| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,873 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,555 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 42,418,948 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 19,194,599 |
واکنش ویژگی های زراعی و عملکرد دانه ژنوتیپ های باقلا (.Vicia faba L) به تنش ماندابی | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| دوره 35، شماره 2، شهریور 1398، صفحه 171-188 اصل مقاله (1.2 M) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/sppi.2019.122615 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ابراهیم ملاعلی1؛ محمدرضا داداشی1؛ فاطمه شیخ* 2؛ حسین عجم نوروزی1؛ محمدتقی فیض بخش2 | ||
| 1دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد گرگان، گرگان، ایران. | ||
| 2بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان،، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تنش ماندابی یکی از عوامل کاهنده عملکرد دانه باقلا محسوب می‌شود. ژنوتیپ‌های مختلف باقلا از این لحاظ تفاوت دارند. ویژگی های زراعی 21 ژنوتیپ باقلا در سه محیط شامل آبیاری بهینه (بدون تنش) و تنش ماندابی در دو مرحله از رشد (آغاز گلدهی و آغاز غلاف دهی به مدت 10 روز) مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. این آزمایش در دو سال زراعی (1397-1395) در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی گرگان انجام شد. تجزیه واریانس مرکب دادهها نشان داد که تفاوت معنی‌داری بین ژنوتیپ‌های باقلا در سطوح مختلف تیمارهای آزمایشی وجود داشت. عملکرد غلاف سبز و عملکرد دانه در تیمار تنش ماندابی در مرحله آغاز گل دهی به ترتیب 34 و 23/9درصد و در تیمار تنش ماندابی در مرحله آغاز غلاف دهی به ترتیب 29/3و 17/18کاهش یافت.کمترین کاهش عملکرد دانه در شرایط تنش ماندابی در مرحله آغاز گل دهی از ژنوتیپ G-Faba-401 حاصل شد و در شرایط تنش ماندابی در مرحله آغاز غلاف دهی ژنوتیپ های G-Faba-401، G-Faba-335، G-Faba-293، G-Faba-290 و G-Faba-524 کمتر از 10 درصد کاهش عملکرد داشتند. بنابراین ژنوتیپهایی که عملکرد بالاتری در شرایط تنش ماندابی داشتند، برای کشت در مناطقی که احتمال وقوع تنش ماندابی در آن وجود دارد مناسب‌تر هستند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| باقلا؛ روز تا گلدهی؛ عملکرد غلاف سبز؛ عملکرد دانه؛ وزن صد دانه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Response of Agronomic Characteristics and Seed Yield of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Genotypes to Waterlogging Stress | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| E. Mollaali1؛ M. R. DadashI1؛ Fatemeh Sheikh2؛ H. Ajam Norozi1؛ M. T. Feizbaksh2 | ||
| 1Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran. | ||
| 2Field and Horticultural Crops Sciences Research Department, Agricultural Researech, Education and Extension Organization, Gorgan, Iran. Organization (AREEO), Gorgan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Waterlogging stress is one of the important factors reducing faba bean seed yield. Response of different faba bean genotypes to this environmental stress varies from tolerance to sensitive. Response of agronomic characteristics and seed yield of 21 faba bean genotypes under three moisture regimes included; optimum irrigation (without stress) and waterlogging for 10 days at two developmental stages; commencement of flowering and pod setting were evaluated. This study was carried out using randomized complete block design with three replications in two cropping seasons (2016-2017 and 2017-2018) at Golestan agricultural and natural resources research and education center, Gorgan, Iran. Combined analysis of variance revealed that there was significant differences between faba bean genotypes in response to different moisture regime conditions. Green pod and seed yields were reduced by 34% and 23.9%, respectively, when waterlogging applied at the commencement of flowering stage. However, when waterlogging applied at pod setting stage these reductions were 29.3% and 17.18%, respectively. The lowest seed yield reduction belonged to G-Faba-401 genotype when stress applied at the flowering stage, and G-Faba-401, G-Faba-335, G-Faba-293, G-Faba-290 and G-Faba-524 genotypes showed less than 10% yield reduction. Therefore, the high-yielding and tolerant faba bean genotypes can be recommended for areas with high probability of waterlogging stress. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Faba bean, day to flowering, green pod yield, seed yield, 100 seed weight | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Amin, M. R., Karim, M. A., Khaliq, Q. A., Islam, M. R., and Akhtar, S. 2017. The influence of waterlogging period on yield and yield components of mungbean (Vigna radiate L. Wilczek). The Agriculturists 15 (2): 88-100.
Ahmed, S., Nawata, E., Hosokawa, M., Domae, Y., and Sakuratani, T. 2002. Alterations in photosynthesis and some antioxidant enzymatic activities of mungbean subjected to waterlogging. Plant Science 163: 117-123.
Ara, R., Mannan, A., Khaliq, Q. A., and Uddin Miah, M. M. 2015. Waterlogging tolerance of soybean. Bangladesh Agronomy Journal 18 (2):105-109.
Brisson, N., Rebiere, B., Zimmer, D., and Renalt, D. 2002. Response of the root system of winter wheat crop to water logging. Plant and Soil 243: 43-55.
Ghobadi, M. A. 2006. Effect of residual stress on yield and root characteristics of wheat cultivars. Ph. D. Thesis. Chamran University of Ahvaz. 189 pp. (in Persian).
Ghobadi, M. A., Bakhshandeh, A., Nadian, H., Fathi, G., Gharineh, M. H., Alemisaied K., and Ghobadi, M. 2007. Effect of waterlogging durations at different growth stages of wheat on yield and yield components. Scientific Journal of Agriculture 30 (2): 133-146 (in Persian).
Kamal, A. H. M., and Komatsu, S. 2015. Involvement of reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial proteins in biophoton emission in roots of soybean plants under flooding stress. Journal of Proteome Research 14: 2219-2236.
Khalfi, M., Gharineh, M. H., Bakhshandeh, A., Lakzadeh, A., and Fathi, G. 2013. The effect of different periods of resistance stress at different growth stages on yield and yield components of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Khuzestan province. Journal of Plant Productions 36 (2): 87-97 (in Persian).
Kiani, A. R., and Homaee, M. 2007. Evaluating SWAP model for simulation of water and solute transport in soil profile. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 8 (1): 13-30. (in Persian).
Krishnamurthy, L., Upadhyaya, H., Saxena, K., and Vadez, V. 2012. Variation for temporary waterlogging response within the mini core pigeon pea germplasm. Journal of Agricultural Science 150: 357-364.
Kidane, H., and Brhane, T. 2018. Improving faba bean production of smallholder farmers’ through on-farm popularization of Orobanche crenata tolerant variety in Southern Tigray, North Ethiopia. International Journal of Agriculture and Biosciense 7 (4): 229-235.
Kidane, H., Amare, B., Legesse, M., Teklay, Z., and Teklay, Y., 2019. Improving faba bean production of smallholder farmers’ through on-farm popularization of waterlogging tolerant variety in southern Tigray, North Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultur and Biosciense 8 (3): 136-140.
Musgrave, M. E., and Ding, N. 1998. Evaluation wheat cultivars for water logging tolerance. Crop Science 38: 90-97.
Mutava, R. N., Prince, S. J. K., Syed, N. H., Song, L., Valliyodan, B., Chen, W., and Nguyen, H. T. 2015. Understanding abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms in soybean: a comparative evaluation of soybean response to drought and flooding stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 86: 109-120.
Noori, K., Ghobadi, M. E., and Ghamarnia, H. 2017. The effect of waterlogging on yield and yield components of chickpea under dry farming. Electronic Journal of Crop Production. 10 (3): 64-51 (in Persian).
Nuruzzaman Manik, S. M., Pengilley, G., Dean, G., Field, B., Shabala, S., and Zhou, M. 2019. Soil and crop management practices to minimize the impact of waterlogging on crop productivity. Plant Science 10: 1-23.
Negash T., Azanaw A., Tilahun G., Mulat K. and Woldemariam S. S., 2015. Evaluation of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) varieties against chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae) in North Gondar, Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research 10 (30): 2984-2988.
Rasaei, A., Ghobadi, M. E., Jalali-Honarmand, S., Ghobadi, M., and Saeidi, M. 2012. Impacts of waterlogging on shoot apex development and recovery effects of nitrogen on grain yield of wheat. European Journal of Experimental Biology 2 (4): 1000-1007.
Rasouli1, S. F., Galeshi, S., Pirdashti, H., and Zeinali, E. 2013. Evaluation of waterlogging stress effect on yield and yield components of rapeseed. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 7(2): 23-41 (in Persian).
Romina, P., Abeledo, L. G., and Miralles, D. J. 2014. Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley. Plant and Soil 378: 265-277.
Saqib, M., Akhtar, J., and Qureshi, R. H. 2004. Pot study on wheat growth in saline and waterlogged compacted soil: I. grain yield and yield components. Soil Tillage Research 77: 169-177.
Setter, T. L., and Waters, I. 2003. Review of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance in wheat, barley and oats. Plant and Soil 253: 1-34.
Sheikh, F., Kalateh Arabi, M., Soghi, H., Bazi. M. T., and Mohamad Abroudi, A. 2008. The effect of water logging stress at filling stage on yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Electronic Journal of Crop Production 1(1): 38-5. (in Persian).
Solaiman, Z., Colmer, T., Loss, S., Thomson, B., and Siddique, K. 2007. Growth responses of cool-season grain legumes to transient waterlogging. Crop and Pasture Science 58: 406-412.
Soltanzadeh Shooshtari, M., and Lak, Sh. 2009. The Effect of residual stress at stem elongation on yield and yield components of wheat genotypes. Crop Physiology 1 (2): 45-34 (in Persian).
Smethurst, C. F., Garnett, T., and Shabala, S. 2005. Nutritional and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of lucerne (Medicago sativa) to waterlogging and subsequent recovery. Plant and Soil 270: 31-45.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 285 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 268 |
||