- همه نشریات
- نشریات علمی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویچ کشاورزی
- مجلات ترویجی سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- سایر نشریات سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
- نشریات علمی انجمن ها
- علوم آب و خاک
- علوم اقتصاد و ترویج کشاورزی
- علوم جنگل, مرتع و آبخیزداری
- علوم دامی و شیلات
- علوم زراعی و باغی
- علوم گیاهپزشکی
- علوم مهندسی و مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی
- نشریات با زبان انگلیسی
- نشریات با زبان فارسی
- نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
- نشریات علمی
پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 283 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 81 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,722 |
| تعداد مقالات | 31,007 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 26,983,539 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 16,148,871 |
اثر تداخل علفهایهرز بر خصوصیات مورفولوژیکی و عملکرد تودههای سیر (Allium sativum L) در کشت ارگانیک | ||
| دانش علفهای هرز ایران | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 14، شماره 1، شهریور 1397، صفحه 33-42 اصل مقاله (361.2 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijws.2018.1401.04 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علیرضا یوسفی* 1؛ یوسف قاضی خانلو2؛ علی عمارلو3 | ||
| 1هات علمی | ||
| 2دانشگاه زنجان | ||
| 3هیات علمی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به منظور بررسی واکنش تودههای سیر به تداخل علفهایهرز در منطقه زنجان، آزمایشی به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در سال زراعی 95-1394 اجرا شد که در آن، چهار توده سیر (همدان یک، همدان دو، همدان سه و طارم) و دو سطح تداخل علفهای هرز (تداخل و عدم تداخل) مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج حاصل از تحقیق نشان داد که واکنش به تداخل علفهای هرز، به طور معنی داری، تحت تاثیر نوع توده قرار گرفت. در رقابت با علفهای هرز، اکثر صفات تودههای همدان دو و همدان سه، کاهش قابل توجهی را نشان دادند. توده طارم، به دلیل توان رقابتی پایین، بیشترین کاهش در صفات مورد بررسی در شرایط تداخل را، نشان داد و کمترین عملکرد را در بین تودهها تولید کرد. بطور کلی، توده همدان یک با توجه به عملکرد بالا و کاهش اندک عملکرد در شرایط تداخل، برای کشت در مناطق سردسیر نظیر زنجان توصیه میشود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تداخل علفهایهرز؛ مناطق سردسیر؛ رقابت؛ گیاه دارویی؛ عملکرد | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of Weed Interference on Some Morphological Traits and Yield of Garlic (Allium sativum L.) Accessions under Organic Cultivation | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| yousef ghazikhanlo2؛ Ali ammarellou3؛ | ||
| 2University of zanjan | ||
| 3university of Zanjan | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| To evaluate the response of different garlic accessions to weed competition in Zanjan, west of Iran, a factorial experiment was carried out based on randomized complete block design with three replications in 2015-2016. Four variety of garlic (Hamedan 1, Hamedan 2, Hamedan 3 and Tarom) at two weed infestation conditions (whole season weed infestation and weed-free) were studied. The results indicated that responses to weed interference were significantly affected by accession. Hamedan 2 and Hamedan 3 accessions showed a considerable reduction in most traits under weed competitions while Tarom accession showed highest reduction that was most likely due to low competitive ability. Overall, Hamedan1 accession is recommended for cultivation in cool season regions such as Zanjan, due to the higher yield and lower yield decreases under weedy conditions. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Cool season regions, Competition, medicinal plant, weed infestation, yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abouziena HF, El-Karmany MF, Singh M and Sharma SD, 2007. Effect of nitrogen rates and weed controltreatments on maize yield and associated weeds in sandy soils.Weed Technology, 21:1049-1053. Ahmed, H. 1991. Effect of weed on growth of garlic (Allium sativum L.). Weed Science Abstract. 39(6): 230-231. Akbari, GH. A, Iran nezhad, H,. Hossein zadeh, K,. Zand, E,. Hejazi, A and Bayat , A, A,. 2010. Effect of wild mastard (Sinapis arvensis L.) Interference on yield and growth indexes of canola (Brassica napus l.). Iranian Journal of field Crop Sciences. 41(2):329-343. (in Persian). Anderson, R. L. 2000. Cultural systems to aid weed management in semiarid corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 14:630–634. Boydston, R.A., and M.D. Seymour. 2002. Volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) control with herbicides and cultivation in onion (Allium cepa L.). Weed Technology. 16: 620 – 626. Challaiah O., Burnside C., Wicks G.A. and Johanson V.A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Science, 34: 689-693. Cooper, R.L. 1977. Response of soybean cultivars to narrow rows and planting rates under weed-free conditions. Agronomy Journal. 69: 89-92. FAOSTAT. 2016. Crop production Statistics. Available on http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed: August 20, 2018. Ghosheh, H.Z. 2004. Single herbicide treatments for control of broadleaved weeds in onion (Allium cepta L.). Crop Protection. 23: 539 – 542. Ghosheh, H.Z. and Al-Shannag, H. K.. 2000. Influence of weeds and onion thrips, Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), on onion bulb yield in Jordan. Crop Protection. 19:175 – 179. Gilreath, J. P., Santos, B. M., Gilreath, P. R. and Maynard, D.N. 2008. Efficacy of early post-transplant herbicides inleeks (Allium porrum L.). Crop Protection. 27: 847-850. Haj Seyed Hadi , M, R,. Noor mohamadi, GH,. Nasiri mahallati, M,. Rahimian, H and Zand, A,. 2010. The potato dry matter change in response to weeds interference. Journal of Plant and Ecosystem. 5 (20):87-103. (in Persian). Honyfer, J. and Egli, D.B. 1993. Shade induced changes in flower and pod number and flower and fruit abscission in soybean. Agronomy Journal. 85: 221-225. Komeyli, H, R,. Rashed mohasel, M, H,. Ghodsi, M and Zare feyzabadi, A,. 2006. Evaluation of drought tolerance of new wheat genotypes under water stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 4(2): 301-314. (in Persian). Kropff, M.J. and W. Joije. 1987. Competition between a sugar beet and population of Chenopodium album L. and Stellaria media L. Netherlands Agriculture Science. 35: 525– 528. Ladent, J. F. 2003. Morphology and yield inwinter wheat grown in high yieldingcondition. Crop Science. 42: 1107 -1120. Lindquist JL and Mortensen DA (1999) Ecophysiological characteristics of four maize hybrids and Abutilon theophrasti. Weed Research. 39: 271-285. Maknali, A. and P. Shimi. 2010. Evaluating effect of different herbicides on weed control and yield on onion (Allium cepa L.). The Proceedings of 3rd Iranian Weed Science Congress. Babulsar. Volume 2. 321 – 324. Monaco TJ, Weller SC and Ashton FM (2002) Weed Science: principles and practices. 4th Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, 672 p. Murphy, C., Lemerle, D., Jones, R. and Harden, S. 2002. Use of density to predict crop yield loss between variable seasons. Weed Research. 42: 377-384. Omid beygi, R,. 2015. Production and processing of medicinal plants with a complete overview. first volume. Eighth edition. Astan Quds Razavi Publishing House. 348 pages. (in Persian). Orcutt DM and Nilson ET (2001) The Physiology of Plants under Stress. Soil and Biotic Factors. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 684 p Patrick, J. and M. Tranela. 2003. Variation in soybean (Glycine max (L.) merr.) interference among common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) accessions. Crop Protection. 22: 375 – 380. Poggio, S. L., Satorre, E. and Fuente, E. 2004. Structure of weed communities occurring in pea and wheat crops in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina). Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 103(1): 225-235. Qasem, J. r. 1996. Weed competition in garlic (Allium sativum L.). Journal of Horticultural Science.71(1): 41-48. Rahman, H. U., Khattak, A. M., Sadiq, M., Ullah, K., Javaria, S. and Ullah, I. 2012. Influence of different weed management practices on yield of garlic crop. Sarhad Journal of Agricultural. 28(2): 213-218. Rahman, H. U., Ullah, K., Sadiq, M., Ullah Khan, H., Azim Khan, M. and Khattak, A. M. 2011. Impact of time of weed removal on garlic (Allium sativum L.) Yield. Pakistan Journal of Weed Sciences Research. 17(2): 151-159. Rajcan I. and C. J. Swanton. 2001; Understanding maize- weedcompetition: Resource competition, light quality and whole plant. FieldCrop Res. 71: 139-150. Rashed mohasel, M,. 2006. Basics of weed management. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Publication. 566 pages. (in Persian). Saleh rastin, N., 2001. Biological fertilizers and their role in achieving sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of the necessity of industrial production of biofertilizers in the country. Agricultural Education Publishing. 1-54. (in Persian). Sharma, A.K. 2002. Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture. Agrobios Publications- India. 300 pages. Swanton, S., M. Buhler, D. D. Forcella, F. Gunsolus, and R. P. King. 1994. Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species. Weed Science. 42: 103-109. Tavakoli hashtchin, T,. 2003. Agricultural machinery mechanics. Salekan Publishing. 520 pages. (in Persian). Tripathi, S.N., Marker, Sh., Pandey, P., Aiswal, K.K.J. and Tiwari, D.K. 2011. Relationship between some morphological and physiological traits with grain yield in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Trends in Applied Sciences Research. 6: 1038-1045. Watson P.R., Derksen D.A., Van Acker R.C. and Blrvine M.C. 2002. The contribution of seed seedling, and mature plant traits to barley cultivar competitivness against weeds. Proceedings of the National Meeting- Canadian Weed Science Society, 14: 49-57. Yin, Y., Allen, H. E., Li, Y., Huang, C. P. and Sanders, P.F. 1996. Adsorption of mercury (II) by soil: effects of pH, chloride, and organic matter. American Society of Agronomy. 25: 837-844.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 446 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 481 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب