| تعداد نشریات | 285 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 83 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,094 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,531 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 49,371,424 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 79,816,880 |
تأثیر پرتوتابی گاما روی عملکرد کمی و کیفی ژنوتیپهای مختلف چغندرقند تحت شرایط مختلف آبیاری | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 38، شماره 1، شهریور 1401، صفحه 55-70 اصل مقاله (808.25 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کامل علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2023.357667.1297 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رحیم محمودی1؛ بهزاد ثانی* 2؛ مهدی صادقی شعاع3؛ فائزه رجب زاده4؛ حمید مظفری2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکترای گروه زراعت، واحد شهرقدس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه زراعت، واحد شهرقدس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3استادیار مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| 4استادیار گروه زراعت، واحد شهرقدس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| اثر پرتوگاما روی بذر و تنش آبی برعملکرد کمی و کیفی در ژنوتیپهای مختلف چغندرقند در دو مکان قم و اسلامشهر بررسی شد. آزمایش بهصورت اسپلیت پلات فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار به اجرا درآمد. فاکتور آبیاری شامل دو سطح (نرمال و تنش کمآبیاری) بود که در کرت اصلی قرار گرفت و فاکتور دوم شامل ژنوتیپ (اکباتان، مطهر، پایا و مادری پایا) و فاکتور سوم پرتودهی پرتوگاما بر روی بذر (شاهد، 50، 100، 200 و 400 گری) بودند که در کرتهای فرعی قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد بین دو مکان مورد ارزیابی اختلاف معنیداری برای اکثر صفات وجود داشت بهصورتی که مکان اسلامشهر عملکردریشه بالاتر و شرایط مطلوبتری را نسبت به مکان قم داشت. بررسی اثرات متقابل میزان آبیاری× ژنوتیپ بر روی عملکرد شکرسفید نشان داد در آبیاری نرمال، بیشترین مقدار این صفت را ارقام اکباتان، مطهر و پایا داشتند که از نظر آماری در یک گروه قرار گرفتند. در حالی که در شرایط تنش، رقم پایا بیشترین عملکرد شکرسفید را داشت. بررسی نتایج همچنین نشان داد کاربرد پرتوگاما با دز 100 گری در چغندرقند، باعث افزایش عملکرد شکرسفید ریشه، کمترین مقدار عملکرد شکرسفید ریشه، مربوط به دز 400 گری بود. بنابراین استفاده از دزهای مناسب پرتوگاما میتواند در افزایش عملکرد چغندرقند نقش داشته باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| آبیاری؛ پرتو گاما؛ ژنوتیپ چغندرقند؛ عملکرد ریشه؛ عملکرد شکرسفید | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The effect of gamma radiation on quantitative and qualitative yield of different sugar beet genotypes under different irrigation conditions | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| R. Mahmoodi1؛ B. Sani2؛ M. Sadeghi-shoae3؛ F. Rajabzadeh4؛ H. Mozafari2 | ||
| 1Department of Agronomy, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Associate professor of Department of Agronomy, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 4Assistant professor of Department of Agronomy, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The effect of gamma radiation on seed, and water stress on quantitative and qualitative yield of different sugar beet genotypes was evaluated in Qom and Eslamshahr locations. The experiment was performed in split plot factorial based on randomized complete block design with three replications. The irrigation factor as the first factor included two levels of normal and low irrigation stress in main plots, the second factor included four sugar beet genotypes of Ekbatan, Motahar, Paya, and maternal line of Paya and the third factor included five levels of gamma radiation on seed including control, 50, 100, 200 and 400 Gy in subplots. Results showed that there was a significant difference between two locations for most of the traits, so that Eslamshahr had higher root yield and more favorable condition than Qom. The effect of irrigation rate × genotype interaction on white sugar yield showed that under normal irrigation, Ekbatan, Motahar and Paya genotypes obtained the highest white sugar yield, which were statistically placed in a same group; however, under low irrigation stress, Paya had the highest white sugar yield. Results also showed that the application of gamma radiation with 100 and 400 Gy resulted in the increase and decrease of white sugar yield, respectively. Therefore, the use of appropriate gamma radiation dose rates can play a significant role in increasing the yield of sugar beet. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Gamma ray, Irrigation, Root yield, Sugar beet genotype, White sugar yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahian-noghabi M, Froud-Williams RJ. Effect of moisture stress and rewatering on growth and dry matter partitioning in three cultivars old sugar beet. Aspects of Applied Biology. 1998; 52: 71-78. Alam MM, Nahar K, Hassanuzzaman M, Fujita M. Exogenous jasmonic acid modulates the physiology, antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems in imparting drought stress tolerance in different Brassica species. Plant Biotechnology Reports. 2014; 8, 279-293. doi:10.1007/s11816-014-0321-8. Alikamanoglu S, Yaycili O, Sen A. Effect of gamma radiation on growth factors, biochemical parameters, and accumulation of trace elements in soybean plants (Glycine max L. Merrill). Biological Trace Element Research. 2011; 141(1-3): 283-293. doi:10.1007/s12011-010-8709-y. Ariraman M, Bharathi T, Dhanavel D. Studies on the effects of mutagens on cytotoxicity behavior in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp) Var. CO-7. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research. 2016; 1(1): 25-28. Borzouei A, Kafi M, Khazaei H, Naseriyan B, MajdabadiA. Effects of gamma radiation on germination and physiological aspects of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2010; 42(4): 2281-2290. Brahmi I, Mabrouk Y, Charaabi K, Delavault P, Simier P, BelhadjO. Induced mutagenesis through gamma radiation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): developmental changes and improved resistance to the parasitic weed Orobanche foetida Poir. International Journal of Biological Research. 2014; 2(11): 670-684. doi:10.1002/ps.4278. Choluj D, Wisniewskaa A, Szafranski KM, Cebulac J, Gozdowskid D, PodlaskiaS. Assessment of the physiological responses to drought in different sugar beet genotypes in connection with their genetic distance. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2014; 171: 1221-1230. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2014.04.016. Ciftci CY, Divanli Turkan A, Khawar, KM, Atak M, Ozcan S. Use of gamma rays to induce mutations in four peas (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars. Turkish Journal of Biology. 2006; 30: 29-37. Clover G, Smith H, Jaggard K. The crop under stress. British Sugar Beet Review. 1998; 66(3): 17-19. Cooke D, Scott R. The sugar beet crop: Science IntoPractice Chapman and Hill, New York. 1993;195pp. Eck HV, Winter SR, Smith SJ. Sugar beet yield and quality in relation to residual beet feed lot waster. Agronomy Journal. 1990; 82: 250-254. doi:10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200020015x. Elshiemy SM, Soliman IA, Abdelaleem MA, Elbassiony KRA. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of Gamma Irradiated Red Beet (Beta Vulgaris L.) Leaves and Roots. Journal of Nuclear Technical Application Sciences. 2019; 7: 4. doi:10.21608/jntas.2019.54552. Fayez AK, Bazaid AS. Improving drought and salinity tolerance in barley by application of salicylic acid and potassium nitrate, Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 2014; 13: 45–55. doi:10.1016/j.jssas.2013.01.001. Firoozabadi M, Abdollahian-Noghabi M, Rahimzadeh F, Moghadam M, ParsaeyanM.Effects of different levels of continuous water stress on the yield quality of three sugar beet lines. Journal of Sugar beet. 2003; 19(2): 133-142. [In Persian] Gaafar RM, Hamouda M, Badr A. Seed coat color, weight and eye pattern inheritance in gamma-rays induced cowpea M2-mutant line. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. 2016; 14: 61-68. doi:10.1016/j.jgeb.2015.12.005. Ghohari J, Tohidloo Gh. Investigation of sugar beet growth trend in Karaj region. Published by Sugar Beet Seed Institute.1998. [In Persian] Hassanuzzaman M, Fujita M. Selenium pretreatment up-regulates the antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification system and confers enhanced tolerance the drought stress in rapeseed seedlings. Biological Trace Elements Researches. 2011; 143: 1758-1776. doi:10.1007/s12011-011-8998-9. Hwang KT, Kim JY, ParkJN, Yang JS. Effects of roasting, powdering and storingirradiated soybeans on hydrocarbon detection for identifying postirradiation of soybeans. Food Chemistry.2007; 102: 263-269. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.05.015. Jahadakbar MR, Ebrahimian HR, Torabi M, Gohari J. Effect of water deficit on sugar beet quality and quantity in Kabotarabad- Esfahan. Journal of sugar beet. 2003; 19(1): 81-94. doi:10.22092/jsb.2003.7168. [In Persian] Kafi M. Biochemical response of two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) to gamma radiation. Pakistan Journal of Botany.2013; 45: 473-477. dor: 20.1001.1.16807073.2012.14.7.13.5. Kashani A. Sugar beet cultivation in temperate regions. Ahwaz Faculty of Agriculture. 1987. [in Persian] Kheirabi J. Analysis of low irrigation. Define and explained. Journal of Water, Soil and Machine. 1995; 13: 16-24. Kim JH, Chung BY, Kim JS, Wi SG. Effects of in Planta gamma irradiation on growth, photosynthesis, and antioxidative capacity of red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants. Journal of Plant Biology.2005; 48(1): 47-56. doi:10.1007/BF03030564. Kochaki A, Hosseini M, Nasiri Mahallati M. Relationship between water and soil in crops (translation). Publications University of Mashhad. 1997. [In Persian] Kochaki A, Soltani A. Sugar beet cultivation. Translation.Publications University of Mashhad. 1996; 328 pp. [in Persian] Kochaki A, Soltani A, Azizi M. Plant ecophysiology. Publications University of Mashhad; 2003; 272 pp. [In Persian] Lamb TA, Moraghan JT. Comparison of foliar and pre-plant applied nitrogen fertilizer for sugar root. Agronomy Journal. 1992; 85: 290-295. doi:10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500020024x. Loilier M. Improvement of the quality of sugar root. Sucreier Francaise. 1981; 122 (49): 131-140. Maity JP, Mishra D, Chakraborty A. Modulation of some quantitative and qualitative characteristics in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and mung (Phaseolus mungo L.) by ionizing radiation. Radiation Physiology Journal. 2005; 74: 391–394. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.08.005. Marcu D, Cristea V, Daraban L. Dose-dependent effects of gamma radiation on lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. capitata) seedlings. International Journal of Radiation Biology.2013a; 89: 219–223. doi:10.3109/09553002.2013.734946. Marcu D, Damian G, Cosma C, Cristea V. Gamma radiation effects on seed germination, growth and pigment content, and ESR study of induced free radicals in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Biological Physiology. 2013b; 39: 625–634. doi:10.1007/s10867-013-9322-z. Melki M, Sallami D. Studies the effects of low dose of gamma rays on the behaviour of chickpea under various conditions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2008; 11: 2326–2330. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2008.2326.2330. Melki M, Marouani A. Effects of gamma ray irradiation on seed germination and growth of hard wheat. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2010; 8: 307. doi:10.1007/s10311-009-0222-1. Melki M, Dahmani Th. Gamma Irradiation Effects on Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2009; 12(23): 1531-1534. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1253/1/012031. Moursy AA, Ismail MM. Effects of boron application and gamma ray irradiation on yield of sugar beet grown in sandy soil. Bangladesh Journal of Botany. 2021; 50(4): 1041-1049. doi:10.3329/bjb.v50i4.57071. Moussa HR. Low dose of gamma irradiation enhanced drought tolerance in soybean. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2011; 17: 63–72. doi:10.1556/AAgr.59.2011.1.1. Naderi A, Hashemi Dezfuli M, Shokrani R, Rezaei A. Effects of Irrigation Stopping Time and Harvest Date on Quantitative and Qualitative Yield of CP-57 Sugarcane in Khuzestan. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences.1998; 1 (1): 19-13. [In Persian] Nepal S, Ojha BR, Meador AS, Gaire SP, ShilpakarC. Effect of gamma rays on germination and photosynthetic pigments of maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds. International Journal of Research.2014; 1(5): 511-525. Ober E. The search for drought tolerance in sugar beet. British Sugar Beet Review. 2001; 69(1): 40-43. Parvizi M. Investigation of different lines of sugar beet in terms of drought tolerance. Master Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran. 1992. [In Persian] Ranji Z, Chegini M, Tohidloo Gh, Abdollahian-Noghabi M. Investigation of drought tolerance on physiological traits in sugar beet related to nitrogen and potassium. Reports in part of breeding research. Sugar Beet Seed Institute. 2000. [in Persian] Reinfeld E, Emmerich A, WinnerC. Zur vuraussage des melassezukers aus rubenanalysen. Zucker.1974; 27: 2-15. Sadeghi Shoae M, Paknejad F, Habibi D, Nooralvandi T, Behdad M. Investigation of the effect of humic acid and the amount of available water on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Agriculture and Plant Breeding. 2011; 3. [in Persian] Sadeghi Shoae M, Taleghani D. Climate modeling and zoning for autumn sugar beet cultivation. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences.2017; 4: 67-73. doi:10.21833/ijaas.2017.01.010. Saha A, Santra SC, Chanda S. Modulation of some quantitative characteristics in rice (Orayza sativaL.) by ionizing radiation. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2005; 74: 391-394. Sarmadnia GH, Kochaki A. Physiological aspects of rainfed agriculture. Mashhad University Jihad. 1992. [In Persian] Shojaei B, Ehsanpour AA, Abdi MR. Effects of gamma radiation on growth, protein content, bioavailability and DNA damage in potato callus cells. Iranian Journal of Biology. 2010; 23 (1): 125-131. [In Persian] Singh B, Datta PS. Gamma irradiation to improve plant vigoure, grain development, and yield attributes of wheat. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2009;79(2): 139-143. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2009.05.025. Sohrabi Y, Shakiba M, Abdollahian-Noghabi M, Rahimzadeh F, Tourchi M, Fotohi K. Investigation of limited irrigation and root harvesting dates on yield and some of quality charactrestics of sugar beet. Pajouhesh Sazandegi Journal. 2006; 70: 8-15. [In Persian] Taleghani D. Study of water and nitrogen consumption efficiency in optimal conditions and stress in two sugar beet planting arrangements, PhD thesis, Research Sciences Branch of Islamic Azad University.1998. [In Persian] Vazan S, Ranji Z, Tehrani M, Ghalavand A, Saaneyi M. Drought stress effects on ABA accumulation and stomatal conductivity of sugar beet. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2002; 3: 176-180. [In Persian] Wang X, Ma R, Cui D, Cao Q, Shan Z, Jiao Z. Physio-biochemical and molecular mechanism underlying the enhanced heavy metal tolerance in highland barley seedlings pretreated with low-dose gamma irradiation. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7: 133-142. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14601-8. Yu X, Wu H, Wei LJ, Cheng ZL, Xin P, Huang CL, Zhang K, Sun YQ. Characteristics of phenotype and genetic mutations in rice after spaceflight. Advanced Space Research. 2007; 40(4): 528-534. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.06.022. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 395 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 455 |
||