| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,846 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,300 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 41,387,139 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 18,562,189 |
واکنش ژنوتیپهای بومی و اصلاح‌شده برنج به رقابت با علف‌های هرز در سیستم کشت مستقیم | ||
| دانش علف‌های هرز ایران | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 13، شماره 1، شهریور 1396، صفحه 71-87 اصل مقاله (5.56 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijws.2017.1301.06 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مریم رجبیان* 1؛ جعفر اصغری2؛ محمدرضا احتشامی2؛ بیژن یعقوبی3 | ||
| 1گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشگاه گیلان | ||
| 2گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان | ||
| 3عضو هیات علمی- موسسه تحقیقات برنج رشت | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به منظور ارزیابی توان رقابتی ژنوتیپهای برنج با علف‌های‌هرز در سیستم کشت مستقیم و تعیین صفات مرتبط با آن، آزمایشی در سال زراعی 96-95 در ﻣﺆسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور واقع در شهرستان رشت انجام گرفت. آزمایش به صورت کرتهای خرد شده در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار اجرا شد. کرتهای اصلی شامل دو سطح مدیریت علفهرز (رقابت کامل تحت شرایط جامعه طبیعی علف‌های‌هرز و عاری از علفهرز) و کرتهای فرعی شامل 10 ژنوتیپ برنج (هاشمی، آبجی‌بوجی، تازه‌حسنی، گیلانه، شیرودی، صالح، RI18430-1، RI18430-60، RI18430-72 و RI18430-77) بودند. نتایج نشاندهنده تفاوت ژنوتیپ‌ها از نظر توانایی رقابت با علف‌های‌هرز بود. تحت شرایط عاری از علف‌های‌هرز، میزان عملکرد دانه از 5/3293 در رقم صالح تا 1/6796 کیلوگرم در هکتار در رقم شیرودی متغیر بود. تحت شرایط رقابت کامل علف‌های‌هرز نیز عملکرد دانه از 6/260 در لاین RI18430-72تا 2/1291 کیلوگرم در هکتار در رقم هاشمی ثبت شد. تغییرات زیستتوده علف‌های‌هرز در مرحله گلدهی از 53/153 تا 63/212 گرم در مترمربع بود که بالاترین و پایین‌ترین میزان آن به‌ترتیب در رقم آبجی‌بوجی و شیرودی مشاهده شد. متوسط افت نسبی عملکرد به واسطه رقابت با علف‌های‌هرز از 55/73 تا 1/94 درصد در میان ژنوتیپهای مختلف، متغیر بود. نتایج همچنین نشاندهنده وجود همبستگی مثبت معنیدار میان توانایی رقابتی و عملکرد دانه بود. ارقام هاشمی، شیرودی و لاین RI18430-60 با دارا بودن بالاترین توانایی رقابتی و عملکرد دانه (مبنای انتخاب مستقیم تحت شرایط رقابت کامل) میتوانند در برنامههای مدیریت تلفیقی علف‌های‌هرز به منظور کاهش مصرف علف‌کش‌ها به کار روند. بر مبنای نتایج به دستآمده، رشد اولیه (بنیه)، شاخص سطح برگ، زیستتوده و ارتفاع بوته، صفاتی هستند که همبستگی مثبت معنی داری با توان رقابتی داشته و از این رو میتوانند به عنوان معیاری جهت تشخیص و انتخاب غیرمستقیم ارقام دارای توان رقابتی بالا مورد استفاده قرار گیرند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| افت نسبی عملکرد؛ انتخاب غیر مستقیم؛ توانایی رقابتی؛ مدیریت تلفیقی علف‌های‌هرز | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Response of Landrace and Improved Genotypes of Rice to Weed Competition in Direct- Seeded System | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Maryam Rajabian1؛ Jafar Asghari2؛ Mohammad Reza Ehteshami2؛ Bijan Yaghoubi3 | ||
| 1Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, University of Guilan | ||
| 2Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Guilan | ||
| 3Department of Plant Protection, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Rasht | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In order to evaluate the competitive ability of rice genotypes against weeds in direct seeding system and determination the traits that may confer such attributes, a field experiment was conducted at the Rice Research Institute of Iran in Rasht during 2016-17 cropping season. The experiment was laid out in a split plot based on randomized complete blocks design with three replications. The treatments included two levels of weed management (weedy (under natural weed flora) and weed-free) as the main plots, and ten rice genotypes (Hashemi, Abjiboji, Tazeh Hasani, Gilaneh, Shiroodi, Saleh, RI18430-1, RI18430-60, RI18430-72, RI18430-77) as subplots. The results showed genotypic differences in competitive ability against weeds. Under weed- free conditions, grain yield varied from 3293.5 in Saleh to 6796.1 kg.ha-1 in Shiroodi. Under weedy conditions, grain yield was also registered from 260.6 in breeding line RI18430-72 to 1291.2 kg.ha-1 in Hashemi. The highest and lowest amounts of weed biomass at flowering were also observed in Abjiboji and shiroodi, respectively. Average yield loss due to weed competition ranged from 73.55 to 94.1% in different rice genotypes. The results also indicated a positive significant correlation between competitive ability and grain yield, thus Hashemi, Shiroodi and the breeding line RI18430-60 had the highest competitive ability against weeds and also grain yield (the basis for direct selection under weedy condition). This method can be applied in integrated weed management programs to reduce herbicide use. The study revealed that early growth (vigor), leaf area index, crop biomass and height had significant positive correlation with competitive ability and hence, can be used as useful indirect selection criteria of genotypes with high competitive ability. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Competitive ability, indirect selection, integrated weed management, relative yield loss | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aggarwal, P.K., Ladha, J.K., Singh, R.K., Devakumar, C. and Hardy, B. 2007. Science, technology, and trade for peace and prosperity. Proc. 26th International Rice Research Conference, 9- 12 October 2006, New Delhi, India. Al Mamun, M.A. 2014. Modelling rice- weed competition in direct- seeded rice cultivation. Agric Res. 3(4): 346-352. Ala, A., AghaAlikhani, M., Amiri Larijani, B. and Soufizadeh, S. 2014. Comparison between direct- seeding and transplanting of rice in Mazandaran province: Weed competition, yield and yield components. Iranian J. Field Crops Res. 12(3): 463-475. Anwar, M.P., Juraimi, A.S., Samedani, B., Puteh, A. and Man, M. 2012. Critical period of weed control in aerobic rice. The Sci. World J. 1-10. Awan, T.H., Sta Cruz, P.C. and Chauhan, B.S. 2015. Agronomic indices, yield- contributing traits, and yield of dry- seeded rice under varying herbicides. Field Crops Res. 177: 15- 25. Baghestani, M.A., Zand, E. and Soufizadeh, S. 2006. Iranian winter wheats (Triticum aestivum L.) interference with weeds: I. Grain yield and competitive index. Pak J. Weed Sci.Res. 12:119-129. Balasubramanian, V. and Hill, J.E. 2002. Direct seeding of rice in Asia: Emerging issues and strategic research needs for the 21st century. In: Pandey, S., Mortimer, M., Wade, L., Tuong, T.P., Lopez, K., Hardy, B. (Eds), Direct Seeding: Research Strategies and Opportunities. Inter. Rice. Res. Inst., Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 15- 42. Bhushan, L., Ladha, J.K., Gupta, R.K., Singh, S., Tirol- Padre, A., Saharawa, Y.S., Gathala, M. and Pathak, H. 2007. Saving of water and labor in a rice-wheat system with no tillage and direct seeding technologies. Agron. J. 99: 1288- 1296. Caton, B.P., Cope, E.A. and Mortimer, M. 2003. Growth traits of diverse rice cultivars under severe competition: Implication for screening for competitiveness. Field Crops Res. 83: 157- 172. Chauhan, B.S. and Johnson, D.E. 2010. The role of seed ecology in improving weed management strategies in the tropics. Adv Agron. 105: 221- 262. Chauhan, B.S., Awan, T.H., Abugho, S.B., Evengelista, G. and Yadav, S. 2015. Effect of crop establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed management,and rice yield. Field Crops Res. 172: 72-84. Ekeleme, E., Kamara, A.Y., Oikeh., Chikoye, D. and Omioigui, S.O. 2007. Effect of weed competition on upland rice production in north- eastern Nigeria. Afr. Crop. Sci. Conf. Proceed. 8:61-65. Farooq, M., Siddique, K.H.M., Rehman, H., Aziz, T., Lee, D.J. and Wahid, A. 2011. Rice direct seeding: Experiences, challenges and opportunities. Soil Till Res. 111: 87- 98. Fernando, B.P., Laca, E.A., Mackill, D.J., Fernandez, G.M. and Fischer, A.J. 2006. Relating rice traits to weed competitiveness and yield: a path analysis. Weed Sci. 54:1122-1131. Fischer, A.J., Ramirez, H.V., Gibson, K.D. and Da Silveira, P.D. 2001. Competitiveness of semi dwarf upland rice cultivars against palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha) and signalgrass (B. decumbens) . Agron J. 93: 967- 973. Gibson, K.D., Fischer, A.J., Foin, T.C. and Hill, J.E. 2003. Crop traits related to weed suppression in water- seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 51: 87- 93. Hill, J.E., Bayaer, D.E., Bocchi, S. and Clampett, W.S. 1990. Direct seeded rice in the temperate climates of Australia, Italy, and the United States. Selected papers from the International Rice Research Conference, Seoul, Korea.27-31 August 1990. pp: 91- 102. ISTA (International Seed Testing Association). 2009. International rules for seed testing. International Seed Testing Association, Basserdorf, Switzerland. Jennings, P.R. and Jesus Jr, J.D. 1968. Studies on competition in rice. I. Competition in mixtures of varieties. Evolution. 22; 119- 124. Kawano, K., Gonzalez, H. and Lucena, M. 1974. Intraspecific competition, competition with weeds, and spacing response in rice. Crop Sci. 14: 841- 845. Kim, J.K., Lee, M.H. and Kim, Y.S. 2000. Labor saving cultivation technologies of rice in Korea direct seeding and machine transplanting- national crop experimental station, Rural developmentAdministration (RDA), Republic of Korea. Lemerle, D., Verbeek, B. and Orchard, B. 2001. Ranking the ability of wheat varieties to compete with Lolium rigidum. Weed Res. 41(3):197-209. Mahajan, G., Ramesha, M.S. and Chauhan, B.S. 2014. Response of rice genotypes to weed competition in dry direct- seeded rice in India. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. The Sci. World J. 8 Pp. Mazid, M.A., Jabber, M.A., Mortimer, M., Wade, L.J., Riches, C.R. and Orr, A.W. 2003. Improving rice- based cropping systems in north- west Bangladesh diversification and weed management. In: The BCPC International Congress. Crop Prod. & Prot., 1029- 1034. Namuco, O. S., Cairns, J.E. and Johnson, D.E. 2009. Investigating early vigour in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.): Part I. Seedling growth and grain yield in competition with weeds. Field Crops Res. 113: 197- 206. Naylor, R. 1996. Herbicides in Asian rice: Transitions in weed management. Palo Alto (California): Institute for International Studies, Stanford University and Manila (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute. Pp:270. Ni, H., Moody, K., Robles, R.P., Paller Jr, E.C. and Lales, J.S. 2000. Oryza sativa plant traits conferring competitive ability against weeds. Weed Sci. 48: 200-204. Rao, A.N., Johnson, D.E., Sivaprasad, B., Ladha, J.K. and Mortimer, A.M. 2007. Weed management in direct-seeded rice. Adv Agron. 93: 153-255 Saito, K., Azoma, K. and Rodenburg, J. 2010. Plant characteristics associated with weed competitiveness of rice under upland and lowland conditions in West Africa. Field Crops Res. 116: 308- 317. Shakoor, A., Islam, S. and Naeem, M. 2000. Efficiency of different herbicides for control of weeds in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under rainfed conditions. Pak J Biol Sci. 3:463- 465. Sunyob, N.B., Juraimi, A.S.,. Hakim, M.A., Man, A., Selamat, A. and Amirul Alam, M.D. 2015. Competitive ability of some selected rice varieties against weed under aerobic condition. Int J Agric boil. 17:61-70. Zhao, D.L., Atlin, G.N., Bastiaans, L. and. Spiertz, J.H.J. 2006. Cultivar weed- competitiveness in aerobic rice: Heritability correlated traits, and the potential for indirect selection in weed- free environments. Crop Sci. 46: 372- 380. Zhao, D.L., Bastiaans, L., Atlin, G.N. and Spiertz, J,H,J. 2007. Interaction of genotype × management on vegetative growth and weed suppressive of aerobic rice. Field Crops Res. 100:327-340. Zimdahl, R.L. 2004. Weed- Crop Competition: A Review, 2nd ed. Blackwell Publishing. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 486 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 391 |
||