| تعداد نشریات | 285 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 83 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,084 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,409 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 48,525,747 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 79,127,089 |
نقش شبکه های سازمانی در بهبود سرمایه اجتماعی مدیریت آبخیزها در طرح ترسیب کربن آبخیز تیل آباد، استان گلستان | ||
| پژوهش های آبخیزداری | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 34، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 130، فروردین 1400، صفحه 30-40 اصل مقاله (559.66 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/wmej.2020.342341.1328 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| احمد عابدی سروستانی* | ||
| دانشیار، دانشکده‌ی مدیریت کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| سرمایهی اجتماعی بر پیوندهای کُنشگران اجتماعی و سرشت آن‌ها در چارچوب شبکه استوار است. به همین دلیل، بایسته است که شبکهیی هم‌آهنگ از سازمانها برای اجرای درست برنامههای پیشرفت ایجاد شود. سازمانهای جهانی نیز ارزش این نکته را برای بستر مدیریت مشارکتی آبخیزها بازگو کرده اند. این پژوهش اثربخشی شبکهی سازمانی طرح ترسیب کربن آبخیز تیل‌آباد را در ارتقادادن سرمایهی اجتماعی بررسی کرده است. با روش تحلیل شبکههای اجتماعی، 30 سازمان و نهاد مرتبط با این طرح در شهرستان آزادشهر استان گلستان بررسی‌شد. ابزار جمعآوری اطلاعات پرسشنامه بود که در آن پیوند تبادل اطلاعات بین سازمانها و نهادها برای مدیریت‌کردن منابع طبیعی در قبل و بعد از اجرای طرح سنجیده شد. تجزیه‌وتحلیل دادهها با نرمافزار یوسینت انجام شد که جبر ماتریسها را برای برآوردکردن سنجههای شبکه، و نظریه‌ی نمودارها را برای نشان‌دادن پیوندها به‌کار می‌گیرد. نتیجه‌های بهدست آمده نشان داد که اجرای طرح ترسیب کربن سبب شده است سنجههای شبکهی سازمانی مانند اندازه، تراکم، دوسویگی پیوندها، انتقال‌یافتگی پیوندها و مرکزیت مجاورت افزایش یابد و از میانگین فاصله‌ی زمین‌سنجی (ژئودزیک) و تمرکز شبکه کاسته شود. این یافتهها در مجموع بیانگر بهبود انسجام نهادی و افزایش پایداری شبکهی ارتباطی است. طرح ترسیب کربن موجب شد که سرمایهی اجتماعی در شبکهی ارتباطی سازمانها بیش‌تر، و شرایط بهتری برای برنامههای اقدام مشترک در آبخیز فراهم شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ارتباط؛ انسجام نهادی؛ سرمایه اجتماعی؛ شبکه سازمانی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Impact of Organizational Networks on Improving the Social Capital of Watershed Management in Carbon Sequestration Project of the Tilabad Watershed in the Province of Golestan | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ahmad Abedi Sarvestani | ||
| Associate Professor, Faculty of Agricultural Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The social capital is based on the relationships of social actors and their communication type within a network. For this reason, the emphasis is on creating a coordinated network between different organizations in order to the successful implementation of development programs. The importance of this issue as a platform for participatory management of watersheds is also emphasized by international organizations. This study investigated the effectiveness of organizational network of the carbon sequestration project in the Tilabad Watershed in promoting the social capital. Using the social network analysis method, 30 organization and institutions related to this project were surveyed in the Azadshahr county of the province of Golestan regards the communication network. The data collection tool was a questionnaire, in which the linkage of information exchange for natural resources management was measured between the concerned organizations before and after the implementation of the carbon sequestration project. Data analysis was performed using the UCINET software, in which the algebra of matrices was used to estimate network parameters and the graph theory was employed to show the relationships. The results indicated that the implementation of the carbon sequestration project led to an increase in organizational network parameters such as size, density, reciprocity, transitivity and closeness centrality. Moreover, the geodesic distance mean and network centralization were decreased. These findings suggest an improvement in the institutional cohesion and an enhancement in the communication network stability. Therefore, the implementation of the carbon sequestration project has reinforced the social capital in the organizations' communication network; thus, it provided better conditions for carrying joint action plans in the Tilabad Watershed. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Communication, institutional cohesion, social capital, organizational network | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahn T, Ostrom E. 2002. Social capital and the second generation theories of collective action: An analytical approach to the forms of social capital. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University. 36 p. Bisung E, Elliott SJ. 2014. Toward a social capital based framework for understanding the water-health nexus. Journal of Social Science and Medicine. 108: 194–200. Bourdieu P. 1986. The forms of capital. In: J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood. pp. 241–58. Bullen P, Onyx J. 1999. Social capital: Family support services and neighborhood and community center in New South Wales. Available at: http://www.mapl.com.au/A12.htm. Coleman J. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology. 4: 464–487. Coleman J. 2002. Social capital in the creation of human capital. In: C. Calhoun, and Others (Eds.), Contemporary Sociological Theory. pp. 110–125. Oxford: Blackwell. Costa ALD, Mertens F. 2015. Governance, networks and social capital in the plenary of the Brazilian national council on water resources. Ambient & Sociedade. 18(3): 153–170. Directorate General of Natural Resources and Watershed Management of Golestan Province. 2014. Golestan Province cooperative management of natural resources and sustainable rural development (carbon sequestration). Gorgan: Golestan Province Department of Natural Resources and Watershed Management. 46 p. (In Persian). Ebrahimi-Azarkhoran F, Ghorbani M, Salajegah A, Mohseni-Saravi M. 2014. Social network analysis of local stakeholders in the water resources participatory management action plan (Case study: Jajrood River in Latian Watershed- Darbandar Village). Iranian Watershed Management Science. 8(25): 47–56. (In Persian). FAO. 2017. Watershed management in action: Lessons learned from FAO field projects. Rome: FAO. Ghorbani M. 2015. Program of monitoring and evaluation of socio-political networks in empowering local communities and comprehensive land management. Tehran: Research Institute for Empowering Local Communities and Participatory Management of Natural Resources, University of Tehran. (In Persian). 84 p. Ghorbani M, Azarniwand H, Mehrabi AK, Bastani S, Jafari M, Naebi H. 2012. Social network analysis: A new approach to collaborative management of natural resources management and planning. Journal of Range and Watershed Management. 65(4): 553–568. (In Persian). Grossman MR. 2018. Climate change and the individual. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 66(1): 345–378. Hanneman RA, Riddle M. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. California: Department of Sociology at the University of California, 322 p. Hansen D, Shneiderman B, Smith M, Himelboim I. 2019. Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann. Hlebec V, Ferligoi A. 2002. Reliability of social network measurement instruments. Field Methods. 14(3): 288–306. Krishna A, Uphoff N. 2002. Mapping and measuring social capital through assessment of collective action to conserve and develop watersheds in Rajasthan, India. In R. Puttnam, C. Grootaert and T. Van Bastelaer (Eds.), The role of social capital in development: An empirical assessment, pp. 85–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511492600.005. Krishna A, Uphoff N, Asman MJ. 2003. Reasons for hope: Informative experiences in rural development. Translated by: Pirouz Izadi, Tehran: Rural Research and Research Center of Ministry of Agriculture. (In Persian). 430 p. Lorenz K, Lal R. 2010. Carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. Netherlands: Springer. Macke J, Vallejos RV, Faccin K, Genari D. 2010 The impact of inter-organizational social capital in collaborative networks competitiveness: An empirical analysis. In: L.M. Camarinha-Matos, X. Boucher, H. Afsarmanesh (Eds.), collaborative networks for a sustainable world, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Berlin: Springer. Mariola J. 2012. Farmers, trust, and the market solution to water pollution: The role of social embeddedness in water quality trading. Journal of Rural Studies. 28: 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.09.007. Mohammadi-Kangarani H, Ghanchepour D. 2013. Charting and analyzing the formal and informal inter-organizational relations network using network analysis (Case study: Hormozgan Province directorate general of natural resources). Iran Forest Journal 5(1): 43–53. (In Persian). Nath TK, Inoue M, Pretty J. 2010. Formation and function of social capital for forest resource management and the improved livelihoods of indigenous people in Bangladesh. Journal of Rural and Community Development. 5(3): 104–122. Onyx J, Bullen P. 2005. Measuring social capital in five communities. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 36(1): 23–42. Putnam RD. 2000. Boling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Sabrifar R, Falsoleimani M, Qaysari S. 2012. Sustainable local development and maximizing people's participation based on the experiences of the international carbon sequestration project. Journal of Geography and Development. 10(28): 54–41. (In Persian). Sayles J, Baggio J. 2017. Social-ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America. 114(10): E1776-E1785. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1604405114. 10 p. Uphoff N. 2001. Understanding social capital: Learning from the analysis and experience of participation. In: I. Serageldin and P. Dasgupta (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective, pp. 215–249. Washington DC: World Bank Publications. 436 p. Wallis J. 2004. Social economic and social capital. International Journal of Social Economics. 31(3): 239–258. DOI: 10.1108/03068290410518238. Woolcock M. 2001. The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Canadian Journal of Policy Research. 2(1): 1–17. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 853 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 816 |
||