| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,031 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,920 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,292,763 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 62,715,434 |
سنجش پایداری بُعد نهادی طرحهای آبخوانداری در مقیاس محلی با رویکرد تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی در روستاهای کتویه، کال و بهرستان، جنوب استان فارس | ||
| پژوهش های آبخیزداری | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 37، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 143، تیر 1403، صفحه 22-38 اصل مقاله (2.12 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/wmrj.2023.361419.1525 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حسن مقیم* 1؛ حنانه محمدی کنگرانی2؛ ارشک حلی ساز3 | ||
| 1دانش آموخته دکتری علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری، اداره کل منابع‌طبیعی و آبخیزداری استان فارس | ||
| 2دانشیار دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع‌طبیعی گرگان | ||
| 3استادیار دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع‌طبیعی گرگان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقدمه و هدف به‌دلیل خشکسالی های اخیر و افت شدید ذخایر آب زیرزمینی در اکثر دشت های کشور، به طرحهای آبخوانداری به عنوان راهکاری مناسب بیش از بیش توجه‌شده است. ارزیابی پایداری طرحهای آبخوانداری در زمینه‌های گوناگون محیطزیستی، اقتصادی، اجتماعی و به‌ویژه نهادی بسیار مهم است. در این پژوهش، ارزیابی پایداری بعد نهادی در جنوب استان فارس (ایران) در مقیاس محلّی و با بهره گیری از روش تحلیل شبکه‌ی اجتماعی بررسی شد. مواد و روش‌ها ارزیابی پایداری بعد نهادی در سه طرح آبخوانداری کتویه لارستان، کال لامرد و بَهرستان مُهر که در سال‌های 1396 تا 1398 اجرا‌شده بود، در پنج گام بررسی شد. در گام اول، دو سنجه‌ی اعتماد و همکاری به‌وسیله‌ی اجماع نظر خبرگان و با روش دلفی کلاسیک انتخاب شدند. در گام دوم، شبکه‌ی رابطه‌های اجتماعی شامل شش موضوع برای هر سه روستای هدف تعریف شد. در گام سوم، پرسش‌نامه مربوطه طراحی شد. تعداد پرسش‌نامه های تکمیل‌شده برای روستاهای کتویه، کال و بهرستان به ترتیب 25، 60 و 20 شمار (جمعاً 105 شمار) بود. در گام چهارم، اطلاعات به‌دست آمده از پرسش‌نامه ها برای هر روستا در نرم افزار UCINET وارد شد. سپس سنجه های تراکم و مرکزیت (درجه و بینابینی) برای ارزیابی دو سنجه‌ی اعتماد و همکاری محاسبه شدند. در گام پنجم، دو موضوع همکاری اداره ها و تمایل به همکاری با اداره ها به‌ترتیب برای دو سنجه‌ی همکاری و اعتماد انتخاب شدند و وضعیت پایداری این دو سنجه در سه روستای هدف تعیین شد. نتایج و بحث نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد، در روستای کتویه، درجه‌ی پایداری برای هر دو سنجه‌ی همکاری و اعتماد 3/3 (پایداری متوسط) بود. از این رو، درجه‌ی پایداری در بُعد نهادی برای روستای کتویه 3/3 یا پایداری متوسط برآورد شد. در روستای کال، درجه‌ی پایداری برای دو سنجه همکاری و اعتماد به‌ترتیب 2/7 و 2/3 بود. از این رو، درجه‌ی پایداری در بُعد نهادی برای روستای کال 2/5 یا تقریباً ناپایدار تا پایداری متوسط برآورد شد. در روستای بَهرستان، درجه‌ی پایداری برای دو سنجه‌ی همکاری و اعتماد به‌ترتیب 3 و 1/7 بود. از این رو، درجه‌ی پایداری در بُعد نهادی برای روستای بَهرستان 2/4 یا تقریباً ناپایدار برآورد شد. نتیجه گیری و پیشنهادها در سه روستای کتویه، کال و بهرستان، نهاد دولتی اداره‌ی منابع‌طبیعی و آبخیزداری شهرستان مربوطه و به تبع آن اداره‌ی کل منابع‌طبیعی و آبخیزداری استان از یک سو و شورای اسلامی روستاهای مزبور به‌عنوان نمایندگان اهالی از سوی دیگر، توانستند با ایجاد رابطه‌های دو سویه، اعتماد و همکاری متقابل را میان طرفین ایجاد کنند. بنابراین، این موضوع سبب تقویت بعد نهادی در پایداری توسعه ی طرح های آبخوانداری شد. به‌منظور جلب بیشتر اعتماد و همکاری آبخیزنشینان و استمرار آن در زمینه‌ی فعالیت های آبخوانداری، پیشنهاد می شود نگهداری از طرحهای آبخوانداری به معتمدین محلی یا شوراهای اسلامی روستاها واگذار شود تا بستر مناسبی برای تقویت و ادامه‌ی مشارکت، همکاری و اعتماد دوطرفه آبخیزنشینان و نهادهای دولتی در زمینه‌ی حفاظت آب و خاک فراهم شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آبخیزداری؛ توسعه‌ی پایدار؛ سرمایه اجتماعی؛ شبکه‌ی رابطه‌ها؛ مدل منشوری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Measuring the Sustainability of the Institutional Dimension of Watershed Projects on a Local Scale with the Approach of Social Network Analysis in the Katouye, Kal and Bahrestan Villages, South of Fars Province | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hassan Moghim1؛ Hannaneh Mohammadi Kangarani2؛ Arashk Holisaz3 | ||
| 1Ph.D., Watershed Management Sciences and Engineering, General Office of Natural Resources and Watershed Management of Fars Province | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction and Goal Due to the current droughts and the sharp drop in ground water reserves in most of the country's plains, aquifer projects have received more and more attention as a suitable solution. The issue of assessing the sustainability of water catchment projects in various environmental, economic, social and particularly institutional dimensions is crucial. In this research, the evaluation of the sustainability of the institutional dimension in the south of Fars province (Iran) has been investigated on a local scale using the social network analysis method. Materials and Methods The evaluation of the sustainability of the institutional dimension in the three aquifer projects of the Katuyeh (Larestan), Kal (Lamard) and Baherstan (Mohr), which were implemented between 2017-2019, was examined through a five-step process. First, the two metrics of trust and cooperation were selected through the consensus of experts and using the classical Delphi method. Second, social relations networks including six topics were established in all three target villages. Third, the relevant questionnaire was designed. The number of completed questionnaires for the villages of Katuyeh, Kal and Behrestan is 25, 60 and 20 respectively (105 in total). In the fourth step, the information obtained from the questionnaires for each village was entered into the UCINET software. Then density and centrality measures (degree and betweenness) were calculated to evaluate two measures of trust and cooperation. Fifth, the two topics of "cooperation of administrations" and "willingness to cooperate with administrations" were determined for the two selection metrics and the stability of these two metrics of cooperation and trust in three villages, respectively. Results and Discussion The results of this research showed that in Katwieh village, the degree of stability for both measures of cooperation and trust was 3.3 (moderate stability). Therefore, the degree of stability in the institutional dimension was estimated to be 3.3 or average stability for Katwieh village. In Kal village, the degree of stability for the two measures of cooperation and trust was 2.7 and 2.3 respectively. Therefore, the degree of stability in the institutional dimension for Kal village was estimated as 2.5 or almost unstable to moderate stability. In Bahristan village, the degree of stability for the two measures of cooperation and trust was 3 and 1.7, respectively. Therefore, the degree of stability in the institutional dimension for Bahristan village was estimated as 2.4 or almost unstable. Conclusion and Suggestions In the three villages of Katoyeh, Kal and Behrestan, the government body of the Natural Resources and Watershed Management Department of the respective city and accordingly the General Department of Natural Resources and Watershed Management of the province on the one hand and the Islamic Council of the said villages as the representatives of the residents on the other hand, were able to establish two-way relations, trust and create mutual cooperation between the parties. Therefore, this issue strengthened the institutional dimension in the sustainability of watershed project development. In order to gain more trust and cooperation of the watershed residents and its continuity in the field of watershed activities, it is suggested that the maintenance of the watershed project plan be entrusted to the local trustees or the Islamic councils of the villages in order to provide a suitable platform for strengthening and continuing participation, cooperation and Provide mutual trust of watershed residents and government institutions in the field of water and soil conservation. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Prismatic model, relationship network, social capital, sustainable development, watershed management | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbasirostami A, Yazdanpanah M, Abdshahi A, Azizi T, Savari M. 2021. Analysis of the social network of cooperative activists in the interconnected management of agricultural water resources in Mazandaran province. Journal of Watershed Management Research. 13(25):197-209. (In Persian). Aeinlu F, Ekhtesasi MR, Ghorbani M, Abdinezhad P, Anjamshoja R. 2022. Analysis of the network of organizational stakeholders in the direction of collaborative management of water resources (Study area: Abhar Plain). Journal of Range and Watershed Management. 75(2):263-282. (In Persian). Agha Alikhani Z, Barakpour N. 2013. Comparison of social and institutional capacities of sustainable development in the cities of Karaj and Qazvin. Scientific Research Quarterly of Urban Studies. 4)14(:81-94. Alizadeh S, Bayat M. 2015. Investigating good environmental governance in middle-income countries. Environmental Science and Technology. 2(2):513-501. An R, Liu P, Cheng L, Yao M, Wang Y. 2021. Network analysis of the food – energy – water nexus in china`s Yangtze river economic belt from a Strategic perspective. Environment research. 16(5):1-16. id.054001. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abe25e. Barnes-Mauthe M, Allen SD, Gray SA, Leung PS. 2013. The influence of ethnic diversity on social network structure in a common-pool resources system: implications for collaborative management. Ecology and Society. 18(1):23. Blore ML. 2015. The role of social capital in community – based natural resource management: A case study from South Africa. M.Sc. dissertation, University of Pretoria. 131p. Bodin O, Prell C. 2011. Social network in natural resources management. Cambridge University Press. Borgatti S. 2005. Centrality and network flow. Social networks. 27(1):55-71. Chainchana C. 2022. Development of an educational sustainability assessment model. Application of the Delphi Research. 9(2):119-128. Darvishi A, Fakheran S, Yousefi M, Ghorbani M, Ahadi M. 2022. Social network analysis for environmental planning and co-management. Journal of Environmental Research. 13(25):151-165. Downer A. 2000. Good Government (Guiding Principles for Implementation), Australia, Canberra mailing center. 9 p. Ebrahimizadeh MA, Mohammadi Kangarani H, Gholami H, Nikkhah H. 2020. Applying network analysis approach to trust network evaluation in Hosein Abad, South Khorasan Carbon sequestration project. Journal of Forest. 12(1):17- 31. (In Persian). Fani A, Ghazi I, Malekian A. 2020. Developing water resources management strategies using the Delphi – SWOT technique for sustainable development (Case study: Bandar Abbas City). Quarterly of Geography and Regional Planning Journal. 10(2-3):667-683. (In Persian). DOI: 20.1001.1.22286462.1399.10.39.11.8 Fatemi M, Rezaei Moghaddam K, Pourghasemi H. 2021. Social networks analysis of rural stakeholders in watershed management. Journal of Environment and Develop. 23(12):17535-17557. (In Persian). DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01399-9 Gandasari D, Dwidienawati D, Tjahjana D, Sugiart M, Faisal M. 2022. Social network analysis: local and global centrality as the communication network structure in the beef cattle farmer groups. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research. 33(2):1-17. Helms R, Ignacio R, Brinkkemper S, Zonneveld A. 2010. Limitations of network analysis for studying efficiency and effectiveness of knwledge sharing. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management. 8(1):53-068. Holland PW, Leichardt S. 1979. The advance research symposium on social networks. In P.W. Holland and s. Leichardt (Eds.) Perspectives on Social Network Research. New York. Jatel N. 2013. Using social network analysis to make invisible human actor water governance's networks visible. The Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the College of Graduate Studies (Interdisciplinary Studies) the University of British Columbia. 35 p . 10.14288/1.0074319 Jovoric R, Draskovic M, Deli basic M. Ovonic M. 2017. The concept of sustainable regional development- Institutional Aspects, Policies and Prospects. Journal of International Studies. 10(1):255-266. Doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2017110-1/18. Karimi Gougheri H, Rezaei Moghaddam K, Zamani GH, Hayati D, Rezaei A. 2017. Analyses of agricultural extension and education organizational network in Kerman province: social network analysis. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education. 13(2):131-151. (In Persian). Lienert J, Schnetzer F, Ingold K. 2013. Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. Environmental Management Journal. August. 125:134-148. Liu J, Qu H, Huang D. 2014. The role of social capital in encouraging resident’s pro-environmental behaviors in community – Based Ecotourism, Tourism management. 41(1):190-201. Macbeth J, Carson D, Northcote J. 2004. Social capital, tourism and regional development: SPCC. Current Issues in Tourism. 7(6):502-522. Mohammadi kangarani H, shamekhi T, hoseinzadeh M. 2011. Investigating and analyzing the network of formal and informal relationships between organizations using the network analysis approach (Case study: Kohgilouye and Boyerahmad Provinces). Faculty of management, University of Tehran. Journal of Governmental Management. 3(6):149-164. (In Persian). Mohammadi Kangarani H, Shayeste A, Holisaz A, Ghonchepoor D. 2016. Drawing and analyzing the trust network among tourism sector employees using the network – based analysis approach (Case study: Tabl Village,Qeshm Island). Hormozgan Cultural Journal. 8(4):137-150. (In Persian). Mohammadi Kangrani H. 2011. Network analysis: A new method to solve management and policy issues in line with industrial development. Journal of Industrial Technology Development Quarterly. 14(8):23-34. (In Persian). Momeni F, Atapour MR, Salehzadeh R, Ghazali MM. 2002. Institutional arrangements and comprehensive development: the role of institutional innovations in achieving technological development and sustainable development. Journal of Economic Researches. 16(3):107-130. (In Persian). Musa HD, Yacob MR, Abdullah AM. 2019. Delphi exploration of subjective well-being indicators for strategic urban planning towards sustainable development in Malaysia. Journal of Unban Management. 8(1):28-41. Navidi F, Mirtahiri L, Hassanzadeh M. 2017. Data analysis methods and links in social networks. Journal of Balance and Information. 4(2):11-21. (In Persian). Newig J, Gunther D, Paha-Wostl C. 2010. Synapses in the network: Learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecology and Society. 15(4):24. Nixon R, Ma ZH, Khan B, Birkenhltz T, Lee L, Ahmadmian I. 2022. Social influence shape adaptive water governance: empirical evidence from northwestern Pakistan. Ecology and Society. 27(3):37. OECD. 2002. Governance for sustainable development. Five OECD case studies, Paris, OECD.100 p. Pfeffer J. 1978. Organizational design. Arlington Heights: AHM publishing.1(2):109–122. Doi: 10.1177/017084068000100207 Rathwell KJ, Peterson GD. 2012. Connecting social networks with ecosystem services for watershed governance: a social- ecological network perspective highlight the critical role of bridging organization. Ecology and Society. 17(2):24-34. Rojas R, Bennison G, Galvaz V, Claro E, Castelblanco G. 2020. Advancing collaborative water governance: unravelling stakeholder's relationships and influences in contentions River basins. Water Journal. 12(12):3316. Sabot K, Wickremasingle D, Blanchet K, Avan B, Schellenberg J. 2017. Use of social network analysis methods to study professional advice and performance among healthcare providers: A systematic review. Systematic Reviews. 6(208):2-28. Salari F, Ghorbani M, Malekian A, Fahmi H. 2016. The application of the social network analysis method in measuring the capacity of local stakeholders for the adoption of cooperative management of water resources (Study area: Sarab Shah Hossein Village, Rezin Watershed, Kermanshah). Journal of Water and Soil Research. 47(2):387-395. (In Persian). Salarian M, Davary K, Alizadeh A, Lagzian M, Fazeli M. 2020. Collaborative framework for decision making processes of the water management (Case study: Kashfrood Basin). JWMR. 11(22):76-95. Salimi Koochi J, Salajegheh A, Ghorbani M, Malekian A, Rezaei A. 2021. Analysis of the structural pattern of social capital within the group of water resource users. Journal of Range and watershed. 73(3):499-511. (In Persian). Soleymani Z, Mohammadi Kangarani H, Rezaei M, Hosseinzadeh M. 2021. Participatory management desert ecosystems study of cooperation network of public and governmental institutions in mangrove forests (Qeshm land).Journal of Rang and Desert Research. 28(4):787-803. (In Persian). Stein C, Ernstson H, Barron J. 2011. A social network approach to analysis water governance: The case of the Mkindo catchment, Tanzania. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 14-15(36):1085-1092. UNCED- United Nation's Conference on Environmental and Development. 1992. Agenda 21, report of the United Nations conference on environment and development, Rio de junior, 3-14-june. 75 p. Valentin A, Spangenberg J. 1999. Indicators for sustainable communities. Paper presented at the international workshop "Assessment methodologies for urban in structure". Stockholm. 20 to 21 November. 88 p. Ward S, Meng F, Bunney S, Diao K, Butter D. 2020. Animating inter-organizational resilience communication: a participant social network analysis of water governance in the UK. Journal of Heliyon/Oct, 3:6(10):e05069 e05069. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05069 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 507 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 192 |
||