| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,846 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,300 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 41,387,117 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 18,562,183 |
بررسی تأثیر فرآیند پس از برداشت بر کیفیت بذر دو رقم تجاری سویای ویلیامز و صبا(L17) در منطقه مغان | ||
| علوم و فناوری بذر ایران | ||
| مقاله 20، دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 16، بهمن 1398، صفحه 271-288 اصل مقاله (1.03 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/ijsst.2019.124315.1243 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| آیدین حمیدی* 1؛ حسین صادقی2؛ حمیدرضا گازر3؛ سامان شیدائی4؛ بیتا اسکویی2؛ حسن میوه چی5؛ محمد نوری5؛ شاپور علیزاده5؛ صابر سیف امیری6؛ لیلا زارع5؛ اعظم دشتی5 | ||
| 1موسسه ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال | ||
| 2موسسه تحقیقات ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال | ||
| 3عضو هیات علمی موسسه تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی | ||
| 4عضو هیأت علمی، مؤسسه تحقیقات ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| 5سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، مؤسسه تحقیقات ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال، کرج، بولوار نبوت، نبش خیابان کلکسیون، صندوق پستی:1516-31535 | ||
| 6سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اردبیل، مغان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این تحقیق به‌منظور بررسی اثر فرآیند پس از یرداشت بر کیفیت بذر 2 رقم تجاری سویا ویلیامز و صبا(L17) در منطقه مغان به صورت یک آزمایش عاملی 5×2، دو رقم×5 مرحله فرآیند پس از برداشت، شامل پس از برداشت، پس از خشک‌کردن، پس از بوجاری، پس از بسته‌بندی و پارت چینی و انبارداری، برپایه طرح کاملاً تصادفی با 3 تکرار انجام شد. صفات مورد بررسی درصد گیاهچه‌های عادی در آزمون جوانه‌زنی استاندارد و پس از آزمون پیری تسریع شده، شاخص وزنی بنیه گیاهچه پس از آزمون جوانه‌زنی استاندارد، درصد بذرهای شکسته، درصد بذرهای با پوسته ترک‌خورده و هدایت الکتریکی بودند. نتـایج نشان داد رقم ویلیامز از درصد گیاهچه‌های عادی پس از آزمون پیری تسریع شده و شاخص وزنی بنیه گیاهچه پس از آزمون جوانه‌زنی استاندارد بیشتر و درصد بذرهای با پوسته ترک‌خورده کمتری برخوردار بود. همچنین کمترین درصد گیاهچه‌های عادی در آزمون جوانه‌زنی استاندارد، درصد گیاهچه‌های عادی پس از آزمون پیری تسریع شده و شاخص وزنی بنیه گیاهچه پس از آزمون جوانه‌زنی استاندارد و بیشترین درصد بذرهای شکسته، درصد بذرهای با پوسته ترک خورده و هدایت الکترکی پس از مراحل خشک‌کردن و انبارداری مشاهده شدند. براساس نتایج این تحقیق بذرهای رقم ویلیامز از توانائی حفظ قابلیت جوانه‌زنی و بنیه بیشتری در خلال مراحل فرآیند پس از برداشت نسبت به رقم صبا(L17) برخوردار بود. همچنین کاهش قابلیت جوانه‌زنی و بنیه بذر پس از مراحل خشک‌کردن و انبارداری نامناسب بودن فرآیند خشک‌کردن بذرها را مشخص کرد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| خشک کردن؛ بوجاری؛ انبارداری؛ پیری تسریع شده؛ هدایت الکتریکی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Study on effect of postharvest process on soybean two commercial cultivars Williams and Saba (L17) seed quality in Moghan region | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| A. Hamidi1؛ Hossein Sadeghi2؛ Hamidreza Gazor3؛ Saman Sheidaei4؛ Bita Oskouei2؛ Hassan Mivechi5؛ Mohammad Nouri5؛ Shapour Alizadeh5؛ Saber Seifamiri6؛ Leila Zare5؛ Azam Dashti5 | ||
| 1SPCRI | ||
| 2Faculty member of SPCRI | ||
| 3Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Karaj | ||
| 4Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 5Agriculture, Research, Education and Extension Organization(AREEO), Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute(SPCRI), Karaj, Nabovat Blvd., Collection St., Po. Box.:31535-1516 | ||
| 6Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Ardabil province Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education center (Moghan) | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This research in order to study on post-harvest process effect on 2 soybean commercial Williams and Saba (L17) in Moghan region was conducted as a 2×5, two cultivars× 5 post-harvest process stages including after harvest, after drying, after cleaning after packing and stacking and storage, factorial experiment based on completely randomized design by 3 replications. Studied traits were normal seedlings percent in standard germination test and after accelerated ageing test, seedling weight vigour index after standard germination test, broken seeds percent, cracked coat seeds percent and electrical conductivity. Results revealed Williams cultivar had more normal seedlings percent after accelerated ageing test and seedling weight vigour index after standard germination test and less cracked coat seeds percent. Also the least normal seedlings percent in standard germination test, normal seedlings percent after accelerated ageing test and seedling weight vigour index after standard germination test and the most broken seeds percent, cracked coat seeds percent and electrical conductivity investigated. Based on this research results Williams cultivar seeds had more germination ability and vigour preservation potential during post-harvest process stages than Saba (L17) cultivar. Also germination ability and vigour decrease after drying and storage stages revealed seed drying unsuitability. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| drying, cleaning, storage, accelerated ageing test, electrical conductivity | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdul – Baki, A. A., and J. D. Anderson. 1973. Vigor determination in soybean by multiple criteria. Crop Sci. 13:630-633. Afrakhteh, S., E. Frahmandfar, A. Hamidi, and H. Darzi Ramandi. 2013. Evaluation of Growth Characteristics and Seedling Vigor in Two Cultivars of Soybean dried under different Temperature and Fluidized bed dryer. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences (IJACS). 5 (21): 2537-2544. Alvarez, P.J.C., F.C. Krzyzanowski, J.M.G. Mandarino, and J.B. Franca Neto. 1997. Relationship between soybean seed coat lignin content and resistance to mechanical damage. Seed Sci. Technol. 25: 209-214. Ardabil Province Meteorology Office. 2016. Long term Ardabil province weather almanac. Ardabil province meteorology office scientific gazette. (In Persian) Askari Dermanaki, V., A., Hamidi, G. Tohidloo, and H.R. Gazor. 2013. Effect of fluidized-bed drying method on seed vigor of two Soybean cultivars by cold test. Iranian J. Seed Sci. Technol. 2(2): 219-228. (In Persian, with English Abstract) Baryeh E.A. 2002. A simple grain impact damage assessment device for developing countries. J. Food Eng. 56: 37–42. Berglund, D.R. 2002. Soybean Production Field Guide for North Dakota and Northwestern Minnesota NDSU Extension Service North Dakota Soybean Council Minnesota Soybean Research and Promotion Council. Divsalar, M., B. Oskouei, and SH. Hashemi. 2012. Assessment of mechanical damage effect in processing on soybean seed germination. Iranian J. Seed Sci. Technol. 1(1): 57-63. (In Persian, with English Abstract) Evans M.D., R.G. Holmes, and M.B. McDonald. 1990. Impact damage to soybean seed as affected by surface hardness and seed orientation. Trans. ASAE. 33:234-240. FAO. 2018. World Food and Agriculture Statistical Pocketbook 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. França Neto, J.B., and A.A. Henning. 1984. Qualidades fisiológica e sanitária de sementes de soja. (Physiological and pathological qualities of soybean seed. EMBRAPA – National Soybean Research Centre. Circular Técnica, 09, 39 p. Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. França Neto, J.B., F.C. Krzyzanowski, and A.A. Henning. 2010. The Importance of Using High Quality Soybeans. Informativo Abrates. 20(1-2): 37-38. Gazor, H.R., A. Javadi, A. Vahedi, M. Younesi, and A. Hamidi. 2017a. Digestion of seed lost in wheat seed processing systems. Iranian J. Seed Sci. Res. 4(1): 113-121(In Persian, with English Abstract) Gazor, H.R., A. Hamidi, and R. Adelzade. 2017b. Study of physical losses in corn seed processing in Moghan. Iranian J. Seed Sci. Technol. 6(1): 131-149. (In Persian, with English Abstract) Gregg, B., and G. Billups. 2010. Seed conditioning (vol. 3) crop seed conditioning. CRC Press. Hamidi, A. 2018. Principles and practices of seed technology (vol. 1). Iran University Press. (In Persian) Hampton, J.G., and D.M. TeKrony. 1996. Handbook of vigour test methods. International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). Zurich, Switzerland. Herbek, J.H., and M.J. Bitzer. 2001. Soybean production in Kentucky PART II: Seed Selection, Variety Selection and Fertilization Issued: 1-88 .Agr-129 .University of Kentucky Pub. Don, R., and S. Ducournau. 2018. ISTA Handbook on Seedling Evaluation Fourth Edition 2018International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). Zurich, Switzerland. International Seed Testing Aassociation. 2020. International rules for seed testing. International Seed Testing Association (ISTA), Zurich, Switzerland. Kachru, R.P., R.K. Gupta, and A. Alam. 1994. Physico-chemical constituents and engineering properties of food crops. Scientific Publishers, India. Keng Feng Chen, S. H., S.T.C. Lai, and S. Shanmugasundaram. 1991. Vegetable Soybean Seed Production Technology in Taiwan. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center. P.O. BOX 42, Shanhua, Tainan 74199, Taiwan. Khazaei J., F. Shahbazi, J. Massah, M. Nikravesh, and M.H. Kianmehr. 2008. Evaluation and modeling of physical and physiological damage to Wheat seeds under successive impact loading: mathematical and neural networks modeling. Crop Sci. 48: 1532- 1544. Krittigamas, N.S., S.T. Vearasilp, S. Suriyong, S. Paoblek, and E. Pawelzik. 2001. Investigation of Post-harvest Soybean Seed Storability after Passing the Different Steps of Processing. Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development. Deutscher Tropentag - Bonn, 9-11 October 2001. McDonald, M.B. 1999. Seed deterioration: Physiology, repair and assessment. Seed S. Technol. 27(1):177-237. McNeal, X. 1966. Conditioning and Storage of Soybeans. Bulletin 714. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas. Mehravar, M., A. Satei, A. Hamidi, M. Ahmadi, and M. Salehi. 2014. Accelerated ageing effect on lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes activity of two soybean cultivars. Iranian J. Seed Sci. Technol. 3(1): 17-30. (In Persian, with English Abstract) Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture. 2019. Agriculture statistics, first volume-horticultural and field crops. 2013-14 crop year. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Programming and economics deputy, Statistics and Information Technology Office. (In Persian). Mirshekarnezhad, B., H. Sadeghi, F. Paknezhad, S. Sheidaie and H. Gholami, 2014. Effect of Cultivars and Processing Stages on Soybean Seed Quality. Ann. Res. Rev. Biol. 4(18): 2795-2803. Ortiz-Ribbing., L. 2008. Addressing Seed Treatment Questions and Soybean Germination. The University of Illinois Extension Ag Advice Printed, U.S. Palusen M.R., W.R. Nave, T.L. Mounts, and L.E. Gray. 1981. Storability of harvest-damaged soybeans. Trans. ASAE. 24(6): 1583-1589. Paulsen M.R. 1978. Fracture resistance of soybeans to compressive loading. Trans. A.S.A.E. 21(6): 1210-1216. Powell A.A. 1988. Seed vigor and field establishment. Advanced Res. Technol. Seeds. 11: 29-80. Quiroga, M., C. Guerrero, M.A. Botella, A. Barceló, I. Amaya, M.I. Medina, F.J. Alonso, S.M. Forchetti, H. Tigier, and V. Valpuesta. 2000. A tomato peroxidase involved in the synthesis of lignin and suberin. Plant Physiol. 122: 1119-1127. Rahman, M.M., J.G., Hampton, and M.J. Hill. 2004. Effect of seed moisture content following hand harvest and machine threshing on seed quality of cool tolerant soybean. Seed Sci. Technol. 32(10): 149-158. Sadeghi, H., H., Heidari Sharif Abad, A. Hamidi, G. Nour Mohammadi, and H. Madani. 2014a. Effect of planting management on soybean agronomic traits. Int. J. Biosciences (IJB). 4(5): 85-91. Sadeghi, H., H., Heidari Sharif Abad, A. Hamidi, G. Nour Mohammadi and H. Madani. 2014b. Influence of canopy temperature during soybean seed filling on seed germination and vigor. Int. J. Biosciences (IJB). 5(9): 174-180. Sadeghi, H., B. Mirshekarnejad, S. Sheidaei, and B. Oskouei. 2014c. Evaluation of germination traits and mechanical damage to soybean seed during processing, under standard germination, electrical conductivity and accelerated aging tests. Agric. Crop Manage. (J. Agric.). 15(3): 187-199. (In Persian) Sadeghi, H., H. Heidari Sharif Abad, A. Hamidi, G. Nour Mohammadi, and H. Madani. 2016. Effect of Harvesting Time and Drying Temperature on Soybean Seed Quality. Iranian J. Seed Res. 2(2): 85-97. (In Persian) Schoorl, D., and J.E. Holt 1983. Mechanical Damage in Agricultural Products: A Basis for Management. Agric. Systems. 11: 143-157. Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute. 2012. Iran plant varieties national list (1st. vol. Agricultural crops).Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Agricultural Research Education and Extensions Organization (AREEO), Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute (SPCRI). (In Persian) Sheidaei, S., H. Heidari Sharifabad, A. Hamidi, G. Nourmohammadi, and A. Moghaddam. 2014. Evaluation of soybean seed quality under long term storage. Int. J. Biosci. (IJB). 5(3): 214-219. Sheidaei, S., H. Heidari Sharif Abad, A. Hamidi, G. Nour Mohammadi, and A. Moghaddam. 2016. Effect of Storage Condition, Initial Seed Moisture Content and Germination on Soybean Seed Deterioration. Iranian J. Seed Res. 2(2): -31-45. (In Persian, with English Abstract) Sosnowski S., and P. Kuzniar. 1999. Effect of dynamic loading on the quality of soybean. Int. Agrophysics. 13:125-132. Stephens, L.E., and G.H. Foster. 1977. Reducing damage to corn handled through gravity spouts. Trans. A.S.A.E. 20(2): 367-371. TeKrony, D. M., D.B. Egli, and G.M. White. 1987. Seed production and technology. In: J. R. Wilcox (ed). Soybeans: improvement, production and uses (2nd. Ed.). Agronomy Monograph, no. 16, ASA-CSSA-SSSA, 677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711. USA. Vearasilpa, S., S. Pa-oblekb, N. Krittigamasa, S. Thanapornpoonponga, S. Suriyonga, and E. Pawelzikc. 2001. Assessment of post-harvest soybean seed quality loss. Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development Institute for Agricultural Chemistry, Georg-August University, Göttingen, 37075 Germany. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 220 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 312 |
||