| تعداد نشریات | 285 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 83 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,107 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,629 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 49,719,203 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 80,117,900 |
تأثیر سطوح مختلف بیوچار حاصل از محصول فرعی پسته بر فراسنجههای تخمیر شکمبه، جمعیت پروتوزوآ و تولید متان بهروش برون تنی | ||
| علوم دامی | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 32، شماره 123، شهریور 1398، صفحه 127-138 اصل مقاله (2.05 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/asj.2018.122035.1708 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| اعظم میرحیدری1؛ نورمحمد تربتی نژاد2؛ پیروز شاکری* 3 | ||
| 1دانش آموخته دوره دکتری علوم دامی، گروه علوم دامی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران. | ||
| 2استاد گروه علوم دامی، گروه علوم دامی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار بخش تحقیقات علوم دامی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کرمان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این تحقیق بهمنظور بررسی اثر سطوح مختلف بیوچار حاصل از محصول فرعی پسته بر میزان تولید گاز، قابلیت هضم، تولید متان، آمونیاک و اسیدهای چرب فرار بهروش آزمایشگاهی انجام شد. آزمایش در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با چهار تیمار و سه تکرار اجرا گردید. سطوح صفر، 5/0، 1 و 5/1 درصد بیوچار محصول فرعی پسته در جیره غذایی برههای پرواری حاوی 40 درصد علوفه و 60 درصد کنسانتره استفاده شد. انکوباسیون با استفاده از مایع شکمبه چهار رأس گوسفند کرمانی فیستوله شده انجام شد. افزودن بیوچار به جیرههای آزمایشی اثر معنیداری بر تولید گاز در زمان 24 و 96 ساعت انکوباسیون، فراسنجههای تولید گاز، جمعیت پروتوزوآ و اسیدهای چرب فرار نداشت. استفاده از بیوچار محصول فرعی پسته سبب افزایش pH نسبت به جیره شاهد شد (01/0p <). غلظت نیتروژن آمونیاکی (05/0p <) و مقدار و درصد متان (01/0p <) با افزودن سطوح 1 و 5/1 درصد بیوچار محصول فرعی پسته به جیره پایه در مقایسه با شاهد کاهش یافت. بهطور کلی نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که استفاده از بیوچار محصول فرعی پسته میتواند باعث کاهش تولید متان و آمونیاک و بهبود بازده تخمیر شکمبه شود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| "بیوچار"؛ "متان"؛ "آمونیاک"؛ "pH" | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of different levels of pistachio by-product biochar on ruminal fermentation parameters, protozoa population and methane production by in vitro method | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| azam mirheidari1؛ Noor Mohammad Torbatinejad2؛ Pirouz Shakeri3 | ||
| 1Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran | ||
| 2Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This study was carried out to investigate the effects of different levels of pistachio by-product biochar (PBPB) on cumulative gas production, gas production parameters, short chain fatty acids, digestibility, methane and ammonia production and volatile fatty acids in an in vitro batch fermentation system. The study was carried out in a completely randomized design with four treatments and three replications. Four levels of PBPB including 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5 % was added to the experimental diets with ratio 60% forage to 40% concentrate. All samples were incubated in three replications using buffered ruminal fluid collected from 4 Kermanian sheep. Result indicated that inclusion of biochar to experimental diet had no significant effect on cumulative gas production after 24 and 96 h of incubation, short chain fatty acids, protozoa population and volatile fatty acids. Inclusion of PBPB to the diet significantly increased pH (p < 0.01) compared to control treatment . Concentrations of ammonia (p < 0.05) and methane (p < 0.01) significantly decreased at 1 and 1.5% of PBPB compared to control. In general, these findings indicated that the use of PBPB can have had a great potential to decrease methane mitigation and ammonia concentrations and improving of rumen fermentation | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| "Biochar", "Methane", "Ammonia", "pH" | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
میرحیدری، ا.، تربتینژاد، ن.، حسنی، س و شاکری، پ. (1397). تاثیر سطوح مختلف بیوچار حاصل از پوست گردو و بسترمرغ بر فراسنجههای تخمیری شکمبه و تولید متان بهروش برون تنی. نشریه پژوهش در نشخوارکنندگان دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان. شماره 117، صفحات. 162-151. Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A.U., Lim, J.E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D., et al. (2014). Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Journal of Chemosphere. 99: 19-33. Bopp, C., Christl, I., Schulin, R. and Evangelou, M.W.H. (2016). Biochar as possible long-term soil amendment for phytostabilisation of TCE-contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 23: 17449-17458. Broderick, G.A. and Kang, J.H. (1980). Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science. 63: 64-75. Cabeza, I., Waterhouse, T., Sohi, S. and Rooke, J.A. (2018). Effect of biochar produced from different biomass sources and at different process temperatures on methane production and ammonia concentrations in vitro. Journal of Animal Feed Science and Technology. 237: 1-7. Cheng, C.H., Lehmann, J. and Engelhard, M.H. (2008). Natural oxidation of black carbon in soils: Changes in molecular form and surface charge along a climosequence. Journal of Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 72: 1598-1610. Chu, G.M., Jung, C.K., Kim, H.Y., Ha, J.H., Kim, J.H., Jung, M.S., et al. (2013). Effects of bamboo charcoal and bamboo vinegar as antibiotic alternative on growth performance, immune responses and fecal microflora population in fattening pigs. Journal of Animl Science. 84:113-120. Cuetos, M.J., Martinez, E.J., Moreno, R., Gonzalez, R., Otero, M. and Gomez, X. (2017). Enhancing anaerobic digestion of poultry blood using activated carbon. Journal of Advanced Research.8: 297-307. Dehority, B.A. (1984). Evaluation of subsampling and fixation procedures used for counting rumen protozoa. Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 48: 182-185. Demeyer, D., DeMeulemeester, M., DeGraeve, K. and Gupta, B.W. (1988). Effect of fungal treatment on nutritive value of straw. Journal of the Faculty of Medicine. 53: 1811-1819. Fedorak, P.M. and Hurdy, D.E. (1983). A simple apparatus for measuring gas production by methanogenic cultures in serum bottles. Journal of Environmental Technology. 4:425-432.Feldmann, M. (1992). Auswirkungen von Aktivkohle auf Fermentationvorgänge im Pansensaft des Rindes (in vitro), Diss. Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover. France, J. and Siddons, R.C. (1993). Volatile fatty acid production. P: 157, In: Forbes, J.M., J. France (eds). Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism. CAB International, Cambridge, UK Garillo, E.P., Pradhan, R. and Tobioka, H. (1994). Effects of activated charcoal on ruminal characteristics and blood profiles in mature goats. Journal of Animal Science. 35:85-89. Gerlach, A. and Schmidt, H.P. (2012). The use of biochar in cattle farming. Journal of Biochar. 281-285. Getachew, G., Makkar, H.P.S. and Becker, K. (2002). Tropical browses: contents of phenolic compounds, in vitro gas production and stoichiometric relationship between short chain fatty acid and in vitro gas production. Journal of Agricultural Science. 139: 341-352. Hansen, H.H., Storm, I.M.L.D. and Sell, A.M. (2013). Effect of biochar on in vitro rumen methane production. Journal of Animal Science. 62: 305-309. Johnson, K.A. and Johnson, D.E. (1995). Methane emission from cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 73: 2483-2492. Kajikawa, H., Valdes, C.K., Hillman, K., Wallace, R.J. and Newbold, C.J. (2003). Methane oxidation and its coupled electron-sink reactions in ruminal fluid. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 36: 354-357.Knittel, K. and Boetius, A. (2009). Anaerobic oxidation of methane: Progress with an unknown process. Journal of Annual Review Microbiology. 63: 311-344.Kumar, S., Jain, M.C. and Chhonkar, P.K. (1987). A note on stimulation of biogas production from cattle dung by addition of charcoal. Journal of Biological Wastes. 20: 209-215.Lehmann, J. (2007). Bio-energy in the black. Journal of Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 5: 381-387.Lehmann, J., Rilling, M.C., Thies, J., Masiello, C.A., Hockaday, W.C. and Crowley, D. (2011). Biochar effects on soil biota–Areview. Journal of Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 43: 1812-1836. Leng, R.A. (2014). Interactions between microbial consortia in biofilms: a paradigm shift in rumen microbial ecology and enteric methane mitigation. Journal of Animal Production Science. 54: 519-543. Leng, R.A., Inthapanya, S. and Preston, T.R. (2012a). Biochar lowers net methane production from rumen fluid in vitro. Journal of Livestock Research for Rural Development. 24: 1-6. Leng, R.A. Preston, T.R. and Inthapanya, S. (2012b). Biochar reduces enteric methane and improves growth and feed conversion in local “Yellow” cattle fed cassava root chips and fresh cassava foliage. Journal of Livestock Research for Rural Development. 24: 199-211. Leng, R.A., Preston, T.R. and Inthapanya, S. (2012c). Methane production is reduced in an in vitro incubation when the rumen fluid is taken from cattle that previously received biochar in their diet. Journal of Livestock Research for Rural Development. . 24: 24-30. Leng, R.A., Inthapanya, S. and Preston, T.R. (2013). All biochars are not equal in lowering methane production in in vitro rumen incubations. Journal of Livestock Research for Rural Development. 25: 100-106. Luo, C., Lü, F., Shao, L. and He, P. (2015). Application of eco-compatible biochar in anaerobic digestion to relieve acid stress and promote the selective colonization of functional microbes. Journal of Water Research. 68: 710-718.Mali´nskaa, K., ´Swiatek, M.Z. and Dach, J. (2014). Effects of biochar amendment on ammonia emission duringcomposting of sewage sludge. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 71: 474-478.McFarlane, Z.D., Myer, P.R., Cope, E.R., Evans, N.D., Bone, T.C., Biss, B.E. and Mulliniks, J.T. (2017). Effect of biochar type and size on in vitro rumen fermentation of orchard grass hay. Journal of Agriculture Science. 8: 316-325. Menke, K. H. and Steingass, H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Journal of Animal Research and Development. 28: 7-55.Morgavi, D.P., Forano, E., Martin, C. and Newbold, C.J. (2010). Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Journal of Animal Consortium. 4: 1024-1036. Nolan, J.V. and Dobos, R.C. (2005). Nitrogen transactions in ruminants. P: 177-206, In: Dijkstra, J., J.M. Forbes and J. France (eds). Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism. CABI Publishing, Walingford, UK. NRC. (2007). Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. National Academy Press. PP: 384. Odesola, I.F. and Owoseni, T.A. (2010). Development of local technology for a small-scale biochar production processes from agricultural wastes. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences. 1: 205-208. Ørskov, E.R. (1982). Protein Nutrition in Ruminants. Academic Press, London and NewYork. PP: 125. Ørskov, E.R. and McDonald, I. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agriculture Science. 92: 499-503. Patra, A.K. and Saxena, J. (2009). Dietary phytochemicals as rumen modifiers: a review of the effects on microbial populations. Journal of Microbiology. 96: 363-375. Pereira, C., Muetzel, R., Camps, S., Arbestain, M., Bishop, P., Hina, K. and Hedley, M. (2014). Assessment of the influence of biochar on rumen and silage fermentation: A laboratory-scale experiment. Journal of Animal Feed Science Technology. 196: 220-231. Prasai, T.P., Walsh, K.B., Bhattarai, S.P., Midmore, D.J., Van, T.T.H., Moore, R.J., et al. (2016). Biochar, bentonite and zeolite supplemented feeding of layer chickens alters intestinal microbiota and reduces campylobacter. Journal of PLoS One. 11: 1-13. Samonin, V.V. and Elikova, E.E. (2004). A study of the adsorption of bacterial cells on porous materials. Journal of Microbiology. 73: 696-701. SAS. (2003). SAS User’s Guide Statistics. Version 9.1 Edition. SAS Inst., Cary, NC. Seredych, M. and Bandosz, T.J. (2007). Mechanism of ammonia retention on graphite oxides: role of surface chemistry and structure. Journal of Physical Chemistry. 111: 15596-15604.Shakeri, P., Durmic, Z., Vadhanabhuti, J. and Vercoe, P.E. (2017). Products derived from olive leaves and fruits can alter in vitro ruminal fermentation and methane production. Journal of the Science Food and Agriculture. 97: 1367-1372. Silivong, P. and Preston, T.R. (2015). Growth performance of goats was improved when a basal diet of foliage of Bauhinia acuminata was supplemented with water spinach and biochar. Journal of Livestock Research for Rural Development. 27: 1-9. Steiner, S., Das, K.C., Melear, N. and Lakly, D. (2010). Reducing nitrogen lossduring poultry litter composting using biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality. 39: 1236-1242.Tabaru, H., Kadota, E., Yamada, H., Sasaki, N. and Takeuchi, A. (1988). Determination of volatile fatty acids and lactic acid in bovine plasma and ruminal fluid by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Veterinary Science. 50: 1124-1126. Tamminga, S. (1992). Nutrition management of dairy cows as a contribution to pollution control. Journal of Dairy Science. 75: 345-357. Van, D.T.T., Nguyen, T.M. and Ledin, I. (2006). Effect of method of processing foliage of Acacia mangium and inclusion of bamboo charcoal in the diet on performance of growing goats. Journal of Animal feed Science and Technology. 130: 242-256. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 597 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 497 |
||