اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات286
تعداد نشریات سازمان84
تعداد شماره‌ها2,848
تعداد مقالات32,322
تعداد مشاهده مقاله41,447,483
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله18,648,256
Selionova, M. I, Aibazov, A. -M. M, Mamontova, T. V, Stolpovsky, Iu. A, Beketov, S. V, Petrov, S. N, Kharzinova, V. R, Dotsev, A. V, Zinovieva, N. A. (1400). Characteristics of the Allele Pool and the Genetic Differentiation of Goats of Different Breeds and their Wild Relatives by Str-Markers. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 76(5), 1351-1362. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.355684.1709
M. I Selionova; A. -M. M Aibazov; T. V Mamontova; Iu. A Stolpovsky; S. V Beketov; S. N Petrov; V. R Kharzinova; A. V Dotsev; N. A Zinovieva. "Characteristics of the Allele Pool and the Genetic Differentiation of Goats of Different Breeds and their Wild Relatives by Str-Markers". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 76, 5, 1400, 1351-1362. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.355684.1709
Selionova, M. I, Aibazov, A. -M. M, Mamontova, T. V, Stolpovsky, Iu. A, Beketov, S. V, Petrov, S. N, Kharzinova, V. R, Dotsev, A. V, Zinovieva, N. A. (1400). 'Characteristics of the Allele Pool and the Genetic Differentiation of Goats of Different Breeds and their Wild Relatives by Str-Markers', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 76(5), pp. 1351-1362. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.355684.1709
Selionova, M. I, Aibazov, A. -M. M, Mamontova, T. V, Stolpovsky, Iu. A, Beketov, S. V, Petrov, S. N, Kharzinova, V. R, Dotsev, A. V, Zinovieva, N. A. Characteristics of the Allele Pool and the Genetic Differentiation of Goats of Different Breeds and their Wild Relatives by Str-Markers. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1400; 76(5): 1351-1362. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.355684.1709

Characteristics of the Allele Pool and the Genetic Differentiation of Goats of Different Breeds and their Wild Relatives by Str-Markers

Archives of Razi Institute
مقاله 24، دوره 76، شماره 5، بهمن و اسفند 2021، صفحه 1351-1362    اصل مقاله (1.13 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ari.2021.355684.1709
نویسندگان
M. I Selionova* 1؛ A. -M. M Aibazov2؛ T. V Mamontova2؛ Iu. A Stolpovsky3؛ S. V Beketov3؛ S. N Petrov4؛ V. R Kharzinova4؛ A. V Dotsev4؛ N. A Zinovieva4
1Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Russian State Agrarian University, Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, Moscow, 127550, Russia
2All-Russian Research Institute of Sheep and Goat Breeding, Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution, North Caucasian Federal Scientific Agrarian Center, Stavropol, 355017, Russia
3Institute of General Genetics, N.I. Vavilov Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia
4Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution, L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Moscow region, Podolsk, settlement of Dubrovitsy, 142132, Russia
چکیده
Based on 16 STR-loci, the allele pool and interbreed differentiation of goat breeds of Russian and foreign breeding were investigated in this study. These breeds included Karachai (KRCH-K, n=73, mountain zone; KRCH-Z, n=33, foothill zone), Dagestan Downy (DAGD, n=30), Dagestan Wool (DAGW, n=30), Soviet Wool (SOVW, n=30), Saanen (SAAN, n=34), Murciano-Granadina (MURS, n=37), as well as wild goats, represented by three species of mountain goats (n=52): Siberian Capricorn (Capra sibirica) of Altai (CSIB-S, n=6), Tajikistan (CSIB-T, n=4), Kyrgyzstan (CSIB-K, n=6), and the Himalayas (CSIB-H, n=4); Bezoar goat (Capa aegagrus) of Turkey (CAEG, n=3) and Pakistan (CAEG-S, n=3); West Caucasian tur (Capra caucasica): western Caucasian (Kuban, CCAU-K, n=10), central Caucasian (CCAU-M, n=8), and eastern Caucasian (Dagestan, CCAU-D, n=8). The highest genetic diversity was observed in the North Caucasus breeds, such as Karachai, Dagestan Downy, and Dagestan Wool. The mean numbers of alleles per locus and allelic diversity were 7.385-9.154 and 7.353-7.713, respectively. The genetic proximity of Caucasian breeds was confirmed by cluster analysis, and they formed a common branch with the highest genetic affinity, while the Orenburg and Soviet Wool breeds formed another branch, and the third branch with the least affinity was the dairy breed of foreign selection. The analysis of the phylogenetic tree of domestic and wild species established the formation of three clusters formed by the subspecies of the West Caucasian tur, Siberian ibex, and breeds of domestic goats. At the same time, populations of the Bezoar goats were localized at the root of the last cluster, which confirmed their role as the ancestors of domestic goats.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Goat؛ Wild Species؛ Breed؛ Genetic Diversity؛ Microsatellites؛ Genetic Differentiation
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Alberto FJ, Boyer F, Orozco-terWengel P, Streeter I, Servin B, de Villemereuil P, et al. Convergent genomic signatures of domestication in sheep and goats. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1-9.
  2. Dong Y, Zhang X, Xie M, Arefnezhad B, Wang Z, Wang W, et al. Reference genome of wild goat (capra aegagrus) and sequencing of goat breeds provide insight into genic basis of goat domestication. BMC Genom. 2015;16(1):1-11.
  3. MacHugh DE, Bradley DG. Livestock genetic origins: goats buck the trend. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98(10):5382-4.
  4. Amills M, Capote J, Tosser‐Klopp G. Goat domestication and breeding: a jigsaw of historical, biological and molecular data with missing pieces. Anim Genet. 2017;48(6):631-44.
  5. I CA, A II. Sheep and goat breeding. INFRA Res Cent. 2016:228.
  6. Lande R. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution. 1976:314-34.
  7. Cañón J, García D, García‐Atance M, Obexer‐Ruff G, Lenstra J, Ajmone‐Marsan P, et al. Geographical partitioning of goat diversity in Europe and the Middle East. Anim Genet. 2006;37(4):327-34.
  8. Colli L, Milanesi M, Talenti A, Bertolini F, Chen M, Crisà A, et al. Genome-wide SNP profiling of worldwide goat populations reveals strong partitioning of diversity and highlights post-domestication migration routes. Genet Sel Evol. 2018;50(1):1-20.
  9. Oget C, Servin B, Palhiere I. Genetic diversity analysis of French goat populations reveals selective sweeps involved in their differentiation. Anim Genet. 2019;50(1):54-63.
  10. Vahidi SMF, Tarang AR, Anbaran MF, Boettcher P, Joost S, Colli L, et al. Investigation of the genetic diversity of domestic Capra hircus breeds reared within an early goat domestication area in Iran. Genet Sel Evol. 2014;46(1):1-12.
  11. Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Myles S. How culture shaped the human genome: bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(2):137-48.
  12. Fan S, Hansen ME, Lo Y, Tishkoff SA. Going global by adapting local: A review of recent human adaptation. Science. 2016;354(6308):54-9.
  13. Sabeti PC, Schaffner SF, Fry B, Lohmueller J, Varilly P, Shamovsky O, et al. Positive natural selection in the human lineage. science. 2006;312(5780):1614-20.
  14. Watson WE. The battle of tours-poitiers revisited. Prov: Stud Western Civ. 1993;2(1):51-68.
  15. Jénot F, Desmaison P. Historique et stratégies des entreprises laitières de Charentes-Poitou pour la production de fromage de chèvre, entre logiques de filière et de territoire. Actes des. 2009;16:325-8.
  16. Sulimova G. DNA markers in genetic studies: types of markers, their properties and the range of application. Usp Sovrem Biol. 2004;124(3):260-71.
  17. Kim K, Yeo J, Lee J, Kim J, Choi C. Genetic diversity of goats from Korea and China using microsatellite analysis. Asian-australas J Anim Sci. 2002;15(4):461-5.
  18. Asroush F, Mirhoseini S-Z, Badbarin N, Seidavi A, Tufarelli V, Laudadio V, et al. Genetic characterization of Markhoz goat breed using microsatellite markers. Arch Anim Breed. 2018;61(4):469-73.
  1. Lenstra J, Tigchelaar J, Biebach I, Consortium E, Hallsson J, Kantanen J, et al. Microsatellite diversity of the Nordic type of goats in relation to breed conservation: how relevant is pure ancestry? J Anim Breed Genet. 2017;134(1):78-84.
  2. Martínez AM, Acosta J, Vega-Pla JL, Delgado JV. Analysis of the genetic structure of the canary goat populations using microsatellites. Livest Sci. 2006;102(1-2):140-5.
  3. Wang G, Chen S, Chao T, Ji Z, Hou L, Qin Z, et al. Analysis of genetic diversity of Chinese dairy goats via microsatellite markers. J Anim Sci. 2017;95(5):2304-13.
  1. Araújo AMd, Guimarães SEF, Machado TMM, Lopes PS, Pereira CS, Silva FLRd, et al. Genetic diversity between herds of Alpine and Saanen dairy goats and the naturalized Brazilian Moxotó breed. Genet Mol Biol 2006;29:67-74.
  2. Seilsuth S, Seo JH, Kong HS, Jeon GJ. Microsatellite analysis of the genetic diversity and population structure in dairy goats in Thailand. Asian-australas J Anim Sci. 2016;29(3):327.
  3. I.M D, Kh.A A, al SGFe. Goat breeding in Russia and its breeding resources. Publisher of FSBSI All Russian Research Institute of Animal Breeding; 2018. 323-5 p.
  4. R KV, N PS, al DAVe. Population-genetic characteristics of some breeds of goats based on the analysis of microsatellites. Sheep, Goats, Wool Busi. 2019;3:7-12.
  5. Aibazov AMM, Mamontova  TV. Some productive and biological indicators of the offspring resulting from crossing the West Caucasian tur and Karachai goats.Coll Sci Works Stavropol Res Inst Livest Forage Produc. 2014;7:50-5.
  6. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6(1):288-95.
  7. Brown AH, Weir BS. Measuring genetic variability in plant populations. Isozymes Plnt Genet Breed, A. 1983:219-39.
  8. Kalinowski ST. Counting alleles with rarefaction: private alleles and hierarchical sampling designs. Conserv Genet. 2004;5(4):539-43.
  9. Hartl DL, Clark AG, Clark AG. Principles of population genetics: Sinauer associates Sunderland, MA; 1997.
  10. Keenan K, McGinnity P, Cross TF, Crozier WW, Prodöhl PA. diveRsity: An R package for the estimation and exploration of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013;4(8):782-8.
  11. Jost L. GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol. 2008;17(18):4015-26.
  12. Jombart T. adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinform. 2008;24(11):1403-5.
  13. Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23(2):254-67.
  14. Wickham H. Elegant graphics for data analysis. Media. 2009;35(211):10.1007.
  15. Urbanek S, Plummer M. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. URL: https://www r-project org/(besucht am 10 01 2017). 2017.
  1. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945-59.
  2. Nei M. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat. 1972;106(949):283-92.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,340
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 397


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب