| تعداد نشریات | 285 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 83 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 3,094 |
| تعداد مقالات | 34,531 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 49,371,391 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 79,816,843 |
تأثیر بایوپرایمینگ بذر با ریزوباکترهای آزوسپریلیوم و ازتوباکتر ( Azospirillum و Azotobacter) بر عملکرد و مقاومت به تنش خشکی در گونه فستوکای پابلند (Festuca arundinacea Schreb) | ||
| تحقیقات مرتع و بیابان ایران | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 23، شماره 4، اسفند 1395، صفحه 760-771 اصل مقاله (495 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijrdr.2017.109505 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| هادی رادنژاد* 1؛ بهزاد بهتری2؛ علی اصغر نقی پور برج3؛ شعله حاج آقا معمار4 | ||
| 1عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد خوراسگان (اصفهان)، اصفهان. | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری علوم مرتع، دانشکده منابع طبیعی دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهرکرد، ایران | ||
| 4دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مرتعداری دانشکده فناوری منابع طبیعی و کشاورزی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| گروهی از باکتریها به نام ریزوباکتریهای محرک رشد گیاهان، که توانایی تجمع روی ریشه گیاه و خاک اطراف ریشه را دارند، محرک رشد گیاهان میباشند. یکی از روشهای پرایمینگ بذر استفاده از میکروارگانیسم در تلقیح بذر میباشد که به بایوپرایمینگ شناخته شده است. استفاده از این میکروارگانیسمها در تلقیح بذر سبب افزایش عملکرد گیاهان میشود؛ بویژه اگر میکروارگانیسمها در منطقه ریشه گیاهان استقرار یافته و با گیاه همزیست شوند. به این منظور این تحقیق جهت بررسی اثرات بایوپرایمینگ با ریزوباکترهای آزوسپریلیوم و ازتوباکتر بر مقاومت به تنش خشکی در گونه مرتعی فستوکای پا بلند در شرایط گلخانهای انجام شد. چهار سطح پتانسیل اسمزی (5/0-، 1-، 5/1- و 2- مگاپاسکال) با استفاده از پلی اتیلن گلایکول با مدت زمان تیمار 2 و 4 روز روی بذر فستوکای پابلندبه عنوان تیمار پرایمینگ همراه با تلقیح با ریزوباکتریها صورت گرفت. تنش خشکی بر اساس ظرفیت زراعی در چهار سطح (100 درصد ظرفیت زراعی (بدون تنش)، 75، 50 و 25 درصد ظرفیت زراعی) در دوران رشد گیاه اعمال شد. نتایج نشان داد که تیمارهای بایوپرایمینگ در صفات مورد مطالعه سبب بهبود عملکرد نسبت به شاهد و افزایش مقاومت به تنش خشکی شد. در این بررسی هر دو نوع ریزوباکترهای آزوسپریلیوم و ازتوباکتر سبب افزایش عملکرد معنیداری نسبت به شاهد شدند. در کل ازتوباکتر به طور نسبی عملکرد بهتری نسبت به آزوسپریلیوم نشان داد. با این وجود تیمار ازتوباکتر 2و 5/0 مگاپاسکال 2 روز در گونه فستوکای پابلندمیتواند بعنوان تیمارهای برتر نسبت به تیمارهای دیگر به کار رفته در این تحقیق مطرح شود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ریزوباکتریهای محرک رشد گیاهان؛ تلقیح بذر؛ ظرفیت زراعی؛ همزیستی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effects of seed biopriming with Azospirillum and Azotobacter on performance and drought resistance in Festuca arundinacea Schreb | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hadi Radnezhad1؛ behzad Behtari2؛ Ali Asghar naghipour Borj3؛ Shole Haj Agfha Memar4 | ||
| 1Scientific Member of Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria are a subset of bacteria, accumulating on the root and rhizosphere. One of the seed priming methods is the use of microorganisms in seed inoculation, known as biopriming. The use of these microorganisms in seed inoculation leads to increased plant performance, especially if the microorganisms are symbiotic in the root zone of the plants. This study was aimed to investigate the effects of biopriming with Azospirillum and Azotobacter on drought resistance in fescue under greenhouse conditions. Osmotic potential at four levels was applied on the Fescue seeds using polyethylene glycol for 2 and 4 days as priming treatment along with inoculation with rhizobacteria. Drought stress was applied during the plant growth based on field capacity at four levels. The results showed that biopriming treatments caused improved performance and increased drought resistance compared to the control. The study showed that both Azospirillum and Azotobacter increased the performance significantly compared to the control. Generally, Azotobacter showed relatively better performance than Azospirillum. However, the Azotobacter treatments at 2 and 0.5 MPa for 2 days can be considered as a superior treatment in fescue as compared with other treatments. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Field capacity, Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, seed incubation, symbiosis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmad, F., Ahmad, I. and Khan, M.S., 2005. Indole acetic acid production by the indigenous isolate of Azotobacter and Fluorescent Pseudomonas in the presence and absence of Tryptophan. Turkish Journal of Biology, 29: 29-34. Alizadeh, M.A. and Jafari, A.A., 2006. Seed and seedling responses of ecotypes of Bromus, Agropyron and Medicago to Fusarium solani and F. oxysporum. Journal of New Seeds, 8: 71-81. Arsac, J.F., Lamothe, C., Mulard, D. and Fages, J., 1990. Growth enhancement of maize through Azospirilum lipoferum inculcation: effect of plant genotype and bacterial concentration. Agronomie, 10: 649-654. Bashan, Y., 1986. Significance of timing and level of inoculation with rhizosphere bacteria on wheat plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 18: 297-301. Bashan, Y. and Holguin, G., 1997a. Azospirillum-plant relationships: environmental and physiological advances (1990-1996). Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 43: 103-121. Bashan, Y. and Holguin, G., 1997b. Short- and medium- term avenues for Azospirillum inoculation. 130-149. In: Ogoshi, A., Kobayashi, K., Homma, Y., Kodama, F. Kondo, N. and Akino, S. (Eds,). Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria. Present status and future prospects. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Hokkaido, Sapporo, Japan. Bashan, Y. and Holguin, G., 1998. Proposal for the division of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria into two classifications. Biocontrol-PGPR (plant growth-promoting bacteria) and PGPB. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30: 1225–1228. Begum, M. M., Sariah, M., Puteh, A. B., Zainal Abidin, M. A., Rahman, M. A. and Siddiqui Y., 2010. Field performance of bio-primed seeds to suppress Colletotrichum truncatum causing damping-off and seedling stand of soybean. Biological Control, 53: 18–23 Bennett, A. J. and Whipps, J. M., 2008. Dual application of beneficial microorganisms to seed during drum priming. Applied Soil Ecology, 38: 83-89. Bent, E., Tuzun, S., Chanway, C. P. and Eneback, S., 2001. Alterations in plant growth and in root hormone levels of lodgepole pines inoculated with rhizobacteria. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 47: 793–800. Boddey, R. M. and Do bereiner, J., 1988. Nitrogen fixation associated with grasses and cereals: Recent results and perspectives for future research. Plant and Soil, 108: 53–65. Bothe, H., Körsgen, H., Lehmacher, T. and Hundeshagen, T., 1992. Differential effects of Azospirillum, auxin and combined nitrogen on growth of the roots of wheat. Symbiosis, 13: 167–179. Callan, N. W., Mathre, D. E. and Miller, J. B., 1990. Bio-priming seed treatment for biological control of Pythium ultimum preemergence damping-off in sh2 sweet corn. Plant Disease, 74: 368–372. Cantliffe, D. J., 1991. Benzyladenine in the priming solution reduces thermo-dormancy of lettuce seeds. Horticulture Technology, 1: 95–97. Chabot, R., Antoun, H. and Cescas, M. P., 1993. Stimulation of the growth of maize and lettuce by inorganic phosphorus- solubilizing microorganisms. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 39: 941-947. Fulchieri, M., Lucangeli, C. and Bottini, R., 1993. Inoculation with Azospirillum affects growth and gibberellin status of corn seedling roots. Plant Cell Physiology, 34: 1305-1309. Ghassemi-Golezani, K. and Esmaeilpour, B., 2008. The effect of salt priming on the performance of differentially matured cucumber (Cucumis sativus) seeds, Journal of Notulae botanicae horti agrobotanici cluj-napoca, 36: 67-70. Giri, G.S. and Schillinger, W. F., 2003. Seed priming winter wheat for germination emergence and yield. Crop sicemce, 43: 2135- 2141. Hardegree, S. P. and Van Vactor, S. S., 2000. Germination and emergence of primed grass seeds under field and simulated-field temperature regimes. Annals of Botany, 85:379–390. Hardegree, S. P. and Emmerich, W., 2000. Effect of matric-priming duration and priming water potential on germination of four grasses. Journal of Experimental Botany, 43: 233-238. Hardegree, S. P., Jones, T. A. and Van Vactor, S. S., 2002. Variability in Thermal response of Primed and Non-primed Seeds of Squirreltail [Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey and Elymus multisetus (J. G. Smith) M. E. Jones]. Annals of Botany, 89: 311-319. Harman, G. E., Taylor, A. G. and Stasz, T. E., 1989. Combining effective strains of Trichoderma harzianum and solid matrix priming to improve biological seed treatments. Plant Disease, 73: 631–637. Heydecker, W. and Coolbaer, P., 1977. Seed treatments for improved performance survey and attempted prognosis. Seed Science and Technology, 5: 353–425. Kloepper, J. W., Rodriguez-Ubana R., Zehnder, G. W., Murphy, J. F., Sikora, E. and Fernandez, C., 1999. Plant root-bacterial interactions in biological control of soil borne diseases and potential extension to systemic and foliar diseases. Australasian Plant Pathology, 28: 21–26. Kucey, R. M. N., 1988. Alteration of size of wheat root system and nitrogen fixation by associative nitrogen- fixation bacteria measured under field conditions. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 34: 735-739. Langer, R. H. M., 1990. Pasture plants. 39-74.In R.H.M. Langer (Eds,) Pastures, their ecology and management. Oxford University Press, Auckland. Levanony, H. and Bashan, Y., 1989. Enhancement of cell division in wheat root tips and growth of root elongation zone induced by Azospirillum brasilens Cd. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 67: 2213-2216. Michel, B. E., Kaufmann, M. R., 1972. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiology, 51: 914-916. Munns, R., 2005. Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytologist. 167: 645–663. Nanda, S. S., Swain, K. C., Panda, S. C., Mohanty, A. K. and Alim, M. A., 1995. Effect of nitrogen and biofertilizers in fodder rainfed upland conditions of Orisa. Current Agricultural Research, 8:45-47. Okon, Y. and Labandera-Gonzalez, C. A., 1994. Agronomic applications of Azospirillum: an evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation. Soil Biology and Soil Biochemistry, 26: 1551-1601. Reddy,P. P. 2013. Bio-priming of Seeds. Recent Advances in Crop Protection, Springer India, 83-90. Reyes, I., Bernier, L. and Antoun, H., 2002. Rock phosphate solubilization and colonization of maize rhizosphere by wild and genetically modified strains of Penicillium rugulosum. Microbial Ecology, 44: 39–48. Romero, D., de Vicente, A., Rakotoaly, R. H., Dufour, S. E., Veening, J. W., Arrebola, E., Cazorla, F. M., Kuipers, O. P., Paquot, M. and Perez-Garcı´a, A., 2007. The iturin and fengycin families of lipopeptides are key factors in antagonism of Bacillus subtilis toward Podosphaera fusca. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 20: 430–440. Rubio Ariasa, H. O. R., Wood, M. K., Nieto, C. M., Lopezc, G. R. and de la Vega, L., 2004. Above and below-ground responses of Eragrostis and Bouteloua grass seedlings to the plant-growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillium brasilense. Journal of Arid Environments, 59: 19–26. Shukla, N. Awasthi, R. P. Rawat L, Kumar J., 2015. Seed biopriming with drought tolerant isolates of Trichoderma harzianum promote growth and drought tolerance in Triticum aestivum. Annals of Applied Biology, 166 (2) 171-182. Steenhoudt, O. and vanderleyden, J., 2000. Azospirillum a free living nitrogen-fixing bacterium closely associated with grasses: genetic, biochemical and ecological aspects. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 24: 487-506. Sturz, A. V., Christie, B. R. and Nowak, J., 2000. Bacterial endophytes: potential role in developing sustainable systems of crop production. Critical Review Plant Science, 19 (1): 1–30. Vessey, J. K., 2003. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil, 255: 271-586. Youssef, A. A., Edris, A. E. and Gomaa, A. M., 2004. A comparative study between some plant growth regulators and certain growth hormones producing microorganisms on growth and essential oil composition of Salvia officinalis L. Plants.Annals of Agricultural Science, 49: 299-311. Zahir, A. Z., Abbas, S. A., Khalid, A. and Arshad, M., 2000. Substrate dependent microbially derived plant hormones for improving growth of maize seedling. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 3: 289-291. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,058 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 755 |
||