| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,873 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,555 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 42,418,914 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 19,194,544 |
ارزیابی عملکرد کمی و کیفی در نتاج حاصل از تلاقی بین طالبی و خربزه | ||
| پژوهش های کاربردی زراعی | ||
| دوره 34، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 133، بهمن 1400، صفحه 14-1 اصل مقاله (574.71 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/aj.2022.352350.1506 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| پیمان جعفری* 1؛ کریم عرب سلمانی2؛ امیرهوشنگ جلالی3 | ||
| 1مربی پژوهش، بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی- باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اصفهان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج | ||
| 2مربی پژوهش در بخش تحقیقات کشت گلخانه ای، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان تهران، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج | ||
| 3استادیار پژوهش، بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی-باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اصفهان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به‌منظور ارزیابی عملکرد و اجزاء عملکرد جمعیت پیشرفته حاصل از انجام تلاقی و گزینش دوره‌ای در دو جمعیت پایه طالبی سمسوری و خربزه سوسکی زرد و مقایسه آن با دو رقم طالبی (سمسوری و شاه‌آبادی) و دو رقم خربزه (سوسکی زرد و جاجو) در سه منطقه ورامین، اصفهان و گلستان، پژوهشی دوساله (1398-1397) با استفاده از طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با 3 تکرار انجام شد. تأثیر منطقه بر صفات عملکرد، تعداد میوه و درصد مواد جامد محلول میوه در سطح یک درصد معنی‌دار بود. برهمکنش ژنوتیپ و مکان بر صفات تعداد میوه و ضایعات میوه در سطح یک درصد ازنظر آماری معنی‌دار بود. تجزیه مرکب داده‌ها نشان داد عملکرد و تعداد میوه در بوته در جمعیت دو رگ به ترتیب برابر 20/16 تن در هکتار و 34/2 عدد بود که با عملکرد و تعداد میوه در بوته طالبی سمسوری (32/15 تن و 07/2 عدد) تفاوت معنی‌داری نداشت. درصد ضایعات میوه میوه دو رگ تولیدشده پس از 6 و 9 روز نگهداری به ترتیب 3/3 و 5/10 درصد بود که به‌طور معنی‌دار کمتر از درصد ضایعات میوه طالبی سمسوری و شاه‌آبادی و همچنین خربزه جاجو بود. دو رگ حاصل از تلاقی طالبی و خربزه، ازنظر ویژگی‌های مهمی مثل عملکرد و تعداد میوه با جمعیت‌هایی مثل طالبی سمسوری برابری می‌کند و حتی در برخی از صفات مثل درصد مواد جامد محلول (58/10) از آن برتر است بنابراین می‌تواند پس از آزمایش‌های تکمیلی به‌عنوان یک رقم معرفی شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| قطر گوشت میوه؛ درصد مواد جامد محلول؛ کاهش وزن میوه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of Qualitative and Qualitative Performance in progeny of crossing between cantaloupe and muskmelon | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| peyman jafari1؛ karim arabsalmani2؛ Amir hooshang Jalali3 | ||
| 1Research Trainer, Horticulture Crops Research Department, Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 2Research trainer, Greenhouse Cultivation Research Department, Tehran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Varamin, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Horticulture Crops Research Department, Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In this experiment, an advanced population obtained by crossing and periodic self-selection in the two populations of cantaloupe (Samsouri and Yellow Beetle Melon), with three cantaloupe (Samsouri, Zamche and Shahabadi) and Muskmelon Yellow Beetle cultivars, in three province of Tehran, Isfahan and Golestan for quantitative and qualitative evaluation were compared. The area was moldboard-plowed and disked before planting. The experiment was conducted as a randomized complete block design with three replications. Each plot was planted two lines at intervals of 3 m and a length of 15 meters and planting depth was 2-3 cm. Irrigation was conducted based depletion of 50 percent of moisture in rooting depth. Cantaloupe and muskmelon seeds populations used in the experiment were prepared of Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran. Number of fruits per plant, single fruit weight, fruit skin thickness were measured by randomly selecting 10 fruits from each plot. The fresh yield was determined by harvesting surface equivalent to five square meters of each plot. Fruit sugar content was also measured randomly on 10 fruits from each plot by a refractometer. The firmness and shelf life of the fruits were evaluated based on the degree of spoilage of 20 fruits in two 6-day and 9-day periods under normal conditions. Percentage of rotten fruit was recorded in each period. The data were subjected to combined analysis of variance by SAS and means Fisher’s Protected LSD (5%) was used for mean separation.The effect of year on experimental traits was not statistically significant, but the effect of area on yield traits, number of fruits and percentage of fruit brix was significant at 1% level. The effect of genotype on all experimental traits was also significant at 1% level (except for fruit brix at 5%). Yield was significantly higher in Varamin and Isfahan than in Gorgan. The amount of this increase in Varamin and Isfahan compared to Gorgan was 41.6% and 34.2%, respectively. One of the main reasons for this increase was the higher number of fruits per plant. Differences in yield of cantaloupe genotypes in different regions may sometimes range from 10 to 76 t ha-1. Yield and number of fruits per plant of hybrid population were 16.20 t ha-1 and 2.34 number, respectively, which was not significantly different from Semsuri cantaloupe, but was significantly higher than other experimental populations. The fruit weight of hybrid populations (1.09 kg) was similar to Semsuri cantaloupe but was less than that of Muskmelon yellow beetle (1.83 kg) and Jaju populations (1.95 kg). In the United States, Brix 9 is considered good and Brix 11 is very good for cantaloupes but Brix is less than 10 for less attractive customers. The diameter of the ovarian cavity in the hybrid population was 6.76 cm, which was 32, 14.7 and 36% smaller than the populations of Shahabadi, Muskmelon yellow beetle and Jaju, respectively. In terms of fruit diameter, hybrid populations with 30.85 mm fruit diameter had a higher diameter than Semsuri population (28.78 mm) and a smaller diameter than Shahabadi population (37.94 mm). Percentage of fruit waste produced after 6 and 9 days was 3.3% and 10.5%, respectively, which was significantly lower than Semsuri and Shahabadi and Jaju melons but similar to beetle muskmelons. The hybrid population was similar with Semsuri population in number to fruit per plant, but in terms of percentage of Brix (fruit sugar) is closer to beetle Muskmelon, and most important after fruit harvesting shelf-life was similar to beetle Muskmelon and much higher than to semsuri. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Diameter of flesh fruit, Solids soluble percentage, Fruit weight loss | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Arabsalmani, K., Jalali, A.H., and Jafari, P. 2018. Effect of salinity stress on yield and yield components of three Iranian cantaloupe masses. Journal of Horticultural Science, 32: 429-438. (In Persian). Aragão, F.A.S.D., Nunes, G.H.D.S., and Queiróz, M.A.D. 2015. Genotype x environment interaction of melon families based on fruit quality traits. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 15:79-86. Bagheriyan, S., Karimi, H.R., and Esmaelizadeh, M. 2015. Evaluation of genetic relationships among melon genotypes based on morphological markers. International Journal of Vegetable Science, 21:36-52. Ban, D., Goreta, S., and Borosic, B. 2006. Plant spacing and cultivar affect melon growth and yield components. Scientia Horticulturae, 109: 238-243. Bett‐Garber, K.L., Lamikanra, O., Lester, G.E., Ingram, D.A., and Watson, M.A. 2005. Influence of soil type and storage conditions on sensory qualities of fresh‐cut cantaloupe (Cucumis melo). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85:825-830. Deakin, J.R., Bohn, G.W., and Whitaker, T.W. 1971. Interspecific hybridization in Cucumis. Economic Botany, 25: 195-211. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2019. FAOSTAT, Retrieved January 17, 2018, from http://faostat.fao.org/site/291/default.aspx. Feyzian, E., Dehghani, H., Rezai, A.M., and Javaran, M.J. 2009. Diallel cross analysis for maturity and yield-related traits in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Euphytica, 168:215-223. Jha, S.N., and Matsuoka, T. 2002. Surface stiffness and density of eggplant during storage. Journal of Food Engineering, 54:23-26. Kerje, T., and Grum, M. 2000. The origin of melon, Cucumis melo: a review of the literature. Acta Horticulturae, 510:37–44. Kultur, F., Harrison, H.C., Staub, J.E., and Palta, J.P. 2001. Spacing and genotype effects on fruit sugar concentration and yield of muskmelon. HortScience, 36: 274–278. Kyriacou, M.C., Leskovar, D.I., Colla, G., and Rouphael, Y. 2018. Watermelon and melon fruit quality: The genotypic and agro-environmental factors implicated. Scientia Horticulturae, 234:393-408. Lamikanra, O., and Richard, O.A. 2002. Effect of storage on some volatile aroma compounds in fresh-cut cantaloupe melon. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 50:4043-4047. Lester, G. 1988. Comparisons of' Honey Dew' and netted muskmelon fruit tissues in relation to storage life. HortScience, 23:180-182. Lima, P.S., Rodrigues, V.L.P., de Medeiros, J.F., de Aquino, B.F., and da Silva, J. 2007. Yield and quality of melon fruits as a response to the application of nitrogen and potassium doses. Revista Caatinga, 20:43-49. Liu, L., Kakihara, F., and Kato, M. 2004. Characterization of six varieties of Cucumis melo L. based on morphological and physiological characters, including shelf-life of fruit. Euphytica, 135:305-313. Luan, F., Sheng, Y., Wang, Y., and Staub, J.E. 2010. Performance of melon hybrids derived from parents of diverse geographic origins. Euphytica, 173: 1-16. Manohar, S.H., and Murthy, H.N. 2012. Estimation of phenotypic divergence in a collection of Cucumis melo, including shelf-life of fruit. Scientia horticulturae, 148:74-82. Mohammadi, R., Dehghani, H., Karimzadeh, G., Dane, F., and Akrami, M. 2014. Study on relationships between yield and its components in Iranian cantaloupe genotypes. Iranian Journal of Horticulture, 1: 1-10. (In Persian). Naroui Rad, M.R., Allahdoo, M., Fanaei, H.R. 2010. Study of some yield traits relationship in melon (Cucumis melo L.) germplasm gene bank of Iran by correlation and factor analysis. Trakia Journal Science, 8(1): 27-32. Pouyesh, A., Lotfi, M., Ramshini, H., Karami, E., Shamsitabar, A., and Armiyoun, E. 2017. Genetic analysis of yield and fruit traits in cantaloupe cultivars. Plant breeding, 136:569-577. Seymour, G.B., and McGlasson, W.B. 1993. Melon. In Seymour, G.B., Taylor, J.E. and Tucker, G.A. Biochemistry of Fruit Ripening. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 273–290. Soltani, F., Akashi, Y., Kashi, A., Zamani, Z., Mostofi, Y., and Kato, K. 2010. Characterization of Iranian melon landraces of Cucumis melo L. Groups Flexuosus and Dudaim by analysis of morphological characters and random amplified polymorphic DNA. Breeding Science, 60:34-45. Tijskens, L.M., Dos-Santos, N., Jowkar, M.M., Obando-Ulloa, J.M., Moreno, E., Schouten, R.E., Monforte, A.J., and Fernández-Trujillo, J.P. 2009. Postharvest firmness behavior of near-isogenic lines of melon. Postharvest biology and technology, 51:320-326. Vashisht, V.K., Guresh, S., Tarsem, L., and Gaikwad, A.K. 2010. Combining ability for yield and yield attributing traits in musk melon (Cucumis melo L.). Crop Improvement, 37:36-40. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 357 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 448 |
||