اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات286
تعداد نشریات سازمان84
تعداد شماره‌ها2,856
تعداد مقالات32,385
تعداد مشاهده مقاله41,498,999
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله18,697,508
طاهری, محمد, پورسعید, علیرضا, اشراقی سامانی, رویا, آرایش, محمدباقر. (1400). راهبردهای توسعه ساماندهی عشایر حوزه زاگرس: کاربرد نظریه زمینه‌ای. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24(3), 94-120. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2020.343291.1233
محمد طاهری; علیرضا پورسعید; رویا اشراقی سامانی; محمدباقر آرایش. "راهبردهای توسعه ساماندهی عشایر حوزه زاگرس: کاربرد نظریه زمینه‌ای". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24, 3, 1400, 94-120. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2020.343291.1233
طاهری, محمد, پورسعید, علیرضا, اشراقی سامانی, رویا, آرایش, محمدباقر. (1400). 'راهبردهای توسعه ساماندهی عشایر حوزه زاگرس: کاربرد نظریه زمینه‌ای', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24(3), pp. 94-120. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2020.343291.1233
طاهری, محمد, پورسعید, علیرضا, اشراقی سامانی, رویا, آرایش, محمدباقر. راهبردهای توسعه ساماندهی عشایر حوزه زاگرس: کاربرد نظریه زمینه‌ای. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1400; 24(3): 94-120. doi: 10.30490/rvt.2020.343291.1233

راهبردهای توسعه ساماندهی عشایر حوزه زاگرس: کاربرد نظریه زمینه‌ای

روستا و توسعه
دوره 24، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 95، آذر 1400، صفحه 94-120    اصل مقاله (761.86 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30490/rvt.2020.343291.1233
نویسندگان
محمد طاهری1؛ علیرضا پورسعید* 2؛ رویا اشراقی سامانی3؛ محمدباقر آرایش4
1دانشجوی دکتری ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، واحد ایلام، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ایلام، ایران
2دانشیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، واحد ایلام، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ایلام، ایران.
3دانشیار گروه مدیریت کشاورزی، واحد ایلام، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ایلام، ایران.
4استادیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، واحد ایلام، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ایلام، ایران
چکیده
هدف از انجام تحقیق کیفی حاضر واکاوی راهبردهای توسعه سامان‏دهی عشایر حوزه زاگرس بر اساس نظریه زمینه‌ای بود. داده‌های پژوهش با مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختارمند و روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند با سی نفر از متخصصان، مدیران و صاحب‌نظران حوزه عشایر گردآوری شد. همچنین، مراحل استخراج نظریه و فرآیند کدگذاری با بهره‌گیری از نرم‏افزار MAXqda18 انجام شد. بر پایه یافته‌های پژوهش، مقولاتی چون عدم موفقیت طرح‌های پیشین، عدم توجه به پایداری محیط زیست، عدم توجه به سرمایه انسانی، طبیعی و توان بوم‌شناختی مناطق عشایری، عدم آسیب‌شناسی فرهنگی- اجتماعی و عدم توجه به اسناد بالادستی به‌عنوان شرایط علی مؤثر بر توسعه سامان‏دهی عشایر حوزه زاگرس شناسایی شدند؛ شرایط زمینه‌ای نیز شامل مقولاتی چون عدم هماهنگی در برنامه‌ریزی و اجرا، کمبود منابع مالی، موانع فرهنگی، کمبود نیروی انسانی متخصص، موانع فناوری و موانع طبیعی بودند. این در حالی است که تغییر مداوم الگوی زیست، عدم سرمایه‌گذاری و بازاریابی، بی‌توجهی به توان­های موجود در منطقه، اجرای سیاست‌های توسعه‌ای موازی و ناهماهنگی بین استان‌های حوزه زاگرس نیز به‌عنوان شرایط مداخله‌گر مشخص شدند. همچنین، به‌منظور توسعه سامان‏دهی عشایر حوزه زاگرس، راهبردهایی چون برنامه‌ریزی غیرمتمرکز و منطقه‌ای، نظام مدیریت مشارکتی، نظام مدیریت محلی(ایلی)، ایجاد تعاونی‌های عشایری، بوم‌گردی عشایری و ایجاد بازارچه‌های محلی شناسایی شدند. در نهایت، مشخص شد که توسعه سامان‏دهی عشایر حوزه زاگرس پیامدهایی از قبیل پایداری محیط زیست، برقراری عدالت اجتماعی، اشتغال پایدار، احیای زیست‌بوم‌های جنگل و مرتع، امنیت غذایی و بهره‌وری را در جامعه مورد بررسی به‌دنبال خواهد داشت. با استناد به یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر، ضمن توجه بیشتر به عشایر منطقه در حمایت از تصمیم‌گیری‌های سیاست‏گذاران، برنامه‌ریزان و مدیران ذی‏ربط، می‌توان در راستای دستیابی به توسعه پایدار گام برداشت.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عشایر؛ توسعه پایدار؛ نظریه زمینه‌ای
عنوان مقاله [English]
Strategies for Zagros Nomadic Organization Development: Application of Grounded Theory
نویسندگان [English]
M. Taheri1؛ A. Poursaeed2؛ R. Eshraghi Samani3؛ M.B. Arayesh4
1PhD Student in Agricultural Extension and Education, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran
2Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran
3Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Management, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran
4Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this qualitative research was to analyze the development strategies of Zagros nomadic organizing based on Grounded Theory. The Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and purposive sampling methods with 30 specialists, managers and experts in the field of nomads. The theory extraction and coding process was performed by MAXqda18 software. The study findings indicated that categories such as failure of previous projects, lack of attention to environmental sustainability, lack of attention to human capital, natural and ecological potential of nomadic areas, lack of socio-cultural pathology and lack of attention to upper-level documents as causal conditions affecting the development of the Zagros nomadic organization were identified; also, grounded conditions included categories such as lack of coordination in planning and implementation, lack of financial resources, cultural barriers, lack of specialized manpower, technological and natural barriers; meanwhile, constantly changing the pattern of life, lack of investment and marketing, disregard for the potentials in the region, implementation of parallel development policies and inconsistencies between the provinces of the Zagros area were also identified as intervening conditions. Besides, in order to develop the nomadic organization of the Zagros area, strategies such as decentralized and regional planning, participatory management system, local (tribe) management system, establishment of nomadic cooperatives, nomadic ecotourism and the creation of local markets were identified. Finally, it was found that the development of the Zagros nomadic organization would have consequences such as environmental sustainability, establishing social justice, permanent job as well as restoration of forest and rangeland ecosystems, food security and productivity among the studied population. Accordingly, the study findings can be exploited by the concerned policy makers, planners and managers while paying more attention to the nomads of the region in supporting decisions in order to achieve sustainable development.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Nomads, Sustainable Development, Grounded Theory
مراجع
  1. Agba, A.M.O., Akpanudoedehe, J.J. and Ushie, M. (2010). Socio-economic and cultural impacts of resettlement on Bakassi people of Cross River State, Nigeria. Studies in Sociology of Science, 2: 22-50.
  2. Amini, A. and Rouzfarakh, S. (2018). Evaluating the consequences of nomads community settelment of boyerahmad County in settling sites of Roum Plain. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 14(1): 185-197. (Persian)
  3. Azadi Y., Gerkani, S.A. and Azadi, Z. (2016). Assessment of nomadic settlement plans with emphasis on the attitude of the settlers. Housing and Rural Environment, 156: 67-79. (Persian)
  4. Bradley, H. R. (2012). Implications of Land Development on Nomadic Pastoralism: Ecological Relaxation and Biosocial Diversity in Human Populations, Senior Thesis in Human Biology, Claremont College.
  5. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (Third Edition): Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. USA: Sage,Thousand Oaks.
  6. Barimani, F., Fazelnia, G. and Saiyadi, Z. (2018). The influence of nomad’s habitation on the participation of nomad’s women in family income (case study: sistani nomad women). Human Geography Research, 49(4): 791-805. DOI: 10.22059/jhgr.2016.57485. (Persian)
  7. Cheraghi, T., Poursaeed, A.R., EshraghiSamani, R., Vahedi, M and Arayesh, M.B(2020). The best method of inhabitation to ensure livelihood sustainability of nomads in Ilam province: The application of multi-criteria decision-making models. Journal of "Talent Development and Excellence. 12(3s),2459–2477.
  8. Dehghani, A. and Adeli Sardoei, M. (2015). Assessment and evaluation of sustainability criteria in nomadic settlements (case study: nomadic settlements in Fars and Isfahan provinces). Human Resource Planning Studies, 10(32): 55-69. (Persian)
  9. Ebrahimi Asl, H., Mohammadzadeh, S. and Jabbarpour, S. (2015). Economic, social and environmental consequences of nomadic settlement plan in Shiblo and Zanganeh plains of Maku and Poldasht counties. Master Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Maku Branch. (Persian)
  10. Emadi, M.H. (2005), The future of nomads in the process of national development: a systematic analysis of challenges and prospects. Proceedings of the National Conference on Organizing the Iranian Nomadic Society, Tehran. Available at https://civilica.com/doc/352499. (Persian)
  11. Fallah-Tabar, N. (2016). Organizing the capacities and capabilities of nomads in line with sustainable security (with emphasis on the nomads of Sistan and Baluchestan). Quarterly Journal of Geography (Regional Planning), 6(2): 101-111. (Persian)
  12. Ghazali, S. and Zibaei, M. (2017). Determinants of livelihood strategies selecting by nomadic households of Fars province. Agricultural Economics, 11(4): 63-80. (Persian)
  13. Habibian, S.H., Mehrabi, A., Arzani, H. and Shaukat-Fadaei, M. (2004). A comparsion of forage production of summer quarter ranglands and exploitation performance by migrant, planned and volunteerily settled groups of nomads in Bakan plain (Fars). Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, 57(1): 353-365. (Persian)
  14. Hayati, D. (2006). An analysis of the consequences and strategies selected for the settlement of nomads in iran with an attitude towards the experience of Bacon village in Fars province. Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 1(1): 67-99. (Persian)
  15. Hosseinzadeh, A.H., Eider, N. and Saki, M. (2011) Sustainable development of nomads. Quarterly Journal of Tribes Nomads, 1(1): 67-86. (Persian)
  16. INAO (2019). Strategic plan for organizing Iranian nomads. Tehran: Iranian Nomadic Affairs Organization (INAO). Available at http://ashayer.ir/index.aspx?pageid=148. (Persian)
  17. IPRC (2016). Regulation on the organization of nomads including the approvals of the Supreme Council of nomads during 2009-2015. Tehran: Islamic Parliament Research Center (IPRC). Available at https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/123049. (Persian)
  18. Jahangiri, J. and Moradi, G. (2009). Spatial and demographic analysis of the nomadic system of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province and providing appropriate plans and models for the sustainable development of natural resources and the organization of nomadic places. Land Management, 1(1): 89-120. (Persian)
  19. Jalili Telchgah, F. and Taleb, M. (2011). Assessing the social effects of nomadic settlement plan (case study: nomadic settlement plan of Kalaghneshin village in Gachsaran County. Master's Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran. (Persian)
  20. Jarmila, P. (2012). Sedentarisation of Tibetan nomads in China: implementation of the nomadic settlement project in the Tibetan Amdo area; Qinghai and Sichuan provinces. Pastoralism: Research. Policy and Practice, 1(4): 1-11.
  21. Jiao, X., Pouliot, M. and Walelign, S.Z. (2017). Livelihood strategies and dynamics in rural Cambodia. World Development, 97: 266-278.
  22. Karimi, K. and Karami Dehkordi, E. (2015). Rangeland use and necessity of diversification of rural households’ livelihoods, a case study in the Mahneshan County. Rural Research, 6(2): 343-368. (Persian)
  23. Kempster, S. and Parry, K.W. (2011). Grounded theory and leadership research: a critical realist perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1): 106-120.
  24. Khogali, M.M. (2001), Nomads and their sedentarization in Sudan. Khartum: University of Khartum, Department of Geography.
  25. Larsen, K. (2003). Sedentarization of nomadic people: the case of the Hawawir in Um Jawasir, Northern Sudan. Report 24, Dry Lands Coordination Group.
  26. Mahdavi, M., Rezaei, P. and Khani, F. (2009). Measuring the attitude of settled nomads towards the settlement in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province of Iran. Village and Development, 12(3): 137-162. (Persian)
  27. Mohammadpour, A. and Ahmadi, N. (2005). Introduction to the methods and policies of development and organization of Iranian nomads from the perspective of human development, sustainable development and development anthropology: Providing a combination and application model. Proceedings of the National Conference on Organizing the Iranian Nomadic Society. Tehran: Naghsh Bayan Publications. (Persian)
  28. Moradi, A., Abbasnejad, H. and Naseri, V. (2018). Investigation and identification of architectural species of grain warehouse in the semi-nomadic life of Zagros Mountains in Ilam province. Housing and Rural Environment, 27(162): 39-54. (Persian)
  29. Moradnejad, A. and Bardi R. (2010). Social developments in the last 50 years among Turkmen tribes (case study: Turkmen port). Journal of Spatial Planning, 1(1): 60-76.. (Persian)
  30. Nasiri, C., Ahmadi, S.A., Yavari, Gh., Amirkhani, A.H. and Mahdian, A. (2012). A model of strategic plan for organizing the nomads of Tehran province. Village and Development, 15(1): 43-63. (Persian)
  31. Nowrouzi, A. and Mahmoudian, F. (2016). Comparative study of economic and social characteristics of settled and uninhabited nomads (case Study: Koohrang County). Spatial Planning, 5(19): 17-38. (Persian)
  32. Rahaee, M., Rashidi, A. and Taherian, Gh. (2012). Consequences of informal settlement of nomads in the cities of Semnan province. Quarterly Journal of Semnan Police Science, 2(6): 87-100. (Persian)
  33. Rahimi, A. (2017). Economic consequences of nomadic settlement in the development centers of West Azerbaijan province. Nomadic Quarterly of Revolutionary Reserves, 58: 75-94. (Persian)
  34. Rahimi, A. and Moshiri, S.R. (2009). Investigating and analyzing the effects and results of nomadic settlement (case study: West Azerbaijan province). Geographical Quarterly of the Land, 6(21): 1-13. (Persian)
  35. Rashno, N.A. (2005). An analysis of Iran's nomadic organization and settlement strategy. Geographical Quarterly of the Land, 2(6): 61-75. (Persian)
  36. Rezaei, P. (2012). Evaluating the program of organizing nomads in development centers. Nomadic Quarterly of Revolutionary Reserves, 57: 9-40. (Persian)
  37. Rezvani, M.R. and Derikvand, M. (2007). Investigating and evaluating of nomadic organization and settlement centers (effects and implications): a case study of Kamari Settlement Center, Azna County. Bimonthly Journal 0f Jihad, 279: 133-151. (Persian)
  38. Riahi, V., Ahmadi R. and Azmi A. (2013a). Investigating the role of housing projects in nomadic economic and social development, case study: Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Housing Centers. Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 13(28): 95-112. (Persian)
  39. Riahi, V., Namdari, F., Pashazadeh, A. and Jesarati, A. (2013b). Investigating the effect of organization and settlement of nomads with emphasis on security dimension (case study: Kalekooh in Saveh). Journal of Police Geography, 1(3): 99-128. (Persian)
  40. Riahi V. and Karimi, K. (2013). Economic consequences of settlement plans on nomadic communities (case study of Milad Town in Shibloi Plain of West Azerbaijan province). Nomadic Quarterly of Revolutionary Reserves, 58: 95-112. (Persian)
  41. Roudgarmi, P. (2011). Qualitative research for environmental sciences: a review. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 9(3): 871-879.
  42. Salehi, A. (2004). Comparative study of nomadic organization plan in two centers of Golfashan and Cheshmeh Rahman. Final Report of the Research Project, Isfahan Agricultural Research Center. (Persian)
  43. Seidaei, S.E. and Dehghani, A. (2011). Planning for nomadic ecosystems. Isfahan: Jihad Daneshgahi Publications, Isfahan Branch. (Persian)
  44. Shahraki, M.R. and Abedi Sarvestani, A. (2012). Nomads, migration and settlement: an analysis of selections for development of nomadic societies. National Conference on Rural Development, Rasht, Guilan University, 14-15 September. (Persian)
  45. Shateri, M. and Sadeghi, H. (2012). Analyzing the socio-economic effects of spontaneous nomads (a case study of nomads in Dehdez district of Izeh city of Khuzestan province). Journal of Spatial Planning, 2(2): 105-128. (Persian)
  46. Shateri, M. and Hajipour, M. (2011). Socio-economic effects of settlement projects on nomadic communities (case study of Nazdasht Sarbisheh town in South Khorasan province). New Attitudes in Human Geography, 3(2): 17-29. (Persian)
  47. Shakur, A. and Rezaei, M.R. (2010). Investigating and comparing the economic patterns of production in Qashqaei tribe of Firoozabad and measuring their tendency towards change in livelihood New Attitudes in Human Geography, 5: 123-135. (Persian)
  48. Taghilou, A. and Mousavi, M. (2015). Evaluation of different levels of development in different social-welfare, infrastructure and technological dimensions of the nomadic community of Iran's provinces. Quarterly Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 4(14): 163-180. (Persian)
  49. Taheri, M., Poursaeed, A.R., Eshraghi Samani, R and Arayesh, M.B(2020). Sustainable Development: Organizing Nomads of the Zagros Region. Based on grounded theory Model. Geo Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10310-4. 1-14.
  50. Tavakkoli, J. and Ziatavana, M.H. (2009). The spatial consequences of settling Iranian nomads in Chaharmahal-and-Bakhtiari province. Village and Development, 12(1): 32-62. (Persian)
  51. Upton, C. (2010). Living off the land: nature and nomadism in Mongolia. Geoforum, 41: 865-887.
  52. Varmaghani, H. (2014). Investigating the factors affecting the design of nomadic and rural housing in Qashqai tribe. New Attitudes in Human Geography, 7(1): 217-236. (Persian)
  53. Yousefi, J., Azkia, M. and Kaldi, A. (2016). Developing a conceptual model of integrating indigenous and modern knowledge using Grounded Theory in reclamation, preservation, maintenance and operation of Natural resources with post-development approach (case Study: Mamasani tribe of Fars province). Sociology Studies, 10(34): 7-31. (Persian)
  54. Ziaeian, P., Salehpour, Sh. and Davardan, B. (2016). Analysis of service and development investment levels in the nomadic community of West Azerbaijan province. Quarterly Journal of Space Economy and Rural Development, 5(17): 71-84. (Persian)
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 672
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 266


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب