آمار

تعداد نشریات277
تعداد نشریات سازمان76
تعداد شماره‌ها1,998
تعداد مقالات22,951
تعداد مشاهده مقاله12,269,751
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله9,940,697
قرنجیکی, عبدالرضا, دردی پور, اسماعیل, عالیشاه, عمران, قادری فر, فرشید. (1397). غربالگری ژنوتیپ‎ های پنبه از نظر کارایی و پاسخ به پتاسیم با استفاده از تجزیه خوشه‎ ای. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 6(1), 95-114. doi: 10.22092/IJCR.2018.117934
عبدالرضا قرنجیکی; اسماعیل دردی پور; عمران عالیشاه; فرشید قادری فر. "غربالگری ژنوتیپ‎ های پنبه از نظر کارایی و پاسخ به پتاسیم با استفاده از تجزیه خوشه‎ ای". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 6, 1, 1397, 95-114. doi: 10.22092/IJCR.2018.117934
قرنجیکی, عبدالرضا, دردی پور, اسماعیل, عالیشاه, عمران, قادری فر, فرشید. (1397). 'غربالگری ژنوتیپ‎ های پنبه از نظر کارایی و پاسخ به پتاسیم با استفاده از تجزیه خوشه‎ ای', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 6(1), pp. 95-114. doi: 10.22092/IJCR.2018.117934
قرنجیکی, عبدالرضا, دردی پور, اسماعیل, عالیشاه, عمران, قادری فر, فرشید. غربالگری ژنوتیپ‎ های پنبه از نظر کارایی و پاسخ به پتاسیم با استفاده از تجزیه خوشه‎ ای. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1397; 6(1): 95-114. doi: 10.22092/IJCR.2018.117934

غربالگری ژنوتیپ‎ های پنبه از نظر کارایی و پاسخ به پتاسیم با استفاده از تجزیه خوشه‎ ای

پژوهش های پنبه ایران
مقاله 7، دوره 6، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 11، بهار و تابستان 1397، صفحه 95-114  XML اصل مقاله (341.36 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/IJCR.2018.117934
نویسندگان
عبدالرضا قرنجیکی1؛ اسماعیل دردی پور email 2؛ عمران عالیشاه3؛ فرشید قادری فر4
1دانشجوی دکتری گروه علوم خاک دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان
2دانشیار گروه علوم خاک دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان
3دانشیار موسسه تحقیقات پنبه کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان
4دانشیار گروه زراعت دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان
چکیده
بعضی از ژنوتیپ‎های پنبه، توانایی بیشتری در جذب پتاسیم از محیط رشد خود دارند و در پاسخ به مصرف کود پتاسیم نیز متفاوتند. شناسایی این ژنوتیپ‎ها،راهبرد بسیار موثری برای تولید بهینه پنبه در خاک‎های دچار کمبود پتاسیم و مصرف بهینه کود پتاسیم می‎باشد. در این تحقیق، در شرایط کمبود و کفایت پتاسیم در محیط کشت هیدروپونیک، کارایی استفاده و پاسخ به پتاسیم 25 ژنوتیپ مختلف پنبه، با استفاده از تجزیه‎ خوشه‎ای مورد مقایسه و گروه‎بندی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان دادکه کمبود پتاسیم منجر به کاهش معنی‎دار وزن خشک ریشه و اندام‎های هوایی ژنوتیپ‌های پنبه شد. همچنین با تامین پتاسیم کافی برای گیاه، غلظت و جذب آن نیز در ریشه و اندام‎های هوایی پنبه افزایش یافت. تجزیه خوشه‎ای، ژنوتیپ‎های پنبه را از نظر کارایی استفاده پتاسیم (شرایط کمبود) به چهار گروه غیر کارا، نسبتاً کارا، کارا و بسیار کارا تقسیم نمود که در آن،ژنوتیپ‎های SKT133، سپید و مهر در خوشه کارا و ژنوتیپ‎های شایان، N2G80، گلستان و ساجدی در خوشه بسیار کارا قرار گرفتند.سایر ژنوتیپ‎ها در گروه غیر کارا یا نسبتاً کارا بودند. همچنین، در پاسخ به مصرف پتاسیم (شرایط کفایت) ژنوتیپ‎های پنبه به چهار خوشه غیر پاسخ‎ده، کم پاسخ‎ده، نسبتاً پاسخ‎ده و پاسخ‎ده گروه‌بندی شدند.بر این اساس، ژنوتیپ‎های ساحل، M13، ساجدی، تابلادیلا و لطیف به عنوان ژنوتیپ‎های پاسخ‎ده شناسایی شدند. ژنوتیپ ساجدی که هم بسیار کارا و هم پاسخ‎ده به پتاسیم بود، بنابراین، برای استفاده در هر وضعیتی از پتاسیم قابل جذب خاک (کمبود یا کفایت)، توصیه می‎شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تجزیه خوشه ‎ای؛ پنبه؛ تنوع ژنتیکی؛ کارایی پتاسیم
عنوان مقاله [English]
Screening of cotton genotypes for potassium use and response efficiencies throughcluster analysis
نویسندگان [English]
Abdoreza Gharanjiki1؛ Esmaeil Dordipour2؛ Omran Alishah3؛ Farshid Ghaderifar4
1Ph.D. student, Soil Sci. Dept., Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan
2Associate Prof., Soil Sci. Dept., Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan
3Associate Prof., Cotton Research Institute of Iran, AREEO, Gorgan, Iran
4Associate Prof., Agronomy Dept., Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan
چکیده [English]
Some cotton genotypes take up potassium more potentially from the growth media and they are also different in response to K fertilizer application. Identification of these genotypes represents a very effective strategy for best cotton production in K deficient soils and optimum K fertilizer application. A hydroponically experiment was carried out to compare and rank 25 cotton genotypes through cluster analysis for K use and response efficiencies in deficient and sufficient K conditions. The results showed that potassium deficiency resulted in significant decrease in root and shoot dry weights of cotton genotypes. Also, by supplying sufficient potassium for the plant, its concentration and uptake increased in the root and shoots of cotton. Cluster analysis categorized cotton genotypes into four non-efficient, moderately efficient, efficient and highly efficient groups in terms of potassium use efficiency (deficiency conditions), in which the SKT133, Sepid and Mehr genotypes were stood in efficient cluster and Shayan, N2G80, Golestan and Sajjadi genotypes were found in the highly efficient cluster. Other genotypes were in non-efficient or moderately efficient groups. Also, in response to potassium application (sufficiency conditions), cotton genotypes were classified into four non-responsive, low responsive, moderately responsive, and responsive clusters. Accordingly, the genotypes of the Sahel, M13, Sajjadi, Tabladilla and Latif were identified as responsive genotypes. Sajid genotype, which is both highly efficient and responsive to potassium, is therefore recommended for use in any state of available soil potassium (deficiency or sufficiency).
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Cluster analysis, Cotton, Genetic variation, Potassium efficiency
مراجع
  1. Aamer M., Sabir M.F., and Sadiq M.A. 2014. Exploiting genotypic variability among cotton cultivars for potassium use efficiency. Dev. Country Stud., 4: 7-12.
  2. Abaidoo, R., Dare, M.O., Killani, S., and and Opoku, A. 2017. Evaluation of early maturing cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) germplasm for variation in phosphorus use efficiency and biological nitrogen fixation potential with indigenous rhizobial populations. J. Agric. Sci. 155: 102-116.
  3. Ahmad, Z., Gill, M.A., Qureshi, R.H., Hamud-ur-rehman, and Mahmood, T. 2001. Phosphorus nutrition of cotton cultivars under deficient and adequate levels in solution culture. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 32: 171–187.
  4. Baligar, V.C., and Fageria, N.K. Nutrient use efficiency in plants: An overview. 2015. pp. 1-14. In: A. Rakshit et al. (eds.), Nutrient use efficiency: From basics to advances. Springer, New Delhi, India.
  5. Cassman, K.G., Roberts, B.A., Kerby, T.A., Bryant, D.C., and Higashi S.L. 1989.Soil potassium balance and cumulative cotton response to annual potassium additions on a vemiculitic soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53: 805 – 812.
  6. Chachar K.M., Chachar Q.I., Chachar N.A., Chachar S.D., and Chachar M.H. 2015.Genotypic variation for potassium uptake and utilization efficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivumL.). J. Agric. Tech. 11: 839-853.
  7. Chen, J., and Gabelman, W.H. 1999. Potassium-transport rate from root to shoot unrelated to potassium-use efficiency in tomato grown under low-potassium stress.J. Plant Nutr. 22:621-631.
  8. Chen, Y., Wen, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, X., and Chen, D. 2014. Cotton potassium uptake and use efficiency vary with potassium application rates and soil potassium nutrition levels. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment. 12. 221-227.
  9. Clement-Bailey, J., and Gwathmey, C.O. 2007. Potassium effects on partitioning, yield, and earliness of contrasting cotton cultivars. Agron. J. 99, 1130-1136.

10. Cope, J.T. 1981. Effects of 50 years of fertilization with phosphorus and potassium on soil test levels and yields at six locations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45: 342-347.

11. Damon, P.M., and Rengel, Z. 2007. Wheat genotypes differ in potassium efficiency under glasshouse and field conditions. Aus. J. Agric. Res. 58: 816-825.

12. Damon, P.M., Osborne, L.D, and Rengel, Z. 2007. Canola genotypes differ in potassium efficiency during vegetative growth. Euphytica. 156: 387-397.

13. Da Silva, A.E., and Gabelman, W.A. 1992. Screening maize inbred lines for tolerance to low-P stress conditions. Plant Soil 146: 181–187.

14. Do Sacramento, L.V.S., and Rosolem C.A. 1997. Efficiency of K utilization by soybean cultivars. pp. 167-168. In: T. Ando et al. (eds.) Plant nutrition for sustainable food production and environment. Developments in plant and soil sciences, vol. 78. Springer, Dordrecht

15. Fageria, N.K., and Baligar, V.C. 1999. Phosphorus-use efficiency in wheat genotypes. J. Plant Nutr. 22: 331-340.

16. Fageria, N.K., and Baligar, V.C. 2003. Methodology for evaluation of lowland rice genotypes for nitrogen use efficiency. J. Plant Nutr. 26:1315-1333.

17. Fageria, N.K., and Melo, L.C. 2014. Agronomic evaluation of dry bean genotypes for potassium use efficiency. J. Plant Nutr. 37: 1899-1912.

18. Fageria, N.K., Baligar, V.C., and Jones, C.A. 2011.Growth and mineral nutrition of field crop.3nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.560 pp.

19. Fageria, N.K., Filho, M.P.B., and Da Costa, J.G.C. 2001. Potassium use-efficiency in common bean genotypes. J. Plant Nutr. 24:1937-1945.

20. Fageria, N.K., Filho, M.P.B., and Moreira, A. 2008. Screening upland rice genotypes for manganese-use efficiency. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Analys. 39:2873-2882.

21. Fageria, N.K., Knupp, A.M., and Moraes, M.F. 2013.Phosphorus nutrition of lowland rice in tropical lowland soil, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Analys, 44:20, 2932-2940,

22. Fageria, N.K., Melo, L.C., and Knupp, A.M. 2015. Dry bean genotype evaluation for potassium-use efficiency.Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Analys. 46:1061-1075.

23. Gill, H., Singh, A., Sethi, S., and Behl, R. 2004. Phosphorus uptake and use efficiency in different varieties of bread wheat ( Triticum Aestivum L.). Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 50: 563-572.

24. Gyan Ansah, S., Adu-Dapaah, H., Kumaga, F., Gracen, V., and Nartey, F.K. 2016. Evaluation of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) genotypes for phosphorus use efficiency. Acta Hortic.1127: 373-380.

25. Habibpour gatabi, K., and Safari shali, R. 2009. Comprehensive manual for using SPSS in survey researches. Louye publishing, Tehran, Iran, 862 P.

26. Halevy, J. 1976. Growth rate and nutrient uptake of two cotton cultivars grown under irrigation.Agron. J. 68:701-705.

27. Heffer, P., and Prud’homme, M. 2016.  Fertilizer Outlook 2016-2020. 84th IFA annual conference, 30 May-1 June, Moscow, Russia.

28. Hua, H.B., Li, Z.H., and Tian, X.L. 2009. Mechanism of tolerance to potassium deficiency between Liaomian 18 and NuCOTN99B at seedling stage. Acta Agron. Sin. 35:475-482.

29. Jiang, C.C., Chen, F., Gao, X.Z., Lu, J.W., Wan, K.Y., Nian, F.Z., Wang, Y.H. 2008. Study on the nutrition characteristics of different K use efficiency cotton genotypes to k deficiency stress. Agric. Sci. China. 7(6): 740-745.

30. Jiang, C.C., Hao, Y.S., Wang, X.L., Wang, D., and Lei, J. 2013. Effect of K on dry matter accumulation and distribution and changes of root-zone K in different cotton genotypes. J. Food Agric. Environ. 11:604-608.

31. Johnson, C.M., Stout, P.R., Broyer, T.C., and Carlton, A.B. 1957. Comparative chlorine requirements of different plant species. Plant Soil 8:337-353.

32. Jones, J.B., and Case, V.W. 1990. Sampling, handling, and analyzing plant tissue samples. Pp. 389-427. In: R.L. Westerman (ed.), Soil testing and plant analysis. SSSA, Madison, WI, USA. 

33. Kerby, T.A., and Adams, F. 1985.Potassium nutrition of cotton.Pp. 843- 860.In: R. D. Munson (ed.) potassium in agriculture. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.

34. Khavazi, K., Balali, M.R., Bazargan, K., Tehrani, M.M., Rezaee, H., Asadi Rahmani, H., Gheibi, M.N., Davoodi, M.H., Saadat, S., Moshiri, F., and Davatgar, N. 2014. Comprehensive soil fertility and plant nutrition program 2014-2025, Vol I. Soil and Water Research Institute Press, Tehran, Iran (in persian).

35. Krishnasamy, K., Bell, R.W., and Ma, Q. 2014. Wheat responses to sodium vary with potassium use efficiency of cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 5: 1-10.

36. Kuzmanova, L., Kostadinova, S., and Ganusheva, N. 2014. Efficiency of potassium in barley genotypes.Turk. J. Agric. Nat. Sci. Spec. Is.1: 584-589.

37. Lokhande, S., and Reddy, K.R. 2015.Reproductive performance and fiber quality responses of cotton to potassium nutrition. Am. J. Plant Sci. 6: 911-924.

38. López, M., El-Dahan, M.A.A., and Leidi, E.O. 2008.Genotypic variation in potassium uptake in dryland cotton. J. Plant Nut. 31: 1947-1962.

39. Makhdum, M.I., Pervez, H., and Ashraf, M. 2007. Dry matter accumulation and partitioning in cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) as influenced by potassium fertilization. Biol. Fert. Soils 43: 295-301.

40. Marcante, N.C., Takashi, M., Pereira, B.I., and Antonio, C.M. 2016.Phosphorus uptake and use efficiency of different cotton cultivars in savannah soil (Acrisol). Acta Sci. Agron. 38(2): 239-247.

41. Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants.2nd ed. Academic press London, UK.889 pp.

42. Mengel, K., and Kirkby, E.A. 2001. Principles of plant nutrition. 5th ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. 849 pp.

43. Moreira, A., Moraes, L.A.C., and Fageria, N.K. 2015.Variability on yield, nutritional status, soil fertility, and potassium-use efficiency by soybean cultivar in acidic soil.Commun.Soil Sci. Plant Analys. 46(19): 2490-2508.

44. Mulins, G.L., and Burmester, C.H. 2010. Relation of growth and development to mineral nutrition. Pp. 97-105. In: J.M. Stewart et al. (eds.). Physiology of cotton.Springer publications, N.Y. USA.

45. Mundim, G.B., and Viana, J.M.S. 2013. Genetic diversity and path analysis for nitrogen use efficiency in popcorn inbred lines. Euphytica 191:291-299.

46. Oosterhuis, D.M., Loka, D.A. and Raper, T.B. 2013. Potassium and stress alleviation: Physiological functions and management of cotton. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 176: 331-343.

47. Pan, X.W., Li, W.B., Zhang, Q.Y., Li, Y.H. and Liu, M.S. 2008. Assessmenton phosphorus efficiency characteristics of soybean genotypes in phosphorus-deficient soils. Agric. Sci. in China 7: 958-969.

48. Pettigrew, W.T. 1999. Potassium deficiency increase specific leaf weight sand leaf glucose levels in field-grown cotton. Agron. J. 91: 962-968.

49. Pettigrew, W.T. 2003. Relationships between insufficient potassium and crop maturity in cotton.Agron. J. 95: 1323-1329.

50. Pettigrew, W.T. 2008. Potassium influences on yield and quality production for maize, wheat, soybean and cotton. Physiol. Plant. 133: 670-681.

51. Pettigrew, W.T., Heitholt, J.J. and Meredith, Jr W.R. 1996.Genotypic interactions with potassium and nitrogen in cotton of varied maturity.Agron. J. 88: 89-93. 

52. Reich, M., Aghajanzadeh, T., De Kok, L.J. 2014.Physiological basis of plant nutrient use efficiency - concepts, opportunities and challenges for its improvement. Pp. 1-27. In: M.J. Hawkesford et al. (eds.), Nutrient use efficiency in Plants. Springer.

53. Rengel, Z., and Damon, P.M. 2008. Crops and genotypes differ in efficiency of potassium uptake and use. Physiol. Plan. 133: 624-636.

54. Rengel, Z., and Graham, R.D. 1995. Wheat genotypes differ in Zn efficiency when grown in the chelate-buffered nutrient solution. I. Growth. Plant and Soil 176, 307-316.

55. Rengel, Z., and Marschner, P. 2005. Nutrient availability and management in the rhizosphere: exploiting genotypic differences. New Phytol. 168: 305-312.

56. Saykhula, A., Chatzistathisa, T., Chatzissavvdisb, C., Koundourasc, S., Theriosa, I., and Dimassi, K. 2013.Potassium utilization efficiency of three olive cultivars grown in a hydroponic system. Sci. Hort. 162: 55-62. 

57. Shah, J.A., Zia-ul-hassan, Rajpar, I., and Sial, M.A. 2014.Evaluating boron-use-efficiency of twenty cotton genotypes of Pakistan.Pak. J. Agri. Agril. Engg. Vet. Sci. 30:147-158.

58. Stewart, M., and Morgan, G.D. 2016. Impact of soil applied potassium on cotton yield and profitability. Better crops 100(3): 19-22.

59. Tupper, G.R., Calhoun, D.S., and Ebelhar, M.W. 1996. Sensitivity of early-maturing varieties to potassium deficiency. Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference, 9-12 Jan. National Cotton Council of America: Nashville, TN. pp. 625-628.

60. Wang, L., and Chen, F. 2012. Genotypic variation of potassium uptake and use efficiency in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 175: 303-308.

61. Wang, Y., and Wu, W.H. 2015. Genetic approaches for improvement of the crop potassium acquisition and utilization efficiency. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 25: 46-52.

62. White, P.J., Hammond, J.P., King, G.J., Bowen, H.C., Hayden, R.M., Meacham, M.C, Spracklen, W.P., and Broadley, M.R. 2010. Genetic analysis of potassium use efficiency in Brassica oleracea. Ann. Bot. 105: 1199-1210.

63. Wu, J. Zhang, X., Li, T., Yu, H., and Huang P. 2011. Differences in the efficiency of potassium (K) uptake and use in barley varieties. Agric. Sci. Chin. 10(1): 101-108.

64. Yang, F., Wang, G., Zhang, Z., Eneji, A.E., Duan, L., Li, Z., and Tian, X. 2011. Genotypic variations in potassium uptake and utilization in cotton. J. Plant Nutr. 34: 83-97.

65. Yang, X.E., Liu, J.X., Wang, W.M., Ye, Z.Q. and Luo, A.C. 2004.Potassium internal use efficiency relative to growth vigor, potassium distribution, and carbohydrate allocation in rice genotypes. J. Plant Nutr. 27: 837-852.

66. Zhang, Z., Tian, X., Duan, L., Wang, B., He, Z., and Li Z. 2007. Differential responses of conventional and Bt-transgenic cotton to potassium deficiency. J. Plant Nutr. 30: 659-670.

67. Zia-ul-hassan, Arshad, M., and Khalid, A. 2011. Evaluating potassium-use-efficient cotton genotypes using different ranking methods. J. Plant Nutr. 34:1957-1972.

68. Zia-ul-Hassan, Kubar, K.A., Rajpar, I., Shah, A.N., Tunio, S.D., Shah, J.A., and Maitlo, A.A. 2014. Evaluating potassium-use-efficient of five cotton genotypes of Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 46:1237-1242.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 29
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 15


Contact Us | Help & Support | Site Map
counter

Journal Management System. Designed by sinaweb.