| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,846 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,307 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 41,394,496 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 18,568,309 |
بررسی تاثیر مقدار و زمان تقسیط نیتروژن بر عملکرد دانه، علوفه و میزان برخی عناصر غذایی در ژنوتیپ‌های جدید تریتیکاله | ||
| پژوهش های کاربردی زراعی | ||
| دوره 33، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 129، اسفند 1399، صفحه 108-127 اصل مقاله (687.41 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/aj.2021.123358.1449 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| خلیل چابک* 1؛ حسین عجم نوروزی2؛ محمد داداشی2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکترای زراعت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرگان ، گرگان، ایران | ||
| 2دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرگان، گرگان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بمنظور بررسی اثرتقسیط مقادیرمختلف نیتروژن برعملکرد علوفه‌تر و دانه ژنوتیپ‌های تریتیکاله، آزمایش اسپلیت فاکتوریل با سه تکرار در دو ایستگاه قراخیل (مرکز) و بایع‌کلا (شرق) مازندران با تغذیه آب باران درسال زراعی 96- 1395 اجرا شد. عامل اصلی شش ژنوتیپ ET-89-1، ET-89-7، ET-89-9، ET-89-12، ET-89-13، ET-89-16 و عامل فرعی فاکتوریل سه سطح نیتروژن خالص (50، 70 و 90 کیلوگرم درهکتار از منبع اوره) در سه سطح تقسیط (مراحل کاشت + طویل‌شدن ساقه‌ها، کاشت + ظهورسنبله و پنجه‌زنی +ظهورسنبله با نسبت 50% :50%) بود. در مرحله خمیری دانه‌ها صفات ارتفاع گیاه، عملکرد علوفه‌تر و خشک، میزان نیتروژن، فسفر، پتاسیم و کلسیم علوفه اندازه‌گیری و در رسیدگی عملکرد دانه تعیین شد. براساس نتایج اثرمکان درتمامی صفات مورد مطالعه بجز نیتروژن و کلسیم علوفه معنی‌دار بود. ایستگاه بایع‌کلا با عملکرد دانه (9/5) نسبت به قراخیل(6/5) و ایستگاه قراخیل در علوفه‌تر (6/48) نسبت به بایع‌کلا (3/43) تن درهکتار تفاوت معنی‌داری نشان دادند. بین ژنوتیپ‌ها، ET-89-13 در متوسط دومنطقه با 5/50 و 1/6 تن درهکتار دارای بیشترین عملکرد علوفه و دانه بود. بین سطوح نیتروژن، مصرف 90 کیلوگرم درهکتار نیتروژن بیشترین علوفه و دانه را تولید کرد. اثر تقسیط نیتروژن برعملکرد علوفه غیرمعنی‌دار و بر عملکرد دانه معنی‌دار و در مقایسه میانگین‌ها در پنجه‌زنی+ ظهورسنبله با 6 تن درهکتار دانه تفاوت معنی‌دار آماری با دیگرتیمارها داشت. برای شرایط مشابه آب و هوایی و حصول بیشترین عملکرد علوفه و دانه ژنوتیپ ET-89-13 با مصرف 90 کیلوگرم درهکتار نیتروژن به ترتیب با تقسیط کاشت + بساقه رفتن و پنجه زنی + ظهور سنبله قابل توصیه می باشد | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تقسیط؛ ژنوتیپ های تریتیکاله؛ عملکرد؛ نیتروژن | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effects of amount and timing of nitrogen consumption on grain yield, forage and the amount of some nutrients in new Triticale genotypes | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| khalil chabok1؛ Hossein Ajamnorozei2؛ Mohammad dadashi2 | ||
| 1student of Agronomy (PhD), Azad University of Gorgan, Gorgan , Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of Islamic Azad University of Gorgan,Gorgan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: Triticale is the first man-made crop. It was designed in order to obtain a cereal, which combines good quality grain yield from wheat parent with tolerance to abiotic and biotic stress. Modern triticale cultivars show higher yields and superior adaptation to soil quality and environments than wheat. In arid and semi-arid conditions, triticale has higher forage yield than wheat and barley. )Oelke et al., 2009(. From triticale, grain yield was reported 5641 kg / ha. (Salehi et. al., 2018). Selection of suitable genotype is very important and will increase seed and forage yield of triticale. Yield superiority of Sanabad cultivar (line ET-82-15) compared to control (Juanilo 92) was reported. But in a report, the average grain yield of Page cultivar (line ET-84-17) was higher than Juanilo 92 and Sanabad (Guodsi et. al., 2017). Many authors have reported positive effect of N fertilization on grain yield .The optimal timing of N application increased grain yield and protein content. One of the major agro technical factors which affect grain yield and enable farmers to take advantage of the high production potential of cereals is mineral fertilization, especially nitrogen nutrition. Nitrogen is the most important yield-boosting nutrient. It affects final grain yield through the influencing on the formation of yield components during the whole growing season. Both N rates and application time are important to the development of yield components. Materials and Methods: In order to determine effect of nitrogen on forage and grain yield of triticale genotypes, this experiment was done in Qarakheil (Qaemshahr) and Baye cola (Neka) of Mazandaran province. The experiment was carried out as split plot factorial design with three replications in the 2016-2017 growing season. Six new triticale genotypes (ET-89-1، ET-89-7، ET-89-9 ، ET-89-12، ET-89 - 13 and ET-89-16) were assigned to the main plots. Three levels of nitrogen amount (50, 70 and 90 kg.ha-1) and three timings of nitrogen application (planting + stem elongation, planting + heading and planting + tillering) were assigned to the sub plots as factorial treatments. Forage yield, dry forage yield, forage nitrogen, grain yield, plant height, and phosphorus, potassium and calcium in forage were measured. Results and Discussion: The results of the combined analysis of variance indicated that the effect of location was significant on the all studied traits (except for forage nitrogen and calcium). The highest grain yield (5.914 ton.ha-1 ) was obtained with Bayecola, which significantly differed from Qarakheil where yield production was recorded as 5.628 ton.ha-1. The highest forage yield of 48.59 ton.ha-1 was achieved in Qarakheil, which had significant difference compared with the yield of Bayecola (43.34 ton.ha-1). Titicale genotype ET-89-13 was the best genotype in terms of forage (50.53 ton.ha-1)and grain yield (6.136 ton.ha-1). The greatest forage and grain yield (46.89 and 5.973 ton.ha-1, respectively) were obtained when nitrogen was used at 90 kg.ha-1. The application time of nitrogen: (1-planting + stem elongation, 2-planting + heading 3-tillering + heading) did not significantly affect forage yield. The application of nitrogen at the tillering + heading stage produced the greatest grain yield of 6.030 ton.ha-1 that had significant difference with other treatments. Nitrogen treatment at 90 kg.ha-1 resulted in the highest nitrogen content in dry forage (1.27 %). The use of nitrogen at the tillering + heading stage gave the greatest nitrogen content in dry forage (1.254 %). The application of 90 kg.ha-1 nitrogen produced the highest potassium content in plant (1.485%). Conclusion: Our results indicated that the amount of nitrogen is important on forage and grain yield of triticale, while the application time of nitrogen had no significant effect on forage yield. the application of nitrogen at the tillering + heading stage produced the highest grain yield in triticale. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Fraction, Triticale genotypes, Yield, Nitrogen | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aaron, j., Schwarte, L.R., Douglas, L.K., Dixon, P.M., Liebman, M.,and Janink, j.2006. Planting date affects on winter triticale grain yield and yield components. Crope Science, 46, 1218- 1224. Ayub, M., Nadeem, M.A., Tanveer, A., Tahir, M., and Khan, R.M.A.2007. Interactive effect of different nitrogen levels and seeding rates on fodder yield and quality of pearl millet. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science, 44(4),592-596. Bly, A.G., and Woodard, H.J. 2003. Foliar nitrogen application timing influence on grain yield and protein concentration of hard red winter and spring wheat. Agronomy Journal, 95:335–338. Boman, R.K., Westerman, R.L., Raun, W.R., and Jojola, M.E. 1995. Time of nitrogen application: Effects on winter wheat and residual soil nitrate. Soil Science Society America Journal. 59:1364–1369. Budakli Carppici, E., Celik, N., and Bayram, G. 2010. Yield and quality of forage maize as influenced by plant density and nitrogen rate. Turkish Journal of Field Crop,15(2),128-132. Chapman, B., Salmon, D., Dyson, C., and Blackley., K. 2005.Triticale production and utilization manual, spring and winter. Triticale for grain, forage and value-added. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. Estrsda-Campuzano, G., Miralles, D.J., and Slafer, G.A. 2008. Genotypic variability and response to water stress of preand post-anthesis phases in triticale. European Journal of Agronomy, 28 (3): 171–177. Fageria, N. K., and Baligar, V. C. 2001. Low land rice response to nitrogen fertilization. Soil Science Plant Annual, 32:1405-1429. Fageria, N.K., Baligar, V.C., and Li, Y.C. 2008. The role of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop yields in the twenty first century. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 31: 1121-1157. Gastal, F., and Lemaire, G. 2002. N uptake and distribution in crops: an agronomical and ecophysiological perspective. Jounal of Experimental Botany, 53: 789-799. Ghodsi, M., Zareh Faizabadi, A., Nazeri, M., Khodarahmi, Tajalli, H., and Azizi, S. 2017. Paj, new triticale cultivar suitable for proper crop cultivation in low-yielding lands of temperate regions of the country. Research Achievments for Field and Horticulture Crops, 5(2): 97-108 Ghodsi, M., 2010. Triticale, planting, harvesting and harvesting technical instructions. Agricultural Research and Education Organization. Khorasan Razavi Agricultural Research Center. Promotional Journal,Reg 88/1513 Giunta, F., and Motzo, R. 2004 Sowingae an cultivar effect total biomass and grain yield of spring triticale grown in a Mediterraneantype environment, Dipartmento di Scienze Agrinomiche e Genetica Vegetale Agraria. Facolta di Agraria , Universita di Sassari, Via De Nicola 07700. Italy. 524pp. Golba, J., Rozbicki, J., Gozdowski, D., Sas, D., Nadry, W., Piechocinski, M., Kurzynska, L., Studnicki, M., and Derejko, A. 2013. Adjusting yield components under different levels of N applications in winter wheat. International Journal of Plant Production, 7: 139-150. Golik, S.I., Chidichimo, H.O., and Sarandón, S.J. 2005. Biomass production, nitrogen accumulation and yield in wheat under two tillage systems and nitrogen supply in the argentine rolling pampa.World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1 (1): 36-41, 2005ISSN 1817-3047. Kochaki, A.R., Gholami, H., and Fallahi, H. A. 2012. Grain yield and nutritional traits in promising lines of Triticale and New Sanabad cultivar. Journal of Research in Crop and Garden Plants, 1( 2) 117-129 Kochaki, A., and Nasiri Mallati, M. (Translators). 1995. Conflation:I. D. Tiyer.-M. M. Pyte.; The relationship between water and soil in crops. Publications University Jehad of Mashhad. Mashhad. Iran. 533p. Lakzadeh, A. 2014. Triticale, a dual-purpose forage plant. Agricultural Research and Education Organization Publication. Reg. 290. Lance, G., Jeanluc, J., Skrdla, R., and Partick, G. 2005. Winter triticale variety performance in lowa 2002-2004 lowa State University. 34p Larter, E. N. 1997. Triticale in evaluation of crop plants, The American Association of Cereale Hemist. 26p. Lestingi, A., Bovera, F., Giorgio, D., Ventrella, D., and Tateo, A. 2010. Effects of tillage and nitrogen fertilization on triticale grain yield, chemical composition and nutritive value. Journal of the Science of Food Agriculture, 90:2440–2446. Lopez-Bellido, L., Lopez-Bellido, R.J., and Redondo, R. 2005. Nitrogen efficiency in wheat under rainfed Mediterranean conditions as affected by split nitrogen application. Field Crop Research, 94: 86–97. McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Morgan, C. A., and Sinclair, L. A.2010.Animal Nutrition. Pearson Education Limited express.692 pp.Moghaddam, H., Chaichi, M.R., Rahimian Mashhadi, H., Savagheby, G.H., and Hosein Zadeh, A . 2007. Effect of method and time of nitrogen fertilizer application on growth, development and yield of grain sorghum. Asian Journal of plant Sciences, 6: 93-97 Mosavi, S.R., Mirhadi, M.J., Siadat, S.A., Normohammadi, G.H., and Darvish, F. 2009. Effect of water defcit and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and water use efficiency sorghum and millet forage. Journal Agriculture sciences years, 5(15), 101-113. Oelke, E. A., Oplinger, E. S., and Brinkman, M. A. 2009.Triticale. Field Crops Manual. P.115. Pasandi, M., Fazaeli, H., Hafezian, S.H., and Kavian, A. 2006. Determination of the nutritional value of cereal straw for feeding livestock . Second National Conference on Agricultural Products Waste. Tarbiat Modares University.. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. Pecio, A. 2010. Productivity of triticale affected by nitrogen fertilization and weather conditions. Fertilizer and Fertilization, 40: 101–116. Royo, C., Voltas, J., and Romagosa, I.1999. Remobilization of preaninesis.assimilates to the grain for only and dualpurpose(forage and grain)triticale. Agronomy Journal, 91:312-316. Rozati, N.S., Gholami, A., and Asghari, H.R., 2012. Study of the effects of different levels of nitrogen and cultivar splitting on agronomic traits and yield of corn. Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 4(2): 1-16. Salehi, Z., Amirnia, R., Rezaei Chineh, A., and Khalilvandi Behrozyar, H. 2018. Performance evaluation and some of the qualitative traits of forage in cultivars of triticale mixed with legumes. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 28(4):59-76. Siadat, S.A., and Fathi, G. 2002. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer splitting on grain yield of two wheat cultivars in Khuzestan province. Agricultural Science Journal, 24(1): 49-70 Snyder, C.S., Bruulsema, T.W., Jensen, T.L., and Fixen, P.E. 2009. Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 133(3-4): 247-266. Solimanpoor, L., Naderi, R., and Najafi Ghiri, M. 2018. Absorption of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by crops and weeds in different systems of grain-legume grain mix. Process and Plant Function, 7(24): 229-246 Soltani, A., Robertson, M.J., and Manschadi, A.M. 2006.Modeling chickpea growth and development: Nitrogen accumulation and use. Field crops research, 99(1): 24-34 Soltani, A., Torabi, B., Galeshi, S., and Zeinali, E. 2010. Analyzing wheat yield constraints in Gorgan with comparative performance analysis (CPA) method. Research Report. Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. Thurling, N. 2006. Morphophysiological determinants of yield in repeseed (Brassica Campestris and Brassica napus)growth and morphological characters. Australian journal of agricultural research, 25 .92 :697- 710. Vahabzadeh, M., Ghodsi, M., Nazeri, M., Khodarahmi, M., Ghasemi, M., Koohkan. S.A., and Tajalli. H. 2014. Sanabad, A new triticale cultivar suitable for temperate and cold-temperate regions of Iran. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Khorasan-e-Razavi. Van Delden, A. 2001.Yield and growth components of potato and wheat under organic nitrogen managmenent. Agronomy Journal, 93(6): 1370-1385. Villegas, D., Casadesus, J., Atienza, S., Martos V., Maalouf, F., Karam, Aranjuel, I., and Nogues, S.2010. Tritordeum, wheat and triticale yield components under multi-local mediterranean drought conditions. Field Crops Research, 116(1-2):68-74 Zeinali, E., Soltani, A., Galeshi, S., and Movahedi-Naeeni, S.A.R. 2009. Estimates of nitrate leaching from wheat fields in Gorgan of Iran. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3(6): 645-655. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 375 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 282 |
||