| تعداد نشریات | 285 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 83 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,086 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,441 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 48,876,610 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 79,334,406 |
برآورد فاکتور زی‌توده اندام‌های مختلف و فاکتور تعمیم زی‌توده صنوبر دلتوئیدس، توسکا ییلاقی و دارتالاب در جنگل‌های دست‌کاشت منطقه کلوده آمل | ||
| تحقیقات جنگل و صنوبر ایران | ||
| مقاله 16، دوره 22، شماره 3، آذر 1393، صفحه 540-549 اصل مقاله (219.57 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijfpr.2014.12438 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| جمشید اسلام دوست1؛ هرمز سهرابی* 2؛ سیدمحسن حسینی3؛ بهرام ناصری4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد جنگلداری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| 2استادیار، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| 3استاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| 4دانشجوی دکتری جنگلداری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| چکیده | ||
| فاکتور زی‌توده یکی از روش‌های کارآمد برای برآورد غیرمخرب زی‌توده و کربن اندوخته در درختان و توده‌های جنگلی است که در سال‌های اخیر به‌دلیل اهیمت مسایل مربوط به تغییر اقلیم، موردتوجه پژوهشگران این بخش قرار گرفته است. هدف پژوهش پیش‌رو، ارائه فاکتور زی‌توده، نسبت زی‌توده تاج به کل و فاکتور تعمیم زی‌توده برای سه گونه جنگلی دست‌کاشت 20ساله صنوبردلتوئیدس (Populus deltoides Bartr. Ex Marsh)، توسکاییلاقی (Alnus subcordata C.A.Mey.) و دارتالاب (Taxodium distichum L. Rich) است. بدین‌منظور از هر گونه، 12 پایه قطع و مشخصه‌های درصد رطوبت و وزن خشک به‌تفکیک تنه، شاخه، سرشاخه و برگ اندازه‌گیری شد. براساس نتایج، فاکتور زی‌توده صنوبردلتوئیدس، توسکاییلاقی و دارتالاب به‌ترتیب برای شاخه 036/0، 007/0، 006/0، سرشاخه 055/0، 017/0، 024/0 و برگ 041/0، 006/0، 031/0 تن بر مترمکعب بود. نسبت زی‌توده تاج به کل در گونه صنوبر دلتوئیدس به‌طور معنی‌داری کمتر از دو گونه دیگر بود. مقادیر فاکتور تعمیم زی‌توده برای صنوبر دلتوئیدس، توسکاییلاقی و دارتالاب به‌ترتیب 499/0، 554/0 و 621/0 تن بر مترمکعب محاسبه شد که اختلاف آنها معنی‌دار بود (05/0> ρ). گرچه این ضرایب ساده و کارآمد هستند، اما استفاده از آنها در جنگل‌کاری‌های دیگر باید با احتیاط انجام شود، زیرا درصورت تفاوت بسیار زیاد توده‌ها، ممکن است برآورد‌ها اریب باشند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| برآورد زی‌توده و کربن؛ تخصیص زی‌توده؛ جنگل‌کاری؛ فاکتور تعمیم زی‌توده؛ کلوده | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Estimation of biomass factor and biomass expansion factor for Populus deltoides, Alnus subcordata and Taxodium distichum in koludeh plantation, Amol | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Jamshid Eslamdoust1؛ Hormoz Sohrabi2؛ Seyyed Mohsen Hosseini3؛ Bahram Naseri4 | ||
| 1M. Sc. Student, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marian Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Prof., Faculty of Natural Resources and Marian Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran | ||
| 3Ph. D. Student, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marian Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran | ||
| 4Prof., Faculty of Natural Resources and Marian Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Biomass factor is one of the efficient methods for non-destructive estimation of biomass and carbon storage in forest stands. To fulfill the existing lack of biomass data in plantations of Northern Iran, this study derived biomass factor (BF), crown biomass to aboveground biomass ratio (R) and biomass expansion factor (BEF) coefficients for three tree species of Eastern Poplar (Populus deltoides), Caucasian Alder (Alnus subcordata)and Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) across a 20-years old plantation. For each species, 12 individual trees were felled down. Then the dry weigh of stem, branches, twigs and leaves were separately measured for each tree. The BF values for Eastern Poplar, Caucasian Alderand Bald Cypress were 0.036, 0.007, 0.006 Mg m-3 for branch, 0.055, 0.017, 0.024 Mg m-3 for twigs and 0.041, 0.006, 0.031 Mg m-3 for leaves, respectively. Compared to the other two species, the R value forEastern Poplarwas significantly lower. The BEF values were 0.499, 0.554 and 0.621 Mg m-3 for Eastern Poplar, Caucasian Alder and Bald Cypress, respectively. Although these coefficients are easy to apply and efficient for use, but using them for other plantations must be done with caution, because applying them for other plantations with different stand structure may result in a biased estimation. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Carbon and biomass estimation, biomass allocation, plantation, biomass expansion factor, Koludeh | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Anonymous, 1993. Report on the operation of the office of afforestation and forest Parks. Forests, Rangeland & Watershed Management Organization of Iran, 40p (In Persian). - Bakhtiarvand Bakhtiari, S. 2011. Assessment of biomass estimation methods for conifer and broadleaved trees in Mobarake steel plantation. M. Sc. thesis, Faculty of Natural Resource and Earth Science, University of Shahr-e-Kord, 99p (In Persian). - Coomes, D.A., Holdaway, R.J., Kobe, R.K., Lines, E.R. and Allen, R.B. 2012. A general integrative framework for modeling woody biomass production and carbon sequestration rates in forests. Journal of Ecology, 100(1): 42-64. - Fang, J.Y., Wang, G.G., Liu, G.H. and Xu, S.L. 1998. Forest biomass of China: an estimation based on the biomass-volume relationship. Journal of Ecological Application, 8(1): 1084-1091. - Fang, J.Y., Guo, Z.D., Piao, S.L. and Chen, A.P. 2007. Terrestrial vegetation carbon sinks in China, 1981- 2000. Journal of Science in China-Series D: Earth Sciences, 50(9): 1341-1350. - Fasth, B.G., Harmon, M.E., Sexton J. and White, P. 2011. Decomposition of fine woody debris in a deciduous forest in North Carolina. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 138(2): 192-206. - Ghani, A., Azizi, M. and Tehranifar, A. 2009. Response of Achillea species to drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol in germination stage. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 25(2): 271-281. - Guo, Z., Fang, J., Pan, Y. and Birdsey, R. 2010. Inventory-based estimates of forest biomass carbon stocks in China: A comparison of three methods. Forest Ecology and Management, 259(7): 1225-1231. - Hakkila, P. 1989. Utilization of Residual Forest Biomass. Springer, 477p. - He, Y., Qin, L., Li, Z., Liang, X., Shao, M. and Tan, L. 2013. Carbon storage capacity of monoculture and mixed-species plantations in subtropical China. Forest Ecology and Management, 295(1): 193-198. - Ikegami, M., Whigham, D.F. and Werger, M.J. 2008. Optimal biomass allocation in heterogeneous environments in a clonal plant-Spatial division of labor. Ecological Modelling, 213(2): 156-164. - Watson, R.T., Noble, I.R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N.H., Verardo, D.J. and Dokken, D.J. 2000. Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 388p. - Penman, J., Gytarsky, M., Hiraishi, T., Krug, T., Kruger, D., Pipatti, R., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K. and Wagner, F. 2003. Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 593p. - Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. and Tanabe, K. 2006. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Japan, 20p. - Iranmanesh, Y. 2013. Assessment on biomass estimation methods and carbon sequestration of Quercus branti Lindl. in Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari forests. Ph. D. thesis, Faculty of Natural Resource, Tarbiat Modares University, 105p (In Persian). - Izadi, S. 2013. Comparison of sampling methods for estimating volume of coarse woody debris in Hyrcanian forest of Iran. M. Sc. thesis in Forestry. Faculty of Natural Resource, Tarbiat Modares University, 71p (In Persian). - Lehtonen, A. 2005. Estimating foliage biomass for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) plots. Tree Physiology, 25(1): 803-811. - Lehtonena, A., Makipa, R., Heikkinenb, J., Sievanena, R. and Liskic, J. 2004. Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 188(1): 211-224. - Lehtonena, A., Ciencialab, E., Tatarinovb, F. and Makipaa, R. 2007. Uncertainty estimation of biomass expansion factors for Norway spruce in the Czech Republic. Annals of Forest Science, 64(1): 133-140. - Levy, P.E., Hale, S.E. and Nicoll, B.C. 2004. Biomass expansion factors and root: shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain. Journal of Forestry, 77(1): 421-430. - Li, X., Yi, M.J., Son, Y., Park, P.S., Lee, K.H., Son, Y.M., Kim R.H. and Jeong J.M. 2010. Biomass expansion factors of natural Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora) forests in Korea. Journal of Plant Biology, 53(6): 381-386. - Litton, C.M., Raich, J.W. and Ryan, M.G. 2007. Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 13(10): 2089-2109. - Namiranian, M. 2006. Measurment of Tree and Forest Biometry. University of Tehran Press, 574p (In Persian). - Pajtık, J., Konopkaa, B. and Lukacc, M. 2008. Biomass functions and expansion factors in young Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst) trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(5): 1096-1103. - Razavi, S.A. 2010. Comparison of soil characteristics and biodiversity in plantations of Bald cypress and Caucasian alder (case study: Kludeh-Mazandaran province). Journal of Wood & Forest Science and Technology, 17(2): 41-56 (In Persian). - Rostamabadi, A., Tabari, M., Salehi, A., Sayad, E. and Salehi, A. 2010. Comparison of nutrition, nutrient return and nutrient retrains location between stands of Alnus subcordata and Taxodium distichum in Tashbandan, Amol (Mazandaran). Journal of Wood & Forest Science and Technology, 17(1): 65-78 (In Persian). - Somogyi, Z., Cienciala, E., Mäkipää, R., Muukkonen, P., Lehtonen A. and Weiss, P. 2007. Indirect methods of large-scale forest biomass estimation. European Journal of Forest Research, 126(2): 197-207. - Tohin, B. and Nieuwenhuis, M. 2007. Biomass expansion factors for Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) in Ireland. European Journal of Forest Research, 126(2): 189-496. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 5,780 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,472 |
||