References
1.Anitha T S, Shreyas S Kuduvalli, Oviya Iyappan Ramalakshmi,
Daisy Precilla S. Evaluation of Cell Doubling Time in C6 and
Y79 Cell Lines Based on Seeding Density. SBV Journal of Basic,
Clinical and Applied Health Science.2019;2(4):146-149.
2.Carter M, Essner R, Goldstein N, Iyer M.Guide to Research
Techniques in Neuroscience , Chapter 13 - Cell Culture
Techniques. 2022;Third Edition(978-0-12-818646-6):291-308.
3.Chen B, Zheng Z, Yang J, Chi H, Huang H, Gong H.
Development and characterization of a new cell line derived from
European eel Anguilla anguilla kidney. Biol Open.
2019;8(1):bio037507.
4.Chen X, Qian W, Song Z, Li QX, Guo S. Authentication,
characterization and contamination detection of cell lines,
xenografts and organoids by barcode deep NGS sequencing.
NAR Genom Bioinform. 2020;2(3):lqaa060.
5.Cooper JK, Sykes G, King S, Cottrill K, Ivanova NV, Hanner R,
Ikonomi P. Species identification in cell culture: a two-pronged
molecular approach. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim.
2007;43(10):344-51.
6.Cossart P, Helenius A. Endocytosis of viruses and bacteria. Cold
Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(8):a016972.
7.Cribiu EP, Di Berardino D, Di Meo GP, Eggen A, Gallagher DS,
Gustavsson I, et al. International System for Chromosome
Nomenclature of Domestic Bovids (ISCNDB 2000). Cytogenet
Cell Genet. 2001;92(3-4):283-99. doi: 10.1159/000056917.
PMID: 11435702.
8.Freshney, R. I. CULTURE OF ANIMAL CELLS. A MANUAL
OF BASIC TECHNIQUE AND SPECIALIZED
APPLICATIONS. 2016;Seventh Edition.
9.Holečková B, Schwarzbacherová V, Galdíková M, Koleničová S,
Halušková J, Staničová J, et al. Chromosomal Aberrations in
Cattle. Genes (Basel). 2021;12(9):1330.
10. Kerr KC, Stoeckle MY, Dove CJ, Weigt LA, Francis
CM, Hebert PD. Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of
North American birds. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7(4):535-543.
11. Kuduvalli SS, Ramalakshmi O, Daisy Precilla S, Anitha
TS. Evaluation of Cell Doubling Time in C6 and Y79 Cell Lines
Based on Seeding Density. J Basic Clin Appl Health Sci.
2019;2(4):146–149.
12. Langdon, S.P. Cell culture contamination: an overview.
Methods Mol Med. 2004;88:309–17.
13. Lednicky J A. Wyatt D E. The Art of Animal Cell
Culture for Virus Isolation. Biomedical Tissue Culture. InTech.
2012;9:151-178.
14. Leland DS, Ginocchio CC. Role of cell culture for virus
detection in the age of technology. Clin Microbiol Rev.
2007;20(1):49-78.
15. Lindström HJG, Friedman R. Inferring time-dependent
population growth rates in cell cultures undergoing adaptation.
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020;21(1):583.
16. Lincoln, CK, Gabridge MG. Cell culture contamination:
sources, consequences, prevention, and elimination. Methods Cell
Biol. 1998;57:49–65.
17. Pan YS, Wei HJ, Chang CC, Lin CH, Wei TS, Wu SC,
Chang DK. Construction and characterization of insect cellderived influenza VLP: cell binding, fusion, and EGFP
incorporation. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:506363.
18. Pastenkos G, Lee B, Pritchard SM, Nicola AV. Bovine
Herpesvirus 1 Entry by a Low-pH Endosomal Pathway. J Virol.
2018;92(20):e00839-18.
19. Potapova TA, Zhu J, Li R. Aneuploidy and chromosomal
Maghami et al / Archives of Razi Institute, Vol. 78, No. 5 (2023) 1528-1541 1541
instability: a vicious cycle driving cellular evolution and cancer
genome chaos. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013;32(3-4):377-89.
20. Pye D. Cell lines for growth of sheep viruses. Aust Vet J.
1989;66(7):231-2.
21. Sheltzer JM, Torres EM, Dunham MJ, Amon A.
Transcriptional consequences of aneuploidy. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 2012;109(31):12644-9.
22. Sobhani M, Lotfi M, Seyfi Abad Shapouri M.R. Ghiami
Rad M. Evaluation of MDBK, BT, CEF and Vero cell lines
sensitivity for replication of bovine parainfluenza virus type
3(bPI3V) in comparison with RBK cell line. Veterinary
Researches & Biological Products. 2018;31(118):48-57.
23. Storch GA. Diagnostic virology. Clin Infect Dis.
2000;31(3):739-51.
24. WHO. TRS987. Recommendations for the evaluation of
animal cell cultures as substrates for the manufacture of biological
medicinal products and for the characterization of cell banks.
2014