اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات283
تعداد نشریات سازمان81
تعداد شماره‌ها2,722
تعداد مقالات31,007
تعداد مشاهده مقاله27,023,170
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله16,153,220
اعمی بنده قرایی, حسن, مهرآفرین, حسن, نوروزیان, محمد, حسینی, سید مهدی. (1402). بررسی کارایی اقتصادی تعاونیهای تولیدی روستایی و اولویت‌بندی مشکلات آن‌ها در فرایند مدیریت و نظام بازاریابی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26(3), 129-156. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.357234.1436
حسن اعمی بنده قرایی; حسن مهرآفرین; محمد نوروزیان; سید مهدی حسینی. "بررسی کارایی اقتصادی تعاونیهای تولیدی روستایی و اولویت‌بندی مشکلات آن‌ها در فرایند مدیریت و نظام بازاریابی". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26, 3, 1402, 129-156. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.357234.1436
اعمی بنده قرایی, حسن, مهرآفرین, حسن, نوروزیان, محمد, حسینی, سید مهدی. (1402). 'بررسی کارایی اقتصادی تعاونیهای تولیدی روستایی و اولویت‌بندی مشکلات آن‌ها در فرایند مدیریت و نظام بازاریابی', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26(3), pp. 129-156. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.357234.1436
اعمی بنده قرایی, حسن, مهرآفرین, حسن, نوروزیان, محمد, حسینی, سید مهدی. بررسی کارایی اقتصادی تعاونیهای تولیدی روستایی و اولویت‌بندی مشکلات آن‌ها در فرایند مدیریت و نظام بازاریابی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 26(3): 129-156. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2023.357234.1436

بررسی کارایی اقتصادی تعاونیهای تولیدی روستایی و اولویت‌بندی مشکلات آن‌ها در فرایند مدیریت و نظام بازاریابی

روستا و توسعه
دوره 26، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 103، دی 1402، صفحه 129-156    اصل مقاله (653.47 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30490/rvt.2023.357234.1436
نویسندگان
حسن اعمی بنده قرایی1؛ حسن مهرآفرین2؛ محمد نوروزیان* 3؛ سید مهدی حسینی4
1دکترای اقتصاد، عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه پیام نور واحدکاشمر، ایران
2دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی گرایش بین الملل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد نیشابور، نیشابور، ایران.
3دانشجوی دکترا گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.
4استادیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.
چکیده
با توجه به اینکه تعاونی­ های تولیدی در توسعه اقتصادی کشور نقش مهمی دارند، ارزیابی عملکرد اقتصادی این شرکت ­ها از اهمیت بالایی برخوردار است. در این مطالعه روش تحلیل پوششی داده‌های تصادفی با رویکرد سناریوی تصادفی (SDEA) به­ منظور برآورد کارایی اقتصادی تعاونی‌های تولیدی روستایی منطقه ترشیز انتخاب ‌شد. برای اولویت‌بندی مشکلات تعاونی‌های تولیدی روستایی این شهرستان‌ها در فرایند مدیریت و نظام بازاریابی، از رهیافت تحلیل سلسله مراتبی (AHP) و معیار آنتروپی استفاده شد. داده­ های مورد نیاز مربوط به سال 99-1398 بود که با تکمیل پرسش­نامه‌ و مصاحبه حضوری با 220 نفر از اعضای تعاونی­ های منتخب جمع­ آوری شد. نتایج نشان داد کارایی تصادفی تعاونی‌های تولیدی روستایی مناطق مورد مطالعه در سطح 73 درصد است و متغیرهای مالکیت تعاونی، تحصیلات اعضا، فاصله تعاونی تا مرکز شهر، شرکت در کلاس‌های آموزشی و سابقه فعالیت شرکت تأثیر مستقیم و معنی‌دار بر کارایی دارد. ایجاد یک واحد مستقل در تعاونی‌های تولیدی روستایی منطقه در زمینه اطلاع ­یابی از روند قیمت روز محصولات در بازارهای داخلی و جهانی جهت دسترسی هرچه سریع‌تر کشاورزان پیشنهاد می‌شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تعاونی های تولیدی روستایی؛ کارایی اقتصادی؛ نظام بازاریابی؛ دشت ترشیز
عنوان مقاله [English]
Surveying the Economic Efficiency of Rural Production Cooperatives and Prioritization of their Problems in the Management Process and the Marketing System
نویسندگان [English]
Hassan Aama Bandeh gharaee1؛ H. Mehrafarin2؛ M Norozian3؛ S.M. Hosseini4
1Assistant Professor, Faculty Member, Payame Noor University, Kashmar, Iran.
2MA of Business Management, International Management, Islamic Azad University, Neishabour, Iran.
3PhD Student in the Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Zahedan, Iran.
4Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Zahedan, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Introduction
Cooperatives have an important role in rural development in a way that they are mentioned as a part of the dynamic and active agricultural environment and as a way to the agricultural world. The studies on the production cooperatives clarified that the cooperatives have a significant role in making important decisions. Agricultural cooperatives are so important in the development of agricultural efficiency that may help to the economic welfare of the farmers. Agricultural cooperatives as one of the most important sources producing agricultural productions are among the suppliers of food security of Iran. According to the statistics and information in this field, nowadays agricultural production cooperative companies provide more than 30% of the products like wheat, barley, rape, sugar beet, cotton, corn and potato. The existing cooperatives have not been that successful so far due to reasons like lack of credit, weak financial basis, inadequate capital, lack of the required training for team work, their inability in omitting brokers and mediators, poor management, the disappointment of the members for the function of cooperative, lack of sufficient expert personnel, law quality of the machinery and poor notification. Regarding the numerous problems of cooperatives, a comprehensive planning for solving the problems is required. These factors result in decrease performance and consequently efficiency drop. The role of management in cooperatives is an effective factor in their efficiency and performance. With the above- mentioned items in mind, estimating the performance of cooperatives in order to compare the managerial abilities of each of the cooperatives, the efficiency of production cooperatives in Khalil Abad, Kashmar and Bardaskan around the province of Khorasan Razawi has been fulfilled.
Materials and Methods
In this study, random data envelopment analysis with random scenario approach (SDEA) was chosen in order to estimate the economic efficiency of rural production cooperatives in Tarshiz (Plain Khalil Abad, Kashmar and Bardaskan). Analytical Hierarchy (AHP) approach and entropy criterion were used to prioritize the problems of rural production cooperatives in these cities in the management process and marketing system.
Generally, in the common DEA models, the exact data is used for measuring the efficiency of decision units. Since a person who wants to make decision is confronted with risky situation and uncertainty, it is not possible to determine the exact amount of inputs and outputs and this may put the precision of the model under question. In order to solve this shortcoming and enter the risky terms and uncertainty in determining the efficiency of each decision making unit, Random Data Envelopment Analysis can be used.
In this study, the statistical information of the year 2019-2020 which was collected by completing a questionnaire and face-to-face interviews with 220 members of the selected cooperatives. The studied units include 60 rural production cooperatives. For this, Excel, GAMS and Eviews software have been used for their analysis.
 
Results and Discussion
This study aims to estimate the efficiency and the effective factors on efficiency of production cooperatives in the above-mentioned cities. In order to follow a set of national policies and fulfill them to reach to a required level of efficiency in cooperatives some actions should be taken. Therefore, in order to provide strong results random Data Envelopment Analysis with random inputs to estimate the efficiency of the cooperatives, separate local studies and categorization based on their efficiency and optimization was conducted. The results showed that the range between the most efficient and the inefficient ones are so wide and with promoting managerial factors from the efficient ones to the inefficient ones, increasing profitability would be possible.
According to the results, the level of efficiency in agricultural cooperatives of these cities is more than average and is relatively efficient. The average of economic efficiency in agricultural cooperatives in the studied areas is 74% and it is possible to promote it up to 26%.
Based on the data collected, there is a direct relationship between CEO’s level of education and economic efficiency in a way that the more educated the CEO, the more efficient the cooperative. Also, the distance of the cooperative from the city center has the direct effect on economic efficiency of the cooperatives. As it is shown variables like the education of the CEO, the distance of the cooperative to city center, participating in training classes and investing in cooperatives have a positive and meaningful effect on the efficiency of the cooperatives. Other factors which were analyzed about efficiency are the number of members in cooperative age and risk taking of the CEO but they were not considerably effective on the efficiency of cooperatives.
Conclusions
The results of random data envelopment analysis (SDEA) showed that the average random efficiency of rural production cooperatives in three cities is 74% and is at a relatively moderate level. The efficiency of private sector cooperatives (83%) is more efficient than the state-managed sector (73%). The results of the hierarchical analysis model (AHP) showed that inappropriate policies in pricing and price fluctuations of agricultural products, low services in the field of packaging, processing, marketing and distribution of products and lack of comprehensive long-term planning by managers (lack of marketing research) are priors in, respectively, the inefficiency of the management process and marketing system of rural production cooperatives in our cities. It is suggested to create an independent unit in the rural production cooperatives of the region in the field of obtaining information about the daily price trends of products in the domestic and global markets in order to reach farmers support the marketing system.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Rural Production Cooperatives, Economic Efficiency, Marketing System, Tarshiz Plain
مراجع
  1. Agricultural Jahad Organization of Khorasan Razavi province. (2020). agricultural statistics and information office, planning and planning department. [In Persian]
  2. Asghari, A. & Aghapour Sabaghi, M. (2016). Evaluation of marketing status of livestock and poultry cooperatives in Khuzestan province. Cooperative and Agricultural Quarterly, 5(18), 133-158. [In Persian].
  3. Bruni, M., Conforti, D., Beraldi, P. & Tundis, E. (2009). Probabilistically constrained models for efficiency and dominance in DEA. International Journal of Production Economics, 117(1), 219-228.
  4. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W.W. (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 6(1), 73-79.
  5. Chellattan, V.P., Ashok, A., Speelman, S., Buysse, J. & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2011). Sub- vector efficiency analysis in chance constrained stochastic DEA: An application to irrigation water use in the Krishna river basin, India. 122nd Seminar, February 17-18, 2011, Ancona, Italy: European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  6. Compbell, R., Rogers, K. & Rezek, J. (2008). Efficient frontier estimation: A maximum entropy approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30(3), 213-221.
  7. Cooperative and Social Welfare Organization of Khalilabad City. (2020). Management Department of Rural Agricultural Cooperatives.
  8. Faizabadi, Y. & Javadi, N. (2017). Recognizing and prioritizing marketing barriers facing agricultural production cooperatives of Dargaz city. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 5(20), 39-63. [In Persian]
  9. Feizollahzadeh, M., Mohammadzadeh, S. & Karrari, S. (2020). Appropriate strategies for marketing and exporting agricultural products of production cooperatives in Maku Free Zone. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 9(35), 53-80. [In Persian]
  10. Hao, J., Jos, B., Cornelis, G., Nico, H., Wim, H. & Xuexi, H. (2018). Cooperative membership and farmers’ choice of marketing channels–evidence from apple farmers in Shaanxi and Shandong provinces, Food Policy, 74, 53-64.
  11. Huang, Z., Fu, Y., Liang, Q., Song, Y. & Xu, X. (2013). The efficiency of agricultural marketing cooperatives in China's Zhejiang province. Managerial and Decision Economics, 34(3-5), 272-282.
  12. Ilskog, E., Kjellström, B., Gullberg, M., Katyega, M. & Chambala, W. (2005). Electrification co-operatives bring new light to rural Tanzania. Energy policy, 33(10), 1299-1307.
  13. Karami, S. & Alibaygi, A. (2014). Identifying and prioritizing effective factors on development of Aagricultural cooperatives. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 3(10), 111-142.
  14. Karbassi, A. & Uhadi, N. (2011). Estimating economic performance of agricultural production cooperatives case study of Sirjan city. Journal of Cooperatives and Agriculture, 22(6), 1-20. [In Persian]
  15. Karim, M.H. (2015). Challenges of Iran's rural cooperative networks. Space Economy and Rural Development, 4(13), 173-196. [In Persian]
  16. Khajooei Pour, A., Mohammadi Nejad, A., Khoobyari Shoorbaz, H. & Shabanzadeh, M. (2016). Choice a competitive marketing strategy using analytic network process (Case study: Rafsanjan pistachio producers cooperative), Agricultural Economic and Development, 24(94), 25-43. [In Persian]
  17. Land, K., Lovell, C.A.K. & Thore, S. (1993). Chance constrained data envelopment analysis. Managerial and Decisional Economics, 14(6), 541-554.
  18. Mugera, A.W. (2013). Measuring technical efficiency of dairy farms with imprecise data: A fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 57(4), 501-520.
  19. Nazaripour, N. & Hossieni, S.M. (2020). Evaluating the technical efficiency of rural cooperatives in Sistan and Baluchestan province of Iran using fuzzy data envelopment analysis (FDEA) Model. Village and Development, 23(1), 79-94. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2020.253809.0. [In Persian]
  20. Norozian, M., Kikha, A.A. & Mohammadi, H. (2019). Evaluation of efficiency of rural production cooperatives in Kashmar. Space Economy and Rural Development, 8(27), 97-118. [In Persian]
  21. Wang, X., Sun, L. & Zhang, Y. (2012). The empirical study on operating efficiency of agricultural cooperatives in langao. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(17), 60-69.
  22. Zheng, S., Wang, Z. & Awokuse, T.O. (2012). Determinants of producers' participation in agricultural cooperatives: Evidence from northern China. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 34(1), 167-186.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 136
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 49


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب