| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,998 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,576 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 44,210,231 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 20,562,867 |
ارزیابی میزان شکارگری و ترجیح طعمه سن شکارگر (Wolff) Orius niger در کنترل آفات مهم مکنده دانههای روغنی | ||
| مهار زیستی در گیاه‌پزشکی | ||
| دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 16، اسفند 1399، صفحه 107-118 اصل مقاله (258.1 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/bcpp.2021.125855 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محبوبه شریفی* 1؛ سید حسن ملکشی2؛ خدیجه مداحی3؛ محمد تقی مبشری1؛ ثمانه ملک شاهکویی4؛ کوروش قادری1؛ علیرضا رجائی1؛ اسماعیل خمر1 | ||
| 1مرکزتحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران | ||
| 2موسسه تحقیقات گیاه‌پزشکی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3گروه گیاه‌پزشکی، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران | ||
| 4مدیریت جهاد کشاورزی گرگان، سازمان جهاد کشاورزی گلستان، گرگان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| سفیدبالک‌ها و تریپس‌ها از آفات مهمی هستند که در مزارع دانههای روغنی فعالیت می‌کنند و علاوه بر خسارت مستقیم، به‌طور غیرمستقیم نیز منجر به کاهش کمّی و کیفی دانههای روغنی می‌شوند. سن شکارگرOrius niger یکی از عوامل مهار زیستی موثر تریپس‌ها و سفیدبالک‌ها است که در مزارع دانههای روغنی و به ویژه پنبه استان گلستان بهوفور مشاهده می‌شود. بهمنظور ارزیابی کارایی شکارگری O. niger، این سن از مزارع پنبه جمع‌آوری شد و در شرایط آزمایشگاهی پرورش داده شد. در آزمایشهای مربوط به میزان شکارگری به ازای هر شکارگر (ماده) تراکم‌های 5، 10، 20، 30 و 40 پوره سفیدبالک، 5، 10، 20، 30 و 50 تخم سفیدبالک و 5، 10، 20، 30 و 40 پوره تریپس داخل ظرف پتری (ده سانتیمتری) قرار داده شد. نتایج رگرسیون لجستیک نشان داد که واکنش تابعی برای هر دو مرحله تخم و پوره سفیدبالک از نوع واکنش تابعی نوع سوم و برای پوره تریپس از نوع دوم میباشد. پرآسنجه قدرت جستجو (a′) برای پوره تریپس، تخم و پوره سفیدبالک بهترتیب 0697/0، 01193/0 و 01072/0 بر ساعت محاسبه شد. مدت زمان لازم برای دستیابی (Th) سن شکارگر به پوره تریپس، تخم و پوره سفیدبالک مقادیر 3802/0، 2686/0 و 1042/4 ساعت بهدست آمد. آزمایش ترجیح طعمه با استفاده از فرمول منلی محاسبه شد. شاخص منلی پوره تریپس (شکار I) و تخم سفیدبالک (شکار II) بهترتیب 92/0 و 08/0 و برای پوره ترپیس (شکار I) و پوره سفیدبالک (شکار II) 85/0 و 15/0 بهدست آمد، که نشان میدهد سن شکارگر O. niger پوره تریپس را به‌طور معنیداری به دو طعمه دیگر ترجیح میدهد. به‌طور کلی، این حشره میتواند بهعنوان عامل مهار زیستی تریپس در مزارع دانههای روغنی و بهویژه مزارع پنبه معرفی شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| واکنش تابعی؛ ترجیح میزبانی؛ سن اوریوس؛ تریپس؛ سفیدبالک | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of predator and prey preference of Orius niger (Wolff) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) in the control of important sucking pests of oilseeds | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mahboobeh Sharifi1؛ Seyed Hassan Malkeshi2؛ Khadijeh Madahi3؛ Mohammad Taghi Mobasheri1؛ Samane Malek Shahkoei4؛ Kourosh Ghaderi1؛ Alireza Rajaei1؛ Esmaeil Khamar1 | ||
| 1Department of Plant Protection, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| 2Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht. Iran. | ||
| 4Gorgan Agricultural Jihad Management, Agriculture Organization of Golestan, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Whiteflies and thrips are important pests that active in cotton fields and in addition to direct damage, they also indirectly reduce quantity and quality of oilseeds. Orius niger (Wolff) (Hem.: Anthocoridae) is one of the optimal biocontrol agents for thrips and whiteflies, which is abundant in oilseed fields, especially cotton fields of Golestan province. In order to evaluate the predatory efficiency of O. niger, this insect was collected from cotton fields and grown in laboratory conditions. In experiments related to the study of predatory; for each predator (female), whitefly densities of 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 nymphs, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 50 eggs and 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 thrips nymphs were placed in the Petri dish. The results of logistic regression showed that the functional response model is type III for both egg and nymph stages of whitefly and type II for nymphs of thrips. For thrips nymphs, eggs and nymphs of whitefly, according to Roger's equation, calculated searching efficiency parameter (a′) was 0.0697, 0.01193 and 0.01072 /h, and handling time (Th) was 0.3802, 0.2686 and 4.1042 hours, respectively. Prey preference experiments were calculated using the Manley's formula. Manley index of thrips larvae (prey I) and whitefly eggs (prey II) were 0.92 and 0.08, respectively, and for thrips larvae (prey I) and whitefly nymphs (prey II) were 0.85 and 0.15 which shows that this predator significantly prefers thrips larvae to the other two preys. In general, the results showed that O. niger can be used as a favorable biological control agent for thrips in cotton fields. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| functional response, host preference, Orius, thrips, whitefly | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alavi, J. 2002. Identification of Thysanoptera, study of distribution and determination of the dominant species in soybean fields of Golestan province and in connection with the complication of soybean sheath disorder. Golestan Province Agricultural Research Center. Plant Pests and Diseases Research Department. Registration number 553/82, 36 pages. (In Persian with English summary) Altwegg, R., Eng, M., Caspersen, S., & Anholt, B.R. 2006. Functional response and prey defense level in an experimental predator–prey system. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 8: 115–128. Arno´, j., Roig, J. & Riudavets, J.J. 2008. Evaluation of Orius majusculus and O. laevigatus as predators of Bemisia tabaci and estimation of their prey preference. Biological Control, 44: 1–6. Askari, A. & Stern, V.M. 1972. Biology and feeding habitats of Orius spp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 65: 96–100. Badii, M.H., Hernandez–ortiz, E.A. & Landeros. J.N. 2004. Prey stage preference and functional response of Euseius hibisci to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 34: 263–273. Bhardwaj, S., Sharma, S. & Bhardwajs, P. 2010. Response of Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) on European Red mite Panonychus ulmi (Tetranychidae) on apple. Indian Journal of Entomology, 72: 297–300. Blackwood, J.S., Schausberger, P. & Croft, B.A. 2001. Prey–stage preference in generalist and specialist phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) when offered Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) eggs and larvae. Environmental Entomology, 30: 1103–1111. Darvish Mojeni, T. 2013. Study of population abundance and dynamic of dominant species Orius spp. In the fields cotton Golestan province. Iranian Journal of Cotton Researches, 1(1): 29–42. (In Persian with English summary) Deligeorgidis, P.N. 2000. Predatory effect of Orius niger (Wolff) (Hem., Anthocoridae) on Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) and Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysan., Thripidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 126: 82–85. Ding–Xu, L. Juan, T. & Zuo–Rui, S. 2007. Functional response of the predator Scolothrips takahashi to hawthorn spider mite, Tetranychus viennensis: effect of age and temperature, Biocontrol, 52: 41– 61. El–Basha, N.A., Salman, M.S. & Osman, M.A. 2012. Functional response of Orius albidipennis (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to the two–spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Entomology, 9(5): 248–256. Fathi, S.A.A. and Nouri–Ganbalani, G. 2009. Prey preference of Orius niger (Wolf.) and O. minutus (L.) from Thrips tabaci (Lind.) and Tetranychus urticae (Koch.). Journal of Entomology, 6: 42–48. Fernández–Arhex, V. & Corley, J.C. 2003. The functional response of parasitoids and its implications for biological control. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 13: 403–413. Gitonga, L., Löhr, B., Overholt, W., Magambo, J. & Mueke, J. 2002. Effect of temperature on the development of Orius albidipennis Reuter, a predator of the African legume flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 22: 215–220 Gerling, D., Alomar, O. & Arno´, J. 2001. Biological control of Bemisia tabaci using predators and parasitoids. Crop Protection, 20: 779–799. Hasanzadeh, H., Esfandiari, M., Shishehbor, P. & Rajabpour, A. 2015. Functional response of different developmental stages of Orius albidipennis Reuter feeding on the strawberry spider mite, Tetranychus turkestani. Plant Protection, 38:3–13. Hassell, M.P. 1978. The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator–Prey Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. pp. 237. Hassell, M.P. & Waage, J.K., 1984. Host– parasitoid population interactions. Annual Review of Entomology, 29: 89–114. Jalalizand, A., Modaresi, M., Tabeidian, S.A. & Karimy, A. 2011. Functional response of Orius niger (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): effect of host plant morphological feature. International Conference on Food Engineering and Biotechnology, 2: 92–96. Jones, D.R. 2005. Plant viruses transmitted by thrips. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 113: 119–157. Juliano, S.A. 1993. Nonlinear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves, p. 159–182. In: S.M. Scheinder and J. Gurevitch (eds.), Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 432. Khormali, S. 2008. Identification and distribution of predatory age of Anthocoridae family in cotton fields of Golestan province. Iranian Plant Protection Research Institute. Final report of the research project, 1–15. (In Persian with English summary) Kosari, A.A., Sahragard, A. & Talaei–Hassanloui, R. 2016. Functional response of Orius niger on healthy and Beauveria bassiana–treated two–spotted spider mite on cucumber. Plant Pest Research, 6(3): 51–63. Latifi, M., Azmayesh Fard, P., Kharazi Pakdel, A. & Saburi, A. 2011. Study of preference for different growth stages of Tetrranychus turkestani (Acari: Tetranychidae) by predatory age of Orius albidipennis (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Letter from the Iranian Entomological Association, 153–150: 1. (In Persian with English summary) Lee, j. & Kang, T. 2004. Functional response of Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to Aphis gossypi Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae) in the laboratory. Biological Control, 31: 306–310. Madadi, H., Enkegaard, A., Brodsgaard, H.F., Kharrazi–Pakdel, A., Ashouri, A. & Mohaghegh– Neishabouri, J. 2008. Orius albidipennis (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae): Intraguild predation of and prey preference for Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on different host plants. Entomologica Fennica, 19: 32–40. Malkeshi, S.H. Talaei Hassanlouii, R., Mohaghegh, J. & Allahyari, H. 2017. Predation rate and prey preference of Nesidiocoris tenuis on Ephestia kuehniella and Tuta absoluta eggs in laboratory. Biocontrol in Plant Protection, 5(1): 31–43. (In Persian with English summary) Manly, B. 1974. A model for certain types of selection experiments. Biometrics, 30: 281–294. Mann, R.S., Sidhu, J.S., Butter, N.S., Sohi, A.S. & Sekhon, P.S .2008. Performance of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on healthy and cotton leaf curl virus infected cotton. Florida Entomology, 91:249–255. Milonas, P.G. Kontodimas, D.C. & Martinou, A.F. 2011. A predator’s functional response: influence of prey species and size. Biological Control, 59: 141–146. Montserrat, M., Albajes, R. & Castan˜e´, C., 2000. Functional response of four heteropteran predators preying on greenhouse whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Environmental Entomology, 29: 1075–1082. Murdoch, W.W. & Oaten, T. 1975. Predation and population stability. Advances in Ecological Research, 9: 1–131. Omkar, G. & Prevez, A. 2004. Functional and numerical response of Propylea dissecta (Col.: Coccinellidae) on three aphid species. Journal of Applied Entomology, 128: 140–146. Pervez, A. & Omkar, M. 2005. Functional responses of coccinellid predators: an illustration of a logistic approach. Journal of Insect Science, 5: 1–6. Ramarkers, M.J. 1990. Control Western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis mediante depredatores. Phytoma Epsana, 4: 56–59. Riley, D.G., Joseph, S.V., Srinivasan, R. & Diffie, S. 2011. Thrips Vectors of Tospoviruses. Journal of Integrated Pest Manegement, 2(1): 1–10. Riudavets, J. & Castan˜e´, C. 1998. Identification and evaluation of native predators of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in the Mediterranean. Environmental Entomology, 27: 86–93. Salas–Aguillar. J. & Ehler, L.E. 1977. Feeding habits of Orius tristicolor. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 70(1): 59–62. Salim, M, Masud, S.A. & Khan, A.M. 1987. Orius albidipennis (Hamiptera: Anthocoridae) a predator of cotton pests. Philippine Entomologist, 7(1): 37–42. Salehi, F., Baniameri, V., Sahragard, A. & Hajizadeh, J. 2011. Investigation on prey preference and switching behavior of the predatory bug, Orius niger Wolff under laboratory conditions (Het.: Anthocoridae). Munis Entomology and Zoology, 6: 425–432. Sa´nchez, J. A. & Lacasa, A. 2006. A biological pest control story. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 29 (4): 19–24. Sarmento, R.A., Pallini, R. Venzon, M, Fonseca de Souza, O.F. Molina–Rugama, A.J. & Lima de Oliveira, C. 2007. Functional response of the predator Eriopis connexa (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to different prey types. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 50: 121–126. SAS Institute Inc. 2004. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, version 9.1, Vols 1 and 2. SAS Institute Inc., Cray. Sidhu, J.S., Mann, R.S. & Butter, N.S. 2009. Deleterious effects of cotton leaf curl virus on longevity and fecundity of whitefly Bemicia tabaci (Gennadious). Journal of Entomology, 6: 62−66. Shapiro, J.P., Shirk, P.D., Reitz, S.R. & Koenig, R. 2009. Sympatry of Orius insidiosus and O. Pumilio (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) in North Central Florida. Florida Entomology, 92: 362–366. Shahpouri, A., Yarahmadi, F. & Sohani, N.Z. 2019. Functional response of the predatory species Orius albidipennis Reuter (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to two life stages of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.)(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 29(1): 14–25. Timms, J.E., Oliver, T.H., Straw, N.A. & Leather, S.R. 2008. The effects of host plant on the coccinellid functional response: Is the conifer specialist Aphidecta obliterate (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) better adapted to spruce than the generalist Adalia bipunctata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Biological Control, 47: 273–281. Touhidul, I. & Shunxiang, R. 2009. Effect of sweet potato whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) infestation on eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) leaf. Journal of Pest Science, 82: 211−215. Toyoshima, S. & Osakabe, M. 2005. Effects of artificially released Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and naturally occurring Orius minutus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) population in apple orchard without insecticides. Annual Reports – Royal Society of plant protection, 56: 188–190. Thomas, J.M.G., Shirk, P.D. & Shapiro, J.P. 2012. Mass Rearing of a Tropical Minute Pirate Bug, Orius pumilio (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Florida Entomologist, 95(1): 202–204. Thompson, D.J. 1975. Towards a predator– prey model incorporating age structure: the effects of predator and prey size on the predation of Daphnia magna by Ischnura elegans. Journal of Animal Ecology, 44: 907–916. Tomar, S., Sharma, S. & Malik, K. 2017. Life parameters of whitefly (Bemisia tabaci, Genn.) on different host plants. Indian Journal of Scientific Research, 12: 34–38. Trexler, J.C. & J. Travis. 1993. Nontraditional regression analysis. Ecology, 74: 1629–1637. Trexler, J.C., McCulloch, C.E. & Travis, J. 1988. How can the functional response best be determined? Oecology, 76: 206–214. Villevieille, M. & Millot, P. 1991. Lutte biologique contre Frankliniella occidentalis aves Orius laevigatus sur fraisier. WPRS/SROP Bull, 14(5): 57–64. Walzer, A., Paulus, H. F. & Schausberger. P. 2004. Ontogenetic shifts in intraguild predation on thrips by phytoseiid mites: the relevance of body size and diet specialization. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 94: 577–584. Wekesa, V.W., Moraes, G.J., Knapp, M. & Delalibera–Jr, I. 2007. Interaction of two natural enemies of Tetranychus evansi, the fungal pathogen Neozygites floridana (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) and predatory mite, Phytoseiulus longipes (Acari: Phytoseiidae). BioControl, 41: 408–414. Wraight, S.P., Lopes, R.B. & Faria, M. 2017. Microbial control of mite and insect pests of greenhouse crops. In: Microbial control of insect and mite pests. New York: Academic Press, 13: 237–252. Yamada, K., Yasunaga, T. & Artchawakom, T. 2016. The flower bug genus Orius wolff, 1811 (Hemiptera: heteroptera: Anthocoridae: oriini) of Thailand. Journal of Natural History, 50:1103–1157. Yazdani, M. & Keller, M. 2016. The shape of the functional response curve of Dolichogenidea tasmanica (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is affected by recent experience. Biological Control, 97:63–69. Zandi–Sohani, N., Rajabpour, A., Yarahmadi, F. & Ramezani, L. 2018. Sensitivity of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and the Generalist Predator Orius albidipennis (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to Vapors of Essential Oils. Journal of Entomological Science, 53:493–502. Zhao, J., Guo, X., Tan, X., Desneux, N., Zappala, L., Zhang, F. & Wang, S. 2017. Using Calendula officinalis as a floral resource to enhance aphid and thrips suppression by the flower bug Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Pest Management Science, 73: 515–520. Zhou, X.M., Zhu, F., Li, H. & Lei, C.L. 2006. Effect of temperature on development of Orius similis Zheng (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) and on its predation activity against Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Pan–Pacific Entomologist, 82: 97–102. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 565 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 505 |
||