| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,846 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,300 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 41,386,936 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 18,562,132 |
ارزیابی خصوصیات رویشی و پومولوژیک و عملکرد میوه برخی از ارقام گلابی آسیایی در شرایط اقلیمی ارومیه | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 35، شماره 1، خرداد 1398، صفحه 73-94 اصل مقاله (1.08 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/spij.2019.125480.1088 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مشهید هناره* 1؛ قاسم حسنی2 | ||
| 1بخش تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان آذربایجان غربی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج | ||
| 2بخش تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان آذربایجان غربی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ارومیه، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| گلابی آسیایی (Rehd. Pyrus serotina) از نظر شکل، اندازه، رنگ، طعم، بافت و زمان رسیدن با گلابی اروپایی (Pyrus communis L.) تفاوت دارد. این تحقیق با هدف ارزیابی رشد و عملکرد هشت رقم گلابی آسیایی شامل KS6، KS7، KS8، KS9، KS10، KS12، KS13 و KS14 همراه با دو رقم شاهد شاه‌میوه و اسپادونا طی هشت سال باغی (1387 تا 1394) در شرایط اقلیمی ارومیه انجام شد. تجزیه واریانس مرکب داده‌ها نشان داد که ارقام گلابی از نظر صفات رویشی رشد سالانه شاخساره‌ها، ارتفاع درخت، قطر تنه و عرض گسترش تاج درخت و طول، عرض، وزن، سفتی بافت، اسید قابل تیتر کل، مواد جامد محلول کل و pH میوه، تعداد میوه در درخت، عملکرد میوه درخت و شاخص عملکرد بر سطح مقطع عرضی تنه تفاوت معنی‌دار (01/0 > p) وجود داشت. کمترین رشد رویشی برای رقم KS14 مشاهده شد. ارقام گلابی آسیایی نسبت به ارقام شاهد (گلابی اروپایی) از وزن میوه و مواد جامد محلول کل کمتر داشتند ولی از سفتی بافت میوه، تعداد میوه، عملکرد و شاخص عملکرد بر سطح مقطع عرضی تنه بیشتری برخوردار بودند. رقم شاهد شاه‌میوه با 37/3 کیلوگرم و رقم KS13 با 06/10 کیلوگرم میوه در درخت به ترتیب دارای کمترین و بیشترین میانگین عملکرد میوه در سه سال آخر بودند. بیشترین شاخص عملکرد بر سطح مقطع عرضی تنه مربوط به رقم KS13 بود. در میان ارقام گلابی آسیایی می‌توانKS7 وKS10 را بعنوان ارقام زودرس وKS13 ،KS14 را بعنوان ارقام متوسط‌رس با عملکرد میوه و بازارپسندی بهتر، جهت کشت در ارومیه و مناطق دارای شرایط اقلیمی مشابه توصیه کرد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| گلابی آسیایی؛ ارتفاع درخت؛ قطر تنه؛ کیفیت میوه؛ شاخص عملکرد | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of Vegeteative and Pomological Characteristics and Fruit Yield of Some Asian Pear Cultivars under Urmia Climatic Conditions | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mashhid Henareh1؛ Ghasem Hasani2 | ||
| 1Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, West Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Urmia, Iran | ||
| 2Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, West Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Urmia, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Asian pears (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) are different from European pears in shape, size, color, flavor, texture and ripening time of fruit. This research was conducted to study growth and fruit yield of eight Asian pear cultivars; KS6, KS7, KS8, KS9, KS10, KS12, KS13 and KS14 as well as cv. Shah Miveh and cv. Spadona as control cultivars in Kahriz field station, Urmia, Iran, from 2008 to 2015. Combined analysis of variance revealed significant differences (P≤0.01) among cultivars for vegetative characteristics including annual growth, tree height, trunk diameter and tree canopy, and fruit attributes; fruit length, diameter, weight, firmness, TSS, pH and TA, fruits number per tree, fruit yield per tree, and fruit yield per unit trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) index. The lowest vegetative growth was observed in KS14 cultivar. Asian cultivars had fruit weight and TSS less, and fruit firmness, fruit number per tree, fruit yield per tree and fruit yield per unit trunk cross-sectional area greater than control cultivars. Cv. Shah Miveh with 3.73 kg and KS13 with 10.06 kg had the lowest and the highest mean fruit yield per tree for last three years. The highest yield per unit trunk cross-sectional area index was observed in KS13. Among Asian pear cultivars; KS7, KS10, as early ripening, and KS13, KS13, as medium ripening with high fruit yield and marketability can be recommened for being grown in Urmia and other regions with similar climatic conditions. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Asian pear, tree height, trunk diameter, fruit quality, fruit yield index | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahi, H., Atashkar, D., and Alizadeh, A. 2012. Comparison of the dwarfing effects of two hawthorn and quince rootstocks on several commercial pear cultivars. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science 43 (1): 53-63 (in Persian).
Abdollahi, H. 2015. Pear (botany, cultivars, rootstocks). (2nd ed.). Education and Agricultural Extension Publications. Tehran, Iran, 188 pp. (in Persian).
Alizadeh, B., and Tarinejad, A. 2001. Application of MSTATC software in statistical analysis. Setodeh Publications. Tabriz, Iran. 260 pp. (in Persian).
Arzani, K. 2002. Introduction of some Asian pear cultivars (Pyrus pyrifolia) to Iran. Acta Horticulturae 596 (1): 287-290.
Arzani, K. 2004. The effect of European pear (Pyrus communis L.) and quince (Cydonia oblonga L.) seedling rootstocks on growth and performance of some Asian pear (Pyrus serotina Rhed) cultivars. Acta Horticulturae 658 (10): 93-97.
Arzani, K. 2005. Progress in the national Asian pear project: a study on the adaptation of some Asian pear (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) cultivars to Iranian environmental conditions. Acta Horticulturae 671 (27): 209-212.
Arzani, K. 2008. Introduction, propagation, quarantine evaluation and onset of some Asian pear cultivars (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) compatibility evaluation under Iran environmental conditions: Phase 1 introduction and propagation of germplasm. Final Report on the National Asian pear project at Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Project No. 4225 with the support of National Research Council of Iran (NRCI). 140 pp.
Arzani, K. 2014. Introduction, propagation, quarantine evaluation and onset of some Asian pear cultivars (Pyrus serotina Rhed.) compatibility evaluation under Iran environmental conditions: Phase 2 Compatibility evaluations under different set of environmental conditions. Final Report on the National Asian pear project at Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Project No. 84006 with the support of National Science Foundation Organization (INSF ORG) of Iran.
Arzani, K. 2019. Asian pear. pp. 329-345. In: de Fertias, S. T. and Pareek, S. (eds.) Postharvest physiological disorder on fruits and vegetables. Innovations in Postharvest Technology Series. CRC Press.
Arzani, K., and Mousavi, S. 2008. Chilling requirement of some Asian pear (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) cultivars grown under Tehran environmental conditions. Acta Horticulturae 800 (42): 339-342.
Arzani, K., and Khoshghalb, H. 2009. A study on growth and quality characteristics of budded Asian pear (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) cultivars on European pear (Pyrus communis L.) seedling rootstocks under Tehran environmental conditions. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science 40 (2): 9-18 (in Persian).
Barbosa, W., Pommer, C. V., Tombolato, A. F. C., Meletti, L. M. M., Veiga, R. F. A., Moura, M. F., and Pio, R. 2013. Asian pear tree breeding for subtropical areas of Brazil. Fruits 62 (1): 1-6.
Bieniasz, M., Necas, T., Dziedzic, E., Ondrasek, I., and Pawlowska, B. 2017. Evaluation of pollen quality and self-fertility in selected cultivars of Asian and European pears. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 45 (2): 375-382.
Chen, J., Wang, Z., Wu, J., Wang, Q., and Hu, X. 2007. Chemical compositional characterization of eight pear cultivars grown in China. Food Chemistry 104: 268-275.
Dehghani, B., Arzani, K., and Sarikhani Khorami, S. 2013. Pomological evaluation and seasonal variation in fruit growth and development of some Asian pear cultivars under Tehran environmental conditions. Seed and Plant Production Journal 28 (4): 419-433 (in Persian).
Faust, M. 1989. Physiology of temperate zone fruit trees. John Wiley and Sons Publications. New York, USA. 338 pp.
Ikinci, A., Bolat, I., Ercişli, S., and Esitken, A. 2016. Response of yield, growth and Iron deficiency chlorosis of ‘Santa Maria’ pear trees on four rootstocks. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 44 (2): 563-567.
Khoshghalb, H., Arzani, K., Malakouti, M. J., and Barzegar, M. 2008. Changes of sugars and organic acids contents in two Asian pear cultivars (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) during fruit development and postharvest storage and its effect on fruit shelf life, quality and internal browning disorder. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 45 (12): 193-204 (in Persian).
Koshesh Saba, M., Arzani, K., and Jalali Javaran, M. 2008. Study of incompatibility S alleles in some Asian pear (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) genotypes by PCR technique. Seed and Plant Production Journal 24 (3): 445-456 (in Persian).
Little, C. R., and Holmes, R. J. 2000. Storage technology for apples and pears, a guide to production, postharvest treatment and storage of pome fruit in Australia. Department of Natural Resources and Environment Publications. Victoria, Australian. 528 pp.
Moazedi, R., Zaare Nahandi, F., Mahdavi, Y., Kamrani, M., and Ebrahemi, M. A. 2014. Assessment of genetic relationships of some cultivars of Asian pears (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) with some native pears of Northern Iran using SSR marker. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences 3 (8): 923-929.
Mousavi, S., Arzani, K., and Abdollahi, H. 2012. An evaluation of self-compatibility vs. self-incompatibility in some Asian pears (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) and European pears (Pyrus communis L.) as well as native pear cultivars. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science 43 (3): 311-321 (in Persian).
Najafzadeh, R., and Arzani, K. 2016. Assessment of morphological, physiological and pomological variations in some of European pear (Pyrus communis L.) genotypes. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 6 (19): 151-164 (in Persian).
Nishio, S., Takada, N., Saito, T., Yamamoto, T., and Iketani, H. 2016. Estimation of loss of genetic diversity in modern Japanese cultivars by comparison of diverse genetic resources in Asian pear (Pyrus spp.). BMC Genetics 17: 81.
Nouri, F., Aziznejad, R., Aghaee, M., Farhadi, M. R., Farshadfar, M., and Nouri, A. 2006. Application of SPSS in agricultural researches. Agricultural Education Publications. Karaj, Iran, 314 pp. (in Persian).
Ozturk, I., Ercişli, S., Kalkan, F., and Demir, B. 2009. Some chemical and physico-mechanical properties of pear cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology 8 (4): 687-693.
Pitera, E., and Odziemkowski, S. 2004. Evaluation of three Asian pear cultivars for cultivation in commercial orchards. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 12: 83-88.
Radwan, R., Hamed, F., and Muzher, B. 2015. Maturity time for some local and introduced pear cultivars in Sweida governorate depending on some environmental, physical and chemical characters. International Journal of ChemTech Research 8 (10): 355-360.
Rasouli, M., and Arzani, K. 2011. A study of total photosynthesis rate and growth pattern in nine Asian pear (Pyrus serotina Rhed) cultivars grown under Tehran environmental conditions. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science 42 (4): 329-338 (in Persian).
Reighard, G. L., Ouellette, D. R., and Brock, K. H. 2008. Field performance of Asian pear cultivars in South Carolina. Acta Horticulturae 800: 38.
Roozban, M. R., Arzani, K., and Meeni, A. 2002. Study on in vitro propagation of some Asian pear (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) cultivars. Seed and Plant 18 (3): 348-361 (in Persian).
Safarpoor Shorbakhlo, M., Hosseini Monfared, R., Paydar, S., and Sharifi, M. 2015. Determination of genetic diversity in pear genotypes using ISSR markers. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology 7 (1): 115-132 (in Persian).
Saito, T. 2016. Advances in Japanese pear breeding in Japan. Breeding Science 66: 46-59. Stenzel, N. M. C., Neves, C. S. V. J., Gomes, J. C., and Medina, C. C. 2003. Medina, performance of ‘Ponkan’ mandarin on seven rootstocks in Southern Brazil. HortScience 38: 176-178.
Verma, M. K., Lal, S., Mir, J. I., Bhat, H. A., and Sheikh, M. A. 2014. Genetic variability among ‘Kashmiri Nakh’ pear (Pyrus pyrifolia): a local variety grown in North- Western Himalayan region of India. African Journal of Biotechnology 13 (31): 3352-3359.
Westwood, M. N.. and Roberts, A. N. 1970. The relationship between trunk cross-sectional area and weight of apple trees. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 95: 28-30.
Wolf, J., Baránková, K., and Nečas, T. 2017. AFLP molecular identification and genetic relationship of Chinese and Japanese pear cultivars grown in Middle European conditions. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 45 (2): 369-374.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 532 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 312 |
||