اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات283
تعداد نشریات سازمان81
تعداد شماره‌ها2,726
تعداد مقالات31,041
تعداد مشاهده مقاله27,716,181
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله16,218,776
Abdulwahid Jaber Al-Fayad, M. (1400). Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and Goats. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 77(1), 477-481. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.356861.1932
M Abdulwahid Jaber Al-Fayad. "Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and Goats". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 77, 1, 1400, 477-481. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.356861.1932
Abdulwahid Jaber Al-Fayad, M. (1400). 'Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and Goats', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 77(1), pp. 477-481. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.356861.1932
Abdulwahid Jaber Al-Fayad, M. Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and Goats. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1400; 77(1): 477-481. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.356861.1932

Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and Goats

Archives of Razi Institute
مقاله 58، دوره 77، شماره 1، فروردین و اردیبهشت 2022، صفحه 477-481    اصل مقاله (448.66 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ari.2021.356861.1932
نویسنده
M Abdulwahid Jaber Al-Fayad*
Faculty of Agriculture and Marshlands, University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriyah, Iraq
چکیده
In recent years, the consumption of milk and dairy products has dramatically increased in several parts of the world. Different livestock plays an essential role in global milk production. This study was designed to evaluate different chemical and physical components of milk in four groups of livestock, including cows, buffalos, sheep, and goats. To this end, 200 raw milk samples were collected from cows, buffalos, sheep, and goats (n=50) across Dhi-Qar Governorate, Iraq, for a period of one year (from 01.10.2018 to 01.06.2019). The findings showed sheep and buffalos’ milk samples had a significantly higher percentage of total solids (TS%), compared to cows and goats’ milk samples (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the TS% between sheep and buffalos’ milk samples. Furthermore, the mean TS% values in cows, buffalos, sheep, and goats’ milk samples were determined at 11.14%, 12.87%, 13.26%, and 11.33%, respectively. As for fat percentage (F%), buffalos’ milk samples had significantly higher F% (4.80%), compared to milk samples of cows, sheep, and goats (P<0.05). Additionally, sheep’s milk samples had significantly higher F% (P<0.05) than cows and goats’ milk samples determined at 2.78%, 4.20%, and 2.98%, respectively. The findings showed the percentage of solids not fat (SNF%) was significantly higher in sheep’s milk (8.97%), compared to milk samples of cows, buffalos, and goats (P<0.05). Additionally, it was found that the SNF% was significantly higher (P<0.05) in Buffalos’ milk samples, compared to cows and goats’ milk samples determined at 8.36%, 8.60%, and 8.35%, respectively. Moreover, the results revealed that the percentage of milk protein content in sheep’s milk was significantly higher than the cows, buffalos, and goats’ milk (P<0.05). Recorded data also showed no significant differences in the percentage of milk lactose among cows, buffalos, sheep, and goats’ milk samples (P<0.05). Furthermore, the findings illustrated that the percentage of milk ash (Ash%) in sheep’s milk samples was significantly higher than the cows, buffalos, as well as goats’ milk samples (P<0.05), and no significant differences were observed among cows, buffalos, and goats’ milk samples in the Ash% (P<0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences in the specific gravity among different milk samples (P<0.05). Finally, the results displayed no significant differences between cows and goats’ milk samples in all the studied traits (P<0.05).
کلیدواژه‌ها
Animal type؛ Buffalos؛ Cows؛ Sheep؛ Total solids
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Gerosa S, Skoet J. Milk availability: trends in production and demand and medium-term outlook. 2012.
  2. MİKAİLOĞLU AM, BAYRAMOĞLU İT, VELİOĞLU AO. Amino acid ingredient of milk azeri buffalo. Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi. 2005;16.
  3. Gantner V, Mijić P, Baban M, Škrtić Z, Turalija A. The overall and fat composition of milk of various species. Mljekarstvo. 2015;65(4):223-31.
  4. Miller BA, Lu CD. Current status of global dairy goat production: an overview. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019;32(8):1219.
  5. Kanwal R, Ahmed T, Mirza B. Comparative analysis of quality of milk collected from buffalo, cow, goat and sheep of Rawalpindi/Islamabad region in Pakistan. Asian J Plant Sci. 2004;3(3):300-5.
  6. Hamad M, Baiomy A. Physical properties and chemical composition of cow's and buffalo's milk in Qena governorate. J Food Dairy Sci. 2010;1(7):397-403.
  7. Javaid S, Gadahi J, Khaskeli M, Bhutto M, Kumbher S, Panhwar A. Physical and chemical quality of market milk sold at Tandojam, Pakistan. Pak Vet J. 2009;29(1):27-31.
  8. Soliman GZ. Comparison of chemical and mineral content of milk from human, cow, buffalo, camel and goat in Egypt. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2005;21(1):116-30.
  9. Ahmad S, Gaucher I, Rousseau F, Beaucher E, Piot M, Grongnet JF, et al. Effects of acidification on physico-chemical characteristics of buffalo milk: A comparison with cow’s milk. Food Chem. 2008;106(1):11-7.
  10. Mahmood A, Usman S. A comparative study on the physicochemical parameters of milk samples collected from buffalo, cow, goat and sheep of Gujrat, Pakistan. Pak J Nutr. 2010;9(12):1192-7.
  11. Kapadiya DB, Prajapati DB, Jain AK, Mehta BM, Darji VB, Aparnathi KD. Comparison of Surti goat milk with cow and buffalo milk for gross composition, nitrogen distribution, and selected minerals content. Vet World. 2016;9(7):710.
  12. Ghadge P, Prasad K, Kadam P. Effect of fortification on the physico-chemical and sensory properties of buffalo milk yoghurt. Elec J Env Agricult Food Chem. 2008;7(5):2890-9.
  13. MALAU‐ADULI AEO, Anlade YR. Comparative study of milk compositions of cattle, sheep and goats in Nigeria. Anim Sci J. 2002;73(6):541-4.
  14. Abdel KAKTF. Analysis of chemical composition of raw milk in some farm animals in Al-Diwania city by using ultrasonic milk analyzer. Al-Qadisiyah J Vet Med Sci. 2011;10(1).
  15. Taher N, Hassan H, Mohammad B. A study effect of age of dam and sex of birth on chemical and physical composition of milk in some farm animals. Kufa J Vet Med Sci. 2011;2(2).
  16. Imran M, Khan H, Hassan SS, Khan R. Physicochemical characteristics of various milk samples available in Pakistan. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2008;9(7):546-51.
  17. Park Y, Juárez M, Ramos M, Haenlein G. Physico-chemical characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Rumin Res. 2007;68(1-2):88-113.
  18. Braun PG, Preuss SE. Nutritional composition and chemico-physical parameters of water buffalo milk and milk products in Germany. Milchwissenschaft. 2008;63(1):70-2.
  1. Khan M, Islam M, Siddiki M. Physical and chemical composition of swamp and water buffalo milk: a comparative study. Ital J Anim Sci. 2007;6(sup2):1067-70.
  2. Salman M, Khaskheli M, Israr-Ul-Haq ART, Khuhro A, Rauf M, Hamid H, et al. Comparative studies on nutritive quality of buffalo and cow milk. Int J Res Appl Nat Soc Sci. 2014;2(12):69-78.
  3. Prajapati DB, Kapadiya DB, Jain AK, Mehta BM, Darji VB, Aparnathi KD. Comparison of Surti goat milk with cow and buffalo milk for physicochemical characteristics, selected processing-related parameters and activity of selected enzymes. Vet World. 2017;10(5):477.
  4. Lee F, Page J, Gokavi S, Guo M, editors. Seasonal variations in chemical composition of water buffalo milk. J Dairy Sci. 2004.
  5. Ahmed MI, El Zubeir IE. The compositional quality of raw milk produced by some dairy cow's farms in Khartoum State, Sudan. Res J Agric Biol Sci. 2007;3(6):902-6.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,012
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 278


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب