Introduction The rural economy, especially its agricultural sector, is facing various risks and policies. Support tools, in such conditions, play an important role in maintaining its economic growth. Although the rural areas of Iran are the environment of industrial, service and agricultural activities, according to the share of employment and income sources of the villagers, the dominant economic activity in these areas is agriculture. For this reason, in comparison with industry and services, any changes that occur in the indicators related to the agricultural sector will have a greater impact on the level of development of the villagers. Risk and uncertainty are considered to be prominent features of economic activities. Risks can be of natural origin (natural risk) or economic origin (market risk). The agricultural sector is more susceptible to both natural and market risks than industrial and service activities. Examining the relationship between insurance and economic growth has shown that the insurance industry affects economic growth through 5 different channels (facilitating trade and commerce, effective risk management, strengthening financial stability, equipping domestic savings and support) in direct and indirect ways. Materials and Methods In this study, the Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) estimation method was used to investigate the effect of agricultural insurance on the value added of Iranian agriculture. The time period is the annual data of 1989-2019, and the required statistics are from the systems and reports available on the website of the Central Bank of Iran (www.cbi.ir), the website of the Iranian Statistics Center (www.amar.org.ir) and the website of the National Productivity Organization of Iran (www.npo.gov.ir). The penetration rate of agricultural insurance has been calculated using the available statistics. E-views software was used to estimate the desired regression model. Results and Discussion The results of the study have shown that statistically, the variables have positive and significant effects according to theoretical expectations on the economy of the agricultural sector of Iran: The agricultural net capital stock has a positive and significant effect on the value added of the agricultural sector (1.02); so that with an increase of one percent in the agricultural net capital stock, the amount of value added of the agricultural sector also increases by 1.02 percent. In fact, more investment and increasing the amount of capital stock provides the necessary platform for the expansion of production activities in the agricultural sector. The estimated coefficient for the agricultural labor force (0.04) indicates that the role of the agricultural labor force in the economic added value of this sector is positive, significant, but small. With an increase of one percent in the agricultural labor force, the amount of the value added of the agricultural sector also increases by 0.04 percent. Increasing the use of human resources, on the one hand, will lead to the timely performance of operations related to the production of products and its increase, and on the other hand, the use of skilled labor will increase the amount of production in this sector by increasing human capital. The positive and significant coefficient of the productivity variable of the net agricultural capital stock (1.03) shows that with a one percent increase in the productivity of the net capital stock in the agricultural sector, the amount of economic value added of this sector also increases by 1.03 percent. The effects of productivity of production factors, including capital, on economic growth and agricultural value added from two channels show an increase in production and a decrease in their respective costs, which is an expected issue in the evolving agricultural production method of Iran. The effect of agricultural labor productivity on the value added of the agricultural sector has become positive and significant (0.01). So that with a one-percent increase in the productivity of the agricultural labor force, the amount of value added of the agricultural sector will increase also insignificantly (0.01 percent). The variable of agricultural insurance penetration has a positive and significant effect on the value added of the agricultural sector (0.01). So that with an increase of one percent in the insurance penetration variable, the amount of value added of the agriculture sector also increases slightly (0.01 percent). The effect of agricultural insurance on its economic growth by compensating a part of production costs (in case of damages) and giving assurance to agriculture in the face of possible risks, preserves farmers' production incentives. Conclusions Considering the high share of agricultural activities in the total economic activities of rural areas of Iran, adopting any policy and implementing any type of action that will lead to the strengthening of value added and, as a result, the economic growth of the agricultural sector, will also strengthen the rural economy. The results of the estimation of the regression model of the value added of Iran's agricultural sector indicate a positive and significant effect of the desired variables (agricultural net capital stock, agricultural labor force, agricultural net capital stock productivity, agricultural labor productivity and agricultural insurance penetration coefficient) in the period of time. This is about the value added of agriculture and as a result, the economic growth of this sector. Although the positive effect of the penetration coefficient of agricultural insurance on the amount of value added and, as a result, the economic growth of Iran's agricultural sector during about three decades of the implementation of the agricultural insurance program, has revealed the importance of insurance in the process of economic growth of this sector, the low coefficient of its effectiveness (0.01 percent), can express several issues:
Agricultural insurance in Iran has not yet adequately covered all agricultural products and assets. The amount of insurance support does not answer all the risks in Iran's agricultural sector (market and non-market). The implementation of the country's agricultural insurance programs and policies, despite the high share and extensive cost burden on the government's annual budget (for example, more than 3200 billion tomans in the 2021 budget to pay the government's share to the agricultural products insurance fund), is not targeted and it has encountered deviations in implementation.
It should be noted that Iran's agricultural sector (as in many other countries), unlike the country's industry and service sectors, does not have the required capacity and infrastructure for the development of private insurance related to production, and the policy of agricultural insurance development until meeting the necessary conditions, should be carried out through the state sector and increasing its participation. It will be very necessary to adopt a set of policies and measures that prevent capital outflow from the agricultural sector in particular and rural areas in general (through improving the exchange relationship between the agricultural sector and rural areas with other economic sectors and urban areas). |
- Agha Abbasi, N. (2007). Study of the role of insurance in the production of livestock in Kerman province. Agricultural Economics and Development, 15(59), 25-36. [In Persian]
- Agricultural Insurance Fund. (2018). Agricultural insurance fund performance report, crop year 2016-2017. Available at: sbkiran.ir. [In Persian]
- Ardestani, M., Khaledi, K. & Abdullahpour, A. (2017). Analysis of global experiences regarding government support for agricultural insurance and providing a suitable model for Iran. Research Project, Agricultural Planning Economic and Rural Development Research Institute (APERDI), RP-1397-1980. [In Persian]
- Asadzadeh, S. & Naqibi, M. (2018). The impact of insurance development on economic growth in selected countries (With emphasis on the role of environmental institutions). Applied Economics, 8(26): 39-49. [In Persian]
- Chau, W.H., Khin, A.A. & Teng, K.L.L. (2013). Economic development cointegration and Malaysian life and general insurance consumption. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(10), 538-546.
- Ebadzadeh, H., Ahmadi, K., Mohammadnia Afroozi, Sh., Abbas Taghani, R., Abbasi, M. & Yari, Sh. (2020). Agricultural statistics of 1398. Ministry of Agriculture–Jahad, deputy of planning and economy, information and communication technology center. Available at: www.sbkiran.ir. [In Persian]
- Ege, I. & Sarac, T.B. (2011). The relationship between insurance sector and economic growths: An econometric analysis. International Journal of Economic Research, 2(2), 1-9.
- Fattahi, S.Y., Mansouri, M. & Khodavaysi, H. (2013). The role of insurance in the production of broiler chicken: (Case study of Khoy city). Iranian Agricultural Economics and Development Research (Iranian Agricultural Sciences), 44 (4), 657-664. [In Persian]
- Hamburg, D. (1996). Patterns of economic growth. Translated by Mehdi Taghavi, Tehran: Scientific and cultural publishing company. [In Persian]
- Han, L., Li, D., Moshirian, F. & Tian, Y. (2010). Insurance development and economic growth. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice. 35(2), 183-199.
- Hosseini, S.M., Durandish, A., Ghorbani, M. & Daneshvar Kakhki, M. (2017). Agricultural products insurance and increasing investment: A case study of khorasan Razavi province. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 19(1), 1-10.
- Jahangard, E. (2011). Insurance and economic growth in Iran. Economic Research and Policy, 19(59), 53-79. [In Persian]
- Jahani, F. & Dehghani, A. (2015). The effect of the expansion of the insurance industry on the economic growth of the countries of the Mena region (during the period 1997-2010). Financial Economics Quarterly (Financial Economics and Development), 9 (32), 123-138. [In Persian]
- Kafshgar Jolodar, H. (2014). Economic growth models. Baqerul Uloom Research Institute, available at: http://pajoohe.ir. [In Persian]
- Khaledi, K. & Haghighatnejad Shirazi, A. (2012). Economic growth of agriculture and rural poverty in Iran. Social Welfare, 12(46), 57-81. [In Persian]
- Khaledi, K. (2014). Generalities of agricultural economics. Kermanshah: Islamic Azad university of Kermanshah branch publications. [In Persian]
- Motaffaker Azad, M.A., Shahbazzadeh Khiavi, A. & Enerjani Khosrow Shahi, A. (2014). The effect of real exchange rate instability on the export of industrial goods in Iran (Saikenen and Lotkipol approach). Quarterly Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 4(16), 189-212. [In Persian]
- Movahedmanesh, S.A. (2016). Application of generalized torque method in investigating the effect of insurance penetration coefficient on GDP, Iranian study. Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 6(24), 69-82. [In Persian]
- Niknami, M., Hatami, F. & Lashkarara, F. (2009). Effects of agricultural insurance on the economic situation of damaged wheat farmers in Qom. Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 2(3), 107-117. [In Persian]
- Qasemi, A.R. (2008). Economics and risk management (Application in agriculture). Tehran: Javadaneh and Jangal Publications. [In Persian]
- Rashidi, A. (2016). Familiarity with property, person and liability insurance. Tehran: Poshtiban Publication. [In Persian]
- Rezaei, A., Hakimipour, N., Narimani, A. & Yazdankhah, M. (2016). Study of the risk structure of the agricultural sector based on optimizing the composition of facilities in different economic sectors. Financial Economics Quarterly, 10(34), 115-130. [In Persian]
- Richterkova, &Korab, P. (2013). Impact of insurance sector activity on economic growth – a meta-analysis. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(7), 2677-2683.
- Safari, S., Mahdavi, G. & Soltani, H. (2011). Analysis of the relationship between insurance industry expansion and economic growth in selected developing countries (Algeria, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Turkey, Philippines, Egypt and India) and its comparison with Iran during the period 1976-2009. Financial Economics (Financial Economics and Development), 5(15), 131-151. [In Persian]
- Safarzadeh, I. & Jafari, H. (2013). Nonlinear relationship between insurance penetration and per capita income. Economic Modeling Quarterly, 7(24), 53-70. [In Persian]
- Shahabadi, A., Mehdipour Zarrin Kamar, F. & Moradi, A. (2020). "The effect of insurance penetration on entrepreneurship in selected countries. Journal of Insurance (Insurance Industry), 35(3), 37-65. [In Persian]
- Sihem, E. (2017). Agricultural insurance-agricultural productivity nexus: Evidence from international data. Journal of Service Science Research, 9, 147-178.
- Statistical Center of Iran. (2015). National accounts system 2008. Iran statistics center publications, Tehran. [In Persian]
- Statistical center of Iran. (2021). Statistical data and information. Available at: www.amar.org.ir. [In Persian]
- Tahamipour, M., Zaker, M.R. & Abdollahi, M. (2021). Investigating the effect of insurance on the total productivity of agricultural production factors: Analysis based on index number approach. International Journal of Economics and Politics, 2(1), 231-250.
- Turkmani, J. & Nikouei, A. (2007). The role of crop insurance in rural development: A case study in Fars province. Village and Development, 10(4), 15-38. [In Persian]
- Yaqubi, A., Chizari, M., Pezeshki Rad, Gh., Mohseni, A. & Faley, S. (2008). The role of agricultural insurance in adjusting the risk of agricultural production. Conference of Agricultural Regions, Axis of Growth and Development, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch. [In Persian]
|