| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,036 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,971 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,666,627 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 76,589,121 |
تأثیر الگوهای مختلف کشت مخلوط سیر (Allium sativum) و نخودفرنگی (Pisum sativum) بر شاخصهای جمعیتی علفهایهرز | ||
| دانش علف‌های هرز ایران | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 12، شماره 2، اسفند 1395، صفحه 222-235 اصل مقاله (752.06 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ارسطو عباسیان1؛ علی نخ زری مقدم1؛ همت الله پیردشتی2؛ ابراهیم غلامعلی پور علمداری1 | ||
| 1دانشگاه گنبد کاووس | ||
| 2گروه زراعت دانشگاه ساری | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این تحقیق در پاییز 1392 به صورت کشت مخلوط دو گیاه سیر و نخود فرنگی در دو منطقه گنبدکاووس و ساری، جهت ارزیابی تغییرات تنوع، جمعیت و زیستتوده علفهایهرز در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی و با سه تکرار اجرا شد. تیمارهای آزمایشی ترکیبهای مختلف کشت مخلوط در نه سطح شامل کشت خالص سیر، کشت خالص نخود فرنگی، مخلوط جایگزینی 25 : 75، 50 :50، 75 : 25 درصد، مخلوط افزایشی 25 + 100، 50 +100، 75 + 100، 100 + 100 درصد نخودفرنگی و سیر در نظر گرفته شد. بر اساس نتایج، زیستتوده علفهایهرز در شهرستان ساری با میانگین 5/2080 بیشتر از منطقه گنبد کاووس با میانگین 4/1479 گرم در متر مربع بود. هر چند علفهایهرز در شهرستان گنبد کاووس (88/44 بوته در متر مربع) از تراکم بیشتری برخوردار بودند. بیشترین وزن زیستتوده (3/3387 گرم در متر مربع) و تراکم علفهایهرز (83/61 عدد در متر مربع) به ترتیب به کشت خالص سیر در شهرستان ساری و مخلوط جایگزینی 75% نخودفرنگی+ 25% سیر در شهرستان گنبد کاووس تعلق گرفت. میانگین شاخص غنای گونهای مارگالف، منهینک و شاخص تنوع شانون-واینر در شهرستان ساری (بهترتیب: 33/1، 01/1 و 96/1) در مقایسه با شهرستان گنبدکاووس (بهترتیب 86/، 7/0 و 03/1) بالاتر بود. در مقایسه، دو شاخص غالبیت سیمپسون (63/0) در کشت خالص نخود فرنگی و شاخص یکنواختی شانون-واینر (89/0) در تیمار جایگزینی کاشت 75% نخود فرنگی+ 25% سیر در گنبد کاووس دارای مقدار بیشتری بود. شاخص تنوع برگر-پارگر (77/0) در کشت خالص سیر در ساری، شاخص تنوع شانون- واینر (42/1) و شاخص تنوع سیمپسون (94/3) هر دو در تیمار جایگزینی کاشت 75% نخودفرنگی+ 25% سیر در ساری از مقدار بالاتری برخوردار بودند. در مجموع، هرچند بین دو منطقه به دلیل ویژگیهایاقلیمی و خاکی، شاخصهای تنوع علفهایهرز متفاوت بودند اما الگوهای کشت مخلوط در مقایسه با نظام تککشتی موجب افزایش تنوع و کاهش غالبیت علفهایهرز در دو منطقه شدند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تراکم؛ زیستتوده؛ غنای گونه؛ یکنواختی؛ غالبیت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of Different Garlic (Allium sativum) and peas (Pisum sativum) Intercropping patterns on Weed Population Indices | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Arastoo Abasian1؛ Ali nakhzarimoghadam1؛ Hemmatollah Pirdashti2؛ Ebrahim Gholamalipour Alamdari1 | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This study was conducted as intercropping of garlic and peas to assess the diversity, bio-mass, and population of weeds in two regions of Gonbad Kavoos and Sari during autumn 2013. The experiment was implemented in a randomized complete blocks design with three replications in both regions. Different combinations of intercropping were considered in nine levels of garlic and peas pure cultures, replacement intercropping of 75:25, 50:50, 25:75%, and additive intercropping of 100+25, 100+50, 100+75, 100+100 for garlic and peas. Results showed that the average biomass value of weeds in Sari (2080.5 gm-2) was greater than in Gonbad region. However, a higher weed density (44.88 m-2) was observed in Gonbad. The highest levels of biomass (3387.3 gm-2) and density (61.83 m-2) of weeds were measured for garlic pure culture in Sari and the intercropping replacement of 75% peas:25% garlic in Gonbad Kavoos. Mean value of Margalef species richness index, Menhinick index, and Shannon-Wiener diversity index were calculated as 1.33, 1.01, and 1.96 in Sari, respectively, which were higher than 0.86, 0.7, and 1.03 in Gonbad. By contrast, the Simpson's dominance index (0.63) for peas pure culture and Shannon-Wiener evenness index (0.89) to replacement intercropping of 75% peas: 25% garlic were greater in Gonbad Kavoos. Berger-Prager diversity index (0.77) for pure garlic culture, and both Shannon diversity (1.42) and Simpson's diversity (3.94) indices for replacement intercropping of 75% peas: 25% garlic were greater in Sari. There was a difference between the two regions in terms of climatic and edaphic characteristics which resulted differences in weed diversity indices, intercropping increased diversity while reducing dominance as compared to the monoculture cropping system in both regions. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| biomass, Density, Dominance, evenness, Species richness | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbasi, Sh., Afsharzadeh, S. 2010. An overview on methods of measuring the biodiversity in vegetation of Iran. In: Proceeding of the 1st National Conference on Ecology Protection. Shahid Beheshti University. Page 8. Bakus, G. J., 2007. Quantitative analysis of marine biological communities. John Wiley & Sons. 435pp. Booth, B.D., Murphy, S. D. and Swanton, C.J., 2003. Weed Ecology in Natural and Agricultural Systems. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. 303pp. Delafuente, E. B., Suarez, S. A. and Ghersa, C. M. 2006. Soybean weed community composition and richness between 1995 and 2003 in the rolling Pampas (Argentina). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 115: 229-236. Derksen, K., Thomas, A., Lafond, G., Loeppky, H. and Swanton, C. 1995. Impact of post emergence herbicides on weed community diversity within conservation tillage systems. Weed Res. 35: 311-320. Dutoit, T., Gerbaud, E., Buisson, E. and Roche, P. 2003. Dynamics of a weed community in a cereal field created after ploughing a seminatural meadow: Roles of the permanent seed bank. Ecosci. 10: 225-23. Ejtehadi, H., Sepehri, A. and Akkafi, H.R. 2013. Methods of Measuring the Biodiversity. Mashhad University Press. 228 pp. (In Persian with English summary). Elba, B., Suárez, S. A., Lenardis, A. E. & Poggio, S. L. 2014. Intercropping sunflower and soybean in intensive farming systems: Evaluating yield advantage and effect on weed and insect assemblages. J. Life Sci. 70: 47-52. Gbanguba., A. U., Ismail, U., Kolo, M. G. M., and Umar, A. 2011. Effect of cassava/legumes intercrop before rice on weed dynamics and rice grain yield at adeggi, Nigeria. African J. of Plant Sci. 5: 264-267. Ghanbarzadeh, S., Chaichi, M. R., Hosseini, S. M. B. and Taleie, A. R. 2010. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density on corn forage yield in an agroforestry system. Iranian J. Field Crop Sci. 41: 521-530. (In Persian with English Summary). Gronle, A., Lux, G., Böhm, H., Schmidtke, K., Wild, M., Demmel, M. and Heb, J. 2015. Effect of ploughing depth and mechanical soil loading on soil physical properties, weed infestation, yield performance and grain quality in sole and intercrops of pea and oat in organic farming. Soil Tillage Res. 148: 59-73. Hajimirza Aghaii, S., Jalilvand, H., Kooch, Y., and PoorMajidian, M.R. 2011. Plant diversity with respect to ecological factor of latitude in Sardabrood forests of Chalous, northern Iran. Iranian J. Biol. 24: 400-411. (In Persian with English Summary). Kazemi, A. and Shahmoradi, A. A. 2000. Autecological study of Prangos ferulacea in Kohgilouyeh and Boyerahmad province, final report, Publication of Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, 78 p. Kaur, N., Bhullar, M. S. and Gill, G. 2015. Weed management options for sugarcane-vegetable intercropping systems in north-western India. Crop Protect. 74: 18-23. Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Blankenship, E. E., Van Acker, R. C., & Lindquist, J. L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci. 50: 773-786. Koochecki, A. R., Mahadavi Damghani, A.A., Kamkar, B., Farsi, M., Rezvanimoghadam, P. and Barzegar, A.B.2006. Agricultural Biodiversity. Mashhad Jahad-Daneshgahi Press. 610Pp. (In Persian with English summary). Krebs, C. J. 1998. Ecological Methodology. 2nd Edition. Manlo Park: Addison- Wesley. 620p. Mahdavi Merj, T., Ghanbari, A. and Asgharpour, M. R. 2014. The effect of manure and chemical fertilizers on yield and weed control in intercropping Carum copticum and Hordum vulgar. Iranian J. Crops Res. 6: 20-30. (In Persian with English Summary). Menalled, F. D., Gross, K. L. and Hammond, M. 2001. Weed aboveground and seed bank community responses to agricultural management systems. Ecol. Appl. 11: 1586-1601. Mesdaghi, M. 2001. Description and Analysis of Vegetation. Mashhad Jahad-Daneshgahi Press. 287Pp. (In Persian with English summary). Mohebbi, A. and Mirzai. M. A. 2013. Comparison index of diversity, dominance, richness and evenness grazed and non-grazed vegetation conditions (case study: No. four of Zarand-e-Shhryar). J. For. Range. 97: 33-39. Narimani, V.M., Minbashi, M. and Mohammadipour, M. 2009. Evaluation and determination the dominant weeds in wheat and barley with quantitative indices in Eastern Azarbaijan Province of Iran. In: Poceedings of the 9th Iranian Weed Sciences Congress. 4Pp. (In Persian with English Summary). Norozzadeh, Sh., Rashed Mohacel, M., Nassiri Mahallati, A., Koochecki, A. R. and Abbaspour, M. 2008. Evaluation of species functional and structural diversity of weeds in wheat fields of Northern, Southern and Razavi Khorasan provinces. Iranian J. Field Crops Res. 6: 471-485. (In Persian with English Summary). Patience, M., Lagoke, S. T. O., Adigun, J. A., Orija, O. R. 2013. Effect of intercropping with maize on weed diversity in cassava. Environmental and Experimental Biology. 11: 189–193. Peiris, H. M. P. 2016. Diversity and behaviour of the naturally regenerated vegetation in commercial tea soils under herbicide free integrated weed management. Procedia Food Sci. 6: 314-317. Poggio, S. L., Satorre, E. H. and Delafuente, E. B. 2004. Structure of weed communities occurring in pea and wheat crops in the Rolling Pampa Argentina .Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 103: 225-235. Ramesh, K., Rao, A. N. & Chauhan, B. S. 2016. Role of crop competition in managing weeds in rice, wheat, and maize in India: A review. Crop Prot. In Press. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.cropro. 2016.07.008. Rastghar, M. A. 2005. Weeds and their Control Methods (3rd edn). University of Tehran Press 413Pp. (In Persian with English summary). Samadani, B. and Rahimmian Mashhadi, H. 2007. Compare the effects of monoculture and mixed cover crops on weed control and yield of tomato. J. Plant Pests Dis. 2: 128-144. (In Persian with English Summary). Shahzad, M., Farooq, M., Jabran, K., & Hussain, M. 2016. Impact of different crop rotations and tillage systems on weed infestation and productivity of bread wheat. Crop Protect. 89, 161-169. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 987 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 882 |
||