| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,846 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,300 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 41,386,752 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 18,562,079 |
ارزیابی ویژگی‌های مورفولوژیک، فنولوژیک و پومولوژیک برخی از ژنوتیپ‌های انتخابی فندق در شرایط آب و هوائی کرج | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| مقاله 13، دوره 34، شماره 1، خرداد 1397، صفحه 81-100 اصل مقاله (1.14 M) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/spij.2018.118630 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حمید حسنی1؛ روح‌اله حق‌جویان* 2؛ سیدمهدی میری3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرج، کرج، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار، پژوهشکده میوه‌های معتدله و سردسیری، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار، گروه باغبانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرج، کرج، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تنوع ژنتیک و پراکنش ژرم‌پلاسم در یک گونه، پتانسیل بهبود گونه از طریق برنامه‌های به‌نژادی را فراهم می‌کند. تاکنون مطالعات کمی در زمینه ارزیابی ارقام و ژنوتیپ‌های فندق (Corylus avellana L.) در ایران صورت گرفته است. بنابراین با هدف دستیابی به ارقام سازگار و با عملکرد بالا در شرایط آب و هوایی کرج، این تحقیق به‌منظور بررسی ویژگی‌های مورفولوژیک، فنولوژیک و پومولوژیک 10 ژنوتیپ و رقم فندق شامل گرچه، پاییزه، کریستینا، کوتکاشن، فوتوکورامی، کوبان، آتابابا، یاقلی فندق، سوچی 1 و پیونر و ارقام گردویی 89 و پشمینه 89 به‌عنوان شاهد در سال‌های 1394 و 1395 انجام گرفت. صفات مورد بررسی شامل فنولوژی درخت، خصوصیات میوه و مغز، عملکرد تک‌درخت، درصد روغن و درصد پروتئین بود که در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار مطالعه شد. نتایج نشان داد که ارقام موردبررسی برای کلیه صفات تفاوت معنی‌داری داشتند. ژنوتیپ پاییزه با 2/69 درصد بیش‌ترین میزان روغن، رقم کریستینا با 3/16 درصد بیش‌ترین میزان پروتئین، رقم سوچی 1 با 8/2 گرم بالاترین وزن میوه خشک و رقم گردویی 89 با 2/1 گرم بیش‌ترین وزن مغز را دارا بودند. بر اساس نتایج به‌دست‌آمده ارقام گردویی 89، پاییزه، کوتکاشن، گرچه و پشمینه 89 دارای عملکرد بیشتر و صفات مطلوب میوه بودند و جهت کاشت در شرایط آب و هوایی کرج مناسب می‌باشند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تنوع ژنتیکی؛ سازگاری ارقام؛ عملکرد؛ خصوصیات مغز | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of Morphological, Phenological and Pomological Characteristics of Some Selected Hazelnut Genotypes Under Climatic Conditions of Karaj in Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| H. Hassani1؛ R. Haghjooyan2؛ S. M. Miri3 | ||
| 1M. Sc. student, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Temperate Fruits Research Center, Horticultural Science Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Genetic diversity and germplasm introduction provide the potential for plant improvement in breeding programs. So far, few studies have been carried out on the evaluation of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) varieties and genotypes in Iran. This study was conducted to investigate morphological, phenological and pomological characteristics of 10 selected hazelnut genotypes and varieties including Gerche, Paeizeh, Christiana, Cote Kashen, Futocramy, Koban, Ata Baba, Yaghly Fandaog, Sochi 1 and Pioneer, and Gerduoei 89 and Pashmineh 89 cultivars as control in 2015 and 2016 in Kamalshahr horticultural research station, Karaj, Iran. The traits included tree phenology, fruit and kernel characteristics, yield per tree, oil and protein contents, which were evaluated in randomized complete block design with three replications. The results showed that there was significant difference between varieties/genotypes for all studied traits. Paeizeh, Christiana, Sochi 1 and Gerdouei 89 varieties showed the highest amount of oil content (69.2%), protein content (16.3%), nut weight (2.8 g) and kernel weight (1.2 g), respectively. The results suggest that Gerdouei 89, Paeizeh, Cote Kashen, Gerche and Pashmineh 89 had the highest yield and desirable fruits characteristics and are suitable for being grown in climate conditions of Karaj in Iran. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Genetic diversity, cultivar adaptation, fruit yield, Kernel properties | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alasalvar, C., Shahidi, F., Liyanapathirana, C. M., and Ohshima, T. 2003. Turkish tombul hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). Compositional characteristics. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 51: 3790-3796.
Alphan, E., Pala, M., Ackurt, F., and Yilmaz, T. 1997. Nutritional composition of hazelnuts and its effects on glucose and lipid metabolism. Acta Horticulturae 415: 305-310.
Aradhya, M., Woeste, K., and Velasco, D. 2010. Genetic Diversity, Structure and Differentiation in Cultivated Walnut (Juglans regia L.). Acta Horticulturae 861: 127-132.
Arzani, K. 2003. Attitude towards the importance, preservation, maintenance, correcting and proper management of traditional Iranian gardens. Proceedings of the first national conference of traditional gardens in Iran: 1-5 (in persian).
Baldwin, B. 2009. The effects of site and seasonal conditions on nut yield and kernel quality of hazelnut genotypes grown in Australia. Acta Horticulturae 845: 83-88.
Baratta, B., Raimondo, A., Calderone, F., and Campisi, G. 1994. Four years of trials on comparing 45 hazelnut cultivars in the Nebrodi area (Me). Acta Horticulturae 351: 79-92 (in Italian).
Bostan, S. Z. 2003. Important chemical and physical traits and variation in these traits in ‘Tombul’ hazelnut cultivar at different elevations. Grasasy Aceites 54: 234-239.
Bostan, S. Z., and Günay, K. 2009. Variation of important quality characteristics in hazelnut at different years and correlations between husk number and nut and kernel traits. Acta Horticulturae 845: 641-646.
Botu, I., Turku, E., Prada, S., Botu, M., and Ache, G. 2005. 25 years of achievements and perspectives in hazelnut breeding in Romania. Acta Horticulture 686: 50-55.
Crews, C., Hough, P., Godward, J., Brereton, P., Lees, M., Guiet, S., and Winkelmann, W. 2005. Study of the main constituents of some authentic hazelnut oils. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53: 4843-4852.
Darvishian, M. 2000. Hazelnut cultivation and production Fani Publishing Company. Tehran, Iran. 176pp. (in Persian).
Dehghani Shouraki, Y., Hosseinava, S., Ghanavati, F., and Hajiloni, S. 2007. National guidelines for conducting tests for distinctness, homogenity and stability in hazelnut. Publication of Seed and Plant Certification and Regestration Inistitute. 30pp.
FAO. 2014. Statistics. WWW.FAO.Org.
Farhadi Tuli, S., Hamidoghly, Y., Hasanpour, A., Potki, P., and Fatahi Moghaddam, M. R. 2011. Evaluation of genetic diversity of hazelnut trees (Corylus avellana L.) in Talesh region using microsatellite markers. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 12 (2): 205-218.
Germain, E., and Sarraquigne, J. P. 2004. Le noisetier. Centre Technique interprofessionel des Fruits et Legumes (CTIFL), Paris, Farance.
Gökirmak, T., Mehlenbacher, S.A., and Bassil, N.V. 2005. Investigation of genetic diversity among European hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars using SSR markers. Acta Horticulturae 686: 141-149.
Grau, P., and Torres, A. 2001. Preliminary evaluation of hazelnut performance in Chile. Acta Horticulturae 556: 49-54.
Hoseinava, S. 2004. Identification of the filbert varieties in the Karaj hazelnut collection. Final Report of Research Project No. 83/843. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII). Karaj, Iran. 45pp. (in Persian).
Hosseinava, S., and Pirkhezri, M. 2010. Evaluation of quantitative and quality characteristics in some hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) varieties in Karaj climatic conditions. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 26-2 (3): 329-342. (in Persian).
Islam, A., and Ozgunven, A. I. 2001. Clonal selection in Turkish hazelnut cultivars grown in Ordu province. Acta Horticulturae 556: 203-208.
Jarvis, D. I., Brown, A. H. D., Cuong, P. H., Collado-Panduro, L., Latornerie-Moreno, L., Gyawali, S., and Tanto, T. 2008. A global perspective of the richness and evenness of traditional crop diversity maintained by farming communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 5326-5331.
Javadi, M. D. 2011. Evaluation of selected superior genotypes of hazelnut. Final report of research project No. 90/294. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII). Karaj, Iran. 18pp. (in Persian).
Karimi, B. 2011. Study of genetic diversity of different hazelnut genotypes in the areas of gilan and Fandoghloo areas of Ardabil using microsatellite markers. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Kjeldahl, J. 1883. A new method for the determination of nitrogen in organic matter. Zeitschreft fur Analytische Chemie 22: 366-382.
Lagersted, H. B. 1975. Filbert. Pp. 456-489. In: J. Janick and J. N. Moore (Eds.) Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue University Press. West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Mehlenbacher, S. A. 1991. Hazelnut. In: J. N. Moore and J. R. Ballington (Eds.). Genetic Resources of temperate fruit and nut crops. Acta Horticulture 290: 789-836.
Mehlenbacher, S. A., Avid, C., Smith, C., Rebecca, L., and Mecluskey, R. L. 2009. Yamhill Hazelnut. Horticultural Science 44: 845-847.
Miletic, R., Mitrovic, M., Duric, G., and Micic, G. 1997. Biological potential of european filbert (C. avelana L) growing wild in Eastern Serbia. Acta Horticulturae 445: 223-228.
Miletic, R., Zikic, M., Mitic, N., and Nicolic, R. 2005. Pomplogical characteristic of superior selections of European filbert (C. avellana L.). Genetica 37: 103-111.
Naghavi, M. R., Qareyazi, B., and Hosseini Salkedeh, Q. 2005. Molecular markers. Tehran University Press. 340pp. (in Persian).
Nejatian, M. A., Hosseinava, S., and Javadi, D. 2012. Collection and evaluation of some Iranian hazelnut genotypes. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 28-1 (1): 132-115 (in Persian).
Rovira, M., and Tous, J. 2001. Perfomance of 17 hazelnut selections from four different breeding programs in Tarragona. Acta Horticulturae 556: 171-176.
Santos, A., Silva, A. P., and Santos, F. 2005. Phenological tree trait and fruit properties of several hazelnut cultivars grown under different microclimates. 6th International. Congress on Hazelnut. Acta Horticulturae 686:79-86. (Abstracts).
Schepers, H. T. A. M., and Kwanten, E. F. J. 2005. Selection and breeding of hazelnut cultivars suitable for cultivation in the Netherlands. Acta Horticulturae 686: 87-90 (Abstract).
Soxhlet, F. 1879. Die gewichtsanalytische Bestimmung des Milchfettes, Polytechnisches Journal (Dingler's) 232: 461.
Thompson, M. M., Lagersted, H. B., and Mehlenbacher, S. A. 1996. Hazelnut. In: J. Janick and J. N. Moore. Fruit Breeding 3: 125-184.
Valentini, N., Marinoni, D., and Me, G. 2001. Evaluation of tonda gentile delle langhe clones. Acta Horticulturae 556: 209-218.
Yurttaş, H. C., Schafer, H. W., and Warthesen, J. J. 2000. Antioxidant activity of non-tocopherol hazelnut (Corylus spp.) phenolics. Journal of Food Science 65: 276-280.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 231 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 248 |
||