| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,036 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,971 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,669,659 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 76,680,378 |
تحمل به تنش شوری ژنوتیپ‌های پیشرفته گندم در شرایط کشت هیدروپونیک و مزرعه | ||
| نهال و بذر | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 33، شماره 2، شهریور 1396، صفحه 215-241 اصل مقاله (277.83 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/spij.2017.115553 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی قربانی1؛ رقیه امینیان1؛ اشکبوس امینی* 2 | ||
| 1گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی (ره)، قزوین | ||
| 2مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به منظور بررسی تاثیر تنش شوری بر برخی صفات گندم، بیست ژنوتیپ پیشرفته در شرایط کنترل شده (کشت هیدرو پونیک) و مزرعه مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. آزمایش مزرعه‌ای در ایستگاه تحقیقاتی بیرجند (امیرآباد) در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در چهار تکرار در شرایط تنش شوری (شوری آب 9 و خاک 12 دسی‌زیمنس بر متر) و آزمایش کنترل شده در گلخانه شوری بخش تحقیقات غلات در شرایط کشت هیدروپونیک، در قالب آزمایش فاکتوریل در سه تکرار به صورت فاکتور A شامل دو سطح شوری (صفر به عنوان شاهد و 12دسی‌زیمنس برمتر نمک کلرید سدیم) و فاکتور B شامل بیست ژنوتیپ انجام شد. نتایج تجزیه واریانس در مزرعه نشان دادکه اثر ژنوتیپ بر صفات عملکرد دانه، تعداد روز تا سنبله رفتن و رسیدن، طول سنبله و پدانکل، تعداد و وزن دانه در سنبله، وزن هزاردانه، عملکرد بیولوژیک و شاخص برداشت معنی‌دار بود. ژنوتیپ شماره 18(1-66-22//PBW154/3/HALT) با داشتن بیشترین مقدار عملکرد دانه وعملکرد بیولوژیک به عنوان ژنوتیپ متحمل و ژنوتیپ شماره 12 (Bow"s"/Vee"s"//1-60-3/3/Cocoraque 75/4/Inia ) به عنوان ژنوتیپ حساس به شوری در شرایط مزرعه تعیین شدند. نتایج به دست آمده در شرایط کنترل شده حاکی از وجود اختلاف معنی‌دار بین ژنوتیپ‌ها و تاثیر معنی‌دار تنش شوری بر صفات ارتفاع بوته، طول، عرض و سطح برگ، وزن خشک ریشه و اندام‌های هوایی و محتوای کلروفیل بود. اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ و شوری نیز برای برخی صفات معنی‌دار بود. در آزمایش هیدروپونیک، ژنوتیپ‌های شماره 4، 5، 14، 17 و 18 با داشتن مقادیر بالایی از عملکرد بیولوژیک و محتوای کلروفیل در مقایسه با ارقام شاهد، به عنوان ژنوتیپ‌های برتر و متحمل و ژنوتیپ شماره 12 به عنوان ژنوتیپ حساس شناسایی شدند که با نتایج مزرعه همخوانی نسبی داشت. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| گندم کشت هیدروپونیک؛ شوری خاک؛ عملکرد بیولوژیک؛ صفات زراعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Salinity Stress Tolerance in Wheat Advanced Genotypes under Hydroponic and Field Conditions | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| A. Ghorbani1؛ R. Aminian1؛ A. Amini2 | ||
| 1Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Imam Khomeini International University, Ghazvin, Iran. | ||
| 2, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| To study the effects of salinity stress on some wheat characteristics, twenty advanced genotypes were evaluated in controlled (hydroponic culture) and field conditions. Field experiment in randomized complete block design (RCBD) was conducted in saline conditions (Ecwater = 9ds/m and Ecsoil = 12ds/m) at the research farm of Birjand station. The hydroponic culture experiment was conducted in factorial based on RCBD with three replications, in which the first factor was salinity of sodium chloride levels of 0 and 12ds/m and the second factor the same twenty wheat genotypes. In filed experiment, ANOVA results showed significant effects of genotype on grain yield, days to heading and maturity, spike length, peduncle length, spike seed number and weight, thousand grain weight, biological yield and harvest index. Genotype no. 18 (1-66-22//PBW154/3/HALT) was recognized as a tolerant genotype due to the highest grain yield and biomass, while genotype no. 12 (Bow"s"/Vee"s"//1-60-3/3/Cocoraque75/4/Inia) was evaluate as a susceptible genotype in field experiment. In Hydroponic culture, the salinity had significant effects on plant height, biomass dry weight, leaf width, leaf length, leaf area, root dry weight and chlorophyll contents. The interaction effects of genotype and salinity were also significant on some traits. In hydroponic experiment, genotypes no. 4, 5, 14, 17 and 18 having higher biomass and chlorophyll contents, compared to the check cultivars, were determined as superior and tolerant genotypes, while genotype no. 12 was susceptible to solinity stress. The results of hydroponic experiment relatively comfimed the results of field experiment. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Wheat, hydroponic culture, Soil salinity, biomass, agronomic traits | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abadia, A., Belkohodja, R., Morales, F., and Abadia, J. 1999. Effects of salinity on the photosyntheyic pigment composition of barely (Hordeum vulgare L.) growth under a triple-line-source sprinkler system in the field. Plant Physiology (154): 392-400.
Akbarpour, O. A., Dehghani, H., Rousta, M. J., and Amini, A. 2015. Evaluation of some properties of Iranian wheat genotypes in normal and salt-stressed conditions using Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML). Iranian Journal of Crop Research 46(1): 57-69 (in Persian).
Amini, A., Amirnia, R., and Ghazvini, H. 2015. Evaluation of salinity tolerance in bread wheat genotypes under field conditions. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 31-1 (1): 95-115 (in Persian).
Amini, A., Amirnia, R., and Gazvini, H. 2016. Evaluation of relationship between physiological and agronomic traits related to salinity tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 17(4): 329- 348. (in Persian).
Ashraf, M., and Harris, P. J. C. 2004. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Science (166): 3-16.
Chartzoulakis, K., and Klapaki, G. 2000. Response of two green houses pepper hybrids to NaCl salinity during different growth stages. Sciencia Horticulturae 86: 247-260.
Colmer, T. D., Flowers, T. J., and Munns, R. 2006. Use of wild relatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 1059-1078.
Farhoodi, R., and Khodarahmpour, Z. 2015. Evaluation of physiological responses in 19 wheat to salinity stress in seedling stage. Journal of Proccess and Function of Plant 4(11): 67-77 (in Persian).
Francois, L. E., Grieve, C. M., Mass, E. V., and Lesch, S. M. 1994. Time of salt stress affects growth and yield components of irrigated wheat. Agronomy Journal (86): 100-107.
Ghorbani, M. H., Khodarahmi, M., Darvish, F., and Taeb, M. 2010. Study the relationship of important agronomic traits with grain yield in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Lines. Journal of Agricultural Crop 82: 101-106.
Ghorbani, M. H., Zeinali, E., Soltani, A., and Galeshi, S. 2001. Effect of salinity stress on growth, yield and yield components of two types of wheat. Proceedings of the 7th Iranian Crop Production and Plant Breeding Congress, Karaj, Iran. Page 773 (in Persian).
Goudarzi, M., and Pakniyat, D. H. 2008. Evaluation of wheat cultivars under salinity stress based on some agronomic and physiological traits. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences 4: 35-38.
Greenway, H., and Munns, R. 1980. Mechanism of salt tolerance in non-halophytes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31: 149-190.
Jafari-Shabestari, J., Corke, H., and Qualset, C. O. 1995. Field evaluation of tolerance to salinity stress in Iranian hexaploid wheat landrace accessions. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 42: 147-156.
Kafi, M., and Ostvar, D. 1997. The effects of salinity on growth and yield of nine varieties of Wheat. Journal of Agricutural Science and Technology 11 (1): 77-85.
Kalantarzadeh, M. 2000. Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative characters of bread wheat in relation with high molecule glutenin by multivariate statistical methods. MSc. Thesis, College of Agriculture Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran (in Persian).
Koushafar, M., Khoshgoftarmanesh, A. H., Moezzi, A., and Mobli, M. 2011. Effect of dynamic unequal distribution of salts in the root environment on performance and crop per drop (CPD) of hydroponic-grown tomato. Sciencia Horticulturae 131: 1-5.
Maas, E. V., and Grieve, C. M. 1990. Spike and leaf development in salt-stressed wheat. Crop Science (30): 1309–1313.
Maas, E. V., and Poss, J. A. 1989. Salt sensitivity of wheat at different growth stages. Irrigation Scienc 10: 29-40.
Mass, E. V., Scott, M.L., Francois, L.E., and Grieve. M. C. 1994. ‘Tiller development in Salt-stressed wheat. Crop Science 34: 1599-1603.
Machado, S., and Paulsen, G. M. 2001. Combined effects of drought and high temperature on water relations of wheat and sorghum. Journal of Plant and Soil 223: 179-187.
Majdi, M., Jalal-Kamali, M. R., Esmaeilzadeh-Moghaddam, M., Eradatmand-Asli, D., Moradi, F., and Tahmasbi, S. 2011. Variation of some agronomic characteristics and soluble stem carbohydrates at content anthesis in spring wheat genotypes under terminal drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 13 (2): 299-309 (in Persian).
Mohammad, J., Naaziri, M., Nazir, A., Shah, D., and Jamal, H. 1996. Wheat yield component as affected by low water stress at different growth stage. Sarhad Journal of Agricultural 12: 19-25.
Munns, R., and James, R. A. 2003. Screening methods for salinity tolerance: a case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant and Soil 253: 201-218.
Pazira, E., and Sadegzadeh, K. 1998. National review document on optimizing soil and water use in Iran. Proceedings of the Workshop of ICISAT, Sahelian Center, 13-18 April, Niamy, Nigeria.
Pessarakli, M., and Szabolcs, I. 2011. Soil salinity and sodicity as particular plant/crop stress factors. In: Pessarakli, M. (ed.) Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress (3rd ed.), Revised and Expanded. Taylor and Francis, Florida, USA.
Rawson, H., Richards, M., R. A., and Munns, R. 1988. An examination of selection criteria for salt-tolerance in wheat, barley and triticale genotypes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39: 759-772.
Sadat Noori, S. A., Roustaei, A., and Foghi, B. 2006. Variability of salt tolerance for eleven traits bread wheatin different saline conditions. Agronomy Journal 5 (1): 131-136.
Salama, S., Terivedi, S., Busheva, M., Afra, A., Grab, G., and Erdei, L. 1994. Effects of NaCl salinity on growth, cation accumation, chlorophyll structure and function in wheat cultivars differing into salt tolerance. Plant Physiology 144: 241-247.
Sardouie-Nasab, S., Mohammadi Nejad, G., Zebarjadi, A. R., Nakhoda, B., Mardi, M., Tabatabaie, S. M. T., Sharifi, G. R., Amini, A., and Majidi Heravan, E. 2013. Response of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines to salinity stress. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 29-1: 81-102 (in Persian).
Shafi, M., Guoping, Z., Bakht, J., Aman Khan, M., Islam, E.U., Dawood Khan, M., and Raziuddin, M. 2010. Effect of cadmium and salinity stresses on root morphology of wheat. Crop Science 42 (4): 2747-2753.
Sharifi, M., Ghorbanli, M., and Ebrahimzadeh, H. 2007. Improved growth of salinity stressed soybean after inoculation with salt pre-treated mycorrhizal fungi. Journal of Plant Physiology 164: 1144-1151.
Siddique, Z. S., Khan, M. A., Kim, B. G., Huang, J. S., and Kwon, T. R. 2008. Physiological responses of Brassica napus genotypes to combined drought and salt stress. Plant Stress 2: 78-83.
Sorkhi, B., and Yazdi Samadi, B. 1998. Study of genetic variation between grain yield and quantitative traits in 500 bread wheat lines by factor analysis. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 29 (2): 363-373 (in Persian).
Staple, R. C., and Gray, H. T. 1984. Salinity Tolerance in Plant. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA. Tabatabaie, S.J., Gregory, P.J., Ho, L., and Hadley, P. 2003. Split root system for the use of saline water in hydroponic tomato production. Acta Horticulturae 609: 307-312.
Taghavi, M., and Chaiechee, M. 1999. Effects of salinity and salt on the germination and early growth stage of sorghum. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resouces (4): 32-40 (in Persian).
Volkmar, K. M., Hu, H., and Stephun, H. 1997. Physiological responses of plants to salinity: A review. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 78: 19-27.
Wang, Y., and Nil, N. 2000. Changes in chlorophyll, ribulose biphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase, glycine betaine content, photosynthesis and transpiration in Amaranthus tricolor leaves during salt stress. Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 75: 623-627.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 492 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 369 |
||