| تعداد نشریات | 284 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 82 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 3,036 |
| تعداد مقالات | 33,983 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,731,223 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 77,177,521 |
غربال ژنوتیپهای چغندرقند نسبت به نماتد سیستی | ||
| چغندرقند | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 32، شماره 2، آذر 1395، صفحه 107-121 اصل مقاله (417.25 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: کامل علمی - پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/jsb.2016.107215 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| لیلا مطیعیان* 1؛ مهدی نصراصفهانی2؛ مجید اولیا3 | ||
| 1کارشناس آزمایشگاه/ دانشگاه خوراسگان | ||
| 2دانشیار مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی اصفهان | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه گیاهپزشکی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه شهرکرد | ||
| چکیده | ||
| نماتد سیستی (Heterodera schachtii Schmidt) یکی از عوامل محدود کننده رشد چغندرقند (Betavulgaris L.) میباشد. با توجه به اهمیت و گستردگی این نماتد در جهان و به منظور جلوگیری از کاهش قابل توجه محصول، مناسبترین روش مدیریت آن، استفاده از ارقام مقاوم میباشد. در این تحقیق حساسیت 70 ژنوتیپ چغندرقنددر برابر نماتد سیستی به صورت طرح کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار در سطح گلخانه و طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار در سطح مزرعه در اصفهان بررسی شدند. تجزیه آماری دادههای حاصل از آزمایشات گلخانهای و مزرعهای با نرم افزار SASو گروهبندی خوشهای آنها توسط نرمافزار SPSSنشان داد که ژنوتیپهای 53 (SB-2)، 69 (NE 0911)، 16 (SB32-HSF-5) کمترین تعداد سیست و ژنوتیپهای 16 (SB32-HSF-5)و 5 (SB31-HSF-2)کمترین میزان تخم و لارو و فاکتور تولیدمثل را دارا بودند. این دو لاین 16 (SB32-HSF-5) و5 (SB31-HSF-2)، به عنوان مقاومترین ژنوتیپها شناخته شده و در یک خوشه قرار گرفتند. به این ترتیب، میتوان از ژنوتیپهای فوق الذکر در مقاومت به نماتدسیستی چغندرقندو نیز برنامههای اصلاحی استفاده نمود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| چغندرقند؛ نماتد مولد سیست؛ مقاومت؛ Heterodera schachtii | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Screening of sugar beet genotypes to beet cyst nematode | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| leila motieeian1؛ Mehdi Nasr Esfahani2؛ Majid Olia3 | ||
| 1Laboratory /Khorasgan University | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Plant Protection, Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Plant Protection, Agricultural College, Shahrkord University, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Sugar beet cyst nematode (Heterodera schachtii Schmidt), is one of the limiting factors of sugar beet growth. Considering the importance and magnitude of this nematode distribution in Iran and also to decrease its destructive damage, use of resistant varieties is recommended. Prerequisite for resistant variety development is resistant genotype availability. In this study, resistance of 70 sugar beet genotypes to sugar beet cyst nematode was evaluated in a completely randomized design with three replications in the greenhouse and in a randomized complete block design with three replications in the field condition in Isfahan, Iran. Data analysis was performed using SAS software and cluster analysis was done by SPSS software. Results showed that genotypes 53 (SB-2), 69 (NE 0911), and 16 (SB32-HSF-5) had the minimum number of cysts, and genotypes16 (SB32-HSF-5) and 5 (SB31-HSF-2) had the lowest rates of eggs, larva and reproductive factor, respectively. The genotypes 16 (SB32-HSF-5) and 5 (SB31-HSF-2) were identified as the most resistant genotypes and were placed in the same cluster. Therefore, these genotypes can be used in breeding programs for resistant variety development. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Cyst nematode, Heterodera schachtii, resistance, sugar beet | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Akhyani A, Damadzadeh M, and Ahmadi A. Evaluation of contaminated areas, causes emissions and increase sugar beet cyst nematode in Isfahan province. Iranian Plant Protection Congress, Rasht. 1993; P. 124. Bani-Hashemi M, Mesbah M, and Mahmoudi B. Assessment of sugar beet breeding material resistant to cyst nematode in greenhouse conditions. 16thIranian Plant Protection Congress.Iran, Tabriz. 2004;P. 165. Capistrano GGG. A candidate sequence for the nematode resistance gene Hs1-2 in sugar beet (PhD thesis).St Germany,Qld: University of Kiel; 2010. Doney D, and Whitney ED. Screening sugar beet for resistance to Heterodera schachtii Sch. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beat Technologist. 1969;15: 546-552. Draycott AP. Sugar Beet. Blackwell Publishing Co Ltd.UK.2006; 514 pp. Fatollah Taleghani D, Sadeghzadeh hemaeti S, and Mesbah M. National strategic document of sugar beet.Improvement Research Institute of sugar beet seed. 2010; 520 pp. Fenwick DW. Methods for recovery and counting of Heteoderaschachtii from soil. Journal ofHelminthology.1940; 18: 155-177. Heijbroek W. Partial Resistance of sugar beet to beet cyst eelworm. Euphytica.1977;26: 257-262. Jafar Pur B, and Mahdikhani Moghadam A. An Introduction to the nematodes of plants.Mashhad Ferdowsi University Press.1997; 363 p. Jäger SC. Hybrid Assembly of Whole Genome Shotgun Sequences of Two Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Translocation Lines Carrying the Beet Cyst Nematode Resistance Gene Hs1-2 and Functional Analysis of Candidate Genes, Doctoral Thesis, Qld:Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel.2013. Kalali GH, and Forivar Mahin H. Some studies on sugar beet nematode (H. schachtii) in Khorassan. Entomol. J. Plant Path. 1979; 47: 1-18. Lewellen RT. Registration of CN12 and CN72 sugerbeet germplasm population with resistance to cyst nematode. Crop Sci.2006; 46:1414-1415. Mahmoudi B. Diseases of sugar beet in Iran. First sugar beet crop Conference. 2007;41-49. Mehdikhani Moghadam E, Kheiri A, and Okhovat M. morphological and morphometrical study of three endoparasitic nematodes of sugar beet in Mashhad region. Iran. J. Plant Path. 1996; 32: 1-8. Mesbah M. Characterization of alien chromosomes in monosomic additions of Beta. Ph.D. Thesis. Wageningen Agricultural University, the Netherlands. 1997;106 pp. Muller J. Newpathothypes of the beet cyst nematode (Heterodera schachtii). Nematolology. 1998;21(5): 519-526. Mulvey RH, and Golden MA.An illustrated key to the cyst forming genera and species of Heteroderidae in the westem hemisphere with species morphometrics and distribution. Nematology J. 1983; 15(1) : 1-59. Oostenbrink M. Major characteristics of the relation between nematods and plant.Maded. Landbouwhogesch.Wageningen. 1966; 66:1-46 Parvizi R. Distribution of sugar beet nematode in West Azarbaijan. (Abst.) Ninth Plant Protect. Congr. Of Iran: 1989; P. 175. Parvizi R, Eshtiaghi H, and Kheyri M. Distribution areas of Heterodera schachtii in West Azarbaijan. AppliedEntomology and Phytopathology. 1993; 60(1&2): 73-79. Qiao F. Jung C. and Defan B.Cloning of a beet cyst nematode resistance gene from the wild beet Patellifolia procumbens. http://www. Plantbreeding.unikiel. de/de/ forschung/ . 2013. Rahmani N, Mesbah M, and Mahmoudi B. Evaluation of selected genotypes resistance to the beet cyst nematode in greenhouse conditions. 19thCongress of Crop Sciences, Tehran University Pardis, Aborayhan.2006;p.463. Rahmani N,Mesbah M,and Norouzi P. Identification of molecular markers linked to sugar beet cyst nematode resistance gene(s). Journal of Sugar Beet. 2013; 28(2): 81-85. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT User’s Guide.Version 9.1.3. Cary: SAS Institute I. 2004. Sharafeh M, and Teymoori F. Survey on infested areas to sugar beet nematode and other cyst forming nematodes in Fars, Iran. J. Plant Path. 1980; 48: 75-81. Steele AE, Savitsky H. Resistance of trisomic and diploid hybrids of Beta vulgaris and B. procumbensto the sugarbeet nematode, Heterodera schachtii.Jornal of Nematology. 1981;13:352-257. Vahedi S, Soltani J, Mahdi Khani P, and Mahmoudi B. Assessment of resistance to the beet cystnematode populations breeding. Proceedings of the 18th Iranian Plant Protection Congress. Iran, Hamedan. 2008;2: 562. Vahedi S, Mahmoudi B, Rajabi A, and Aghaei Zadeh M. Beet cyst nematode resistance evaluation masses of sugar beet to Heterodera schachtii.Journal of Plant Protection. 2013;35(3) Van Geyt JPC, Lange W, Oleo M, and De Bock TSM. Natural variation within the genus Beta and its possible use for breeding sugar beet: Areview. Euphytica.1990; 49:57-76. Whitney ED, and Duffus JE. Compendium of Beet Diseases and Insects.American Phytopathological Society, Minnesota.1986; 76 pp. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 896 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 632 |
||