| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,846 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,300 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 41,387,114 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 18,562,179 |
بررسی بهره وری آب و عملکرد سویا در سامانه‌های مختلف خاک ورزی و بقایای گیاهی | ||
| تحقیقات سامانه‌ها و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 21، شماره 74، شهریور 1399، صفحه 83-96 اصل مقاله (1.21 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/erams.2018.123528.1274 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد اسماعیل اسدی* 1؛ حمیدرضا صادق نژاد2 | ||
| 1استادیار بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران | ||
| 2مربی بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه سطح کشاورزی حفاظتی در جهان بیش از 180 میلیون هکتار و یکی از مزایای اصلی آن بهبود بهره وری آب است. این تحقیق در بارۀ کاشت سویا تحت مدیریت های مختلف میزان بقایا و روش های خاک ورزی روی بقایای گندم است که به صورت کرت های نواری در قالب طرح بلوک های کامل تصادفی در سال های 1389 و 1390 در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی گرگان اجرا شد. تیمارهای اصلی در سه سطح مدیریت بقایا، شامل 1R: سوزاندن، R2: حفظ 50 درصد بقایا و تیمار R3: حفظ 100 درصد بقایا و تیمارهای فرعی نیز در سه سطح روش های خاک ورزی، شامل T1: خاک ورزی مرسوم (شخم + دیسک + کشت با ردیف‌کار)، T2: کم خاک ورزی (خاکورزی حداقل با دستگاه خاک ورز مرکب+ کشت با ردیف‌کار) و T3: بی خاکورزی (کشت با کارندۀ بیخاک‌ورز) است. نتایج بررسیها نشان میدهد تیمار اصلی R2 و تیمار فرعی T3 بهترین بازده را از نظر تولید داشته اند و عملکرد محصول 47/7 و 17/4 درصد به ترتیب نسبت به R1 و T1 افزایش داشته است. بیشترین و کمترین میزان حجم آب مصرفی به مقدار 3950 و 2690 مترمکعب در هکتار به ترتیب متعلق به تیمار R1 و R3 و حداکثر و حداقل بهره‌وری آب سویا به ترتیب مربوط به تیمارهای R2 وR1 به میزان 1/13 و 0/55 کیلوگرم بر مترمکعب بوده است. کاشت در شرایط بی‌خاک‌ورزی موجب بهبود بهره‌وری آب سویا نسبت به روش مرسوم به مقدار 15/3 درصد شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آبیاری بارانی؛ بی‌خاک‌ورزیغ کشاورزی حفاظتی؛ گرگان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigation of Crop Water Productivity and Yield in Different Systems of Tillage and Crop Residues | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Esmaeil Asadi1؛ Hamidreza Sadeghnezhad2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center AREEO, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| 2Research associate, Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center AREEO, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Currently, the area of agricultural land under conservation practices in the world exceeds 180 million hectares, one of the main advantages of which is improvement in crop water productivity (CWP). An investigation in soybean cultivation in a farm with different level of management of residues was carried out in a randomized complete block design with split plot design in 2010 and 2011 at Gorgan Agriculture Research Station. Main treatment was residue management at three levels: R1: burning of residue , R2: retaining 50% of residues, and R3: maintaining 100% of residues; the secondry treatment was tillage practises at three levels: T1: conventional tillage (plowing + disk + row crop planter), T2: minimum tillage (stubble cultivator + row crop planter) and T3: no tillage (sowing with no till planter). The best results obtained from R2 and T3: 42.7% and 17.4% increase in yield respectively, comparing R1 and T1. The highest and lowest of water consumption level were found 3950 m3 ha-1 and 2690 m3 ha-1 in R1 and R3 respectively. The maximum and minimum CWP were found in R2 and R1 treatments with 1.13 kg m-3and 0.55 kg m-3 respectively. Sowing with no tillage system in irrigated conditions improved CWP by 15.3% compared to the conventional method. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Conservation Agriculture, Gorgan, Sprinkler Irrigation, No Tillage | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adem, H. H., Tisdall, J. M., & Willoughay, M. (l984). Tillage management changes size distribution of aggregates and macro-structure of soil used for irrigated row crops. Soil and Tillage Research, 4, 561-570.
Al-Darby, A. M., & Lowery, B. (1984). Conservation tillage: A comparison of methods. Agricultural Engineering, 65(10), 23-24.
Alvarez, A., & Steinbach, H. S. (2009). A review of the effects of tillage systems on some soil physical properties, water content, nitrate availability and crops yield in the Argentine Pampas. Soil and Tillage Research, 104, 1-15.
Amuri, N., Brye, K. R., Gbur, E. E., Popp, J., and Chen, P. (2008). Soil property and soybean yield trends in response to alternative wheat residue management practices in a wheat-soybean, double-crop production system in eastern Arkansas. Electronic Journal of Integrative Biosciences, 6(1), 64-86.
Anon. (2000). Terminology and efinitions for soil-tool relationships. ASAE Standard.
Anon. (2017). Agricultural Statistics. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Deputy Director of Planning and Economics, ICT Center, Vol I: Crop Production. (in Persian)
Anon. (2018). Soystats. Available at: http://www.soystats.com/.
Asadi. M. E. (2012). Optimum Crop Water Management. Noruzi Pub. Gorgan, Iran. (in Persian)
Asadi, M. E., & Sadeghi, S. (2017). Healthy Soils With Conservation Agriculture Systems. Noruzi Pub. Gorgan, Iran. (in Persian)
Barut, Z. B., & Celik, I. (2010). Different tillage systems affect plant emergence, stand establishment and yield in wheat-corn rotation. The Philippine Agricultural Scientist, 93(4), 392-398.
Baumhardt, R. L., & Jones, O. R. (2002). Residue management and tillage effects on soil-water storage and grain yield of dryland wheat and sorghum for a clay loam in Texas. Soil and Tillage Research, 68, 71-82.
Blackshaw, R. E., Larney, G. O., Lindwall, C. W., & Kozub, G. C. (1994). Crop rotation and tillage effects on weed populations on the semi-arid Canadian prairies. Weed Technology, 8, 231-237.
Bolliger, A., Magid, J., Amado, J. J. C., Neta, F. S., dos Santos Ribeiro, M., Calegari, A., Ralish, R., & Neergaard, A. (2006). Taking stock of the Brazilian zero-till revolution: a review of landmark research and farmers’practices. Advances in Agronomy, 91, 47-110.
Casa, R., & Lo Cascio, B. (2008). Soil conservation tillage effects on yield and water use efficiency on irrigated crop in central Italy. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 149, 310-319.
Cruse, R., & Ressler, D. (2004). Lesson 8: Water Flow in Soil. Agronomy 502: Chemistry, Physics, and Biology of Soils. CD-ROM. Iowa State University.
Dahiya, R., Ingwersenb, J., & Streckb, T. (2007). The effect of mulching and tillage on the water and temperature regimes of a loess soil: Experimental findings and modeling. Soil and Tillage Research, 96(1-2), 52-63.
Edwards, J. H., Thurlow, D. L., & Eason, J. T. (1988). Influence of tillage and crop rotation on yields of corn, soybean and wheat. Agronomy Journal, 80, 76-80.
Farooq, M., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2015). Conservation Agriculture. Springer International Pub. Switzerland.
Halvorson, A. D., Mosier, A. R., Reule, C. A., & Bausch, W. C. (2006). Nitrogen and tillage effects on irrigated continuous corn yields. Agronomy Journal, 98, 63-71.
Howell, T. A. (2008). Irrigation Efficiency. In: S. W. Trimble (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Water Science. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group. Boca Raton, FL.
Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., & Derpsch, R. (2018). Global Spread of Conservation Agriculture. International Journal of Environmental Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2018. 1494927.
Martens, D. A. (2000). Nitrogen cycling under different soil management systems. Advances in Agronomy, 70, 143-191.
Nielsen, D. C., Unger, P., & Miller, P. R. (2005). Efficient water use in dryland cropping systems in the Great Plains. Agronomy Journal, 97, 364-372.
Norwood, C. (1999). Water use and yield of dryland row crops as affected by tillage. Agronomy Journal, 91, 108-115.
Oorts, K., Garnier, P., Findeling, A., Mary, B., Richard, G., & Nicolardot, B. (2007). Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in no-till and conventional tillage using PASTIS model. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71, 336-346.
Padgitt, M., Newton, D. Penn, R., & Sadretto, C. (2000). Production practices for major crops in U. S. Agriculture, 1990-1997. Economic Research Service (ERS)/(USDA). Statistical Bulletin. No. SB969. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov.
Papendick, R. I., Lindstrom, M. J., & Cochran, V. L. (1973). Soil mulch effect on seedbed temperature and water during fallow in eastern Washington. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 37, 307-314.
Popp, M. P., Oliver, L. R., Dillon, C. R., Keisling, T. C., & Manning, P. M. (2000). Evaluation of seedbed preparation, planting method and herbicide alternatives for dryland soybean production. Agronomy Journal, 92, 1149-1155.
Rydberg, T. (1990). Effects of plough less tillage and straw incorporation on evaporation. Soil and Tillage Research, 17, 303-314.
Saha, S., Chakraborty, D., Sharma, A. R., Tomar, R. K., Bhadraray, S., Sen, U., and Behera, U. K., Purakayastha, T. J., Garg, R. N., & Kalra, N. (2010). Effect of tillage and residue management on soil physical properties and crop productivity in maize (Zea mays) – Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 80(8), 679-685.
Sasal, M. C., Andriulo, A. E., & Taboada, M. A. (2006). Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil and Tillage Research,87, 9-18.
Schwartz, R. C., Baumhardt, R. L., & Evett, S. R. (2010). Tillage effects on soil water redistribution and bare soil evaporation throughout a season. Soil and Tillage Research,110, 221-229.
Sessiz, A., Alp, A., & Gursoy, S. (2010). Conservation and conventional tillage methods on selected soil physical properties and corn yield and quality under cropping system in Turkey. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 16(5), 597-608.
Vetsch, J. A., Randall, G. W., & Lamb, J. A. (2002). Corn and soybean production as affected by tillage systems. Agronomy Journal, 99, 952-959.
Wiese, A. F., Marek, T., & Harman, W. L. (1998). No-tillage increases profit in a limited irrigation-dryland system. Journal of Production Agriculture, 11, 247-252
Wilhelm, W. W. J., Doran, W., & Power, J. F. (1986). Corn and soybean yield response to crop residue management under no tillage production systems. Agronomy Journal, 78, 184-189. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 584 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 296 |
||