- همه نشریات
- نشریات علمی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویچ کشاورزی
- مجلات ترویجی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- سایر نشریات سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- نشریات علمی انجمن ها
- علوم آب و خاک
- علوم اقتصاد و ترویج کشاورزی
- علوم جنگل, مرتع و آبخیزداری
- علوم دامی و شیلات
- علوم زراعی و باغی
- علوم گیاهپزشکی
- علوم مهندسی و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی
- نشریات با زبان انگلیسی
- نشریات با زبان فارسی
- نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
- نشریات علمی
پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 283 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 81 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,728 |
| تعداد مقالات | 31,067 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 28,463,971 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,283,168 |
ارزیابی نگرش آبخیزنشینان به طرح‌های مدیریتی در آبخیز ریمله | ||
| پژوهش های آبخیزداری | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 35، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 137، دی 1401، صفحه 34-46 اصل مقاله (1.36 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/wmrj.2022.358184.1460 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ابراهیم کریمی سنگچینی* 1؛ امین صالح پور جم2؛ مهشید بهادری3 | ||
| 1استادیار بخش تحقیقات حفاظت خاک و آبخیزداری، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان لرستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، خرم آباد، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار پژوهشکده ی حفاظت خاک و آبخیزداری، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3بخش تحقیقات اقتصادی، اجتماعی و ترویجی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان لرستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، خرم آباد، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| نگرش آبخیزنشینان به طرح‌های مدیریتی در آبخیز ریمله از دیدگاه بهره‌برداران بررسی شد. آبخیز ریمله یکی از زیرآبخیز‌های رود کشکان است. جامعه‌ی آماری همه‌ی سرپرستان خانوارهای روستایی در این آبخیز بود. شاخص‌های سنجش نگرش بهره‌برداران به کنش‌های مدیریتی آبخیز از مقاله‌ها و کتاب‌های علمی گرفته‌شد. روایی و پایایی پرسش‌نامه ها آزموده شد (آلفای کرونباخ = 0/827). برپایه‌ی رابطه‌ی کوکران و با روش نمونه گیری انتساب متناسب به 135 آبخیزنشین از جامعه‌ی آبخیزنشینان مراجعه شد. اثر کنش‌های مدیریتی آبخیز بر معیارهای اقتصادی و اجتماعی با آزمون فریدمن رتبه‌بندی و ارزیابی شد. در میان شاخص‌های بهبود تراز درآمد اقتصادی آبخیزنشینان، شاخص تبدیل دیم‌زارهای کم‌بازده به باغ (میانگین رتبه 16/44) بیش‌ترین امتیاز گرفت. بیش‌ترین امتیاز در میان شاخص‌های بهبود تراز دانش، و آگاهی و توان اقتصادی خانوار آبخیزنشینان به کاربرد مناسب ظرفیت دیگر نهادها (میانگین رتبه 7/9) داده شد. نتیجه‌ی این پژوهش قابل استفاده برای مدیران و تصمیمگیران آبخیز در حفظ اندوخته‌های آب و خاک و افزایش توان‌مندی اجرایی فعالیت های مدیریتی در مقیاس آبخیز است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آزمون فریدمن؛ اولویت‌‌بندی؛ بهبود درآمد؛ روایی و پایایی؛ معیارهای اقتصادی و اجتماعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of the Stakeholders’ Attitude Towards Watershed Management Projects in Rimeleh Watershed | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ebrahim Karimi Sangchini1؛ Amin Salehpour Jam2؛ Mahshid Bahadori3 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Department, Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute (SCWMRI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Economic, Social and Extension Research Department, Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This study examined the attitude of watershed stakeholders to watershed management plans in the Rimleh watershed from the perspective of residents. Rimleh is one of the watersheds of the Kashkan river basin. All heads of rural households in the basin were selected as the statistical population. Practical indicators for measuring the attitude of users towards watershed management measures were prepared from related scientific articles and books. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were tested (Cronbach's alpha = 0.827). On the basis of the Cochran formula, 135 respondents were chosen in a stratified sampling scheme among the local communities of the watershed. The effects of watershed management measures on economic and social criteria were classified and evaluated using the Friedman test. Among the indicators of improving the economic income level of watershed residents, the index of converting low-yielding meadows into sloping land gardens (rank 16.44) had the highest score. Also, among the indicators of improving the level of knowledge and awareness and economic power of watershed households, the index of proper use of the capacity of other institutions had the highest score (7.9 mean rank). The results of this research can be used by managers and decision-makers to promote soil and water resources protection as well as to promote the adoption of management actions at the watershed scale. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Economic and social criteria, Friedman test, improve income, prioritization, validity and reliability | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Blomley T. 2006. Mainstreaming participatori forestry within the local government reform process in Tanzania. International institute for environmental and development. Gatekeeper Series, 26 p. Chen Y, Zhang D, Sun Y, Liu X, Wang N, Savenije HG. 2005. Water demand management: A case study of the Heihe River Basin in China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 30(1): 408–419. Dadrasi Sabzevar A, Ghazanchian A, Namaki M. 2016. The factors analysis of information, related to socio-economic effects of watershed management activities, According to the villagers point of view of Gosh Watershed of Mashhad. Watershed Engineering and Management, 8(3): 290–302. (In Persian). Derikvandi F. 2008. Assessing the effects and economic-social consequences of the mascara development plan. Journal of Village and Development, 11(1): 173–198. (In Persian). Ghafari, Ahmadi, Bahmani O, Nazari Samani AA. 2017. Technical assessment of watershed operating steps in Sologan Aquifer’S Basin. Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 70(1): 169–180. (In Persian). Hasani H, Maleki M. 2019. Socio-economic impact assessment of watershed plans implemented from the perspective of stakeholders (Case study: Hasan abdal Basin- Zanjan Province). Journal of Watershed Management Research, 13(45): 54–62. (In Persian). Karimi Sangchini E, Islami I,. Farajollahi A, Arami S A, Jafari M. 2017. Development and prioritization of socio-economic strategies to elevate public participation in natural resource management using TOPSIS approach; Case study: Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province (Iran). Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 21 (3): 476–485. Karimi Sangchini E, Ownegh M, Sadoddin A, Tahmasebipuor N, Rezaee H. 2018. An investigation on affecting factors on community participation and predicting the community acceptance of the vegetation-based management scenarios for the Hable-rud River Basin. Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, 10(3): 280–293. (In Persian). Karimi Sangchini E, Ownegh M, Sadoddin A, Zarghami M, Vayskarami I. 2021. Developing a model for the integrated management of water and soil resources in the Hableh-Rud River Basin using the system dynamics approach. Journal of Watershed Management Research, 12(23): 119–129. (In Persian). Karimi Sangchini E. 2022. Investigating the effect of implementing various natural resources projects on the protection and principled exploitation of forests and rangelands with a sustainable livelihood approach in the Rimeleh Watershed of Khorramabad city. Lorestan Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center, 145 p. (In Persian). Lee CC, Huang KC, Kuo SY, Cheng CK, Tung CP, Liu TM. 2021. Development of a social impact assessment for the water environment: A professional perspective. Water, 13(1): 3355–3376. Liu BW, Wang M H, Chen TL, Tseng PC, Sun Y, Chiang A, Chiang PC. 2020. Establishment and implementation of green infrastructure practice for healthy watershed management: Challenges and perspectives. Water-Energy Nexus, 3(1): 186–197. Mekonnen M, Abeje T, Addisu S. 2021. Integrated watershed management on soil quality, crop productivity and climate change adaptation, dry highland of Northeast Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems, 186(21): 1–16. Mirjalili AB, Tabatabaeizadeh M, Hakimzadeh MR, Mashhadi N. 2016. Investigation effect of floodwater spreading on vegetation and soil, case study: floodwater spreading of Miankooh, Yazd. Desert Management, 4(7): 24–36 (In Persian). Mosaffaie J, Salehpour Jam A, Soltani M J. 2020. Identification and prioritization of effective factors on preventing participation of rural societies in watershed management plans, Case study (Niarij Watershed of Qazvin Province). Journal of Watershed Management Research, 11 (22):121–131. (In Persian), Mosaffaie J, Salehpour Jam A, Tabatabaei M, Kousari M. 2021. Developing resources management responses in the gorganroud Watershed using the driving force, pressure, state, impact, response (DPSIR) software. Watershed Management Research Journal, 34(1): 93–111. (In Persian). Mosaffaie J, Salehpour Jam A. 2018. Economic assessment of the investment in soil and water conservation projects of watershed management. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11(14): 368–377. Mosaffaie J, Salehpour Jam A. 2020. Quantitative analysis of the impacts of watershed management activities on catchment hydrological status. Watershed Engineering and Management, 12(2): 526–534. (In Persian). Ruiz-Malle´n I, Corbera E, Calvo-Boyero D, Reyes-Garcı´a V. 2015. Participatory scenarios to explore local adaptation to global change in biosphere reserves: Experiences from Bolivia and Mexico. Environmental Science & Policy, 54(1): 398–408. Saby L, Nelson JD, Band LE, Goodall JL. 2021. Nonpoint source water quality trading outcomes: Landscape-scale patterns and integration with watershed management priorities. Journal of Environmental Management, 294(1): 112–124. Salehpour Jam A, Rasooli F, Sarreshtehdari A, Mosaffaie J, Kianian M. 2020. Prioritization of preventing social indices affecting on peoples' participation in natural resources plans using AHP method and nonparametric tests. Watershed Engineering and Management, 12(1): 330–339. (In Persian). Sarangi A, Madramootoo CA, Cox C. 2004. A decision support system for soil and water conservation measures on agricultural watersheds. Land Degradation and Development, 15(49:( 49–63. Sarreshtehdari A, Salehpour Jam A, Soltani M, Noroozi A, Shademani A, kherkhah zarkesh M. 2022. Evaluating the impacts of flood spreading plans from the view point of experts using nonparametric statistical tests, Case study: Ab-Barik aquifer of Bam. Watershed Engineering and Management, 14(1): 55–64. Soltani MJ, Motamedvaziri B, Noroozi AA, Ahmadi H, Mosaffaei J. 2021. Identifying and prioritizing the factors affecting the creation of dust in Hendijan City and providing management solutions by DPSIR framework. Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, 13(2): 269 – 282. (In Persian). Statistical Center of Iran. 2016. Population and housing census. www.amar.org.ir. Varua ME, Maheshwari B, Ward J, Dave S. 2017. Groundwater conservation attitudes, behavior and water management: The case of farmers in rural india. Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 220: 141–150. Yaebiyo G, Tesfay Y, Assefa D. 2015. Socio-economic impact assessment of integrated watershed management in Sheka watershed, Ethiopia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(9): 202–212. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 234 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 542 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب