| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,873 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,558 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 42,482,588 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 19,247,546 |
شکست خواب فیزیکی و ارزیابی عوامل محیطی بر جوانه‌زنی بذر انگل سس (Cuscuta Campestris) | ||
| علوم و فناوری بذر ایران | ||
| دوره 10، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 22، تیر 1400، صفحه 1-13 اصل مقاله (368.67 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijsst.2020.341568.1324 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| احمد زارع* 1؛ زینب پور عامری2 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی. دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان | ||
| 2دانشجوی گیاه پزشکی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به منظور شناخت خواب و جوانه‌زنی بذر انگل سس به عوامل مختلف (اسید سولفوریک (خواب فیزیکی)، نور، دما، شوری و خشکی) به صورت چهار آزمایش جداگانه در سال 1397 در دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان انجام گرفت. تیمارهای آزمایشی به ترتیب شامل مدت غوطه‌ور کردن بذرها در اسید سولفوریک 96% (صفر، 10، 20، 30، 60، 90 و 120 دقیقه)، جوانه‌زنی در دماهای مختلف (پنج، 10، 15، 20، 25، 30، 35، 40 و 45 سلسیوس)، شرایط نور (روشنایی/تاریکی و تاریکی)، سطوح تنش شوری (صفر، 50، 100، 150، 200، 250، 300، 350 و 400 میلی‌مولار) و تنش خشکی (صفر، 2/0-، 4/0-، 6/0-، 8/0-،1/0- و 2/1- مگاپاسکال) بود. غوطه‌وری بذر به مدت 30 دقیقه منجر به افزایش جوانه‌زنی (%100) گردید و با افزایش مدت زمان به 120 دقیقه جوانه‌زنی به 60 % کاهش یافت. درصد جوانه‌زنی در دماهای 10 (53%) ، 20 ( 88%)، 25(%100)، 30 (%100)، 35 (%100) و 40 درجه سلسیوس (%42) بود. جوانه‌زنی انگل سس وابسته به نور نبود. کاهش 50 % صفات درصد جوانه‌زنی، شاخص جوانه‌زنی و سرعت جوانه‌زنی در89/154، 71/139 و 11/119 میلی‌مولار شوری پیش‌بینی گردید. همچنین پاسخ بذر سس به تنش خشکی نشان داد کاهش 50 % صفات درصد جوانه‌زنی، شاخص و سرعت جوانه‌زنی بر اساس معادله لجستیک در سطوح 57/0، 43/0، 52/0 مگاپاسکال خشکی پیش‌بینی گردید. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اسید سولفوریک؛ درصد جوانه‌زنی؛ سرعت جوانه‌زنی؛ شوری؛ معادله لجستیک | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Breaking of physical dormancy and evaluation of environmental factors on seed germination of field dodder parasite (Cuscuta Campestris) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| ahmad zare1؛ Zeinab Porameri2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor of Plant Production and Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan. Bavi, Mollasani, Iran | ||
| 2-B. Sc. Student of Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In order to knowledge the dormancy and seed germination of field dodder in response to environmental factors (sulfuric acid (physical dormancy), light, temperature, salinity and drought stress) four separate experiments were conducted at agricultural scientists and natural recourses university of Khuzestan. Treatments of sulfuric acid (96%) immersion (0, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90 and 120 m exposure to sulfuric acid), temperature (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45°C). Light (light/dark and darkness), salinity (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400 and 400 mM) and drought stress (0, -0.2,-0.4, -0.6, -0.8, -1 and -1.2 MPa) were considered. Seed immersion for 30 m increased germination up to 100% while by increasing of seed immersion in sulfuric acid to 120 minutes, germination decreased to 60%. Seed germination were at 10°C (53%), 20 (88%), 25 (100%), 30 (100%), 35 (100%) and 40°C (42%). Germination of field dodder wasn’t dependent on light. The salinity required to 50% inhibition for traits germination percentage, germination index and germination rate were predicted 154.89, 139.71 and 119.11mM respectively. From the results of drought stress indicated that for 50% inhibition of germination percentage, germination index and germination rate (logistic equation) were predicted -0.57, -0.43 and 0.52 MPa respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Sulfuric acid, germination percentage, germination rate, light | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Albert, M., X. Belastegui-Macadam, M. Bleischwitz, and R. Kaldenhoff. 2008. Cuscuta spp.: Parasitic plants in the spotlight of plant physiology, economy and Ecology. Prog Bot. 69: 267-277. Benvenuti, S., G. Dinelli, A. Bonetti, and P. Catizone. 2005. Germination ecology, emergence and host detection in Cuscuta campestris. Weed Res. 45: 270–278. Bert, A.M., G. Satin, A.M. Baldoni, A. Delpino, P. Frrero, M. Montemurron, F. Tel, P. Viggiani, and G. Zanin. 2006. Relationship between crop yield and weed time of emergence removal modeling and parameter stability. Weed Res. 48: 378-388. Bewick, T.A., L.K. Binning, and M.N. Dana. 1988. Post-attachment control of swamp dodder (Cuscuta gronovii) in cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) and carrot (Daucus carota). Weed Technol. 2: 166-169. Chauhan B.S., and D.E. Johnson. 2008. Seed germination and seedling emergence of giant sensitiveplant (Mimosa invisa). Weed Sci. 56: 244-248. Chauhan, B.S., G. Gill, and C. Preston. 2006. African mustard (Brassica tournefortii) germination in Southern Australia. Weed Sci. 54: 891-897. Costea, M., and F.J. Tardif. 2006. The biology of Canadian weeds. 133. Cuscuta campestris Yuncker, C. gronorii willd. Exschult, C. umbrosa Beyr. Exhook., C. epithymum (L.) and C. epilinum Weihe. Can. J. Plant Sci. 86: 293-316. Cudney, D.W., S.B. Orloff, and J.S. Reints. 1992. An integrated weed management for the control of dodder (Cuscuta indecora) in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Technol. 6: 603-606. Dawson, J.H., L.J. Musselman, P. Wolswinkel, and I. Dörr .1994. Biology and control of Cuscuta. Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 265-317. De Paula, A.S., C.M.L. Delgado, M.T.S. Paulilo, and M. Santos. 2012. Breaking physical dormancy of Cassia leptophylla and Senna macranthera (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae) seeds: water absorption and alternating temperatures. Seed Sci. Res. 22: 259-267. Ebrahimi, E.E., S.V. Eslami, and E. Zand. 2011. Effect of Environmental Factors on Germination and Emergence of Eastern Dodder (Cuscuta monogyna) J. Plant Protec. 25(1): 83-91. (In Persian, with English Abstract) Ganbari, A., M. Afshari, and S. Mijani. 2012. Effect of drought and salinity stress on emergence of field dodder. Iran. J. Field Crops Res. 10: 311-320. (In Persian, with English Abstract) Goldwasser, Y., H. Miryamchik, B. Rubin, and H. Eizenberg. 2016. Field Dodder (Cuscuta campestris)—A New Model Describing Temperature-Dependent Seed Germination. Weed Sci. 64(1): 53-60. Haidar, M.A., G.L. Orr, and P. Westra. 1997. Effects of light and mechanical stimulation on coiling and prehaustoria formation in Cuscuta spp. Weed Res. 37: 219-228. Holm, L., J. Doll, E. Holm, J. Panch, and J. Herberger.1997. World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 1129 pp. Hutchinson, J.M., and F.M. Ashton. 1980. Germination of field dodder (Cuscuta campestris). Weed Sci. 28: 330–333. Irum, M., I. Khokhar, and S. Mushtaq. 2011. Cuscuta campestris Yunck. A new pest of Capsicum frutescens L. (Hot chilli) in Lahor- Pakistan. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 17: 103-110. Keith, R.A., and D. C. Tingey. 1968. Germination and spring emergence of dodder as influenced by temperature. Weeds. 12:45–48. Kheloufi, A., L.M. Mansouri, and F.Z. Boukhatem. 2017. Application and use of sulphuric acid pretreatment to improve seed germination of three acacia species. Reforesta. (3): 1-10 Sarić-Krsmanović, M., D. Božić, D. Pavlović, L. Radivojević, and S. Vrbničanin. 2013. Temperature effects on Cuscuta campestris Yunk seed germination. Pestic. Fitomed. 28(3): 187-193. Lanini, W.T. 2004. Economical Methods of Controlling Dodder in Tomatoes. Proc. Calif. Weed Sci. Soc. 56: 57-59. Lanini, W.T, and M. Kogan. 2005. Biology and management of Cuscuta in crops. Int. J. Agric. Nat. Resour. 32(3): 127-141. Leblanc, M.L., D.C. Cloutier, K.A. Stewart, and C. Hamel. 2003. The use of thermal time to model common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) seedling emergence in corn. Weed Sci. 51(5): 718-724. Lyshed, B.O. 1992. Studies of mature seeds of Cuscuta pedicellata and C. campestris by electron microscopy. Ann. Bot. 69: 365-371. Mensah, S.I., and C. Ekeke. 2016. Effects of Different Pretreatments and Seed Coat on Dormancy and Germination of Seeds of Senna obtusifolia (L.) HS Irwin & Barneby (Fabaceae)." Int. J. Biol. 8(2): 77-84. Mishra, J.S. 2009. Biology and management of Cuscuta species. Indian J. Weed Sci. 41: 1-11. Mosavi, M.R., and P. Shimi. 1997. Parasitic weed of world. (Biology and Control). Varamin Azad University. 396 Pp. Nir, E., B. Rubin, and S.W. Zharasov. 1996. On the biology and selective control of field dodder (Cuscuta campestris). Pages 809–816 in Moreno MT, Cuberu JI, Berner D, Joel D, MusselmanLJ, Parker C, eds. Advances in Parasitic Plant Research. Cordoba, Spain: Junita de Andalucia. Prather, A., and R.J. Tyrl. 1993. The Biology of Cuscuta attenuata Waterfall (Cuscutaceae) . Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 73:7-13 Rubin, B. 1990. Weed competition and weed control in Allium crops. Vol. II. p. 63-84. In: H.D. Rabinowitch and J.L. Brewster (eds.) Onions and Allied Crops. CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton, Florida.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 397 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 356 |
||