Introduction In the villages of Zahedan Township, there is a lack of facilities and services for education, health and so on, along with inadequate rural passages and inadequate rural housing in the face of natural disasters and consequently we face increased migration from the village to the city. Accordingly, during the years, the preparation and implementation of a rural conductor plan has been proposed as one of the solutions to reduce these problems in these villages. On the one hand, despite the widespread implementation of conductor plans in recent years and its goals, its effects appear to be less than expected and limited to changes in the physical context and less so in economic and social factors. On the other hand, due to the activities carried out by the Housing Foundation of Zahedan province and city in rural areas, especially in the central part of Zahedan, no evaluation of the services provided and the strengths and the weaknesses of these plans have not been investigated. Based on this issue, the purpose of this research is to investigate the performance of the implementation of rural guidance projects in the villages of the central part of Zahedan city and to evaluate the level of satisfaction of the villagers with its implementation. Materials and Methods The research method in this research is based on descriptive-analytical methods with survey approach. Information about the theoretical foundations and literature of the research was collected through documentary method and field data through a questionnaire. In designing the questionnaire, the issue, research problem, research purpose and socioeconomic conditions of the study area were considered. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by university professors, Islamic Revolution Housing Foundation experts, and Zahedan Central Provincial Staff. Its reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha, which was 0.84. The statistical population of the study consists of 2623 villages in the central part of Zahedan city, out of which 5 villages with conductive plan were selected and excluded from the populated villages. The method of selection of the villages under study was selective and judgmental and used criteria such as population (in terms of population) and time of project implementation (5 years or more). To estimate the sample size, 335 villagers were selected by Cochran formula with 95% confidence level and 5% error probability by simple random sampling. After data collection and processing, SPSS, EXELL and ArcGIS software were used to analyze the data in the study area using one-sample t-test and Kruskal-Wallis. Results and Discussion Among the economic indicators, direct and indirect employment (2.63) had the highest performance and investment components in the village and the production of production units in the village had the lowest (2.40 and 2.49, respectively). In general, the results show that all economic indicators are below average and undesirable at the target level. Among the social indicators, the components of educational facilities in the village and the reduction of rural migration with the mean of 2.62 and 2.46 had the highest performance and the components of participation in the preparation of the conductor plan and the goals of the project were in line with the villagers' expectations, respectively. They have the lowest performance with averages of 2.37 and 2.39. In general, the results show that all social indicators are below average and undesirable at the desired level. Among the physical indices, the components of absorption of infrastructure facilities and services and compliance with the technical requirements of the project in construction with the mean of 2.54 and 2.48 have the highest performance and the components of the status of the design of the water supply and disposal network, respectively. The squares have the lowest yields with the mean of 2.27 and 2.20, respectively. In general, the results show that all physical indices are below average and undesirable at the target range. One sample t-test was used to evaluate the performance of conductor design in socioeconomic and physical dimensions of the study area. Physical performance with average of 2.31 had the lowest performance. Overall average conductor design performance was lower than average among study villages and has been shown to be undesirable. The results of Kruskal-Wallis test to measure people's satisfaction in the five studied villages showed that the average of people's satisfaction in the studied villages was not the same and there were significant differences. According to the results, people's satisfaction with the performance of rural guide plan in Sefidsang village with average of 202.30 is higher than other villages. Also, the residents of Shah Moradabad village have the least satisfaction with the implementation of the rural guide plan with an average rating of 100. Conclusions Among the economic indicators, direct and indirect employment creation has the highest performance and the components of investment in the village and creation of productive units in the village have the lowest performance. From the social point of view of the respondent, the main effect of the conductor plan was on the components such as the existence of educational facilities in the village and the reduction of rural migration and the least impact on the components of participation in the preparation of the conductor plan and the project goals were in line with the villagers' expectations. In terms of physical impacts from the perspective of individuals, the conductor design had the greatest impact on the components such as attracting infrastructure facilities and services and observing the technical requirements of the design in construction and had the least impact on the components of the design status of the water disposal network and the layout and squares. In general, the results showed that the performance of the conductor plan in all dimensions was lower than the average in the studied villages, which indicates the dissatisfaction of the villagers. |
- Ahmadizadeh, M. (2016). Evaluation of the role of guide plans in the physical development of rural settlements, a case study of Dasht Ab district, Baft township, Kerman province, Master Thesis for the Master of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Geography and Planning Environmental, University of Sistan and Baluchistan. [In Persian]
- Alinaghipour, M. & Pourramezan, I. (2014). Assessment of effects of implementation of guiding plan on physical development in the central district villages of Rasht township, Journal of Human Settlements Planning Studies, 9(29), 101-113. [In Persian]
- Amir Entekhabi, Sh., Gharagozloo, H. & Amini Gavaqlou, E. (2021). Analysis of the effects of the pilot implementation on improving the quality of life in rural areas (Case study: Khalajistan ward, Qom County), Rural Development Strategies, 8(2), 213-231. [In Persian]
- Anabestani, A.A. & Akbari, M.H. (2012). Assessment of rural guidance and its role in the rural physical development from the villagers view (Case study: Jahrom county), Human Geography Research, 44(4), 93-110. [In Persian]
- Anabestani, A.A. & Javanshiri, M. (2014). Factors influencing the location of land uses in rural guide projects, Space Economy and Rural Development, 3(7), 35-54. [In Persian]
- Anabestani, A.A. & Hajipour, Y. (2013). Social and economic effects of the implementation of guidance projects in rural settlements (Case study: Villages of Dana city). Journal of Regional Planning, 3(9), 13-26. [In Persian]
- Azizpour, F. & Hoseini Hasel, S. (2008). Review on physical transition process in villages in the country (with emphasize on villages guide plan), Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 27(123), 42-55. [In Persian]
- Azizpour, F., Khalili, A., Mohsenzadeh, A. & Hosseini Hasel, S. (2011). Economic Impact Analysis and Assessment of Implementation of Plan in Rural Settlements of Iran, Housing and Rural Environment, 30(135), 71-84. [In Persian]
- Bahrami, (2018). Analyzing the physical effects of rural directorial plans on villager’s satisfaction (Case study: Rural district of Neggel, Sanandaj), Physical Social Planning, 4(8), 66-77. [In Persian]
- Byrd, E., Bosley, H.E. & Dronberger, M.G. (2009). Comparisons of stakeholder perceptions of tourism impacts in rural eastern North Carolina, Tourism Management, 30(5), 693– 703.
- Gane, M. (2007). Forest strategy: Strategic management and sustainable development for the forest sector, Netherlands: Springer.
- Gevelt, T.V., Zaman, T, George, F, Bennett, M.M. Fam, S.D. & Kim, J.E. (2020). End-user perceptions of success and failure: Narratives from a natural laboratory of rural electrification projects in Malaysian Borneo, Energy for Sustainable Development, 59, 189-198.
- Ghafari, Gh., Mirzaei, H. & Karimi, A.R. (2018). Investigating on the relationship between industry and quality of life, Journal of Community Development (Rural-Urban Communities), 3(1), 1-24. [In Persian]
- Gibson, K., Cahill, A. & McKay, D. (2010). "Rethinking the dynamics of rural transformation: Performing different development pathways in a Philippine municipality", Journal of Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(2), 237- 255.
- Habibi, M. (2003). Improvement and renovation of residential structures, Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
- Heidari Mokarar, H., Jahantigh, H.A. & Masoumi Jashni, M. (2016). The assessment of the rate of the villagers' satisfaction from the socio- economic and physical performance of the rural guide plan (Case study: The villages of the Nimrooz city), Spatial Planning, 5(4), 57-74. [In Persian]
- Jalalian, H., Khodaiee, S. & Amini Qovaghlou, A. (2017). The effects of implementing the rural guide plan on the physical development of rural settlements (Case study: Somarin district in Ardabil county), Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 6(17), 1-18. [In Persian]
- Kadivar, A.A. & Shohaninejad, M. (2015). Investigating the economic, social and environmental effects resulting from the implementation of guide projects in rural areas (Case example: Mish Khas County in Ilam province), Geographical Sciences (Applied Geography), 11(22), 107-88. [In Persian]
- Long, H., Ma, L., Zhang, Y. & Qu, L. (2022). Multifunctional rural development in China: Pattern, process and mechanism. Habitat International, 121(3), 102530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102530.
- McGuire, R., Longo, A. & Sherry, E. (2022). Tackling poverty and social isolation using a smart rural development initiative. Journal of Rural Studies, 89, 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.11.010.
- Moulai Hashjin, N. (2002). An analysis of the use of geography in planning the physical development of rural settlements in Iran. Geographical Space, 2(6), 49-66. [In Persian]
- Pezeshkian, M. (2015). The performance of rural guide projects in the physical, social and economic development of rural settlements (Case study: Charosa district, Kohgiluyeh Township), Master's thesis, Birjand University, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Department of Geography. [In Persian]
- Rabieifar, V. & Hazrati, M. (2015). Evaluation of rural hadi plan to improve the physical dimensions-space, rural quality of life (Case Study: Zanjan province), Spatial Planning, 5(2), 117-138. [In Persian]
- Reeder, R.J. & Brown, D.M. (2005). Recreation, tourism, and rural wellbeing, United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Report Number 7, Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/46126/15112.
- Sartipipour, M. (2004). Evaluation of guide rural project, Tehran: Islamic Revolution Housing Foundation. [In Persian]
- Satendra & Sharma, V.K. (2004). "Sustainable Rural Development for Disaster Mitigation". New Delhi: Ashok Kumar Mittal.
- Scott, M. (2007). Rural Housing: Politics, public policy and Planning, Housing Contemporary Ireland, I, 344-363.
- Statistical yearbook of Iran. (2015). Statistical Center of Iran.
- Tavakkoli, J. & Razlansari, A. (2015). Analysis physical and economic impacts of rural guide plans (Case: villages of Kermanshah county), Economy of Space and Rural Development, 5(16), 141-160. [In Persian]
- Zarei, Y. (2009). A critical view to the process of rural guide plan provision, Housing and Village Environment, 28(127), 56-65. [In Persian]
|