اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات286
تعداد نشریات سازمان84
تعداد شماره‌ها2,873
تعداد مقالات32,555
تعداد مشاهده مقاله42,418,908
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله19,194,523
ابراهیمی, مهرزاد. (1399). آسیب‌پذیری اجتماعی، اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی کشاورزان نسبت به خشکسالی: دشت بکان اقلید. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 28(1), 171-192. doi: 10.30490/aead.2020.283680.1060
مهرزاد ابراهیمی. "آسیب‌پذیری اجتماعی، اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی کشاورزان نسبت به خشکسالی: دشت بکان اقلید". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 28, 1, 1399, 171-192. doi: 10.30490/aead.2020.283680.1060
ابراهیمی, مهرزاد. (1399). 'آسیب‌پذیری اجتماعی، اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی کشاورزان نسبت به خشکسالی: دشت بکان اقلید', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 28(1), pp. 171-192. doi: 10.30490/aead.2020.283680.1060
ابراهیمی, مهرزاد. آسیب‌پذیری اجتماعی، اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی کشاورزان نسبت به خشکسالی: دشت بکان اقلید. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1399; 28(1): 171-192. doi: 10.30490/aead.2020.283680.1060

آسیب‌پذیری اجتماعی، اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی کشاورزان نسبت به خشکسالی: دشت بکان اقلید

اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه
مقاله 8، دوره 28، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 109، اردیبهشت 1399، صفحه 171-192    اصل مقاله (1 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30490/aead.2020.283680.1060
نویسنده
مهرزاد ابراهیمی*
استادیار و عضو هیئت علمی گروه اقتصاد، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران
چکیده
کشاورزان به­ شدت از خشکسالی­ های سریع تأثیر می‏ پذیرند. با پاسخ­ های سازگاری مناسب می ­توان از پیامدهای منفی این پدیده کاست و همچنین، ارزیابی آسیب ­پذیری زیست‏ بوم­ های اجتماعی و اقتصادی محلی به ایجاد این فرآیند کمک می­کند. هدف مطالعه حاضر ارزیابی آسیب ­پذیری اجتماعی، اقتصادی و زیست ­محیطی در سطح خانوار و در چهار خوشه روستایی دشت بکان اقلید بود. اطلاعات مربوط به «در معرض واقع شدن»، «حساسیت» و «ظرفیت سازگاری» خوشه­ های روستایی از طریق مصاحبه­ های رو در رو با 122 خانوار کشاورز در تابستان 1397 جمع‏ آوری شد. به ­منظور محاسبه شاخص آسیب ­پذیری، اجزای اصلی متغیرهای یادشده اندازه ‏گیری و یکپارچه سازی شدند. نتایج نشان­دهنده سطوح قابل توجه «در معرض خطر خشکسالی واقع شدن» و «حساسیت نسبت به این پدیدة ناگوار» و اما «ظرفیت محدود برای سازگاری» در میان خوشه­ های فضایی و در نتیجه، آسیب ­پذیری زیاد اجتماعی، اقتصادی و زیست ‏محیطی بوده و با این حال، سطوح آسیب­ پذیری در میان خانوارها به­ دلیل عوامل مختلف اجتماعی و اقتصادی مانند دارایی­ های معیشتی متغیر است. با توجه به محدود بودن ظرفیت سازگاری خانوارهای مورد مطالعه، به ­منظور رسیدگی به نیازهای خانوارهای بسیار آسیب ­پذیر، سیاست­گذاری سازش از طریق رهیافت «ابتدا افراد ضعیف» لازم است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
در معرض واقع شدن؛ حساسیت؛ ظرفیت سازگاری؛ خوشه‌های روستایی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Socioeconomic and Environmental Vulnerability of Farmers to Drought: Bakan Plain in Eghlid County of Iran
نویسندگان [English]
M. Ebrahimi
Assistant Professor and Faculty Member, Department of Economics, Branch of Shiraz, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده [English]
Fast droughts have an extreme effect on farmers. Useful adaptations make smaller negative impacts of the event and vulnerability evaluations of local socioeconomic ecosystems help to start off the process. This aimed at identifying and assessing the socioeconomic and environmental vulnerability of households in four village clusters of Bakan plain in Eghlid County of Iran. Data were collected on the principal components of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity through face to face interviews with 122 farming households of the rural clusters in summer 2018. These principal components were calculated and integrated to create the vulnerability index. The results revealed significant levels of exposure to drought and sensitivity to this extreme event, but restricted capacities to adapt among spatial clusters, resulting in high socioeconomic and environmental vulnerability. Yet, there was found a variation in the vulnerability among the studied households because of different socioeconomic factors such as their livelihood assets; so, they had few adaptive capacities. Finally, it was recommended to take an adaptation policy to consider the needs of the most vulnerable households via a ‘Poor People First’ approach.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Exposure, Sensitivity, Adaptability Capacity, Rural Clusters
مراجع
  1. Adger, W.N. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in Coastal Vietnam. World Development, 27: 249-269.
  2. Adger, W.N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 268-281.
  3. Adger, W.N., Agrawala, S., Mirza, M.M.Q., Conde, C., O'Brien, K. and Pulhin, J. (2007). Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Adu, D.T., Kuwornu, J.K.M., Anim-Somuah, H. and Sasaki, N. (2017). Application of livelihood vulnerability index in assessing smallholder maize farming households' vulnerability to climate change in Brong-Ahafo region of Ghana. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38: 1-11.
  5. Alcamo, J., Acosta-Michlik, L., Carius, A., Eierdanz, F., Klein, R., Kromker, D. and Tanzler, D. (2005). A new approach to the assessment of vulnerability to drought. Paper Presented at the Concluding Symposium of the German Climate Research Programme (DEKLIM).
  6. Aryal, S., Cockfield, G. and Maraseni, T.N. (2014). Vulnerability of Himalayan transhumant communities to climate change. Climatic Change, 125(2): 193-208.
  7. Ashtab, A. and Sharifzadeh, M. (2017). Farmers livelihood vulnerability caused by drought: the case of Hirmand County. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 13(1): 75-88. (Persian)
  8. Berkes, F. and Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Brant, S. (2017). Assessing vulnerability to drought in Ceara, Northeast Brazil. MS Thesis, University of Michigan.
  10. Brooks, N. and Adger, W.N. (2005). Assessing and enhancing adaptive capacity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Christiaensen, L.J. and Subbarao, K. (2005). Towards an understanding of household vulnerability in rural Kenya. Journal of African Economies, 14: 520-558.
  12. Ebi, K.L., Kovats, R.S. and Menne, B. (2006). An approach for assessing human health vulnerability and public health interventions to adapt to climate change. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(12): 1930-1934.
  13. Ethlet, C. and Yates, R. (2005). Participatory vulnerability analysis: a step-by-step guide for field staff. International Emergencies Team.
  14. Ford, J.D. and Smit, B. (2003). A framework for assessing the vulnerability of communities in the Canadian Arctic to risks associated with climate change. Arctic, 57(4): 389-400.
  15. Füssel, H.M. (2007). Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change, 17(2): 155-167.
  16. Füssel, H.M. and Klein, R.J.T. (2006). Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Climatic Change, 75(3): 301-329.
  17. Gerlitz, J.Y., Macchi, M., Brooks, N., Pandey, R., Banerjee, S. and Jha, S.K. (2017). The Multidimensional Livelihood Vulnerability Index– an instrument to measure livelihood vulnerability to change in the Hindu Kush Himalayas. Climate and Development, 9(2): 124-140.
  18. Haan, N., Farmer, G. and Wheeler, R. (2001). Chronic vulnerability to food insecurity in Kenya, 2001. A WEP Pilot Study for Improving Vulnerability Analysis..
  19. Hahn, M.B., Riederer, A.M. and Foster, S.O. (2009). The livelihood vulnerability index: a pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change: a case study in Mozambique. Global Environmental Change, 19(1): 74-88.
  20. Iraji, H., Zibaei, M. and Nasrnia, F. (2015). Assessing the vulnerability of wheat farmers to drought in north of Fars province. Agricultural Economics and Development, 29(2): 169-180. (Persian)
  21. Jahad (Department of Agriculture - Jahad) (2017). Agricultural household statistics of Eghlid County. Sgiraz: Department of Agriculture - Jahad.
  22. Kusunose, Y. (2010). Drought risk and vulnerability of Moroccan dryland wheat farmers. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 126: 36-45.
  23. Luers, A.L., Lobell, D.B., Sklar, L.S., Addams, C.L. and Matson, P.A. (2003). A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 13(4): 255-267.
  24. McCarthy, J.J., Canziani, O.F., Leary, N.A., Dokken, D.J. and White, K.S. (2001). Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Mohan, D. and Sinha, S. (2010). Vulnerability assessment of people, livelihoods, and ecosystems in the Ganga Basin, India. World Wildlife Fund (WWF).
  26. Nasrnia, F. and Zibaei, M. (2018). Evaluation of farmers livelihood vulnerability of Bakhtegan Basin to drought. Paper Presented at the 11th Biennial Conference on Iranian Agricultural Economy (11BCIAE). (Persian)
  27. Pandey, R. and Bardsley, D.K. (2015). Social-ecological vulnerability to climate change in the Nepali Himalaya. Applied Geography, 64: 74-86.
  28. Patnaik, U. and Narayanan, K. (2015). Vulnerability and climate change: an analysis of the eastern coastal districts of India. Paper Presented at the Human Security and Climate Change, an International Workshop, Asker and Near Oslo.
  29. Pirmoradian, N., Shamsnia, S.A., Boustani, F. and Shahrokhnia, M.A. (2009). Evaluation of drought return period using standardized precipitation index (SPI) in Fars province, Iran. Agroecology Journal, 4(4): 7-21. (Persian)
  30. Rahmani, H. and Nozari, H. (2014). Drought and agriculture in Eghlid County. Paper Presented at the National Conference on Water Crisis in Iran and Middle East, Shiraz. (Persian)
  31. Sharafi, L. and Zarafshani, K., (2011). Psychological and technical vulnerability among wheat farmers during drought: the case of Kermanshah, Sahneh and Ravansar counties. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 7(1): 1-15. (Persian)
  32. Sharma, U. and Patwardhan, A. (2007). Methodology for identifying vulnerability hotspots to tropical cyclone hazard in India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 13: 703-717.
  33. Shewmake, S. (2008). Vulnerability and the impact change in South Africa’s Limpopo River Basin. Paper Presented at the International Food Policy Research Institute.
  34. Sullivan, C.A. (2011). Quantifying water vulnerability: a multi-dimensional approach. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 25: 627-640.
  35. Turner, B.L., Kasperson, R.E., Matson, P.A., McCarthy, J.J., Corell, R.W. and Christensen, L. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14): 8074-8079.
  36. Wilhelmi, O.V. and Wilhite, D.A. (2002). Assessing vulnerability to agriculture drought: a Nebraska case study. Natural Hazards, 25: 37-58.
  37. Zakieldeen, S.A. (2009). Adaptation to climate change: a vulnerability assessment for Sudan; Key highlights in sustainable agriculture and natural resource management. Paper Presented at the International Institute for Environment and Development.
  38. Zimmerman, F. and Carter, M. (2003). Asset smoothing, consumption smoothing and the reproduction of inequality under risk and subsistence constraints. Journal of Development Economics, 71: 233-260. 
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 625
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 435


counter
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب