- همه نشریات
- نشریات علمی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویچ کشاورزی
- مجلات ترویجی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- سایر نشریات سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- نشریات علمی انجمن ها
- علوم آب و خاک
- علوم اقتصاد و ترویج کشاورزی
- علوم جنگل, مرتع و آبخیزداری
- علوم دامی و شیلات
- علوم زراعی و باغی
- علوم گیاهپزشکی
- علوم مهندسی و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی
- نشریات با زبان انگلیسی
- نشریات با زبان فارسی
- نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
- نشریات علمی
پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 283 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 81 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,722 |
| تعداد مقالات | 31,008 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 27,136,292 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,162,968 |
Study of the Response of Leucojum aestivum L. Bulbs Collected from Different Regions to Organic and Biological Fertilizers under Field Conditions | ||
| Journal of Medicinal plants and By-product | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 9، شماره 2، آذر 2020، صفحه 181-191 اصل مقاله (508.73 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jmpb.2020.127354.1132 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mona Bakian1؛ Moazzam Hassanpour Asil* 2؛ Mohammad Bagher Farhangi3؛ Amir Sahraroo2 | ||
| 1Department of Horticultural Sciences, University of Guilan, University Campus 2, Rasht, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Leucojum aestivum L. is a perennial and bulbous plant. Its bulbs are used in the medical industry because of having alkaloids. This study was conducted as split plot in a completely randomized design with 3 replications in 2018 at the University of Gilan in field conditions. The main factor included bulbs collected from three regions of Lahijan, Tonekabon and Langrood. The sub-factor included 10 levels of organic fertilizers, biochar (3, 6 and 12 tons per hectare), inoculation of Glomus intraradices, Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices + Glomus mosseae fungi, inoculation of Azospirillum, Azotobacter and Pseudomonas bacteria and the control. Data collected and analysed for morphological traits and absorbed macro and micro as elements by plants. There was significant difference between genotypes in terms of the plant height, leaf area per plant, leaf weight per plant, bulb weight, flowering stem weight, root weight and total plant weight (p<0.01). A significant difference was observed in the types of fertilizers used for all morphological traits and yield (p<0.01) and for phosphorus, potassium and iron content (p<0.05). The genotype by treatments interaction effect was significant for leaf number, leaf area per plant, leaf weight per plant, bulb weight, flowering stem weight, root weight and total weight showed a difference (p<0.01). Lahijan genotype plants had the highest plant height (57.6 cm), leaf length (52.5 cm) and plant leaf weight (27.2 g/per plant). The highest root weight (9.5 g) and total plant weight (74.1 g/per plant) was for biochar treatment of 12 ton/h. The study results indicated that Leucojum aestivum L. had good adaptation to crop conditions, and using biochar fertilizer and some biofertilizers improved various crop traits of this plant. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Leucojum aestivum L؛ Biochar؛ Gilan؛ Biological fertilizer | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Tutin T.G, Heywood V.H, Burges N.A, Valentine D.H. Flora Europaea 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1980. 486p.
2-Mazhari N. Flora of Iran. Nos. 46,47: Ixioliriaceae, Amaryllidaceae. RIFR, Isfahan. 2004.
3. Ghost B. C, Bhat R. Environmental hazards of nitrogen loading in wetland rice fields. Environ. Pollut. 1998;102:123-126.
4. Murty M. G, Ladha J. K. Influence of Azospirillum inoculation on the mineral uptake and growth of rice under hydroponic conditions. Plant and Soil. 1988;108:281-285.
5. Barzegar A.R, Nelson P.N, Oades J.M,. Rangasamy P. Organic matter, Sodicity and Clay Type: Influence on Soil Aggregation. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1997;56:1292-1298.
6. Follet R.H, Murphy S.L, Donahue R. Fertilizer and soil ammendments. 2nd edition, Prentic -Hal Pub., England. 1981. 557p.
7. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M. Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems -a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 2006;11:403-427.
8. Xu X, Cao X, Zhao L, Wang H, Yu H, Gao B. Removal of Cu, Zn, and Cd from aqueous solutions by the dairy manure-derived biochar. Environ Sci Pollution Res. 2013;1:358-68.
9. Joseph J. Biochar for Environmental Management Science and Technology. Earthscan. 2009.
10. Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan K. Y, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil. 2010. 327;235-246. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x.
11. Peng X, Ye L. L, Wang C. H, Zhou H, Sun B. Temperature-and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: Characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China Soil and Tillage Research. 2011;112:159-166.
12. Blackwell P, Krull E, Butler G, Herbert A, Solaiman Z. Effect of banded biochar on dryland wheat production and fertiliser use in south-western Australia: an agronomic and economic perspective. Australian J Soil Res. 2010;48:531-545. DOI: 10.1071/sr10014.
13. Singh S, Kapoor KK. Inoculation with phosphate solubilizing microorganisms and vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus improves dry matter yield and nutrient uptake by wheat grown in a sandy soil. Biol Fertil Soils. 1998;28:139-144.
14. Ahmad F. Ahmad I, Khan M.S. indole acetic acid production by indigenous isolated of Azotobacter and Fluorescent pseudomonas in the presence and absence of Tryptophan. Turk J Biol. 2005;29:29-34.
15. Askary M, Mostajeran A, Amooaghaei R, Mostajeran M. Influence of the co-inoculation Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobum meliloti plus 2,4-D on grain yield and N, P, K content of Triticum aestivum (Cv. Baccros and mahdavi). American-Eurasian J Agric & Environ Sci. 2009;5:296-307.
16. Yang J. W, Yu S. H, Ryu C. M. Priming of defense-related genes confers root-colonizing bacilli-elicited induced systemic resistance in pepper. The Plant Pathology J. 2009:25:389-399.
17. Saeed Nejhad AH, Rezvani Moghadam P. Evaluation of consumption of compost, vermicompost and manure fertilizers on yield, yield components of Cumin and essence percentage. Horticulture Sci J. 2010;24:142-148.
18. Nezarat S, Gholami K. Screening plant growth promoting rhizobacteria forimproving grain germination, grainling growth and yield of maize. Pakistan J Biolo Sci. 2009;12:26-32.
19. Patten C, Glick B. R. Regulation of indoleacetic acid sigma factor Rpos. Canadiuan J Micro. 2002:48:635-642.
20. Abdelaziz M, Pokluda R, Abdelwahab M. Influence of compost, microorganism and NPK fertilizer upon growth, chemical composition and essential oil production of Rosmarinus officinalis L. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobo Cluj-Napoca. 2007;35:86-90.
21. Zand A, Darzi M. T, Haj Seyed Hadi M. R. Efects of Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms and Plant Density on Seed Yield and Essential Oil Content of Anise (Pimpinella anisum). Middle-East J Sci Res. 2013;14:340-346.
22. Abdul-Jaleel C, Manivannan P, Sankar B, Kishorekumar A, Gopi R, Somasundaram R, Panneerselvam R. Pseudomonas flurecence enhance biomass yield and ajmalicine production in Catharanthus roseus under water deficit stress. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2007;60:7-11.
23. Banchio E, Bogino P, Zygadlo J, Giordano W. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria improve growth and essential oil yieldin Origanum majorana L. Biochem Sys Ecology. 2008;36:766-771.
24. Ojha S, Chakraborty M.R, Dutta S, Chatterjee N.C. Influence of VAM on nutrient uptake and growth of custard-apple. Asian J Experi Sci. 2008;22:221-224.
25. Usha K, Mathew R, Singh B. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of Foeniculum vulgare. Karnataka J Hortic. 2004;1:56-60.
26. Das K, Dang R, Shivananda T.N, Sekeroglu N. Influence of bio-fertilizers on the biomass yield and nutrient content in Stevia rebaudiana Bert. grown in Indian subtropics. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2007;1:005-008.
27. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoxidase in beta vulgaris. Plant physi. 1949;24:1-15.
28. Lynch J.M, Barbano D.M. Kjeldahl nitrogen analysis as a reference method for protein determination in dairy products. J Aoac Inter. 1999;82:1389-1398.
29. Avila-Segura M, Lyne J.W, Meyer J.M, Barak P. Rapid spectrophotometric analysis of soil phosphorus with a microplate reader. Communications in soil science and plant analysis. 2004;35:547-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120029731.
30. Hald P.M. The flame photometer for the measurement of sodium and potassium in biological materials. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1947;167:499-510. http://www.jbc.org/content/167/2/499.citation
31. Hovind H. Trace elements determination AAS. Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Horizontal-20. 2004.
32. Abbaszadeh B. Ecophysiological Study of Salinity Tolerance in Two Halophyte Medicinal Plants (Camphorosma monspliaca L.) & (Artemisia sieberi Besser). Diss. Ph. D. Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch. 2011, 385 pp.
33. Layeghhaghighi M, Hassanpour Asil M, Abbaszadeh B. Investigation of morphophysiological traits, essential oil percentage and some elements of Artemisia sieberi affected by changes in habitat soil (case study: Hoz Soltan lake in Qom). Iranian J Hortic Sci. 2017;48:61-71.
34. Ardekani M.R, Abbaszadeh B, Assareh M.H, Paknezhad F, Kashani A, Layeghhaghighi M. Evaluation of morphological characters, essential oil percentage and some mineral elements of camphorosma monspilica L. IJMAP. 2012;28:267-279.
35. Tajali A.A, Amin Gh.R. Gandomkar A. Evaluation and identification compound of essential oil of Camphorosma monspeliaca L. on different phonological stages in Arak, Hamedan and Shar-e-kord rangelands. J Range. 2009;3:302-316.
36. Ghazi Manas M, Banj Shafiee Sh, Hajseyd Hadi M.R, Darzi M.T. Effects of vermicompost and nitrogen on qualitative and quantitative yield of chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.), IJMAP. 2013;29:269-280.
37. Jat R.S, Ahlawat I.P.S.. Effect of vermicormpost, bio fertilizer and phosphorus on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by gram (Cicer arietinumi and their residual effect on fodder maize (Zea mays). Indian J Agric Sci. 2004;74:359-361.
38. Shaharoona B, Arshad M, Zahir Z.A, Khalid A. Performance of Pseudomonas spp. Containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in the presence of nitrogenous fertilizer. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38:2971-2975.
39. Salantur A, Ozturk A, Akten S. Growth and yield response of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to inoculation with rhizobacteria. Plant Soil Environ. 2006;52:111-118.
40. Dobbelaere S, Vanderleyden J, Okon Y. Plant growth promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Critical Review in Plant Sciences. 2003;22:107–149.
41. Salehi A, Ghalavand A, Sefidkon F, Asgharzadeh A. The effect of zeolite, PGPR and vermicompost application on N, P, K concentration, essential oil content and yield in organic cultivation of German Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.), IJMAP. 2011;27:188-201.
42. Sharma S.D, Bhutani V.P. Response of apple seedling to Azotobacter and inorganic fertilizers. Hortic J. 1998;11:18.
43. Karthikeyan B, Jaleel C.A, Zhao Joe M.M, Srimannarayn J, Deveekasundaram M. The effect of AM fungi and phosphorus level on the biomass yield and ajmalicine production in Catharanthus roseus. EurAsian J Biosci. 2008;2:26-33.
44. Melero M, Vanderlinden K., Ruiz J.C, Madejon E. Long-term effect on soil biochemical status of a Vertisol under conservation tillage system in semi-arid Mediterranean conditions. European J Soil Biology. 2008;44:437-442.
45. Tilak K. V. B. R, Ranganayaki N, Pal K. K, De R, Saxena A. K, Shekhar Nautiyal C, Mittal S, Tripathi A. K, Johri B. N. Diversity of plant growth and soil health supporting bacteria. Current Sci. 2005;89:136-150.
46. Velmurugan M, Chezhiyan N, Jawaharlal M. Influence of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on cured rhizome yield and quality of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) cv. BSR-2. Intern J Agric Sci. 2008;4:142-145.
47. Chan K.Y, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Australian J Soil Res. 2007;45:629. DOI: 10.1071/sr07109.
48. Zhang A, Cui L, Pan G, Li L, Hussain Q, Zhang X, Zheng J, Crowley D. Effect of biochar amendment on yield and methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a rice paddy from Tai Lake plain, China. Agric Eco Environ. 2010;139:469-475.
49. Chan K.Y, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S. Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Australian J Soil Res. 2008;46:437. DOI: 10.1071/sr08036.
50. Gaskin J.W, Speir R.A, Harris K, Das K.C, Lee R.d, Morris L.A, Fisher D.S. Effect of Peanut Hull and Pine Chip Biochar on Soil Nutrients, Corn Nutrient Status, and Yield. Agro J. 2010;102:623-633. DOI:10.2134/AGRONJ2009.0083.
51. Novak J.M, Busscher W.J, Laird D.L, Ahmedna M, Watts D.W, Niandou M.A.S. Impact of Biochar Amendment on Fertility of a Southeastern Coastal Plain Soil. Soil Sci. 2009. 174:105-112. DOI: 10.1097/SS.0b013e3181981d9a.
52. Zakerian F. Investigative ecophysiological response of Satureja sahandica under drought strees and mycorrhizal (Glomus mosseae and G. intraradices ). Ph. D Thesis of Islamic Azad University in Agriculture-Medicinal plants. 2019;345p. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 646 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 340 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب