| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,980 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,446 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 43,911,891 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 20,410,891 |
مطالعه واکنش تابعی کفشدوزک Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Col.: Coccinellidae) روی شپشک آردآلود مو Planococcus ficus (Hem.: Pseudococcidae) | ||
| مهار زیستی در گیاه‌پزشکی | ||
| دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 14، اسفند 1398، صفحه 127-137 اصل مقاله (206.72 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/bcpp.2020.122641 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| طیبه اکبری* 1؛ حسنعلی واحدی1؛ محمد حیدری2 | ||
| 1گروه گیاه‌پزشکی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه | ||
| 2گروه علوم بیولوژی، وای کالج، دانشگاه لندن، انگلستان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| یکی از معیارهای مهم ارزیابی دشمن طبیعی در مهار زیستی، تعیین واکنش تابعی آن نسبت به تغییرات تراکم میزبان میباشد. شپشک آردآلود مو،Planococcus ficus (Signoret) ، یکی از آفات مهم تاکستانها در جهان است. کفشدوزک شکارگر CryptolaemusmontrouzieriMulsant شناخته شده‌ترین دشمن طبیعی شپشکهای آردآلود است. پژوهش حاضر برای تعیین نوع واکنش تابعی و قدرت جستجوی کفشدوزک یاد شده نسبت به شپشک آردآلود مو انجام شد. در این پژوهش واکنش تابعی لاروهای سن سوم و حشرات بالغ نر و ماده کفشدوزک یاد شده نسبت به تراکمهای 3، 5، 7، 9 عددی حشرات کامل ماده شپشک بهعنوان طعمه، در 10 تکرار و در دمای 1±26 درجه سلسیوس، رطوبت نسبی 5 ±70 درصد و دوره نوری 12:12 (روشنایی: تاریکی) داخل ظروف پتری پلاستیکی به قطر5/7 و عمق یک سانتیمتر و با درپوش منفذدار بررسی شد. تعداد شپشکهای تغذیه شده در هر ظرف ثبت گردید. تجزیه و تحلیل دادههای واکنش تابعی با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SAS و به روش دو مرحلهای جولیانو انجام شد. در این بررسی منفی بودن شیب قسمت خطی منحنی درجه دو رگرسیون لجستیک در حشرات بالغ نر و ماده و در لارو سن سوم کفشدوزک، نشان دهنده واکنش تابعی از نوع دوم است. میزان قدرت جستجو (a) و زمان دستیابی (Th) برای لاروهای سن سوم و حشرات بالغ نر و ماده کفشدوزک بهترتیب (6922/0 بر ساعت و 9549/0ساعت)، (4901/0 بر ساعت و 3542/1 ساعت) و (5977/0 بر ساعت و 0996/1 ساعت) بود. لارو سن سوم دارای قدرت جستجوی بیشتر و زمان دستیابی کمتری نسبت به حشرات بالغ نر و ماده بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| زمان دستیابی؛ شپشک آردآلود مو؛ قدرت جستجو؛ مهار زیستی؛ واکنش تابعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Functional response of mealybug ladybird, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Col.: Coccinellidae) on Planococcus ficus (Hem.: Pseudococcidae) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Tayebeh Akbari1؛ Hassanali Vahedi1؛ Mohammad Heidari2 | ||
| 1Department of Plant Protection, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Biological Science, Wye College, University of London, England | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| One of the parameters used in natural enemies evaluation is functional response studies to predict the efficacy of the predator in biological control programs. The vine mealybug, Planococcusficus (Signoret) is an important vineyard pests in all parts of the world. Cryptolaemusmontrouzieri Mulsant, is a well–known natural enemy of mealybugs. The experiment was conducted under laboratory condition with 26±1°C with 70±5 % RH and 12:12 D:L photoperiod with four densities of adult females of vine mealybug, P. ficus, as host insect. Adult female and male and 3rd instar larval stage of C. montrouzieri and four densities (3, 5, 7 and 9, each with 10 replicates). The number of host killed after 24 hours were recorded. Determination type of functional response model and estimation of related parameters were carried out based on two–stage analysis method by using SAS software. A type 2 functional response was concluded under this experimental condition for all stages of predator using logistic regression with parameters estimated through nonlinear regression. The results for searching efficiency and handling time for 3rd instar larval, adult male and adult female of the predator were (0.6922 and 0.9549 hours), (0.4901 and 1.3542 hours) and (0.5977 and 1.0996 hours), respectively. Results showed that 3rd instar larvae of predator showed a better searching efficiency and lowest handling time rather than adults which is a fine character for a predator. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| biological control, functional response, handling time, searching efficiency, vine mealybug | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdolahi–Ahi, Gh. 2010. Functional Response of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (Col.; Coccinellidae) to Citrus Mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso) (Hom.; Pseudococcidae) Under Laboratory Conditions. M.Sc. thesis of agricultural entomology. Plant Protection Department, Gorgan University, 124 pp. Al–Khateeb, N. & Raie, A. 2001. A study of some biological parameters of the predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant introduced to Planococcus citri (Risso) in Syria, and estimate of its predation rate in the laboratory. Plant Protection, 19(2): 131–134. Atif, J.Y.M., Naser, K.S.A., Elsherif, M.E. & Al– Humiari, A.A. 2011. Functional response of the adult predator of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant), reared on the third nymphal instar of Planococcus citri (Risso). Egyptian Journal of Pest Control, 21: 267–270 Borbón, M. de Gracia, O. & Gómez Talquenca, G.S. 2004. Mealybugs and grapevine leafroll–associated virus 3 in vineyards of Mendoza, Argentina. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 55(3): 283–285. Borgo, M. & Michielini, C. 2000. Natural spread of grapevine leafroll on varieties and biotypes of Vitis vinifera. Rivista di Viticoltura e di Enologia, 53(4): 3–13. Cabaleiro, C. & Segura, A. 1997. Field transmission of grapevine leafroll associated Virus 3 (GLRa V–3) by the mealybug Planococcus citri. Plant Disease, 81: 283–287. Danzig, Е.М. & gavrilov, I.A. 2010. Mealybugs of the genera Planococcus and Crisicoccus (Sternorrhyncha: Pseudococcidae) of Russia and adjacent countries. Zoosystematica Rossica, 19(1): 39–49 Esmaeili, M. 2007. The most important pests of fruit trees. Publishing Center Sepehr, Pp 578. (In Persian with English summary) Gautam, R.D., Chi, W.D. & Lessey, M. 1998. Preliminary studies on inoculative releases of Australian beetle Crypto–laemus Montrouzieri Mulsant and another Indian ladybird, Scymnus coccivora Aiyar against pink mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green at point Fortin. Proceedings of the First Symposium on the Hibiscus Mealybug (Centeno, Trinidad and Tobago), 25–29. Ghorbanian, S. 2009. Study of biology and predator performance Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (Col.Coccinellidae) on Citrus Mealybug control. MSc. Thesis, Tehran University Campus Aboureihan, 102 pages. (In Persian with English summary) Gkounti, V.T., Savopoulou–Soultani, M. & Milonas, P.G. 2015. Intra–and interspecific interactions between Nephus includes and Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. Journal of Applied Entomology, 139: 647–653. Gutierrez, A. P., Daane, K.M., Ponti, L., Walton, V. M. & Ellis. K. 2008. Prospective evaluation of the biological control of vine mealybug: refuge effects and climate. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45: 524–536 Hassanpour, M. & Moradi, M. 2019. Temperature–dependent functional response of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Col.: Coccinellidae) to the Citrus Mealybug, Planococcus citri (Hem.: Pseudococcidae). Journal of Plant Protection, 33(3): 267–280. Hassell, M. P. 1978. The dynamics of arthropod predator–prey systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 237 pp. Heidari, H., Aghajan–zadeh, S. & Ardeh, J. 2000. Additional studies on Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant and its breeding hosts. Final report of the Iranian Plant Protection Research Institute. 9 pages. Heidari, M. & Copland, M.J.W. 1992. Host finding by Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Col., Coccinellidae), a predator of mealybugs (Hom.: Pseudococcidae). Entomophaga, 37:621–625. Heidari, M. & Copland, M.J.W. 1993. Honeydew: a food resource or arrestant for the mealybug predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. Entomophaga, 38(1), 63–68. Hodek, I. & Honek, A. 1996. Ecology of Coccinellidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 464 pp. Holling, C. S. 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Canadian Entomology,91: 385–398. Holling, C. S. 1966. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Canadian Entomology, 48: 1–86. Jervis, M. & Kidd, N. 1996. Insect Natural Enemies: Practical Approaches to their Study and Evaluation. Chapman and Hall, London, 491pp. Juliano, S.A. 1993. Nonlinear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. In‘‘Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments’’ (S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, Eds.), Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 159–182. Kairo, M.T.K, Pollard, G.V., Peterkin, D.D. & Lopez, V.F. 2000. Biological control of the hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Caribbean. Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 5: 241–254. Kaur, H., & Virk, J.S. 2012. Feeding potential of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri against the mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis. Phytoparasitica, 40: 131–136. Kosari, M. 1324. Scale insects in Iran. Ministry of Agriculture (from the General Directorate of Pest Management). Ministry of Agriculture Printing House, Tehran, 39p. (In Persian with English summary). Lai, W.H., and Chang, N.T. 2010. Lady bugs (Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant)) (Col.; Coccinellidae) Life history, population parameters, and predationof Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant) (Col.; Coccinellidae). Available at:http://tve.npust. edu.te Mohasesian, E., Ranjbar Aghdam, H. & Pakyari H. 2015. Temperature–dependent Functional Response of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Col.: Coccinellidae) on Citrus Mealybug, Planococcus citri (Hem.: Pseudococcidae). Journal of BioControl in Plant Protection, 2 (2): 1–11. (In Persian with English summary) Rogers, D.J. 1972. Random search and insect population models. Journal of Animal Ecology, 41:369–383. Saljoqi, A.U.R., Nasir, M., Khan, J., Ehsan–Ul–Haq, M., Salim, M., Nadeem, Z., Huma, H., Saeed, G., Ahmad, B. & Sadur–Rehman, Z. 2015. Functional response study of Cryptolaemus Montrouzieri Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) fed on Cotton mealy bug, Phenacoccus Solenopsis Tinsley under Laboratory Conditions. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 3(3): 411–415. Shirazi, M. 2011. Checkscales of shady treesin Kermanshah. MSc Thesis. Kermanshah Razi University, 132 pages. (In Persian with English summary) Skinkis, P., Dreves, A., Walton, V.M. & Martin, R.R. 2009. Field monitoring for grapevine leafroll virus and mealybug in pacific northwest vineyards. furtherance of the acts of congress. http://extension.oregonstate.edu/ (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), a key pest in South African vineyards. A review. SouthAfrican Journal of Ecology and Viticulture, 25(2): 54–62. Solomon, M.E. 1949. The natural control of animal populations. Journal of Animal Ecology, 18: 1 –35. Waage, J. D.& Greathead, D. 1988. Biological control: Challenges opportunities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 318: 111–126. Williams, D.J. & Moghaddam, M. 1999. Mealybugs species of the genus Planococcus Ferris in Iran (Hom.: Coccoidea; Pseudococcidae) with discussion of P.vovae Nasonov. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran, 18(1, 2): 32. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 539 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 389 |
||