| تعداد نشریات | 286 |
| تعداد نشریات سازمان | 84 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 2,828 |
| تعداد مقالات | 32,031 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 40,821,152 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 18,073,791 |
بررسی اثر خاکورزی حفاظتی و تراکم بوته بر عملکرد دو رقم پنبه | ||
| پژوهش های پنبه ایران | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 2، شماره 1، خرداد 1393، صفحه 105-122 اصل مقاله (422.28 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22092/ijcr.2014.100662 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مریم نوروزی1؛ حسینعلی شمس آبادی* 2؛ شهرام نوروزیه3 | ||
| 1کارشناس ارشد مهندسی مکانیک بیوسیستم | ||
| 2استادیار دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان | ||
| 3استادیار موسسه تحقیقات پنبه کشور پنبه | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به‌منظور بررسی تأثیر سیستمهای مختلف خاکورزی، تراکم بوته و رقم بر عملکرد پنبه، آزمایشی بصورت کرتهای خرد شده در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار در ایستگاه تحقیقات پنبه‌هاشم آباد اجرا گردید. سه سیستم خاکورزی از جمله سیستم خاکورزی سطحی (دیسک)، سیستم کم خاکورزی (سیکلوتیلر+دیسک) و سیستم خاکورزی مرسوم (گاوآهن برگردان‌دار+ دیسک) بعنوان فاکتور اصلی؛ دو رقم پنبه به نام‌های گلستان و خرداد به‌عنوان فاکتور فرعی و تراکم بوته در سه سطح 12/5، 6/3 و 4/2 بوته در مترمربع بعنوان فاکتور فرعی فرعی در نظر گرفته شد. نتایج حاکی از عدم وجود اختلاف معنیدار بین سیستمهای مختلف خاکورزی بود. بالاترین و پایینترین میزان عملکرد پنبه بترتیب به سیستمهای کم خاکورزی و خاکورزی مرسوم اختصاص داشت. دو سیستم خاکورزی سطحی و کم خاکورزی نسبت به سیستم خاکورزی مرسوم دارای تعداد شاخه زایا، طول شاخه رویا و ارتفاع بوته کمتر؛ تعداد غوزه و وزن 10 غوزه و در نتیجه عملکرد بیشتری بودند. با کاهش فاصله بوتهها روی ردیف کاشت از 30 به 10 سانتیمتر، تعداد غوزه در بوته و وزن 10 غوزه کاهش یافت، اما با افزایش تعداد بوته در واحد سطح، عملکرد محصول افزایش یافت. رقم گلستان نیز در مقایسه با رقم خرداد بالاترین عملکرد را داشت. علاوه براین بیشترین عملکرد مربوط به رقم گلستان در سیستم کم خاکورزی و تراکم 12/5 بوته در متر مربع بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تراکم بوته؛ سیستم های خاک ورزی؛ عملکرد پنبه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of conservational tillage and plant density on two cottons cultivars yield | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Maryam Nowruozi1؛ Hosseinali Shamsabadi2؛ shahram Nowrouzieh3 | ||
| 1MSc. Bio-system mechanics engineering | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Prof., Cotton Research Institute of Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In order to investigate the effects of different tillage systems, plant density and cultivar on yield of cotton, an experiment was carried out as a split - split plot in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 3 replications in Cotton Research Station of Hashemabad. Gorgan, Iran. The three tillage systems namely; 1) shallow tillage system (disk harrow), 2) reduced tillage system (cyclo tiller + disk harrow) and 3) conventional tillage system (moldboard + disk harrow) were assigned to main plots. The two cotton cultivars namely; Golestan and Khordad were considered as sub plot and three plant densities including 12.5, 6.3 and 4.2 plant per m2 were attributed to sub-sub plots. The results showed that tillage systems were no significant effect on yield of cotton. The lowest and the highest values of cotton yield were attributed to conventional and reduced tillage system, respectively. The two systems of reduced and shallow tillage systems yielded the lowest number of sympodia, length of monopodia and plant height; and the highest number of boll and 10 boll weights that caused an increase yield. With decreasing the plant distance from 30 to 10 cm, the number of boll and 10 boll weights were decreased, but the yield was increased with increasing in number of plant in a hectare. The highest value of yield cotton was attributed to Golestan cultivar at the reduced tillage plots and S1, with plant space of 10 cm. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| plant density, Tillage system, Cotton Yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadi, M., and Agha-alikhani, M. 2012. An analysis of energy consumption of cotton cultivation in Golestan province to offering strategy for increasing resources productivity. J. Agro ecology, 4(2): 151-158.
Aykas, E. and Onal, I. 2004. Effects of different tillage techniques on cotton yield and quality. Asian J. Plant Sci. 3: 403-405.
Bazari, M. 1999. Effects of planting date and plant density on yield of cotton C.V. Varamin. Final report project, Cotton Research Institute of Iran Agricultural Research and Education organization, Iran.
Bednarz, C.W., Bridges, D.C. and Brown, S.M. 2000. Analysis of cotton yield stability across population densities. Agron. J. 92: 128-135.
Biabani, A. 1997. Study and determine the best plant arrangement of crop Belinda
variety. Zeitoon monthly J.
Blaise, D., and Ravindran, C.D. 2003. Influence of tillage and residue management on growth and yield of cotton grown on a Vertisol over 5 years in a semi-arid region of India. Soil. Till. Res. 70: 163-173.
Borie, F., Rubio, R., Rouanet, J.L., Morales, A., Borie, G. and Rojas, C. 2006. Effects of tillage systems on soil characteristics, glomalin and mycorrhizal propagules in a Chilean Ultisol. Soil and Tillage Research, 88: 253-261.
Ghaderifar, F., Ghajari, A., Sadeghnezhad, H.R. and gharanjiki, A. 2011. The effects of tillage systems on canola- cotton double cropping yield in Gorgan. Iranian J. Field Crops Res. 9(3): 416-421.
Ghajari, A., and Ghaderifar, F. 2007. Influence of row spacing and population density on yield and yield components of three cotton cultivars in gorgan. Iranian J. Agri. Sci. 12(4): 833-844.
Ghajari, A., Galeshi, S., and Zeinali, A. 2002. Effect of plant density on vegetative and reproductive characteristics of three cotton cultivars. J. Agri. Sci.Natur. Resources, 9(2): 57-74.
Ghajari, A., Miri, A.A. and Mohsenian, N. 2010. Investigation of plant date and plant density interaction on yield and yield components of Sepid in the east of Golestan province. Electronic j. Cotton Fiber crops, 1(2): 19-36.
Ghajari. A., Miri, A.A., Zanghi, M.R. and Soltani, S. 2011. Determination of optimum planting arrangement and plant density of early cotton varieties after canola Harvesting. Electronic J. Crop Prod., 4(4):103-121.
Gharanjiki, A. and Miri, A.A. 2010. Effect of wheat crop residues on yield and yield components of double-cropping cotton cultivars. Electronic j. Cotton Fiber crops, 1(1): 69-78.
Hayes, W. 1982. Minimum tillage farming. Brookfield Debbie Lissister. U.S. A.
Heidari Soltanabadi, M., Miranzadeh, M., and Hemmat, A. 2004. Proceedings of 3th national conference on agricultural machinery engineering and mechanization, 1-3 Sep. Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran.
Herridge, D.F. and Holland, J.F. 1992. Production of summer crops in northern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research, 43: 105-122.
Heydari, A. 2011. Effect of tillage methods on soil physical properties and irrigated wheat yield. J. Sci. Tech. Agric. Natur. Res., Water and Soil Sci. 15(57): 115-124.
Horne, D.J., Ross, C.W. and Hughes, K.A. 1992. Ten years of maize-oats rotation under three tillage system on a silt loam in New Zealand І: A comparison of soe soil properties. Soil. Till. Res. 22: 131-143.
Hoshyarfard. M., and Ghajari, A. 2010. Effect of tillage and residue management on damping-off and verticillium wilt diseases, yield and yield components of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Iranian J. Crop Sci. 12(2): 127-139.
Ike, I.F. 1986. Soil and crop responses to different tillage practices in a ferruginous soil in the Nigerian savanna. Soil Till. Res. 6:3. 261-272.
Jacobs, C.O. and Harrel, W.R. 1983. Agricultural power and machinery. Mc Grow Hill Book Co. New York. p. 472.
Kaspar, T.C. Erbach, D.C., and Cruse, R.M. 1990. Corn response to seed-row residue removal. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54: 1112-1117.
Khajehpour, M. 2006. Principles and basics of Agronomy. Iranian academic center for education, branch of Isfahan University of technology publishing, 398 pp. Isfahan, Iran.
Matocha, J.E. 1988. Conservation tillage of cotton production in south texas. Preview of 1988 Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Natl. Cotton Council and Cotton Foundation, Memphis, TN., P: 134.
Michel, Jr., J.A., Formstorm, K.J. and Borrelli, J. 1985. Energy requirements of two tillage systems for irrigated sugar beets, drybeens and corn. Trans of the ASAE 28: 1731-1735.
Mohammadi, Kh., Heidari, Gh., Javaheri, M. and Aghaalikhani, M. 2012. The Effect of tillage and fertilization systems on soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity in sunflower production. J. Water Soil, 26(1):104-113.
Momeni, D., Sharifi, A., and Esfandiari, S. 2007. Effects of conservation tillage methods on yield of sesame. Proceedings of 5th national conference on agricultural machinery engineering and mechanization, 5-7 Sept. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
Nowrouzieh, S., and Khaje, S. 2013. No-tillage and conventional tillage effect on cotton yield and weed density. Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 3-19: 2554-2558.
Nowrouzieh, S., Miri, A., Azad, G. and Dieji, A. 2013. The effect of different tillage system in yield and fiber quality of different cotton variety on cotton double cropping. Final report project, Cotton Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research and Education organization, Gorgan, Iran.
Omidi1, H., Tahmasebi sarvestani, Z., Ghalavand, A., and Modarres Sanavi, S.A.M. 2005. Evaluation of tillage systems and row distances on grain yield and oil content in two canola (Brassica napus) Cultivars. Iranian J. Crop Sci. 7(2): 97-111.
Patil, F.N. and Jawale, S.M. 1977. Effect of plant density and nitrogen levels on yield of sorghum under different Plant Population condition. J. Maharashora Agri. Univ. 2: 30-35.
Quincke, J.A., Wortmann, Mamo, C.S., Franti, M., Drijber, T., Garcia, R.A., Sidiras, N., Henklain, J.C. and Derpsch, R. 1982. Comparison of three different tillage systems with respect to some physical properties, the soil and water conservation and the yields of soybean and wheat on an Oxisols. Zeitschrift fur Ackerund Pflanzenbau 151: 137-148.
Rahimzadeh, R., Sharifi, A., and Javadi, A. 2007. Effect of tillage methods on yield of chickpeas in cold dryland areas. Proceedings of 5th national conference on agricultural machinery engineering and mechanization, 5-7 Sep. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
Ramroudi, M., Majnoun hosseini, N., Hosseinzadeh, H.D., Mazaheri, D. and Hosseini, M.B. 2011. Evaluating the effects cover crops, tillage systems and nitrogen rates on soil properties and sorghum forage yields. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi), 92:18-23.
Rashidi, Z., Zare, M.J., Rejali, F. and Ashraf mehrabi A. 2011. Effect of soil tillage and integrated chemical fertilizer and biofertilizer on quantity and quality yield of bread wheat and soil biological activity under dry land farming. Electronic J. Crop Prod., 4 (2):189-206.
Robinsons, F.E., and Cudency, D. 1973. Use of sprinklers to study the influence of population density upon seed cotton production in arid area. Agr. J. 65:266-268.
Sadeghnezhad, H.R., and Eslami, K. 2006. The comparison of wheat yield under different tillage methods. 12(1):103-112. Shafiee, A. 2008. Tillage Machines. University of Tehran Press. Iran, pp. 5-6.
Shamabadi, Z., Faeznia, F., and Mohajer milani, P. 2009. Effect of tillage methods on wheat - sunflower and some physico-chemical properties of soil. J. Agri. Sci. 19(1): 165-173.
Shojaie ghadikolaie, M., Ahmadi vostakolaie, M., mobasser, H., and Eftekhari, A. 2007. Effect of different tillage methods on yield and yield components of three maize cultivars. Proceedings of 10th conference of soil science of Iran, Karaj, Iran.
Tackett, J.L., and Pearson, R.W. 1964. Oxygen requirements of cotton seedling roots for peneteration of compacted core. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 28: 600-605.
Wright, A.L., Hons, F.M., Lemon, R.G., McFarland, M.L. and Nichols, R.L. 2007. Stratification of nutrients in soil for different tillage regimes and cotton rotations. Soil. Till. Res. 96: 19-27.
Younesi alamouti, M., and Sharifi, A. 2012. Study and determine the amount of power, needed fuel and some physical properties of soil in several tillage methods. J. Agri. Machinery Eng. 2(1):11-18.
Zibilske, L.M., Bradford, J.M. and Smart, J.R. 2002. Conservation tillage induced changes in organic carbon, total nitrogen, and available phosphorus in a semi-arid alkaline subtropical soil. Soil. Till. Res. 66: 153-163.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,902 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,246 |
||