Nikkami, D. (2020). Sampling accuracy of runoff and sediment from erosion plot tanks using bucket. , 12(3), 635-642. doi: 10.22092/ijwmse.2019.125700.1630
Davoud Nikkami. "Sampling accuracy of runoff and sediment from erosion plot tanks using bucket". , 12, 3, 2020, 635-642. doi: 10.22092/ijwmse.2019.125700.1630
Nikkami, D. (2020). 'Sampling accuracy of runoff and sediment from erosion plot tanks using bucket', , 12(3), pp. 635-642. doi: 10.22092/ijwmse.2019.125700.1630
Nikkami, D. Sampling accuracy of runoff and sediment from erosion plot tanks using bucket. , 2020; 12(3): 635-642. doi: 10.22092/ijwmse.2019.125700.1630

Sampling accuracy of runoff and sediment from erosion plot tanks using bucket

مهندسی و مدیریت آبخیز
Article 3, Volume 12, Issue 3, September 2020, Pages 635-642    PDF (800.84 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22092/ijwmse.2019.125700.1630
Author
Davoud Nikkami*
Professor, Soil and Water Conservation Research Institute, Agricultural Research and Training Organization, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Using erosion plots is a way to research on soil erosion and conservation that with different dimensions, which are constructed in the natural arenas or in laboratories. Mistakes and false conclusions are common task that should be avoided when sampling runoff and sediment from the tanks of these plots. A few researches have been done on the ways of sampling from these tanks and reducing the errors. In this study, the accuracy of sampling was investigated by placing a bucket in the tank and using bottle sampling. For this purpose, two 220 liter tanks were used. In the first tank located at the upper level, concentrations of sediment were prepared for five, 10 and 20 grL-1 and the mixture of runoff and sediment was transferred to the second tank. Coarse particles were trapped by a bucket of twenty liters placed underneath the importer tube in the second tank. The contents of the bucket were weighed in the laboratory after drying. Also, sampling of the second tank contents was carried out after mixing the solution and using one-liter bottles in three replications per each concentration. Sampling was also done without placing the bucket as a witness. The significance of the effect of concentrations on the error value was defined by analysis of variance through a random block design scheme. Results demonstrated that there was a significant difference between the concentrations obtained in the experiment with bucket and without bucket at a level of one percent. Without using bucket, the amount of errors were 63.13, 78.40 and 73.97 percent for 5, 10 and 20 gr.L-1 concentrations, respectively and with using bucket they were 15.90, 15.07 and 4.83 percent. The mean errors in all concentrations were 71.83 and 11.93 percent without and with using buckets, respectively.
Keywords
Bottle sampling; Sampling error; Sediment concentration; Soil erosion; Traping coarse particles
References
  1. Cerdà, A., A. Giménez-Morera and M.B. Bodí. 2009. Soil and water losses from new citrus orchards growing on sloped soils in the western Mediterranean basin. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34(13): 1822–1830.
  2. Flanagan, D.C., C. Huang, L.D. Norton and S.C. Parker. 1995. Laser scanner for erosion plot measurements. Transactions of the ASAE, 38(3): 703-710.
  3. Govers, G. and J. Poesen. 1988. Assessment of the interrill and rill contributions to total soil loss from an upland field plot. Geomorphology, 1(4): 343-354.
  4. Hudson, N. 1995. Soil conservation. Third Edition, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. 392 pages.
  5. Kreyszig, E. 1993. Advanced engineering mathematics. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Toronto, Canada, 267 pages.
  6. Lang, R.D. 1992. Accuracy of two sampling methods used to estimate sediment concentrations in runoff from soil-loss plots. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 17(8): 841-844.
  7. Matin, M., H. Ebrahimian and T. Akhbari. 2003. Measuring soil erosion and runoff in rainfed and abandoned Final Report of Research Project, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, Tehran, Iran, 54 pages (In Percian).
  8. Mutchler, C.K., C.E. Murphree and K.C. McGregor. 1994. Laboratory and field plots for erosion research. In R. Lal (ed.), Soil Erosion Research Methods, 2nd ed., pp.11-37. Soil and Water Conservation Society, St. Lucie Press, Ankeny, IA.
  9. Nikkami, D., M. Arabkhedri, P. Razmjoo and M. Ahrar. 2004. Investigating sediment suspension and sampling accuracy in erosion plot tanks. Research Project Final Report, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, Tehran, Iran, 31 pages (In Percian).
  10. Nikkami, D., A. Jafari Ardakani, F. Bayat Movahed and P. Razmjoo. 2005. The effects of plough on soil erosion and determining land slope threshold for dry farming. Final Report of Research Project, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, Tehran, Iran, 49 pages (In Percian).
  11. Nikkami, D. 2012. Investigating sampling accuracy to estimate sediment concentrations in erosion plot tanks. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 36(5): 583-590.
  12. Poesen, J.W., D. Torri and K. Bunte. 1994. Effects of rock fragments on soil erosion by water at different spatial scales: A review. Catena, 23(1-2): 141-166.
  13. Przedwojski, B., R. Blazejewski and K.W. Pilarczyk. 1995. River training techniques, fundamentals, design and applications. Balkema, Rotterdam, 654 pages.
  14. Raeisian, R. and M. Asadi. 2002. Investigating the effect of changing vegetation cover and slope on sediment yield. Final Report of Research Project, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, Tehran, Iran, 54 pages (In Percian).
  15. Rickson, R.J. 1987. Small plot field studies of soil erodibility using a rainfall simulator. In Pla Sentis, I. (ed.), Soil conservation and productivity. Sociedad Venezolana de la Ciencia del Suolo, Maracay, 339-348.
  16. Sarreshtehdari, A., A.H. Charkhabi and A. Jafari Ardakani. 2004. Evaluating soil loss and its effect on forest soil fertility. Final Report of Research Project, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, Tehran, Iran, 58 pages (In Percian).
  17. Shafaei Bajestan, M. 1994. Sediment hydraulic. Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran, 556 pages (In Percian).
  18. Stroosnijder, L. 2005. Measurement of erosion: Is it possible? Catena, 64(2-3): 162-173.
  19. Święchowicz, J. 2002. Linkage of slope wash and sediment and solute export from a foothill catchment in the Carpathian Foothills of South Poland. Earth Surface Processes and Landform, 27/12: 1389-1413.
  20. Valentine, W.H. and M.J. Cook. 1979. Monitoring cut slope erosion by close range photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 45(6): 788-798.
  21. Wischmeier, W.H. and D.D. Smith. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation ‎ U.S.‎ Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Handbook, 58 Pages.
  22. Zobisch, M.A., P. Klingspor and A.R. Oduor. 1996. The accuracy of manual runoff and sediment sampling from erosion plots. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 51(3): 231-233.
Statistics
Article View: 442
PDF Download: 356


counter
Journal management system. designed by sinaweb