| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,043 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,036 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 46,399,040 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 77,470,885 |
ارزیابی واکنش ژنوتیپ های گندم دوروم به تنش خشکی آخر فصل | ||
| پژوهش های کاربردی زراعی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 33، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 126، فروردین 1399، صفحه 23-43 اصل مقاله (966.92 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/aj.2019.125259.1384 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| غلامحسین احمدی* | ||
| بخش تحقیقات زراعی-باغی مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات، اموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرماتشاه، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تنش خشکی آخر فصل از مهمترین عوامل تاثیر گذار در تولید گندم دوروم (Triticum turgidum var. durum Desf.) است. لذا با هدف شناسایی لاین‌های جدید متحمل به این تنش، تعداد 154 لاین گندم دوروم در شرایط آبیاری بهینه و تنش خشکی آخر فصل (قطع آبیاری از مرحله آبستنی یا Z=4.5) در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی اسلام آباد غرب طی سال‌های 92-1391 و 93-1392 کشت شدند. براساس عملکرد دانه دو محیط، شاخص‌های تحمل به خشکی محاسبه شد. بین لاین‌های مورد بررسی تنوع بالایی برای عملکرد و شاخص‌های تحمل به خشکی مشاهده شد. تجزیه‌خوشه‌ای لاین‌ها را در 6 گروه جای داد. تعداد 12 لاین با قرار گرفتن در یک گروه، براساس بیشتر شاخص‌های تحمل به خشکی و عملکرد دو محیط نسبت به دیگر گروه‌ها برتر بودند. نتایج تجزیه‌به‌مولفه‌های‌اصلی لاین-های برتر نشان داد لاین‌هایG41، G116، G123 و G199 بهترین لاین‌ها برای تحمل به خشکی آخر فصل بوده و در شرایط آبیاری بهینه نیز عملکرد مطلوبی داشتند. از طرف دیگر لاین‌های G50، G46 و G38 برای شرایط بهینه مناسب بوده و واجد تحمل به تنش آخر فصل نیز بودند. لاین‌های G29 وG157 هرچند در بین لاین‌های برتر بودند، اما تحمل به تنش پایینی نشان دادند و برای شرایط بهینه مناسب بودند. لاین‌های G105، G93 و G159 به شرایط تنش انتهایی متحمل بودند، اما در شرایط بهینه عملکرد پایینی داشتند. بطورکلی چهار لاین به شماره های G41، G116، G123 وG199، بویژه لاین G116، پتانسیل تولید رقم برای تنش خشکی انتهای فصل را داشته و برای شرایط منطقه مورد مطالعه یا مناطق مشابه قابل توصیه می باشند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| گندم دوروم؛ تنش خشکی؛ تنش خشکی آخر فصل | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) lines response to terminal drought stress | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Gholamhossein Ahmadi | ||
| Horticulture crops research dep., Kermanshah agricultural and natural resource research and education center, ARREO, Kermanshah, Iiran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: Wheat, bread and durum, is most important crop of Iran and durum wheat has a historical cultivation background in country. Pasta and macaronis industries of country need 400000 ton of durum annually. To cover this tonnage, releasing and introducing new and high yielding durum cultivar to wheat growers is crucial. On other hand, drought stress, especially terminal drought stress, TDS, is one of the most important factors affecting cultivation of wheat in various environments (Kilic and Yagbasanlar, 2010) and usually happened during filling period in Mediterranean countries (Golabadi et al., 2006). Totally, drought resistance is an erratic and complex trait and its effects depend on growth stage of crop. Lack of drought tolerance cultivars plus drought periods during wheat growing season are main reasons of Iran wheat production fluctuation. Drought resistance indices widely used by scientist to screening and selection drought tolerate wheat genotypes (Bennani et. al., 2017). So to combating these hazard and mitigate effects of water shortage and drought stress on durum wheat production, identifying and releasing new terminal drought tolerate durum wheat cultivars, present study was conducted. Material and methods: The154 durum wheat lines originated from International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) plus Syrian4 (Saji) cultivar as durum check were investigated under normal irrigation and TDS conditions at Islamabad Agricultural Research Station over 2013-14 and 2014-15 cropping period. Each plot consisted of 2 rows, 2 m length with 0.3m inter row spaces. Cropping density was 450 seed per m2. Sowing was done by hand. Irrigation cut at boating stage (Z = 4.5) of crop. The grain yield, GY, (Kg/ha) of two years was used to calculating 21 drought tolerance indices namely MP, TOL, SSI, STI, GMP, YI, DI, ATI, SSPI, SNPI, MRP, REI, MSTIk1, MSTIk2, HARM, Red, RDI, GM, DTE. The SPSS software was used for cluster analysis and drawing of bipolot. Result and discussion: High variation was observed among the studied lines for GY and drought resistance indices. The cluster analysis by using UPGMA method and square of Euclidean distance, sorted evaluated lines in 6 groups. According to most drought resistance indices and the performance in both environments, the 12 genotypes namely g29, g38, g41, g46, g50, g93, g105, g116, g123, g157, g159 and g199 located at first group and showed remarkable advantages over other groups. The results of the analysis of the main components indicated that g116, g199, g41 and g123 lines were the best genotypes for TDS, which showed good performance under irrigated conditions also. On the other hand, the g50, g46 and g38 lines were the best ones for optimal conditions that showed TDS resistance also. The g29 and g157 lines were among superior lines with less resistance to TDS suitable for optimal conditions, whereas g105, g93 and g159 lines were relatively resistance to TDS with low yield under normal irrigation. Totally four genotypes, g41 (STORLOM/3/RASCON_37/TARRO_2//RASCON_37/4/ D00003A…), g116 (SIMETO/4/DUKEM_1//PATKA_7/YAZI_1/3/PATKA_7/YAZI_1…) g123 (ADAMAR _15/PLATA_18/3/SORA/2*PLATA_12//SOMAT_3/6/LIRO…) and g199 (PLATA_10/6/MQUE/4/ USDA573//QFN/AA_7/3/ALBA-D…), with emphasis on g116 lines, showed potential to mention as candidates to releasing as new cultivars, recommending and presenting to wheat growers of TDS conditions of area of study and similar condition. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Durum wheat, Drought stress, Terminal drought stress | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abid, M., Tian, Z., Ata-Ul Karim, S. T., Liu, Y., Cui, Y., Zahoor, R., and Dai, T. 2016. Improved tolerance to post anthesis drought stress by pre-drought priming at vegetative stages in drought-tolerant and-sensitive wheat cultivars. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 106: 218-227. Ahmadi, G. H., Tovmasyan, G., Jalal Kamali, M. R., Khodarahami, M., and Aghaeei, M. 2010. Selection of terminal drought tolerate bread wheat genotypes via field and laboratory indices. Proceeding of 8th International wheat Conference. St. Petersburg, Russia. June1-4. 2010. pp:150. Akbarabadi, A., Kahrizi, D., Rezaizad, A., Ahmadi, G.H., Ghobadi, M., and Molsaghi, M. 2015. Study of variability of bread wheat lines based on drought resistance indices. Biharean Biologist, 9 (2), 88-92. Anonymous, 2015. www.ag.ndsu.edu/plantsciences/research/durum/. Accessed March, 2015. Anonymous, 2018. http://.amar,mja.ira. Accessed February, 2019. Bennani, S., Nsarellah, N., Jlibene, M., Tadesse, W., Birouk, A., and Ouabbou, M. 2017. Efficiency of drought tolerance indices under different stress severities for bread wheat selection. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 11(04), 395-405. Blum, A., Sinemina, B., and Ziv, D. 1980. An evaluation of seed and seedling drought tolerance screening tests in wheat. Euphytica, 29: 727–736. Bouslama, M., and Schapaugh, W. T. 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean. I. Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science, 24: 933-937. Farshadfar, E., and Javadinia, J. 2011. Evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for drought tolerance. Seed and Plant Improvement journal, 27(4), 517-537. Farshadfar, E., and Sutka, J. 2002. Multivariate analysis of drought tolerance in wheat substitution lines. Cereal Research Communication, 31: 33-39. Fernandez, G.C.J. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceeding of Symposium. Taiwan, 13-16 Aug. Chapter 25. Pp: 257-270. Fischer, R.A., and Maurer, R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I: Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29: 897-912. Fischer, R.A., and Wood, J.T. 1979. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars III. Yield association with morphological traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 30: 1001-1020. Fleury, D., Jefferies, S., Kuchel, H., and Langridge, P. 2010. Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(12), 3211-3222. Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campaline, R.G., Ricciardi, G.L., and Borghi, B. 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 77: 523- 531. Golabadi, M., Arzani, A., and Mirmohammadi Maibody, S.A.M. 2006. Assessment of drought tolerance in segregating population in durum wheat. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(5), 162-171. Gonzalez, A., Bermjo, V., and Gimeno, B.S. 2010. Effect of different physiological traits on grain yield in barley grown under irrigated and terminal water deficit conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, 148: 319–328. Hossain, A.B.S., Sears, A.G., Cox, T.S., and Paulsen, G.M. 1999. Desiccation tolerance and its relationship to assimilate partitioning in winter wheat. Crop Science, 30: 622-627. Kalloo, G. 1992. Utilization of wild species .In: G. Kalloo and J.B. Chowdhury (eds), Distant Hybridization of Crop Plants. Springer Verlag. Pp.149-167. Khan, N., and Naqvi, F.N. 2011. Effect of water stress in bread wheat hexaploid. Current Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 3(5), 487-498. Kilic, H., and Yagbasanlar, T. 2010. The effect of drought stress on grain yield, yield components and some quality traits of durum wheat (Triticum durum ssp. durum) cultivars. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca Journal, 38 (1),164-170. Kirigwi, F.M., Van Ginkel, M., Trethowan, R., Sears, R.G., Rajaram, S., and Paulsen, G.M. 2004. Evaluation of selection strategies for wheat adaptation across water regimes. Euphytica, 135: 361–371. Kissing Kucek, L., Veenstra, L.D., Amnuaycheewa, P., and Sorrells, M.E. 2015. A Grounded guide to gluten: how modern genotypes and processing impact wheat sensitivity. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 00: 1-18. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12129. Kristin, A.S., Senra, R.R., Perez, F.I., Enriques, B.C., Gallegos, J.A.A., Vallego, P.R., Wassimi, N., and Kelley, J.D. 1997. Improving common Bean Performance under drought stress. Crop Science, 37: 43-50. Lan, J. 1998. Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 7:85-87. Mohammadnia, S., Asghari, A., Sofalian, O., Mohammaddoust, H., and Karimizadeh, R. 2017. Evaluation of durum wheat lines using seed yield based indices in drought condition and relation between these indices. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(20), 11-23 (Abstract in Persian). Moosavi, S.S, Samadi, Y.B., Naghavi, M.R., Zali, A.A., Dashti, H., and Pourshahbazi, A. 2008. Introduction of new indices to identify relative drought tolerance and resistance in wheat genotypes. Desert, 12: 165-178. Moradi, H., Akbari, G.A., Khorasani, S.K., and Ramshini, H.A. 2012. Evaluation of drought tolerance in corn (Zea Mays L.) new hybrids with using stress tolerance indices. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(3), 543-560.
Naderi, A., Majidi, I., Dezfuli, A. H., Rezai, A. M., and Mohammad, G. N. 1999. Efficiency analysis of indices for tolerance to environmental stresses in field crops and introduction of a new index. Seed and Plant, 4:390–402. Najafi Mirak, T. 2018. Study of yield stability and adaptability of elite lines in uniform regional durum wheat yield trials in temperate zone (ERDYT-M94). Final report of Project No: 0-03-03-94206. Seed and plant Improvement institute. Karaj, Iran. Najafian, G. 2009. Drought tolerance indices, their relationships and manner of application to wheat breeding programs. Middle Eastern and Russian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 3(1), 24-34. Pfeiffer, W.H., Reynolds, M.P., and Sayre, K.D. 2000. Enhancing genetic grain yield potential and yield stability in durum wheat. In” Durum wheat improvement in the Mediterranean region: New challenges”. Royo, C., Nachit, M., Di Fonzo, N. and Araus, J.L. (Eds.). Zaragoza, CIHEAM, Pp: 83-93. Rebetzke, G.J., and Richards, R.A. 2000. Gibberellic acid-sensitive dwarfing genes reduce plant height to increase kernel number and grain yield of wheat. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research, 51: 235-245. Rosielle, A.A., and Hamblin, J. 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science, 21: 943-949. Royo, C., Garcia del Moral, L.F., Aparicio, N., Villegas, D., Casadesús, J., and Araus, J.L. 2000. Tools for improving the efficiency of durum wheat selection under Mediterranean conditions. In” Durum wheat improvement in the Mediterranean region: New challenges”. Royo, C., Nachit, M., Di Fonzo, N. and Araus, J.L. (Eds.). Zaragoza, CIHEAM, Pp: 63-70. Saint Pierre, C., Peterson, C.J., Ross, A.S., Ohm, J.B., Verhoeven, M.C., Larson M., and Hoefer, B. 2008. White spring wheat grain quality changes with genotype, nitrogen fertilization and water stress. Agronomy Journal, 100: 414-420. Schuhwerk, D., Nakhforoosh, A., Kutschka, S., Bodner, G., and Grausgruber, H. 2010. Field-screening of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) for drought tolerance. Proceeding of 61th Tagung der Vereinigung der Pflfl anzenzüchter und Saatgutkauflfl eute Österreichs, 147-154. Shewry, P.R. 2009. Wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60(6), 1537-1553. Siddique, M.R.B., Hamid, A., and Islam, M.S.1999. Drought stress effects on photosynthetic rate and leaf gas exchange of wheat. Botanical Bulletin Academia Sinica, 40: 141-145. Takeda, S., and Matsuoka, M. 2008. Genetic approaches to crop improvement: responding to environmental and population change. Nature, 9: 444-457. Talebi, R., Fayyaz, F., and Naji, A.M. 2010. Genetic variation and interrelationships of agronomic characteristics in durum wheat under two constructing water regimes. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 53(4), 785-791. Uddin, N., Carver, B.F., and Clutter, A.C. 1992. Genetic analysis and selection for wheat yield in drought-stressed and irrigated environments. Euphytica, 62: 89-96. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 555 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 603 |
||