اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات286
تعداد نشریات سازمان84
تعداد شماره‌ها2,846
تعداد مقالات32,300
تعداد مشاهده مقاله41,387,051
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله18,562,160
Mohamed, W. F, Askora, A. A, Mahdy, M. M. H, EL-Hussieny, E. A, Abu-Shady, H. M. (1401). Isolation and Characterization of Bacteriophages Active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infections. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 77(6), 2187-2200. doi: 10.22092/ari.2022.359032.2357
W. F Mohamed; A. A Askora; M. M. H Mahdy; E. A EL-Hussieny; H. M Abu-Shady. "Isolation and Characterization of Bacteriophages Active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infections". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 77, 6, 1401, 2187-2200. doi: 10.22092/ari.2022.359032.2357
Mohamed, W. F, Askora, A. A, Mahdy, M. M. H, EL-Hussieny, E. A, Abu-Shady, H. M. (1401). 'Isolation and Characterization of Bacteriophages Active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infections', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 77(6), pp. 2187-2200. doi: 10.22092/ari.2022.359032.2357
Mohamed, W. F, Askora, A. A, Mahdy, M. M. H, EL-Hussieny, E. A, Abu-Shady, H. M. Isolation and Characterization of Bacteriophages Active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infections. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 77(6): 2187-2200. doi: 10.22092/ari.2022.359032.2357

Isolation and Characterization of Bacteriophages Active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infections

Archives of Razi Institute
مقاله 22، دوره 77، شماره 6، بهمن و اسفند 2022، صفحه 2187-2200    اصل مقاله (657.68 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ari.2022.359032.2357
نویسندگان
W. F Mohamed1؛ A. A Askora* 2؛ M. M. H Mahdy2؛ E. A EL-Hussieny3؛ H. M Abu-Shady3
1Ain-Shams University Specialized Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt
2Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Cairo, Egypt
3Faculty of Science, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
چکیده
Diabetic foot infection has become one of the most important public health concerns and is a growing problem. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an important opportunistic multidrug-resistant bacterium in diabetic foot infections. In the absence of antibiotics active against MDR strains of P. aeruginosa, phage therapy becomes a key way to deal with P. aeruginosa infections. Out of 185 samples collected from diabetic foot ulcers, 50 (27.02%) isolates were identified as P. aeruginosa. The incidence increases with older ages, and males (n=34, 68%) predominated in all age groups. The tested isolates showed maximum susceptibility towards colistin (80%), imipenem (72%), amikacin (66%), and piperacillin/tazobactam (62%), while these isolates showed moderate susceptibility towards ceftazidime (58%), cefepime (52%) and gentamicin (46%). However, it showed complete resistance (100%) to ampicillin, cefaclor, and sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim and highly resistance to clindamycin (90%) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (84%). Two bacteriophages (ϕPAE1 and ϕPAE2) isolated from sewage samples showed a broad host range against P. aeruginosaa clinical strains. ϕPAE2 infected 74% (37/50) and ϕPAE2 58% (29/50). Furthermore, both phages were host-specific, infecting only P. aeruginosa strains and could not infect other bacterial species in the cross-infectivity studies. Both phages were found to be relatively heat stable as over a period of 1 h, after exposure to a temperature range of 37–50°C, no significant loss in phage activity was observed. On the other hand, the lowest activity was observed at 70°C (39.15%) for ϕPAE1 whereas it was inactivated at 75°C while the lowest activity was observed at 75°C (38.01%) for ϕPAE2 whereas it was inactivated at 80°C. Isolated phages were able to survive and lyse host bacteria over a wide pH range. The optimum pH range for infection was from 6 to 8. Furthermore, ϕPAE1 lost its ability to lyses at pH 2, 3, 11 and 12, whereas; ϕPAE2 lost its infectivity at pH 2, 3 and 12. Chloroform was the most effective solvent that reduced the infectivity of ϕPAE1 and ϕPAE2 to 63.27% and 77.88%, respectively. On the other hand, petroleum ether showed the lowest effect on the infectivity of ϕPAE1 and ϕPAE2; it was reduced to 96.4% and 97.48%, respectively, followed by acetone and ethyl alcohol. The ability of P. aeruginosa phages to form plaques after different storage temperatures (4°C, 30°C, 37°C and 44°C) for a month was slightly affected. The storage of ϕPAE1 and ϕPAE2 at 4ºC showed the least effect on its infectivity, and the storage at 44ºC showed the highest reduction in its infectivity. Moreover, Phage counts were slightly decreased by increasing storage period and temperature.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Bacteriophages؛ Phage treatment؛ Pseudomonas aeruginosa؛ Diabetic foot؛ Antibiotic resistance
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Price BL, Morley R, Bowling FL, Lovering AM, Dobson CB. Susceptibility of monomicrobial or polymicrobial biofilms derived from infected diabetic foot ulcers to topical or systemic antibiotics in vitro. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228704.
  2. Arias M, Hassan-Reshat S, Newsholme W. Retrospective analysis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis management and outcome at a tertiary care hospital in the UK. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216701.
  3. Oliveira VC, Bim FL, Monteiro RM, Macedo AP, Santos ES, Silva-Lovato CH, et al. Identification and Characterization of New Bacteriophages to Control Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm on Endotracheal Tubes. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:580779.
  4. Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick BR, Lin TJ, Cheng Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37(1):177-92.
  5. El-Shibiny A, El-Sahhar S. Bacteriophages: the possible solution to treat infections caused by pathogenic bacteria. Can J Microbiol. 2017;63(11):865-79.
  6. Jamal M, Andleeb S, Jalil F, Imran M, Nawaz MA, Hussain T, et al. Isolation and characterization of a bacteriophage and its utilization against multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa-2995. Life Sci. 2017;190:21-8.
  7. Schmelcher M, Loessner MJ. Bacteriophage endolysins - extending their application to tissues and the bloodstream. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021;68:51-9.
  8. Jeon J, Yong D. Two Novel Bacteriophages Improve Survival in Galleria mellonella Infection and Mouse Acute Pneumonia Models Infected with Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85(9).
  9. Olivares E, Badel-Berchoux S, Provot C, Prevost G, Bernardi T, Jehl F. Clinical Impact of Antibiotics for the Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Infections. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2894.
  10. Hassan MA, Tamer TM, Rageh AA, Abou-Zeid AM, Abd El-Zaher EHF, Kenawy ER. Insight into multidrug-resistant microorganisms from microbial infected diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019;13(2):1261-70.
  11. Ahiwale S, Prakash D, Gajbhiye M, Jagdale S, Patil N, Kapadnis B. BVPaP-3, a T7-like lytic phage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: its isolation and characterisation. Curr Microbiol. 2012;64(4):305-11.
  12. Kwiatek M, Parasion S, Rutyna P, Mizak L, Gryko R, Niemcewicz M, et al. Isolation of bacteriophages and their application to control Pseudomonas aeruginosa in planktonic and biofilm models. Res Microbiol. 2017;168(3):194-207.
  13. Pires D, Sillankorva S, Faustino A, Azeredo J. Use of newly isolated phages for control of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and ATCC 10145 biofilms. Res Microbiol. 2011;162(8):798-806.
  14. Sekhar MS, M KU, Rodrigues GS, Vyas N, Mukhopadhyay C. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of aerobes in diabetic foot ulcers in a South-Indian tertiary care hospital. Foot. 2018;37:95-100.
  15. Ackermann H-W, Tremblay D, Moineau S. Long-term bacteriophage preservation. 2004.
  16. Nunan R, Harding KG, Martin P. Clinical challenges of chronic wounds: searching for an optimal animal model to recapitulate their complexity. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7(11):1205-13.
  17. Kurup R, Ansari AA. A study to identify bacteriological profile and other risk factors among diabetic and non-diabetic foot ulcer patients in a Guyanese hospital setting. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019;13(3):1871-6.
  18. Bansal E, Garg A, Bhatia S, Attri AK, Chander J. Spectrum of microbial flora in diabetic foot ulcers. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008;51(2):204-8.
  19. Al Benwan K, Al Mulla A, Rotimi VO. A study of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections in a teaching hospital in Kuwait. J Infect Public Health. 2012;5(1):1-8.
  20. Saltoglu N, Ergonul O, Tulek N, Yemisen M, Kadanali A, Karagoz G, et al. Influence of multidrug resistant organisms on the outcome of diabetic foot infection. Int J Infect Dis. 2018;70:10-4.
  21. Machado C, Teixeira S, Fonseca L, Abreu M, Carvalho A, Pereira MT, et al. Evolutionary trends in bacteria isolated from moderate and severe diabetic foot infections in a Portuguese tertiary center. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(3):205-9.
  22. Chavan SK, Karande GS, Chavan KB. Bacterial Profile and Pattern of Antimicrobial Drug Resistance in Diabetic Foot Ulcers at Tertiary Care Hospital. Int J Med Res rev. 2015;3(1).
  23. Bassetti M, Vena A, Croxatto A, Righi E, Guery B. How to manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Drugs Context. 2018;7:212527.
  24. Muthu SE, Aberna RA, Mohan V, Premalatha G, Srinivasan RS, Thyagarajan SP, et al. Phenotypes of isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a diabetes care center. Arch Med Res. 2006;37(1):95-101.
  25. Amjad SS, Zafar J, Shams N. Bacteriology Of Diabetic Foot In Tertiary Care Hospital; Frequency, Antibiotic Susceptibility And Risk Factors. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017;29(2):234-40.
  26. Parvez N, Dutta P, Ray P, Shah VN, Prakash M, Khandelwal N, et al. Microbial profile and utility of soft tissue, pus, and bone cultures in diagnosing diabetic foot infections. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(8):669-74.
  27. Michael CA, Dominey-Howes D, Labbate M. The antimicrobial resistance crisis: causes, consequences, and management. Front Public Health. 2014;2:145.
  28. Fu P, Zhao Q, Shi L, Xiong Q, Ren Z, Xu H, et al. Identification and characterization of two bacteriophages with lytic activity against multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. Virus Res. 2021;291:198196.
  29. Merchant S, Proudfoot EM, Quadri HN, McElroy HJ, Wright WR, Gupta A, et al. Risk factors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in Asia-Pacific and consequences of inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018;14:33-44.
  30. Khanolkar MP, Bain SC, Stephens JW. The diabetic foot. QJM. 2008;101(9):685-95.
  31. Kesik-Szeloch A, Drulis-Kawa Z, Weber-Dabrowska B, Kassner J, Majkowska-Skrobek G, Augustyniak D, et al. Characterising the biology of novel lytic bacteriophages infecting multidrug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Virol J. 2013;10:100.
  1. Zavascki AP, Carvalhaes CG, Picao RC, Gales AC. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii: resistance mechanisms and implications for therapy. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8(1):71-93.
  2. Dion MB, Oechslin F, Moineau S. Phage diversity, genomics and phylogeny. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(3):125-38.
  3. Viertel TM, Ritter K, Horz HP. Viruses versus bacteria-novel approaches to phage therapy as a tool against multidrug-resistant pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(9):2326-36.
  4. Adnan M, Ali Shah MR, Jamal M, Jalil F, Andleeb S, Nawaz MA, et al. Isolation and characterization of bacteriophage to control multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa planktonic cells and biofilm. Biologicals. 2020;63:89-96.
  5. Alvi IA, Asif M, Tabassum R, Aslam R, Abbas ZJAoV. RLP, a bacteriophage of the family Podoviridae, rescues mice from bacteremia caused by multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 2020;165(6):1289-97.
  6. Pires DP, Vilas Boas D, Sillankorva S, Azeredo J. Phage Therapy: a Step Forward in the Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. J Virol. 2015;89(15):7449-56.
  1. Knezevic P, Kostanjsek R, Obreht D, Petrovic O. Isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa specific phages with broad activity spectra. Curr Microbiol. 2009;59(2):173-80.
  2. Balarjishvili NS, Kvachadze L, Kutateladze M, Meskhi TS, Pataridze T, Berishvili T, et al. New virulent bacteriophages active against multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Appl Biochem Microbiol. 2015;51(6):674-82.
  3. El Didamony G, Askora A, Shehata AA. Isolation and characterization of T7-like lytic bacteriophages infecting multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from Egypt. Curr Microbiol. 2015;70(6):786-91.
  4. Bielke L, Higgins S, Donoghue A, Donoghue D, Hargis BM. Salmonella host range of bacteriophages that infect multiple genera. Poult Sci. 2007;86(12):2536-40.
  5. Jensen EC, Schrader HS, Rieland B, Thompson TL, Lee KW, Nickerson KW, et al. Prevalence of broad-host-range lytic bacteriophages of Sphaerotilus natans, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64(2):575-80.
  6. Olson MR, Axler RP, Hicks RE. Effects of freezing and storage temperature on MS2 viability. J Virol Methods. 2004;122(2):147-52.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 15,143
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 704


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب