, Amanian, N., and Waldron, D. (1995). Design of labyrinth spillways. American Society of Civil Engineering. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 121(3), 247-255. Tullis, P. Crookstone, M. Brislin, J. and Seamons, T. (2020). Geometric Effects on Discharge Relationships for Labyrinth Weirs. Journal of Hydraulic engineering, 146(10), 0402006. Yasi, M. Mohammadi. M. (2007). Study of Labyrinth Spillways with Curved Planform. Jwss, 11 (41) ,1-13
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,489 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 237 |
||