- همه نشریات
- نشریات علمی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویچ کشاورزی
- مجلات ترویجی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- سایر نشریات سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- نشریات علمی انجمن ها
- علوم آب و خاک
- علوم اقتصاد و ترویج کشاورزی
- علوم جنگل, مرتع و آبخیزداری
- علوم دامی و شیلات
- علوم زراعی و باغی
- علوم گیاهپزشکی
- علوم مهندسی و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی
- نشریات با زبان انگلیسی
- نشریات با زبان فارسی
- نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
- نشریات علمی
پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 283 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 81 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,726 |
| تعداد مقالات | 31,042 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 27,937,589 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,237,171 |
بررسی کارایی علفکش تین‌کاربازون-متیل+ ایزوکسافلوتل+ایمن کننده در مقایسه با علفکش‌های رایج مزارع ذرت دانه‌ای (Zea mays L.) | ||
| پژوهش های کاربردی زراعی | ||
| دوره 33، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 128، آذر 1399، صفحه 95-116 اصل مقاله (784.98 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/aj.2020.123568.1353 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد حسن هادی زاده* 1؛ محمد رضا کرمی نژاد2؛ محمد رضا جمالی3؛ پیمان ثابتی4 | ||
| 1عضو هیات علمی/ مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی | ||
| 2آزمایشگاه تحقیقات آفات و بیماری های گیاهی کرج، موسسه تحقیقات گیاه پزشکی کشور | ||
| 3عضو هیات علمی/ مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی فارس | ||
| 4بخش تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی ،مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمانشاه، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| کارایی علفکش ترکیبی تین‌کاربازون-متیل+ ایزوکسافلوتل+ سایپروسولفامید در مهار علفهای هرز ذرت دانه‌ای (Zea mays L.) در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با چهار تکرار در مشهد، کرج، شیراز و کرمانشاه بررسی گردید. تیمارها شامل مصرف مزوتریون+تربوتیلازین+متولاکلر (پیش رویشی یا پس رویشی)؛ فورام‌سولفورون سدیم+ یدوسولفورن متیل‌سدیم+تین‌کاربازون متیل+سایپروسولفامید؛ تاپرامزون؛ تین‌کاربازون-متیل+ ایزوکسافلوتل در سه مقدار (330و 440 و 550 میلی لیتر از ماده تجاری 5/46% در هکتار)؛ و دوشاهد بدون جین و جین دستی بودند. نتایج نشان داد علفکش تینکاربازونمتیل+ایزوکسافلوتل (440و 550 میلیلیتر در هکتار) از نظر کارایی مبارزه با علفهای هرز (75-88% کنترل جمعیت) و حفظ عملکرد دانه ذرت در تمام مناطق آزمایش موفق، ولی کارایی مقدار 330 میلیلیتر زیر 50-30درصد بود. تاپرامزون در تمام مناطق به‌طور نسبی ضعیف بود. فورام‌سولفورون+یدوسولفورون+تین‌کاربازون کارایی مناسبی (بیش از 72%) در دو منطقه مشهد و کرج داشت. تاجخروس (Amaranthus spp.) در تمام مناطق حضور غالب داشت. خرفه (Portulaca oleraceae L.) در مشهد، کرج و شیراز و سوروف (Echinochloa crus-galli) در کرج و مشهد غالب بود. سایر گونهها شامل پیچک‌صحرایی (Convolvulus arvensis) فقط در مشهد، سلمه‌تره (Chenopodium album) در کرج، قیاق (Sorghum halepense) در شیراز، و عروسک پشت پرده (Physalis divaricata)، شیرین بیان (Glycyrrhiza glabra) و ارزن وحشی (Setaria viridis) در کرمانشاه غالب بودند. شیرین بیان و سوروف جزو علفهای هرزدشوار کنترل محسوب گردیدند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تراکم؛ دشوار‌کنترل؛ سولفونیل اوره؛ عملکرد؛ علایم خسارت؛ وزن خشک | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Efficacy of thiencarbazone-methyl+isoxaflutole +cyprosulfamide as compared with common herbicides for weed control in corn (Zea mays L.)) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammadreza Karaminejad2؛ Mohammadreza Jamali3؛ payman Sabeti4؛ | ||
| 2Faculty member, Plant and Diseases Research Lab. Iranian Institute of Plant Protection | ||
| 3Assistant Professor of Plant Protection Research Department, Agricultural and Natural Research Resource and Education Center of Fars | ||
| 4Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education center, AREEO, Kermanshah, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: Plant Protection Organization (PPO) has registered sixteen commercial herbicides formulations for weed control of corn in Iran (Nourbakhsh, 2016). Among these herbicides, eight herbicides contain one active ingredient and the other seven have two or three active ingredients including acetolactate synthase (ALS) enzyme inhibiting groups - similar-auxin groups, photosynthetic inhibitors of photosystem II and inhibitors of fatty acids and cell division, which are sometimes formulated with safeners. Previous studies show that existing weed species do not similarly respond to herbicides and therefore the percentage control of some of the weed species is lower than the other species (Hadizadeh, 2016). These hard-to control weeds are naturally resistant to herbicides. Thus, new herbicides with several active ingredients are suggested to be used to suppress such weeds. The aim of this work was to find the best chemical treatments against weeds in corn production based on using new herbicides thiencarbazone+isoxaflutol+cyprosulfamide and comparing their efficacy with the common registered herbicides in the major corn growing areas of Iran. Materials and Methods: A field study was conducted in four regions of Iran, including Mashhad, Karaj, Shiraz and Kermanshah during 2017 growing season. The statistical layout was a completely randomized block design with four replicates. Seven chemical treatments were mesotrione+ s-metalachlor+ terbuthylazine (Lumax® 537.5SE pre-emergence, 4 l ha-1 or post-emergence, 4.5 l ha-1), foramsulfuron+iodosulfuron+thiencarbazone (MaisTer Power® 4.25%OD, 1 l ha-1), topramezone (Clio® 29.7%SC, 150 ml ha-1) and the new herbicide thiencarbazone+isoxaflutol+cyprosulfamide with three recommended doses (Adengo 46.5%Sc, 330, 440 and 550 ml ha-1). A hand-weeded treatment and an unweeded treatment served as controls. Weed density and weed dry weight for each plot were measured four weeks after the last application the herbicides. Corn was harvested from 10 m2 of each plot after removing border plots. Corn grain yield was determined after adjusting the moisture level of grain to 14 %. To measure corn biological yield, samples of 10 corn plants were taken and then were dried in an oven. Data from each region were subjected to statistical analysis using SAS/STAT statistical software and the means were separated by LSD (α=5%). Results and Discussion: The results showed a diverse spectrum of weeds (17 species) at the experimental locations. Pigweed species (Amaranthus retroflexus and A. blitoides) were dominant in all tested locations. The next dominant weed species were Portulaca oleraceae L., Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv., Convolvulus arvensis L., Chenopodium album L., Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers., Physalis divaricate L., Glycyrrhiza glabra L., and Setaria viridis L. Across the experimental locations, thiencarbazone+isoxaflutol+cyprosulfamide was efficient at 440 and 550 ml ha-1 concentrations for weed control (75 to 88%). However, when applied at dosage of 330 ml ha-1, its weed control efficiency was lower (30 to 50%). Topramezone was inefficient in controlling weeds in all the locations, which was in agreement with the findings of some previous studies (Hadizadeh et al. 2015). Foramsulfuron+Iodosulfuron+Thiencarbazone (1l ha-1) was efficient in weed control (70-85%) in Mashhad and Karaj. All herbicides (except topramezone) effectively controlled P. divaricate as an invasive weed. E. crus-galli and G. glabra were identified as difficult-to-control weeds. None of herbicides showed injury symptoms on corn. Conclusion: Thiencarbazone+isoxaflutol (440 and 550 ml ha-1) showed 70-85 weed control efficiency averaged in the all experimental locations and it could be recommended to be used in corn field after registration process. Due to environmental concern, it should be applied at low doses. Foramsulfuron+ idosulfuron+ thiencarbazone was found to be the next efficient herbicide. Barnyard grass and licorice were difficult-to-control weed species or there were not controlled by new herbicides. We also suggest evaluation of the herbicides for their residual effects on the succeeding crops. Acknowledgements: We wish to thank Professor Eskandar Zand, Dr. Mehdi Minbashi, Dr. Saeed Khavari and Mr. Yahya Javid-Shafiee for their very useful contribution to this project. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Density, difficult-to-control, dry weight, injury symptom, sulfonylurea, yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Armel, G. R., Hall, G. J., Wilson, H. P., and Cullen, N. 2009. Mesotrione plus atrazine mixtures for control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvens). Weed Science, 53(2), 202-211. Azadbakht, A., Esmaely, A., Tobeh, A., and M. T. Alebrahim. 2015. Efficacy evaluation of ultima® (Nicosulfuron+Rimsulfuron), a new herbicide for weeds control in forage corn in Marvdasht, Fars. National Conference of Sustainable Agriculture, Environment and Rural development, 16 April, Koohdasht-Fars, Iran, (In Persian with English Summery). Baghestani, M.A., Zand, E., Lotfi-Mavi, F., Esfandiari, H., Pourazar, R., and Mamnoei, E. 2014. Evaluation of spectrum efficacy of registered herbicides used in corn. Plant pests and Diseases, 81(2), 109-121 (In Persian with English Summery). Bernards, M., Simmons, J., Guza, C., Schulz, C., Penner, D., and Kells, J. 2006. Inbred corn Rresponse to acetamide herbicides as affected by safeners and microencapsulation. Weed Technology, 20(2), 458-465. Blair, A.M. and Martin, T. D. 1988. A review of the activity, fate and mode of action of sulfonylurea herbicides. Pesticide Science, 22(3), 195-219. Hadizadeh, M. H., Nezamabadi, N., and Torabi, S. H. 2016. Efficacy of iodosulfuron+ foramsulfuron+ thincarbazone as a pre-mixed herbicide compared with common registered herbicides for weed control of corn (Zea mays L.) in Mashhad. 7th Iranian Weed Science Congress, 27-29 Aug. Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran, (In Persian with English Summery). Hadizadeh, M. H. 2016. Weeds, chapter three in: Momeni, H., Kazemi, H., Ranjbar-Aghdam, H. and Hadizadeh, M. H., (Eds.), Corn Handbook (Plant Protection). Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran. 162P, (In Persian). Hadizadeh, M. H., Khavari-Khorasani, S., Torabi, S.H., Shafiee, S. Y., Zand, E., and Bazoobandi, M. 2015. Complementary study on the chemical control of weeds in the commercial inbred lines of corn (Zea mays L. SC704). Final report of research project no 04-43-16-92147. Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran. 55P, (In Persian with English Summery). Hadizadeh, M. H., Khavari-Khorasani, S., Tavakoli, M. R., Noroozzadeh, S., Arabi, M., and Etaati, M. 2011. Chemical Control of Weeds in the Commercial Inbred Lines of Corn (Zea mays L. SC704). Final report of research project no 014-43-16-8902-89002. Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran. 49P, (In Persian with English Summery). Loubier, P., Millet, J. E., and Fiuery, P. 1998. The significance of RPA201772 for pre emergence weed control in maize. Weed Science Society of America Abstract.47: 2. Menendez, J., Gomez, A., and Loubiere, P. 1998. Control of problematic weeds in maize with the new herbicide 1soxaflutule. Proc. 5oth International Sym. Crop Prot., Genet, Belgium: 761-767. Monaco, T. J., Weller, S. C., and Ashton, F. M. 2002. Weed Science: Principles and practices, 4th ed. John Wiley and Sons. New York. 688P. Müller, K. H., Gesing, E.R.F., and Santel, H. J. 2011. Sulfonylaminocarbonyl-triazolinones, in: Jeschke, P., Kräehmer, P. W., Schirmer, U. and Witschel, M. (eds.): Modern crop protection compounds, second edition, Wiley-Vch Verlag Gmbh & Co. Kgaa, Weinheim. Nazari J., Rahimian-Mashadi, H., Alizadeh, H., and Mousavi, S. K. 2011. Comparative phenology and damage of ground cherry (Physalis divaricate L.) on sugar beet crop. Iranian Journal of Weed Science, 7 (2), 1-12 (In Persian with English Summery). Nezamabadi, N., Hadizadeh, M.H., Pourazar, R., and Sharifi-Ziveh, P. 2015. Efficacy evaluation of Maister power® to control weeds in corn fields. Final report of research project no 04-16-16-93128. Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran. 56P, (In Persian). Noorbakhsh, S. 2016. Index of pests, diseases and weeds of main crops, pesticides and control recommendations. Plant Protection Organization, Tehran. 203P. Available at Web Site: http://ppo.ir/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=CqfpbWZiSCw%3d&tabid=890, (Accessed September 2016). (In Persian). Nurse, R.E., Hamill, A.S., Swanton, C.J., Tardif, F.J., and Sikkema, P. H., 2007. Weed control and yield response to Foramsulfuron in corn. Weed Technology, 21: 453-458. Pallett, K. E., Little, J. P., Sheekey, M., and Veerasekaran, P., 1998. The Mode of Action of Isoxaflutole: I. Physiological Effects, Metabolism, and Selectivity. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 62: 113-124. Rangbar-Gilko, S. and Mehri, S. 2016. Effect of different herbicides on the yield and yield components of Maize SC704 in Moghan Area. Third E-Conference of new finding in environment and agricultural ecosystems. 31 July, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, (In Persian). Tomlin, C.D.S. (ed.) & Tomlin, Clive & British Crop Protection Council 2009. The pesticide manual: a world compendium (15th ed. / editor, C.D.S. Tomlin). BCPC, Alton, Hampshire. Sadi, Z., Medhaj, A., and Pourazar, R. 2015. The effects of additives (surfactants) on the efficacy of maize herbicides in environmental conditions in Khuzestan. The Second conference on new findings in environment and agricultural ecosystems September 11, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, (In Persian). Sarabi, V., Ghanbari, A., Rashed Mohassel, M.H., Mahallati, M.N., Rastgoo, M. 2018. Interaction of foramsulfuron or nicosulfuron with 2,4-D + MCPA on important broadleaf weeds in corn (Zea mays L.). Plant Production Science, 21: 203-214 (In Persian with English Summery). Santel, H.J. 2012. Thiencarbazone-methyl (TCM) and Cyprosulfamide (CSA) – a new herbicide and a new safener for use in corn. The 25th German Conference on Weed Biology and Weed Control, March 13-15, Braunschweig, Germany. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/Stat User’s Guide, Version 8.0. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Sharifi-Ziveh, P., Fakhary, R., Karbalaee-Khiavi, H., and Ayenechi, P. 2016. A comparative study on the efficacy of common herbicides on the weed control of corn in Moghan region. The 22nd Iranian Plant Protection Congress, 27-29 Aug. University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran, (In Persian with English Summery). Sutton, P., Richards, C., Buren, L., and Glasgow, L. 2002. Activity of mesotrione on resistant weeds in maize. Pest Management Science, 58(9), 981-984. Veisi, M., Khalghani, J., and Sabeti, P. 2010. Integrated management (chemical and rotation) of Glycyrrhiza glabra L. as a troubeling weed in wheat harvest. The third Iranian Weed Science Congress, 17 February 2010, Babolsar, Iran. Wilkinson, R.E. 1971. Research Methods in Weed Science. Southern Weed Science Society, 40 pp. Zare, S. and Ghadiri, H. 2008. Effect of application of herbicide and planting date on controlling redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and chinese lantern (Physialis alkekengi) in maize (Zea mays L.). The 10th Congress of Iranian Crop Science, 18-20 August. Tehran University, Tehran, Iran, (In Persian). Zand, E., Baghestani-meybodi, M. A., Pourazar R., Sabeti, P., Ghezeli F., Khayami, M. M., and Razazi, A. 2009. Efficacy evaluation of ultima (nicosulfuron+nimsulfuron), lumax (mesotrion+ s-metolacholor+ terbuthlazine) and amicarbazone (daynamic) in comparison with current herbicide to control of weeds in corn. Journal of Plant Protection (Agricultural Science and Technology), 23(2), 42-55 (In Persian with English Summery). Zand, E., Baghestani, M.A., Nezamabadi, N., and Shimi, P. 2010. Herbicides and important weeds of Iran. Markaz-E-Nashr-Daneshgahi Press, Tehran, Iran. 143P, (In Persian). Zand, E., Mousvi, S. K., and Heidari, A. 2014. Herbicides and their applications, 2nd Edition. 2014. Jihad-e-Daneshgahi Press. Mashhad, Iran, 547 P, (In Persian). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 474 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 464 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب